Connect with us

Oregon

Supreme Court abortion decision: What happens in Oregon? – Oregon Capital Chronicle

Published

on

Supreme Court abortion decision: What happens in Oregon? – Oregon Capital Chronicle


The U.S. Supreme Court docket’s choice to overturn an almost 50-year-old proper to abortion has little fast affect in Oregon, the place the state Structure ensures reproductive rights, together with free abortions, that aren’t touched by the ruling.

Nonetheless, the landmark choice issued Friday in Washington, D.C., will have an effect on Oregon. Reproductive well being care suppliers have been making ready for months for an inflow of sufferers from states, together with neighboring Idaho, the place docs will face jail time for offering abortions.

Well being care suppliers, Democratic lawmakers and Lawyer Common Ellen Rosenblum are a part of a legislative workgroup that presently is analyzing Oregon’s legal guidelines for loopholes in entry, together with guaranteeing that medical professionals aren’t punished for offering care to girls from states the place abortion is illegitimate. They’re additionally reviewing legal guidelines on different controversial well being care points, together with gender-affirming care, within the occasion of future Supreme Court docket choices limiting medical care. 

Oregon led the best way

Abortion has been authorized in each state for the reason that Supreme Court docket’s 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, although many states restrict entry with legal guidelines requiring counseling, ready intervals or bans on late-term abortions. In Oregon, abortion turned a proper below the state Structure in 1983. 

Advertisement

Oregon turned the primary state to codify abortion rights in legislation in 2017. The Reproductive Well being Fairness Act of 2017  requires insurance coverage corporations to cowl abortion prices, amongst different issues, and ensures the state will cowl prices for individuals on Medicaid or who’re uninsured, together with these with out authorized documentation to reside within the U.S. A federal legislation, the Hyde Modification, prevents federal cash from getting used to pay for abortions.

Oregon voters have repeatedly rejected poll measures that might prohibit abortion, most not too long ago voting down a 2018 proposal to ban using state cash for abortions. Solely 35% of voters supported the proposed ban. 

However in Republican-controlled states, lawmakers have lengthy pushed laws that conflicts with the precedent set by Roe v. Wade within the hopes that the Supreme Court docket would finally overturn it because it now has finished. Dobbs v. Jackson Girls’s Well being Group, the case that prompted the ruling, entails a 2018 Mississippi ban on abortions after 15 weeks of being pregnant. The legislation has been on maintain whereas it was challenged in courts.

The court docket’s ruling returns the authority to limit or ban abortions to the states, clearing the best way for the Mississippi legislation and legal guidelines in different states limiting abortions to take impact. Greater than 20 states have legal guidelines limiting abortions, in response to the Guttmacher Institute, a nonprofit that tracks abortion legal guidelines. These legal guidelines embrace “set off” legal guidelines in 13 states set as much as robotically ban abortion if the court docket guidelines because it did. They may go into impact, together with in Idaho. 

A spokeswoman for Rosenblum stated the legal professional basic wouldn’t touch upon the opinion till she evaluations dissenting opinions. 

Advertisement

State Rep. Travis Nelson, a Portland-area nurse and a member of the legislative workgroup, stated girls ought to really feel assured that their rights are protected in Oregon. 

“We’re gonna do all we will right here in Oregon to make sure that girls’s rights are protected, and that Oregon is a protected place to hunt reproductive care,” he stated. “Long run, although, I do have considerations trying into the long run. If we find yourself sometime getting a United States authorities during which the president is Republican, the Home is Republican and the Senate is Republican, we could possibly be nationwide laws that makes abortion unlawful, which may make all of the work that we’ve finished in Oregon moot.” 

Whereas the legislative workgroup was established after a leaked draft opinion within the Dobbs case, it’s reviewing greater than reproductive care. Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward, a doctor and member of the group, stated abortion is a part of a development of political choices about well being care. 

“We have to shield well being care suppliers who’re offering companies within the state which can be fully authorized, and we must be occupied with all types of points which can be being introduced up that we by no means thought we have been going to have to think about,” she stated. “So it’s not nearly abortion. It’s about a variety of well being care that has been politicized and shouldn’t have been.”

Potential for substandard care

Lisa Gardner, govt director of Deliberate Parenthood of Southwest Oregon, stated the choice can be felt extensively. 

Advertisement

“This choice will profoundly affect people from having company over their very own lives, their financial futures and that of their households,” Gardner advised the Capital Chronicle.  “This choice will even have a profound affect on the American economic system, because the restrictions that can observe in probably half of the states on this nation will affect the power of individuals to indicate up for work – in an economic system that’s already challenged by workforce shortages.”

She stated individuals of colour and people with low incomes can be most affected.

“Individuals will proceed to search out abortion care following this choice. These with financial assets could have entry to personal docs who will meet their well being care wants – as was the case earlier than 1973 when the Roe case was determined,” Gardner stated.  “What we are going to see are those that wouldn’t have these means will search substandard care, and folks will die – as they did pre-Roe.”

However reproductive well being care suppliers, together with Deliberate Parenthood, weren’t stunned by the Supreme Court docket’s choice.

“Deliberate Parenthood has been planning for this present day for over two years – for the reason that final administration made clear that they deliberate to dismantle private freedoms and the precise to privateness,” Gardner stated. She stated the nonprofit will proceed to assist sufferers with their household planning wants, together with performing abortions, an offering gender affirming and different care.

Advertisement

She stated the choice implies that states like Oregon which shield abortion rights must “choose up the slack,” by responding to stepped up demand. Already, suppliers in Oregon have confronted requests for abortions from girls in Texas – and Idaho, which has a so-called set off ban making abortions now unlawful there following the Supreme Court docket choice.

“We noticed the trauma and the hurt of sufferers having to take extraordinary actions – or not to have the ability to take these measures – in in search of the well being care they want,” Gardner stated.  

Deliberate Parenthood has leased house in a constructing in Ontario alongside the Idaho border, however the group has but to announce a clinic there. The abortion ban in Idaho implies that girls in jap Oregon who had traveled throughout the border for abortion and different care will now should journey elsewhere. Deliberate Parenthood’s closest clinic now could be in Bend.

Abortion’s future in Oregon

Whereas Oregon’s Democratic lawmakers ready to defend and strengthen the state’s abortion legal guidelines, abortion rights opponents praised the court docket’s choice. Trevor Lane, Oregon Proper to Life spokesman,stated in a press release that abortion opponents have been working towards this present day for greater than 50 years. 

“This choice doesn’t make abortion unlawful, somewhat it returns the duty for abortion legal guidelines, together with safety for unborn infants, to state legislatures,” he stated. “Oregon’s excessive legal guidelines – elective abortion till the second of delivery – should not supported by most Oregonians.”

Advertisement

Legal guidelines governing abortion in Oregon and nationally may change relying on the result of this November’s election. In Oregon, Democratic gubernatorial nominee Tina Kotek and unaffiliated candidate Betsy Johnson, beforehand a Democratic state senator, have each pledged to assist abortion rights.

Republican nominee Christine Drazan, who declined to touch upon the sooner leaked draft, has stated she is going to veto payments increasing abortion entry. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oregon

Oregon private colleges offer support to Southern California students impacted by wildfires

Published

on

Oregon private colleges offer support to Southern California students impacted by wildfires


Lewis & Clark College is opening up its residence halls early to students impacted by the wildfires in Los Angeles. Odell Annex pictured here, is a residence hall on the Lewis & Clark campus in Portland.

Adam Bacher courtesy of Lewis & Clark College

Some private universities in Oregon are offering extra assistance — from crisis counseling to emergency financial aid — to students who call Southern California home.

This comes amid the devastating wildfires currently burning in Los Angeles.

Advertisement

Lewis & Clark College, University of Portland and Reed College sent out messages of support to students with home addresses in Southern California this week.

Administrators at Lewis & Clark contacted around 250 undergraduate students in the region affected by the blazes. These students represent close to 12% of the college’s current undergraduate students.

The school, which begins its next term on Jan. 21, is opening up its dorms early for Southern California students at no extra cost.

“We will keep communicating with students in the weeks and months ahead to know how this impacts their next semester and beyond,” said Benjamin Meoz, Lewis & Clark’s senior associate dean of students. “That will mean a range of wraparound academic and counseling support.”

Lewis & Clark also pushed back its application deadline for prospective students from the Los Angeles area to Feb. 1.

Advertisement

Oregon crews arrive in Southern California to aid wildfire response

Reed College began reaching out to about 300 students who live in Southern California on Wednesday. In an email, the college urged students and faculty impacted by the fires to take advantage of the school’s mental health and financial aid resources.

Reed will also support students who need to return to campus earlier than expected. Classes at Reed do not begin until Jan. 27.

Students at University of Portland will be moving back in this weekend as its next term begins on Monday, Jan. 13. But UP did offer early move-in to students living in the Los Angeles area earlier this week. A spokesperson with UP said four students changed travel plans to arrive on campus early.

Students are already back on campus at the majority of Oregon’s other colleges and universities, with many schools beginning their terms earlier this week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Elon Musk to stop plan to kill 450,000 barred owls

Published

on

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Elon Musk to stop plan to kill 450,000 barred owls


play

Four Oregon lawmakers are calling on Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to help stop a plan that would kill 450,000 barred owls in an effort to save endangered spotted owls over the next 30 years.

The entrepreneurs were named by President-elect Donald Trump to lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.

Advertisement

In a letter sent Tuesday, state Rep. Ed Diehl, R-Stayton, Rep. David Gomberg, D-Lincoln County, Rep. Virgle Osborne, R-Roseburg, and Sen.-elect Bruce Starr, R-Yamhill and Polk counties, asked the incoming Trump administration officials to stop the reportedly more than $1 billion project, calling it a “budget buster” and “impractical.”

Environmental groups Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy in late 2024 filed a federal lawsuit in Washington state to stop the planned killing of the barred owls.

Here is why the Oregon lawmakers are opposed to the plan, what the plan would do and why it is controversial.

Why the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wants to kill barred owls

In August 2024, after years of planning, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service came up with a proposal to kill a maximum of 450,000 invasive barred owls over 30 years as a way to quell habitat competition between them and the northern spotted owl.

Advertisement

Spotted owl populations have been rapidly declining due in part to competition from invasive barred owls, which originate in the eastern United States. Northern spotted owls are listed as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act.

According to the USFWS plan, barred owls are one of the main factors driving the rapid decline of northern and California spotted owls, and with their removal, less than one-half of 1% of the North American barred owl population would be killed.

The plan was formally approved by the Biden administration in September 2024.

Why environmental groups want to stop the plan to kill barred owls

Shortly after it was announced, Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy immediately responded in opposition to the plan to kill barred owls. They argued the plan was both ill-conceived and that habitat loss is the main factor driving the spotted owls decline.

Advertisement

“Spotted owls have experienced significant population decline over decades,” a news release from the groups filing the lawsuit said. “This decline began and continues due to habitat loss, particularly the timber harvest of old growth forest. The plan is not only ill-conceived and inhumane, but also destined to fail as a strategy to save the spotted owl.”

In their complaint, the groups argued the USFWS violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to properly analyze the impacts of their strategy and improperly rejecting reasonable alternatives to the mass killing of barred owls, such as nonlethal population control approaches, spotted owl rehabilitation efforts and better protections for owl habitat.

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Musk to stop the plan to kill barred owls

The four Oregon lawmakers are siding with the environmental groups and calling for Musk and Ramaswamy to reverse the federal government’s plan to kill the barred owls. It was not immediately clear how the two could stop the plan.

The lawmakers letter stated the plan was impractical and a “budget buster,” with cost estimates for the plan around $1.35 billion, according to a press release by the two groups.

The letter speculates there likely isn’t an excess of people willing to do the killing for free: “it is expected that the individuals doing the shooting across millions of acres – including within Crater Lake National Park – will require compensation for the arduous, night-time hunts,” according to the press release.

Advertisement

“A billion-dollar price tag for this project should get the attention of everyone on the Trump team concerned about government efficiency,” Diehl said. “Killing one type of owl to save another is outrageous and doomed to fail. This plan will swallow up Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars for no good reason.”

USFWS says they aren’t trying to trade one bird for the other.

“As wildlife professionals, we approached this issue carefully and did not come to this decision lightly,” USFWS Oregon State Supervisor Kessina Lee said in announcing the decision in August. “Spotted owls are at a crossroads, and we need to manage both barred owls and habitat to save them. This isn’t about choosing one owl over the other. If we act now, future generations will be able to see both owls in our Western forests.”  

Statesman Journal reporter Zach Urness contributed to this report.

Ginnie Sandoval is the Oregon Connect reporter for the Statesman Journal. Sandoval can be reached at GSandoval@gannett.com or on X at @GinnieSandoval.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Santa Clara’s last-second overtime tip-in hands Oregon State men a heartbreaking defeat

Published

on

Santa Clara’s last-second overtime tip-in hands Oregon State men a heartbreaking defeat


A rebound basket with 3.5 seconds left in overtime allowed Santa Clara to escape with an 82-81 overtime win over Oregon State in men’s basketball Thursday night.

The Beavers, looking for their first road win of the season and their third since 2021, just missed when Tyeree Bryan’s tip-in with 3.5 seconds left was the difference.

Oregon State, leading 81-78, had two chances to rescue the win.

Adama Bal, fouled while shooting a three-pointer with 10 seconds remaining, made his first two free throws but missed the third. But Bal outfought OSU for the rebound, then kicked the ball out to Christoph Tilly, whose three-point shot glanced off the rim. Bryan then knifed between two Beaver rebounders, collecting the ball with his right hand and tipping it off the backboard and into the basket.

Advertisement

OSU (12-5, 2-2 WCC) came up short on a half-court shot at the buzzer.

The loss spoiled what was a 12-point second-half comeback for Oregon State, which led by as many as four points in overtime.

Parsa Fallah led the Beavers with 24 points and seven rebounds. Michael Rataj had a double-double with 16 points and 10 rebounds, while Isaiah Sy scored 12 points and Damarco Minor 11.

Elijah Maji scored 21 points for Santa Clara (11-6, 3-1), which has won eight of its last nine games.

The game was tied at 32-32 at halftime following a first half where OSU trailed by as many as 12 points. Fallah and Minor combined to score the final eight points as OSU finished the half on a 10-2 run.

Advertisement

The game began to get away from the Beavers again as Santa Clara built a 60-48 lead with 9:43 remaining. Sy got OSU going with a three-pointer, as the Beavers whittled away at the deficit. OSU eventually grabbed the lead at 67-65 with 5:19 left on another three by Sy. It was a defensive brawl for the rest of regulation, as neither team scored during the final 1:58.

Oregon State never trailed in overtime until the final three seconds. A Sy three with 1:29 left gave the Beavers a four-point cushion. After the Broncos later cut the lead to one, Fallah’s layup with 17 seconds left put OSU up 81-78.

Oregon State returns to action Saturday when the Beavers complete their two-game road trip at Pacific. Game time is 7 p.m.

–Nick Daschel can be reached at 360-607-4824, ndaschel@oregonian.com or @nickdaschel.

Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending