Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

The True Story of the Military’s Secret 1950 San Francisco Biological Weapons Test | KQED

Published

on

The True Story of the Military’s Secret 1950 San Francisco Biological Weapons Test | KQED


Episode Transcript

Katrina Schwartz: It’s a foggy September day in 1950s San Francisco. For most Bay Area residents, it’s a normal day…people get up and head out to work or school…just like any other day. The San Francisco Examiner is full of news about the Korean War and a reminder that daylight savings ends soon.

On the ocean, just outside the Golden Gate, floats a Navy boat. On deck, men hold up what look like big metal hoses and point them at San Francisco. There’s a long, low cloud over them that could be mistaken for part of the area’s usual fog, but it’s not.

Two days later, Stanford hospital, which was located in San Francisco at the time, started noticing something odd. Doctors started seeing some patients complaining of serious chest pain, shortness of breath, chills and fever — symptoms of what’s called serratia marcescens infection. Doctors had never seen this bacteria at the hospital before, and certainly not in so many patients at one time. Eleven people got sick, and one would die.

Is it possible that the U.S. military was testing biological weapons on its own citizens? That’s what one Bay Curious listener wants to know. We’ll get into it right after this. I’m Katrina Schwartz, and you’re listening to Bay Curious.

Advertisement

Sponsor message

Katrina Schwartz: The question we’re answering today is whether it’s possible the U.S. government was spraying bacteria over its own citizens to learn more about how to stage a biological attack on an enemy. And it’s true. In 1950, the military sprayed bacteria over an unsuspecting Bay Area for eight days, with no medical monitoring plan.

It was just one of hundreds of experiments that the military carried out in secret across the nation from the 1940s through the 1960s. These tests would affect people’s lives and help shape our country’s policy on biological weapons. Reporter Katherine Monahan takes us back to that time to help us understand how and why this happened.

Sounds of archival newsreel static

Katherine Monahan: The U.S. was obsessed with the threat from the Soviet Union.

Advertisement

Archival newsreel: In 1950, men throughout the world learned to look at the brutal face of communism…

Katherine Monahan: The Cold War was in full swing, and the Korean War had just begun. Only a few years out of World War II, people feared a World War III was on the horizon. And Army spokesmen said the only intelligent move was to prepare.

Clip 1: For many years, information has been needed about the effects of a biological warfare attack on man.

Clip 2: Because today the threat cannot be ignored.

Clip 3: If we adopt a pacifist attitude the end can only be a communist dictatorship of the world.

Advertisement

Katherine Monahan: During WWII, the U.S. government had created a chemical weapons research division within the military. And in the late 1940s, it began testing on human subjects.

Matthew Meselson: A very small circle of people knew anything about this. After all, it certainly wasn’t public knowledge.

Katherine Monahan: Matthew Meselson is a Harvard molecular biologist and geneticist who served as a government consultant on arms control. He was instrumental in changing our nation’s policy on biological weapons.

Matthew Meselson: Research on weapons goes on all the time. Otherwise, you’d be caught with your pants down, so to speak. If a war broke out.

Katherine Monahan: The program was centered at Fort Detrick in Maryland, where the Army produced, tested, and stockpiled pathogens like anthrax and botulism, as well as defoliants like Agent Orange.

Advertisement

The military wanted to know how these substances could be used to attack different populated areas. For example, whether a small boat offshore could spray a biological weapon to cover a coastal city like San Francisco.

Matthew Meselson: They needed something that was, first of all, thought to be harmless because they certainly didn’t wanna kill everybody in San Francisco or Oakland. And that could easily be detected by simple methods.

Katherine Monahan: So the Army used substances that would disperse like a biological weapon, but weren’t actually harmful, as far as they knew.

For the San Francisco experiment, they chose two bacteria: bacillus globigii and serratia marcescens. Serratia marcescens is found naturally in water and soil, and it’s not normally dangerous to healthy people, but then it’s not normally sprayed into the air in large quantities.

It has a unique property that makes it easy to track.

Advertisement

Matthew Meselson: It’s bright red, and that’s why the Navy decided to use it, because when you plate a sample from the air on a petri dish, there’s only one thing that makes nice red colonies and they’re very easy to see.

Katherine Monahan: While the testing team sprayed the bacteria along the coast, monitors at 43 sampling stations around the Bay Area held up little cones to collect it, and found that it had traveled as far as 23 miles, covering the East Bay as well. The Army summarized its findings in a report.

Voice over: Every one of the 800,000 people in San Francisco exposed to the cloud at normal breathing rate (10 liters per minute) inhaled 5,000 or more fluorescent particles.

Katherine Monahan: That’s per minute. The test, Meselson said, showed that it was indeed possible to attack a coastal city by spraying a biological weapon from a boat offshore.

Matthew Meselson: Presumably, of course, if it was a real war, you’d use something like anthrax that would kill people.

Advertisement

Katherine Monahan: But this supposedly harmless bacteria may have killed someone.

Music featuring chimes

The winds carried the spray directly over Stanford hospital. Eleven patients developed serratia marcescens infections. And one of them — a 75-year-old Irish American named Edward Nevin — died, when the bacteria made its way into his heart.

Its source was a mystery.

Meselson would be one of the first members of the public to connect Edward Nevin’s death to the military’s experiment. But not until 15 years later, when a lab assistant shared a secret with him. Her boyfriend had worked at the Navy’s Biological Laboratory Facility in Oakland.

Advertisement

Matthew Meselson: Her boyfriend told her that one day the commander of this naval base called a meeting of everybody and told them that a recent test they had just done, probably was responsible for the death of a man, and if anyone ever talked about that publicly, that the Navy would make sure that that person could never find a job anywhere in the United States.

Katherine Monahan: The Pentagon declined to interview for this story, but said in a statement that it is “committed to safeguarding our nation and our citizens.”

Meselson was already gravely concerned about the U.S. biological weapons program because he’d worked for the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency in 1963. He had high security clearances and was given a tour of Fort Detrick in Maryland, where the biological weapons were developed.

Archival newsreel: At Camp Detrick, a National Guard airport near Fredrick, Maryland, requisitioned for this purpose, a new chapter in an uncharted adventure was to begin.

Matthew Meselson: We came to a seven-story building. So I asked the Colonel. What do you do in this building? And he said, we make anthrax spores there. So I said something like, well, why do we do that?

Advertisement

Archival newsreel: The aim: defensive and offensive protection against this new weapon.

Matthew Meselson: And he said, because anthrax could be a strategic weapon. Much cheaper than hydrogen bombs. Now, I don’t know if it occurred to me right away. But certainly on the taxi ride back to the State Department, it dawned on me that the last thing the United States would like is a cheap hydrogen bomb so that everybody could have one.

Katherine Monahan: Meselson began alerting members of the government that this was madness. He was friends with Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and was able to get the message through to President Richard Nixon.

Matthew Meselson: You don’t wanna make powerful weapons very, very cheap. This would create a world in which we would be the losers. It’s obvious. It’s a simple argument and that’s what made the United States decide to get out of it.

Katherine Monahan: In 1969, Nixon ended U.S. research into biological weapons and ordered all offensive toxins destroyed. And in 1972, the U.S. signed on to the international Biological Weapons Convention — still in effect today — in which almost all nations agree not to develop or stockpile biochemical weapons.

Advertisement

Around this time, the public started to find out about the more than 200 tests that had been done on them. And people were horrified. One of the first experiments people learned about was in the New York City subway system. Here’s a reenactment from a 1975 Senate hearing. Senator Gary Hart of Colorado is questioning Charles Senseney, a physicist at Fort Detrick.

Voice actor for Gary Hart: How was the study or experiment conducted?

Voice actor for Charles Senseney: Well, there was one person that was the operator — if you want to call it an operator — who rode a certain train, and walking between trains, dropped what looked like an ordinary light bulb, which contained biological simulant agent. And it went quite well through the entire subway system.

Voice actor for Gary Hart: Were the officials of the city of New York aware that this study was being conducted?

Voice actor for Charles Senseney: I do not believe so.

Advertisement

Voice actor for Gary Hart: And certainly the passengers weren’t?

Voice actor for Charles Senseney: That is correct.

Katherine Monahan: The public was appalled. Even more so when a subsequent hearing and report revealed more tests — in greyhound bus stations in Alaska and Hawaii, in the national airport in Washington D.C., on the Pennsylvania Turnpike, in Texas, and the Florida Keys.

Edward Nevin III remembers when he first learned about the San Francisco experiment, now known to the public as Operation Seaspray.

Edward Nevin III: I was on the BART train going into my office in San Francisco for Berkeley, where I lived.

Advertisement

Katherine Monahan: He was reading the San Francisco Chronicle, as he usually did on his way to work, and saw that his grandfather was the man who died in Stanford hospital.

Edward Nevin III: I was reading it with sort of an upset that the government would do something like that. And, uh, I turned to the back page and it says, ‘The only person who died was Edward Nevin.’ That’s how I learned it.

Katherine Monahan: Eddie III, as his grandfather used to call him, had been 9-years-old when his grandpa went into the hospital for a simple surgery, with a full recovery expected. His family had been stunned and puzzled by his death.

Edward Nevin III: I remember sitting in a ‘41 Chevy, my family’s car, uh, outside, waiting for my parents who went in to see him. They didn’t want the children in there. So I have absolute memory of that moment.

Katherine Monahan: Eddie III by 1976 was a trial lawyer in his early 30s. And he decided to sue the United States government.

Advertisement

He called his huge Irish American family together to discuss it.

Edward Nevin III: One aunt, God love her, said, uh, ‘Eddie, you’re pretty young, are you sure we shouldn’t get someone that’s been around a while, you know?’ I said, ‘I don’t think anyone will do it. There’s no real money in it.’

Katherine Monahan: The family was reluctant at first. They didn’t want the publicity. And they knew Eddie’s grandfather, a proud immigrant who loved America, would not have wanted to sue his country.

Edward Nevin III: He had his citizenship papers on the wall of the living room in the home. I truly believe he would’ve told me not to do it if he were alive. I’m sure he would’ve said no.

Katherine Monahan: But Eddie III was determined, and his family came to see it as the only way to find out what had truly happened to their loved one. So in 1981, the trial of the Nevin family — all 67 of them — vs. the United States began.

Advertisement

It was action-packed. At one point, an army general challenged Eddie III to a fistfight outside the courtroom.

Edward Nevin III: People were really mad at me. They, they were, they felt like they were quite a heroes themselves for doing this hard work, you know? And so they were upset that I would even imagine bringing a case like that.

Katherine Monahan: The military maintained that the test was safe, and the death was a coincidence. And that, anyway, the government had legal immunity from being sued by a citizen for a high-level planning decision like this one.

For the family’s side, Dr. Meselson and other scientists argued that the serratia found in Edward Nevin’s blood was likely the same serratia the military had sprayed over the city. And that they should have considered that there was potential for it to cause disease.

Edward Nevin III: The judge did one fine thing. He said, there’s no jury in this case. I will give the jury box to the press. And so they filled the jury box every day.

Advertisement

Katherine Monahan: That is where the real trial took place, Nevin figures, in the minds of the American people. He says every day he was interviewed outside the courthouse, and the story ran in newspapers across the country.

Katherine Monahan in scene: Did you ever think that you were gonna win?

Edward Nevin III: No. But we still had to tell the story. To have a citizen submitted to that kind of risk is awful.

Katherine Monahan: The Nevins lost their case. They appealed, lost again at the 9th Circuit, and appealed again to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear it.

Looking back on it all, Dr. Meselson, who campaigned to ban chemical weapons, is relieved that the era of secret chemical warfare testing on the public is over.

Advertisement

Matthew Meselson: This kind of weapon is really useful only if you want to kill civilians. And that’s not a very good thing to do in a war. Who knows where it could lead. It’s turning our knowledge of life against life. It’s a bad idea.

Katherine Monahan: Today, so far as we have evidence for, no country in the world is developing new biological weapons.

Katrina Schwartz: That story was brought to you by KQED reporter Katherine Monahan.

Bay Curious is produced at member-supported KQED in San Francisco.

Our show is produced by Gabriela Glueck, Christopher Beale and me, Katrina Schwartz. With extra support from Maha Sanad, Katie Sprenger, Jen Chien, Ethan Toven-Lindsey and everyone on Team KQED.

Advertisement

Thank you for listening and donating and being members. We appreciate it so much. Thank you, and have a great week.



Source link

San Francisco, CA

Bay Area residents hold rally in SF as war with Iran enters 2nd month

Published

on

Bay Area residents hold rally in SF as war with Iran enters 2nd month


SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — With the war in Iran about to enter a second month, calls for regime change continue.

“I’m here just to be a voice for the people of Iran. What they want? Free Iran. What they want? To have a normal life, which they can’t have. They are murdered by the Iranian government,” said Mahsa Garakani, Marin County resident.

Hundreds of Iranians from across the Bay Area marched along San Francisco’s Embarcadero on Sunday.

“We’re just echoing what our people want from the inside all our families. A lot of people don’t understand the minimal internet access they have. They are sending us videos telling us what they want, and we’re going to keep doing this every week until they have their freedom,” said Ali Lohrassebi from Pacifica

Advertisement

“We are here to support president’s actions, President Trump and all this administration’s actions on Iran taking strikes on the regime, killing them all and we are asking them to continue this until the regime changes,” said Sayna Ibrahimi, Los Altos Hills resident.

Iran live updates: IDF launches ‘widespread’ strikes in Tehran

And while this group of rallygoers is very much in favor of the war, there is a group of local Iranians with a much different opinion.

“The first thing we would like to see happen is bombs stopping. That’s the first thing. Before that, people are just in survival mode,” said Babak Sani, Oakland resident.

Babak Sani is one of the voices calling for an end to the war…and for the people of Iran to have control over who their next leader is.

Advertisement

“What the war does is it sets back any kind of movement for democracy. It sets back the aspirations of the people. The idea of self-determination is one of the first things that came up right away in our first gathering and it’s been in the heart of our discussions throughout,” Sani, Oakland resident.

Still there are no signs of the war ending soon, The Washington Post is reporting the Pentagon is preparing for weeks of limited ground operations, that could involve raids by special operators.

Axios reporting The White House is also considering deploying up to 10,000 more troops to the region.

Copyright © 2026 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Get out of the house with these SF events

Published

on

Get out of the house with these SF events


San Francisco isn’t letting the rain that’s in the forecast damper residents’ moods. 

Here are some of the top events to check out this week in The City. 

Daniel Grace at Book Passage (Monday)

Advertisement

Goran Bregovic and his Wedding and Funeral Orchestra (Monday)

Out of This World Showcase (Monday)

San Francisco’s Next Congress Member? The Candidates Debate (Tuesday)







Congress

State Sen. Scott Wiener, center, progressive-activist Saikat Chakrabarti and Supervisor Connie Chan are among the candidates vying for the congressional seat representing San Francisco. 

Advertisement




An evening with Nathan Bickert and Levi Gillis (Tuesday)

Portrait painting (Wednesday)

Felt collage art workshop (Wednesday) 







YBCA

Yerba Buena Center for the Arts provides participants with materials for its drop-in workshops.



Advertisement


Live Music: France, Pateka, Agnes Martian (Wednesday)

Artist reception (Thursday)

Advertisement


SF steps up efforts to designate local landmarks amid push for housing

New accelerated program adopted to preserve historic and cultural resources in balance with updated zoning rules


Why the venture industry’s dark days don’t mean it’s doomed

With few IPOs and exits, firms have been struggling to send money back to investors and raise new capital from them — but experts see a turnaround coming

Advertisement


Where every culture is beautiful: Carnaval season commences

Thirteen competitors will perform for a chance to headline the Mission parade and festival

Advertisement

Downtown First Thursday (Thursday)

Wood Engravers’ Network 5th Triennial Exhibition opening reception (Thursday)

After Dark: Immersed in Verse (Thursday)







Exploratorium

Exploratorium patrons will be able to participate in activities such as an exercise in which people explore the connections between language and phyiscal movement.

Advertisement




An evening with Anthony McGill and Gloria Chien (Friday)

Dirty Pop! First Fridays (Friday)

Advertisement

‘16 x 20’ opening reception (Saturday)

Launderland Circus (Saturday-Sunday)

Advertisement

Easter Mountain Lake Park 5K (Sunday)

Bring Your Own Big Wheel (Sunday) 







BYOBW

The annual Bring Your Own Big Wheel event takes place on Vermont Street in Potrero Hill.



Advertisement




Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco’s 5 Best Affordable Places To Stay On A Tight Budget, According To Guests – Islands

Published

on

San Francisco’s 5 Best Affordable Places To Stay On A Tight Budget, According To Guests – Islands






As one of the most expensive tourist destinations in the U.S., according to a GoBankingRates study, San Francisco, California, turns “affordable” into a relative term. While you might be able to nab a roadside hotel for under $50 in the middle of nowhere, San Francisco hotels are considerably more expensive.

I’m from the Bay Area and often travel to San Francisco for work. I usually stay outside the touristy neighborhoods — I prefer the area near San Francisco International Airport (SFO) — because I drive my own car. The following suggestions are based on guest feedback from Reddit, Tripadvisor, Google Reviews, and Booking.com, supplemented by my knowledge of different parts of the city. These aren’t the absolute cheapest places in San Francisco, but accommodations I’d feel comfortable recommending to visiting friends or family on a budget.

Advertisement

Although rates vary significantly based on demand, location, and a myriad of other factors, most relatively comfortable, affordable stays start from $150 per night for a private room, including taxes and fees. However, most hotels initially display rates online without taxes and fees. These hidden costs can easily bump up displayed room rates by $30 to $50, so make sure the final price includes everything, such as the “guest amenities fee” in some hotels. To keep the price somewhat low, you’ll likely need to sacrifice something, be that location, cleanliness, ambiance, amenities, space, or privacy. I’ve included estimated rates for the cheapest room at each accommodation (including fees and taxes), but you should take these numbers as rough guidance.

Chancellor Hotel on Union Square

Frequently mentioned among the top affordable hotels in San Francisco on Tripadvisor forums, Reddit, and area-specific Facebook groups, the Chancellor Hotel on Union Square makes guests feel at home in the heart of the city. Among the tallest buildings in San Francisco in its heyday, this 3-star stay dates back to 1914 and offers a taste of the past at an accessible price point. 

Advertisement

Featuring over 130 rooms, most of which fit two adults max, this family-run hotel earns 4.5 stars on Tripadvisor, in part due to small touches. “I loved the free homemade cookies, fresh apples, and high-end coffee in the cozy lobby,” enthused a guest on Google Reviews. “They truly went above and beyond and made me feel like an old friend.” The location is also a draw for visitors. Union Square sits one block over, and the Powell Street Cable Car passes directly in front of the hotel. 

Those who didn’t enjoy their stay usually found issues with the small room sizes, lack of air conditioning, or staying in a loud room. For reference, the only time I’ve ever used air conditioning in San Francisco is during an unusually hot stretch in California’s “Indian Summer,” usually a few days in September or October. However, the price point is reason enough to sacrifice a few comforts. Expect room rates from $130 for a queen bed with a private bathroom, a bathtub with a bright yellow rubber duck (yes, you can take the duck home), and a mini-fridge. 

Advertisement

Handlery Union Square Hotel

To secure a hotel with a heated pool, sauna, and gym in Union Square, you usually have to pay through the nose, but the 3-star Handlery Union Square Hotel is an exception. Cocooned in a courtyard, the swimming pool offers sun loungers and a place to relax after dark. The small gym features just enough equipment to maintain your fitness routine—treadmills, ellipticals, and free weights —while the sauna is private and must be reserved in advance. 

Built in 1908, the historic rooms (the most affordable option) feature Victorian architecture, as well as modern amenities like a mini-fridge, coffee maker, and flat-screen TV. A block from Union Square, the location is incredibly walkable and near Chinatown, shopping centers like Macy’s, and many restaurants. In the historic wing, guests report the problems you’d expect from an old building. For instance, some guests found the soundproofing insufficient, or stayed in rooms that felt dated rather than vintage.

However, for the price, most guests feel like they’re getting their money’s worth. “It was great, especially for the very reasonable price I paid. Very classy reception, and clean on the parking garage side too – felt very safe,” per a guest via Google Reviews. Rates hover between $150 and $250 for the most affordable rooms. However, the hotel offers discounts for guests attending events like a Giants’ game at Oracle Park or a concert at Civic Auditorium. There’s also a 20% discount for California residents. 

Advertisement

HI San Francisco Fisherman’s Wharf Hostel

Showcasing views of Alcatraz and the Golden Gate Bridge, HI San Francisco Fisherman’s Wharf Hostel is a step above your average backpacker experience. While the hostel offers traditional dorms, ranging in size from four to 20 beds, guests can also book private rooms with views across the bay. “I got the private room and if you stood on the far side of it you could see part of the Golden Gate Bridge. It’s one of the best views you’ll get for this price in the entire city,” shared a traveler on Google Reviews. 

Occupying a cypress-covered hill in Fort Mason Park, the location is one-of-a-kind. It’s one of the only places in the city where you can stay in an urban national park; although campers can pitch a tent at Angel Island State Park in San Francisco Bay. Here, visitors can stroll along paths or sunbathe in the grass before exploring the city on foot or with public transportation. Lombard Street, the city’s famous winding road, is only a 20-minute walk away, and you can reach Fisherman’s Wharf and Pier 39 in 15 minutes. The hostel offers weekly free events, such as the Mission Walking Tour on Wednesdays or the Yoga at Grace Cathedral on Saturdays. Check the schedule here.

Dorm beds start from $36, while private rooms with shared bathrooms go for $110 and up. Guests use the common areas to work remotely or meet other travelers, while the hostel also offers laundry facilities and a kitchen.

Advertisement

Golden Gate Hotel, San Francisco

Situated on the border of the Nob Hill and Union Square neighborhoods, the Golden Gate Hotel, San Francisco, maintains its old-world charm without falling into disrepair. It’s just around the corner from the California Street cable car and a 10-minute walk to the Cable Car Museum. A favorite among visitors on travel communities like San Francisco Travel Tips, this 4-story bed and breakfast was built in 1913, earning a spot on the National Register of Historic Places. Although the facade displays the Edwardian architecture typical of San Francisco, the interior reminds guests of compact flats in France or Italy.

With only 23 rooms, each one slightly different from the next, the hotel earns a 4.6-star rating on Tripadvisor. Afternoon tea and breakfast are complimentary, and guests appreciate the homey feel and resident cat, Skittles. “You could stay in the St. Francis for 3 times the price but you probably would NOT feel the sincere welcome of the decades-long established Golden Gate Hotel,” praised a guest on Tripadvisor. “This very clean, and gently cared for ‘nest’ in a wonderful location will soothe your frazzled senses when coming back from the tiring excitement of touristy jaunts.” 

Small rooms with a shared bathroom start from around $110, and come with Wi-Fi, a TV, bathrobes, and toiletries. Rooms with a private bathroom (plus an antique claw-foot tub) offer slightly more space and start from around $150 per night.  

Advertisement

Marina Motel

Situated in the Marina District, just off Highway 101, the 3-star Marina Motel is a top choice among families visiting San Francisco. Many of the rooms come with kitchens and multiple bed configurations, which makes traveling with children easier. In addition, the room rate includes free parking, a rarity in San Francisco. 

Dating back to 1939, the hotel originally provided overnight accommodation (with parking) for people driving over the brand new Golden Gate Bridge. Still run by the founder’s grandchildren, the motel offers rooms perched over small garages, nestled in a courtyard with bougainvillea vines and window boxes filled with flowers. Every room comes with a microwave, coffee maker, and mini-fridge, but the kitchen accommodations also have a gas oven and stove top, a freezer, and kitchenware. “My fiance and I took our teenage daughter and her friend to San Francisco as a spring break getaway. This hotel gave the girls their own room and their own beds, while my fiancé and I got a nice quiet space to ourselves! The price was unbeatable for having 2 rooms,” praised a visitor on Google Reviews, where the motel earns 4.4 stars.

Advertisement

From the motel, guests can easily reach San Francisco’s most iconic sites, but having a car is useful. However, the Palace of Fine Arts is a 10-minute walk away, and the motel serves as a starting point for exploring the nature trails at the Presidio. Rooms start around $140 per night with discounts for longer stays.

Methodology

To find the best affordable stays in San Francisco, I used my experience visiting as a Bay Area local and living in the city short-term as a jumping-off point. I scoured Facebook groups like San Francisco Travel Tips, and Reddit threads like r/AskSF and r/TravelHacks for affordable hotels I hadn’t heard of or potential hidden gems. 

Next, I dug through thousands of guest reviews on Tripadvisor, Google Reviews, and Booking.com, searching for hotels with convenient locations, clean rooms, helpful staff, amenities, and, of course, low prices. Then, I double-checked the prices using the hotel’s official website. I only included hotels where guests felt safe, and prioritized walkable locations. Finally, all the hotels have at least a 4.0 rating on Google Reviews or Tripadvisor. When booking your stay, consider using travel guru Rick Steves’ expert tip to find the most affordable hotels online.

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending