Oregon
What the end of Roe v. Wade means for Oregon and Washington
The Supreme Courtroom’s determination to overturn Roe v. Wade yesterday places the ability to permit or ban abortions within the palms of state governments. In Oregon and Washington abortion stays a totally authorized well being process, protected by state legislation. However that’s not the case in a number of different states, right here abortion clinics are already closing.
OPB’s well being reporter Amelia Templeton joined “All Issues Thought of” host Tiffany Camni to debate how the choice might impression the Northwest.
Tiffany Camhi: Amelia, this determination from the Supreme Courtroom received’t have an effect on abortion entry in Oregon or in Washington. Are you able to clarify why?
Amelia Templeton: Sure. This ruling means states are answerable for making their very own legal guidelines concerning abortion entry. Oregon and Washington broadly enable it. There aren’t any ready intervals, no parental consent requirement for minors. And also you don’t have to be an Oregon or Washington resident to obtain an abortion legally right here, or another kind of well being care, for that matter.
Actually, Gov. Kate Brown, Gov. Jay Inslee and California’s governor introduced as we speak that the three states intend to work collectively to guard abortion suppliers and sufferers on the West Coast.
Camhi. That’s attention-grabbing. Are you able to inform me extra about this joint announcement from West Coast governors?
Templeton: What it quantities to is making an attempt to shore up numerous sorts of authorized safety round abortion suppliers and their sufferers in Oregon.
West Coast governors promise to defend abortion rights
They mentioned that they’ll resist intrusion by out-of-state prosecutors or legislation enforcement making an attempt to research sufferers who obtain providers in our state, with steps like directing native prosecutors and legislation enforcement companies to not cooperate with different states on arrests or prosecutions associated to abortion.
However I feel we actually must take this as a political assertion with a little bit of a grain of salt, as a result of each abortion opponents and abortion supporters have mentioned there’s super uncertainty proper now.
The director of Deliberate Parenthood described this as a brand new world the place what has been established legislation and precedent acquired utterly overthrown, and the authorized panorama is mass confusion.
Idaho will ban most abortions after US Supreme Courtroom ruling
ACLU mentioned they’re nonetheless reviewing what potential dangers folks in Oregon — docs, associates — would possibly face if they assist somebody from Idaho journey to acquire an abortion right here.
These are difficult tough authorized questions and there’s super uncertainty proper now.
Camhi: Let’s take a step again right here. The courtroom’s determination comes after many years of strategizing by abortion opponents. How are anti-abortion organizations in Oregon reacting as we speak?
Templeton. They imagine that Roe was wrongly determined and that this was the appropriate determination.
I talked with Lois Anderson, the chief director of Oregon Proper to Life. She mentioned she’s dedicated her whole grownup life to this and didn’t know if she would stay to see this present day, and that her group doesn’t see this as the tip. They may proceed to work on state-level coverage, for instance, pushing to ban abortions later in being pregnant in Oregon.
She was very clear. “This isn’t the tip for us,” she mentioned.
Lois Anderson: That is just the start and it’s our accountability to … look inside our communities for, moms who’re in unsupported pregnancies or are in conditions the place they need assistance. It’s as much as us to stroll alongside them.
Oregon abortion advocacy teams — each professional and con — on the tip of Roe v. Wade
Camhi: And what are you listening to folks on the opposite aspect of the controversy, abortion rights advocates?
Templeton: A couple of issues. First, that this can be a mistaken determination. That it was a political determination on the a part of the Supreme Courtroom and it stripped girls of their autonomy.
Right here’s how An Do, with Deliberate Parenthood, described what the courtroom has performed for individuals who can carry pregnancies:
An Do: They’ve failed this nation. The courtroom is stealing our personal energy to manage our personal our bodies, our lives, and private medical choices and handing that over to politicians.
Templeton: I additionally heard that, for folks with cash and household connections, abortion will now possibly be extra inconvenient, one thing that folks journey to a different state to hunt.
However for a lot of others — pregnant youngsters, victims of home violence, girls of shade, poor girls in rural areas — they might simply not have the assets to journey. And they also will find yourself bearing youngsters in opposition to their will, in conditions they didn’t need.
I feel the very last thing advocates are saying is, in any case, abortion clinics throughout the state stay open and proceed to see sufferers, together with as we speak.
Camhi: Amelia, thanks in your reporting on this.
Templeton: Thanks.
Oregon
Oregon private colleges offer support to Southern California students impacted by wildfires
Some private universities in Oregon are offering extra assistance — from crisis counseling to emergency financial aid — to students who call Southern California home.
This comes amid the devastating wildfires currently burning in Los Angeles.
Lewis & Clark College, University of Portland and Reed College sent out messages of support to students with home addresses in Southern California this week.
Administrators at Lewis & Clark contacted around 250 undergraduate students in the region affected by the blazes. These students represent close to 12% of the college’s current undergraduate students.
The school, which begins its next term on Jan. 21, is opening up its dorms early for Southern California students at no extra cost.
“We will keep communicating with students in the weeks and months ahead to know how this impacts their next semester and beyond,” said Benjamin Meoz, Lewis & Clark’s senior associate dean of students. “That will mean a range of wraparound academic and counseling support.”
Lewis & Clark also pushed back its application deadline for prospective students from the Los Angeles area to Feb. 1.
Oregon crews arrive in Southern California to aid wildfire response
Reed College began reaching out to about 300 students who live in Southern California on Wednesday. In an email, the college urged students and faculty impacted by the fires to take advantage of the school’s mental health and financial aid resources.
Reed will also support students who need to return to campus earlier than expected. Classes at Reed do not begin until Jan. 27.
Students at University of Portland will be moving back in this weekend as its next term begins on Monday, Jan. 13. But UP did offer early move-in to students living in the Los Angeles area earlier this week. A spokesperson with UP said four students changed travel plans to arrive on campus early.
Students are already back on campus at the majority of Oregon’s other colleges and universities, with many schools beginning their terms earlier this week.
Oregon
Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Elon Musk to stop plan to kill 450,000 barred owls
Tips to manage poor air quality
Smoke from wildfires is increasingly impacting the Willamette Valley. Here are a few tips to manage poor air quality.
Four Oregon lawmakers are calling on Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to help stop a plan that would kill 450,000 barred owls in an effort to save endangered spotted owls over the next 30 years.
The entrepreneurs were named by President-elect Donald Trump to lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
In a letter sent Tuesday, state Rep. Ed Diehl, R-Stayton, Rep. David Gomberg, D-Lincoln County, Rep. Virgle Osborne, R-Roseburg, and Sen.-elect Bruce Starr, R-Yamhill and Polk counties, asked the incoming Trump administration officials to stop the reportedly more than $1 billion project, calling it a “budget buster” and “impractical.”
Environmental groups Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy in late 2024 filed a federal lawsuit in Washington state to stop the planned killing of the barred owls.
Here is why the Oregon lawmakers are opposed to the plan, what the plan would do and why it is controversial.
Why the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wants to kill barred owls
In August 2024, after years of planning, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service came up with a proposal to kill a maximum of 450,000 invasive barred owls over 30 years as a way to quell habitat competition between them and the northern spotted owl.
Spotted owl populations have been rapidly declining due in part to competition from invasive barred owls, which originate in the eastern United States. Northern spotted owls are listed as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act.
According to the USFWS plan, barred owls are one of the main factors driving the rapid decline of northern and California spotted owls, and with their removal, less than one-half of 1% of the North American barred owl population would be killed.
The plan was formally approved by the Biden administration in September 2024.
Why environmental groups want to stop the plan to kill barred owls
Shortly after it was announced, Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy immediately responded in opposition to the plan to kill barred owls. They argued the plan was both ill-conceived and that habitat loss is the main factor driving the spotted owls decline.
“Spotted owls have experienced significant population decline over decades,” a news release from the groups filing the lawsuit said. “This decline began and continues due to habitat loss, particularly the timber harvest of old growth forest. The plan is not only ill-conceived and inhumane, but also destined to fail as a strategy to save the spotted owl.”
In their complaint, the groups argued the USFWS violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to properly analyze the impacts of their strategy and improperly rejecting reasonable alternatives to the mass killing of barred owls, such as nonlethal population control approaches, spotted owl rehabilitation efforts and better protections for owl habitat.
Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Musk to stop the plan to kill barred owls
The four Oregon lawmakers are siding with the environmental groups and calling for Musk and Ramaswamy to reverse the federal government’s plan to kill the barred owls. It was not immediately clear how the two could stop the plan.
The lawmakers letter stated the plan was impractical and a “budget buster,” with cost estimates for the plan around $1.35 billion, according to a press release by the two groups.
The letter speculates there likely isn’t an excess of people willing to do the killing for free: “it is expected that the individuals doing the shooting across millions of acres – including within Crater Lake National Park – will require compensation for the arduous, night-time hunts,” according to the press release.
“A billion-dollar price tag for this project should get the attention of everyone on the Trump team concerned about government efficiency,” Diehl said. “Killing one type of owl to save another is outrageous and doomed to fail. This plan will swallow up Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars for no good reason.”
USFWS says they aren’t trying to trade one bird for the other.
“As wildlife professionals, we approached this issue carefully and did not come to this decision lightly,” USFWS Oregon State Supervisor Kessina Lee said in announcing the decision in August. “Spotted owls are at a crossroads, and we need to manage both barred owls and habitat to save them. This isn’t about choosing one owl over the other. If we act now, future generations will be able to see both owls in our Western forests.”
Statesman Journal reporter Zach Urness contributed to this report.
Ginnie Sandoval is the Oregon Connect reporter for the Statesman Journal. Sandoval can be reached at GSandoval@gannett.com or on X at @GinnieSandoval.
Oregon
Santa Clara’s last-second overtime tip-in hands Oregon State men a heartbreaking defeat
A rebound basket with 3.5 seconds left in overtime allowed Santa Clara to escape with an 82-81 overtime win over Oregon State in men’s basketball Thursday night.
The Beavers, looking for their first road win of the season and their third since 2021, just missed when Tyeree Bryan’s tip-in with 3.5 seconds left was the difference.
Oregon State, leading 81-78, had two chances to rescue the win.
Adama Bal, fouled while shooting a three-pointer with 10 seconds remaining, made his first two free throws but missed the third. But Bal outfought OSU for the rebound, then kicked the ball out to Christoph Tilly, whose three-point shot glanced off the rim. Bryan then knifed between two Beaver rebounders, collecting the ball with his right hand and tipping it off the backboard and into the basket.
OSU (12-5, 2-2 WCC) came up short on a half-court shot at the buzzer.
The loss spoiled what was a 12-point second-half comeback for Oregon State, which led by as many as four points in overtime.
Parsa Fallah led the Beavers with 24 points and seven rebounds. Michael Rataj had a double-double with 16 points and 10 rebounds, while Isaiah Sy scored 12 points and Damarco Minor 11.
Elijah Maji scored 21 points for Santa Clara (11-6, 3-1), which has won eight of its last nine games.
The game was tied at 32-32 at halftime following a first half where OSU trailed by as many as 12 points. Fallah and Minor combined to score the final eight points as OSU finished the half on a 10-2 run.
The game began to get away from the Beavers again as Santa Clara built a 60-48 lead with 9:43 remaining. Sy got OSU going with a three-pointer, as the Beavers whittled away at the deficit. OSU eventually grabbed the lead at 67-65 with 5:19 left on another three by Sy. It was a defensive brawl for the rest of regulation, as neither team scored during the final 1:58.
Oregon State never trailed in overtime until the final three seconds. A Sy three with 1:29 left gave the Beavers a four-point cushion. After the Broncos later cut the lead to one, Fallah’s layup with 17 seconds left put OSU up 81-78.
Oregon State returns to action Saturday when the Beavers complete their two-game road trip at Pacific. Game time is 7 p.m.
–Nick Daschel can be reached at 360-607-4824, ndaschel@oregonian.com or @nickdaschel.
Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.
-
Business1 week ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health5 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades