Seattle, WA
Richard Sherman right about what Seattle Seahawks need – kinda
We are eight weeks into this Seattle Seahawks season and it’s clear that they are missing something. Maybe a couple of somethings.
What happened to Seahawks’ homefield advantage at Lumen Field?
After racing out to that fast start (mostly against teams and quarterbacks not going much of anywhere this season), they have lost four of five games. And for the second time in three weeks, they find themselves in desperate need of a win to avoid going into meltdown mode.
While the Seahawks aren’t the most talented team in the league, they have enough on their roster to expect them to be competitive every week. Head coach Mike Macdonald isn’t questioning their effort level, and he said that there isn’t a problem with the scheme. But the team can’t run the ball and they can’t stop the run. So what is it?
It’s with that question in mind that Richard Sherman enters the chat.
“The Seattle Seahawks look like they need leadership on defense,” he said on his podcast this week in a moment of lucidity. “They need a veteran presence to stabilize this defense. Maybe a Pro Bowler, maybe an All-Pro linebacker who’s just played a lot of football. Just somebody that’s been there, that knows the team, that knows the city … Don’t get me started on the idiocracy that it is to watch Bobby Wagner walk away for the second time. Not the first time – second time!”
Oh well. What started as actual analysis turned out to be just a pitch for his old teammate.
Wagner was not necessarily the solution for what ails these Seahawks, but the comment does bring up one of the problems that hasn’t been discussed: they do need leadership.
That isn’t to say the team doesn’t have veterans. They do. Geno Smith and Tyler Lockett are both in their 30s and should be resources for younger players on the team. Same with Jarran Reed, Leonard Williams and others on the defensive side of the ball. But one thing those four have in common (along with every other player on the roster until the arrival of special teamer Josh Ross) is that they have never played for Mike Macdonald.
When Macdonald first arrived, we all wondered which coaches and players he would bring along with him. When he eschewed the tradition of hiring coaches from his previous locale, it came with an understandable rationale: he was looking for the best teachers rather than the ones with the most familiarity with his system.
It’s compelling logic, and proof that he isn’t beholden to the good ol’ boy culture that is too pervasive in the NFL. But maybe having someone else who “speaks his language” could have helped ease the transition and lessened the strain on the head coach himself. How much easier would it be to have others on staff with an understanding of the concepts that predate this past offseason?
While a coach with familiarity might have helped with the installation, the last few weeks make a case for Sherman’s observation that they needed more veteran leadership – though not necessarily for the reasons he may think.
Is the old Russell Wilson back? Brock Huard shares what he sees
Sherm is (as always) clouded by his dismissal from Seattle. He believes the team should have kept the entire band together forever. It’s a revisionist version of history that conveniently forgets the injuries, the decline, the salary cap, and the behavior that ultimately led to his exit and some of the others around him.
“There’s a standard set,” Sherm said of Wagner. “But people are so quick to move on. They’re quick to say, ‘Oh, the new thing’s the better thing.’ It’s not.”
Maybe he’s talking about his former teammate, but it sure sounds like he’s just talking about himself. Shocker.
And yet I do believe Macdonald would have been served to have more veteran leadership on his team, though not necessarily for the same reasons as Sherm. Just as coaches familiar with Macdonald’s system would be helpful to explain it to others in the building, so too would a player or two familiar with his culture. Sure, they could be a useful voice on the field to make sure the communication is on point, but even more importantly, they could testify as to the success of the scheme and culture. That might have been helpful at the start, but I would think it is even more important now, when things aren’t going as smoothly as possible and doubt could start to creep in.
While Wagner could certainly have provided leadership both on and off the field, he is also a direct link to the past. And with a new coach coming in trying to set his own culture, those constant reminders of the previous regime can lead to mixed messaging. Remember, this is the head coach that removed the basketball hoop from the meeting room and set about redecorating the halls to reinforce his philosophies rather than those of his predecessor.
Yes, Macdonald could have used a veteran presence. But that presence should have had familiarity with his system and culture. Someone who could translate the coaches’ words and reinforce the validity of his culture. Someone who could, for lack of a better word, proselytize his vision from a place of experience. Maybe the addition of Ross was a (small) step in that direction.
Macdonald said after Sunday’s loss to Buffalo that he would be trimming the playbook.
“I think you gotta start making some decisions on where to narrow it down. You can’t focus on everything,” he said. “So taking out the stuff that we feel like is kind of sunk costs at this point, maybe trying to trim that and then really focusing on and honing in on the stuff that we want to go excel at.”
Maybe less is more? Certainly that is the hope and it makes sense. But why is it necessary?
According to Macdonald, they haven’t “executed the things well enough and created the situations where we want to be able to get to everything. You have some things that would help schematically, but the answer at the end of the day isn’t the X’s and O’s. It’s really not.”
More: Macdonald on where Seahawks are at with schemes
While my initial read on that was to suggest that he was blaming the talent rather than the coaching, perhaps a clearer interpretation is that he needs players with more experience in the system to be able to everyone get deeper into the playbook.
Macdonald could use some help. He could use more veteran experience in the locker room and on the field. And he could use more familiarity with his system. I’m curious to see if and when that occurs.
Thanks, Sherm!
More on the Seattle Seahawks
• Seattle Seahawks appear to have a new position battle brewing
• How much is Geno Smith at fault for Seattle Seahawks’ woes?
• Huard: A troubling Seahawks stat sticks out after loss to Bills
• Check-In: Mike Macdonald’s 4-4 Seahawks hard to pin down
• Disastrous goal-line gaffes doom Seattle Seahawks in ugly loss
Seattle, WA
Seattle weather: Drier skies Friday, some rivers remain above flood stage
SEATTLE – High river levels continue this evening after the heaviest showers came to an end Thursday with only a few lingering showers. A Flash Flood Watch remains in effect for the Mount Vernon area due to flood risks if local levees fail, which remains possible through Friday afternoon.
A Flash Flood Watch is posted until late Friday: there is a possibility of dike/levee failure. (FOX 13 Seattle)
Landslide and localized flooding will still remain an issue into the end of the week.
High river levels continue this evening after the heaviest showers come to an end Thursday.
We have seen three rivers in Western Washington reach record level heights, making this a historic flooding event for the state. We still have the likelihood of seeing record heights for the Skagit River at Mount Vernon this evening into early Friday morning as it crests. Most of our area rivers will continue to decrease overnight and throughout Friday.
We have seen three rivers in Western Washington reach record level heights, making this a historic flooding event for Western Washington.
Rainfall totals Thursday were significantly lower compared to Wednesday, which will help to lower river levels over the next few days.
Rainfall totals Thursday were significantly lower compared to Wednesday, which will help to lower river levels over the next few days.
Temperatures this afternoon were also significantly warmer compared to average, with highs in the mid to upper 50s.
Temperatures this afternoon were also significantly warmer compared to average, with highs in the mid to upper 50s.
What’s next:
Skies will be much drier Friday as we see the atmospheric river move out of Western Washington. High pressure will slowly build back in for Friday and Saturday, aiding in the rivers receding and for the soil to dry out.
Skies will be much drier Friday as we see the atmospheric river move out of Western Washington.
Highs will remain very mild through the weekend, reaching the mid 50s. We will see dry skies and even some sunbreaks for Saturday. Our next round of showers return Sunday with scattered rain, then heavier showers and lowering snowlevels by the middle of next week.
Highs will remain very mild through the weekend, reaching the mid 50s.
MORE NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE
New WA laws in 2026 include higher wages, luxury car tax, plastic bag fee hike
Wild Waves Theme Park to shut down in 2026
Charter bus breaks down in Leavenworth, leaving dozens stranded
75-year-old woman attacked in Downtown Seattle, suspect arrested
Washington State Ferries seeks new owners for aging fleet castoffs
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.
The Source: Information in this story came from FOX 13 Seattle Meteorologist Claire Anderson and the National Weather Service.
Seattle, WA
Op-Ed: Seattle Monorail Should Honor Transfers, Be Treated Like Real Transit » The Urbanist
Seattle landmarks are woven into the city’s identity: the Space Needle, Gas Works Park, Pike Place Market, Humpy the Salmon. They’re playful, iconic, and accessible to locals and visitors alike. The monorail should belong in that same category. It is a piece of transportation infrastructure history that helps residents move through the city and remark on times gone by. Instead, it is becoming a premium attraction aimed at visitors, rather than a practical option for everyday riders.
Fresh off hiking fares on the nearly-one-mile-long monorail to $4.00, Seattle Monorail Services is getting rid of transfer credits to other transit services in a blow to riders. In early December, ORCA informed riders that starting January 1, 2026, monorail fares paid with ORCA E-purse will no longer receive the two-hour transfer credit. Every ride will require full payment, even if the rider tapped onto another service minutes earlier.
For transit users who rely on transfers to move through the city, this is a step backward. It is also a policy decision that treats the monorail as an exception to regional transit norms — or perhaps not a service intended for use by locals, at all.
Taking the 1 Line from Lynnwood and transferring to the monorail to attend Pride, Seattle Eats, or any number of other events in Seattle Center just jumped from $4 per person to $7 per person. Fortunately, many Climate Pledge Arena events come with monorail cost bundled in the ticket cost.
History of the Seattle Monorail
Seattle’s monorail began as a showpiece, built in 1962 for the Century 21 World’s Fair. The idea wasn’t to serve commuters, but rather to dazzle visitors and move crowds between downtown and the fairgrounds. For more dazzling during the World’s Fair, Seattle Center had rollercoasters, which I, for one, am in favor of bringing back.

” data-medium-file=”https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives.jpg” data-large-file=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-1024×666.jpg?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-1024×666.jpg?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-188343″ srcset=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-1024×666.jpg?ssl=1 1024w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-768×499.jpg 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-646×420.jpg 646w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-696×452.jpg 696w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives.jpg 1114w” sizes=”(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px”/><figcaption class=)
The monorail system worked as millions rode it in its first year, and the sleek elevated trains helped cement the city’s Jet Age identity. But the system was never expanded, and the short two-stop alignment was left behind as a novelty once the fair ended.
Seattle actually tried to scale that vision into real transit. In 1968 and 1970, voters were asked to approve the Forward Thrust plan, a regional rapid transit system combining tunnels, elevated lines, and stations across the city. Both measures earned a majority, but Washington law required 60% voter approval to issue bonds. The transit proposals failed, and the federal funds earmarked for Seattle were redirected to Atlanta (where only a simple 50% majority vote was required), funds that ultimately seeded MARTA.
Meanwhile, Seattle spent decades without rapid transit, and the monorail became a relic of a future that never materialized. Fortunately, Seattle eventually invested in light rail and continues to do so despite financial hurdles.
But before light rail buildout, Seattle made one more attempt to turn the monorail into a network. From the late 1990s through the mid-2000s, voters backed the Seattle Popular Monorail Authority, which pursued the elevated “Green Line” from Ballard through Downtown to West Seattle. The citizen-led program struggled with escalating costs, uncertain financing models, and political backlash.
Map of the proposed Seattle Monorail Project, superimposed on Link (2021 extent) and Sounder. (Mliu92, CC 4.0)After five public votes, the project was dissolved in 2005 without breaking ground. What remained was the original 0.9-mile segment. Still iconic, still beloved by tourists, but functionally unchanged since the Eisenhower era.
Recent fare hike
In 2024, the City and the contracted operator of the monorail announced another round of fare increases. Adult fares rose from $3.50 to $4.00, a 14% jump in a single adjustment.
The monorail fare hike was much steeper than those on other transit services in the region. King County Metro buses moved from $2.75 to $3.00, a 9% increase. Sound Transit’s Link light rail standardized fares at $3.00 regardless of trip distance, in a win for long-distance commuters. Even in larger cities with higher living costs, like New York and San Francisco, transit fares remain lower at around $2.85–$2.90 for metro service. The monorail is now one of the most expensive local transit rides per mile in the country.
For many riders, fare increases alone would be frustrating but manageable. Seattle transit often requires combining services: a bus from a neighborhood, a train downtown, then the monorail to a shift at Seattle Center or an event at Climate Pledge Arena. The regional ORCA card system has long made this a possibility. Riders are given a two-hour transfer window so multiple trips are counted as part of the same journey rather than priced separately.
That saving grace is about to end with the end of monorail transfer credits in 2026.
Email sent by MyORCA on December 2nd, 2025. (MyORCA) The monorail has always been an unusual piece of infrastructure. The city owns the physical system, but operations are handled by a private contractor. That arrangement gives the operator strong incentives to raise revenue, while riders are left without the protections and policies that apply to publicly-run transit service.
The argument for ending transfer credits is that monorail operating costs have risen, and maintenance is essential to preserving a historic system. That is a reasonable concern. Transit infrastructure requires investment, but charging riders twice within two hours, once for a bus or train and again for the monorail, does not preserve the system; it discourages the very people who use it most consistently. The monorail should not be the transfer exception.
Ridership rebound
“But Sam hardly anyone takes the monorail anyway. Why does it matter?” I hear you say. Despite its short route and just two stops, the monorail sees real usage. The Seattle Times reported that the monorail hit its highest ridership in over a decade in early 2023. Buoyed by Seattle Kraken hockey fans, the monorail recorded 533,000 rides in the first quarter of 2023, 150,000 more than during the same period in 2022, and over 100,000 more than in the same four months of 2019. That’s about 4,000 rides per day.

” data-medium-file=”https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126.jpg” data-large-file=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-175650″ srcset=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1 1024w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-768×576.jpg 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-560×420.jpg 560w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-696×522.jpg 696w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-265×198.jpg 265w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126.jpg 1280w” sizes=”auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px”/><figcaption class=)
In 2023, the monorail carried nearly 2.1 million passengers and in 2024 approached 2.2 million trips, offering a strong indication that, given the right circumstances, the monorail serves a concrete transit need, not just occasional tourists.
Admittedly, other transit lines get far more ridership. In 2024, the region’s six ORCA transit agencies delivered about 151 million trips, up from roughly 134 million in 2023, a 12% increase. Within that total, Sound Transit alone logged 41.5 million trips in 2024, up by more than 4 million from 2023 (about an 11% year-over-year increase).
The Link light rail system operated by Sound Transit carried 30.8 million passengers in 2024 and averaged about 90,050 weekday riders system-wide. Recent months have seen ridership climb even higher: as of May 2025, Link weekday boardings exceeded 112,000, a 23% increase over May 2024.
For the monorail, much of that boost came from event traffic. With the arrival of the Seattle Kraken hockey franchise and the rebound in concert and arena events at Climate Pledge Arena after the 2020 pandemic, a notable portion of fans used the monorail (or other transit) to avoid heavy traffic and gridlock around Seattle Center. Now, with a new Professional Women’s Hockey League hockey team and the FIFA World Cup on the horizon the entire city’s infrastructure needs to be ready, with transit running at peak efficiency to handle the load. Mega events act as a canary in a coal mine, stress testing our transportation network.

” data-medium-file=”https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR.jpg” data-large-file=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1″ alt=”A small crowd waits for the doors to open on a monorail train at Seattle Center” class=”wp-image-188264″ srcset=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1 1024w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-768×576.jpg 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-560×420.jpg 560w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-696×522.jpg 696w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-265×198.jpg 265w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR.jpg 1280w” sizes=”auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px”/><figcaption class=)
But the monorail’s renewed popularity and potential to help shoulder the load during World Cup games doesn’t mean its pricing should shift even further toward tourists. If anything, high ridership underscores its value as part of a functioning public-transport network.
Possible solutions
Unlike most transit systems in Washington, the Seattle Center Monorail is not a drain on the public purse. The monorail’s operations are uniquely funded through fare revenue rather than taxpayer subsidies, and even returns money to the City of Seattle annually under a concessions agreement. That revenue covers day-to-day operations, and equipment upgrades, an almost unheard-of arrangement in U.S. transit.
But the monorail’s success doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Its elevated track and supporting pylons occupy the public right-of-way along 5th Avenue and Belltown corridors, forming a permanent footprint above some of the city’s most heavily used streets. Riders may not feel it, but the system relies on the city’s public infrastructure and airspace to operate.
Seattle’s broader goals like reducing car dependency, cutting emissions, and encouraging public transit depend on regional coordination. Breaking fare integration works in the opposite direction. If the monorail is truly a civic asset, it should align with the rest of the city’s transportation policies.
There are realistic solutions. The City of Seattle can require that the monorail restore ORCA transfer credit as a condition of its operating agreement. The City can tie future fare increases to best practices other agencies typically follow, such as conducting public outreach, publishing a cost-benefit analysis noting ridership impacts, and providing a public forum to debate the tradeoffs.
Most importantly, Seattle leaders can treat the monorail as part of the transit network rather than an isolated, revenue-dependent attraction. None of these changes require a huge funding infusion or an expansion of the system (even if I think it would be cool if they expanded the monorail). They simply require prioritizing residents over ticket revenue.
I ride the monorail more than most living in Lower Queen Anne/Uptown. It avoids traffic, provides a distinct view of the city, and remains one of Seattle’s most recognizable transit experiences. It should not be reserved for tourists or special occasions. Public transportation should be priced to serve the public. If it brings joy while doing so, that is even better.

Samuel Ross
Samuel Ross is a Seattle based public servant, returned Peace Corps volunteer, and self-described nerd. He works to promote sustainable development backed by mixed-method research. All opinions expressed are his alone and do not reflect attitudes of any organizations he is affiliated with.
Seattle, WA
WA river levels remain high through Thursday, scattered showers remain
SEATTLE – A strong atmospheric river remains over the Pacific Northwest, bringing heavy rain, record level flooding and dangerous conditions. Winds continue through this evening, but will ease into Thursday morning. Landslide risks remain high through the end of the week with very saturated soil.
A strong atmospheric river remains over the Pacific Northwest, bringing heavy rain, record level flooding and dangerous conditions.
A rare Flash Flood Watch is in effect for parts of western Skagit and northwestern Snohomish County through Friday night due to a possible threat of levee or dike failure. Heavy rain is creating extreme flooding forecasts, which could break the current levee or dike structure below Sedro-Woolley. This could cause inundation in areas like Burlington and Mount Vernon, then along to Skagit Bay. This is an alert to “Get Ready,” because if the levees break, they will release a sudden torrent of water.
A rare Flash Flood Watch is in effect for parts of western Skagit and northwestern Snohomish County through Friday night due to a possible threat of levee or dike failure.
Rain totals reached one to over two inches for parts of Western Washington as steady rain fell through this evening.
Rain totals reached one to two inches for parts of Western Washington as steady rain fell through this evening.
Heavy rain will fall through early Thursday, but the atmospheric river will slowly sag southward throughout the day. Showers will still be around Thursday, but will not be as heavy as the past several days. We could also see snowfall at the higher mountain passes and peaks, mainly above Stevens Pass.
Heavy rain will fall through early Thursday, but the atmospheric river will slowly sag southward throughout the day.
Major river flooding is expected to continue through Friday afternoon, and we will continue to watch the latest conditions very closely. Linger showers continue Friday with drier skies by Saturday. A few showers are possible Sunday, with another round of showers into next week.
Major river flooding is expected to continue through Friday afternoon, and we will continue to watch the latest conditions very closely.
MORE NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE
New WA laws in 2026 include higher wages, luxury car tax, plastic bag fee hike
Charter bus breaks down in Leavenworth, leaving dozens stranded
75-year-old woman attacked in Downtown Seattle, suspect arrested
Washington State Ferries seeks new owners for aging fleet castoffs
26 years later, family of abducted Tacoma toddler holds toy drive in her honor
Everett police chief retires, replacement to be appointed
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.
The Source: Information in this story came from FOX 13 Seattle Meteorologists Claire Anderson and Ilona McCauley, and the National Weather Service.
-
Alaska6 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics1 week agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Texas6 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
News1 week agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World1 week agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Washington3 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire