Connect with us

New Mexico

Oil and gas fighting back as feds, New Mexico increase industry pollution oversight

Published

on

Oil and gas fighting back as feds, New Mexico increase industry pollution oversight


Oil and gas companies struggled to adhere to New Mexico’s and the federal government’s recent restrictions on methane emissions, said industry supporters concerned the new rules could stymie energy production and the economic benefit it brings to the state.

An about $3.5 billion infusion of “new money” was recently reported by the state’s Legislative Finance Committee, largely credited to growing oil and gas production in the Permian Basin of southeast New Mexico.

Grant Swartzwelder with OTA Environmental Solutions said during a meeting with oil companies and the Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico (IPANM) that recent regulations could be difficult for operators to navigate as they produce oil and gas but also remain compliant with state and federal laws.

Advertisement

More: Top oil and gas bills to watch during New Mexico’s 2024 Legislative Session

New Mexico in 2021 and 2022 passed new regulations via the Oil Conservation Division (OCD) and New Mex Environment Department (NMED) aimed at limiting air pollution from the fossil fuel industry.

The OCD rules outlawed routine flaring, the burning of excess natural gas, while calling on all operators in the state to capture 98 percent of produced gas by 2026.

Meanwhile, NMED added stricter requirements for leak detection, repair and reporting of emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other chemicals believed to form ground-level ozone, or smog.

Advertisement

More: $4.5 billion sale of Callon Petroleum to APA announced as oil surges in Permian Basin

At the same time the Environmental Protection Agency last year enacted rules to increase requirements for the use of low-emission technology at oil and gas facilities around the U.S. and require states to develop air pollution reduction plans for not only newly installed but also existing extraction operations.

And New Mexico Democrat lawmakers proposed multiple bills to increase regulations on the industry, a week ahead of the 2024 Legislative Session. Those proposals sought to increase royalty payments, restrict the use of freshwater in drilling and block oil and gas facilities from areas within a mile of schools.

Swartzwelder said increased state and federal rules were making it a challenge to continue producing fossil fuels in the Permian Basin, arguing the industry was already taking successful actions to address its environmental impacts.

More: Here’s the latest oil and gas drilling rig count in Permian Basin, New Mexico and Texas

Advertisement

“As you know, New Mexico is trying to be a leader in regulatory actions. It really creates a lot of challenges for operators,” Swarzwelder said. “What’s frustrating about all the regulatory changes, is its really in light of some positive things in the industry. The industry up to this point has done a very good job of limiting its emissions.”

He said a recently enacted “methane tax,” a policy by the EPA to charge operators for methane emissions would affect 65 percent of operators in U.S., mostly small operators, threatening their financial viability.

The EPA announced in last year it will charge $900 per metric ton for methane waste emissions in 2024, rising to $1,200 in 2025 and $1,500 per metric ton in 2026 and after for operators reporting more than 25,000 metric tons of emissions per year.

More: Oil and gas exempt from drilling rules in endangered bird habitat. Is species threatened?

“It really affects the smaller producers,” Swarzwelder said. “There’s a lot of small producers out there. It really puts you in a sensitive situation.”

Advertisement

President of American Petroleum Institute Mike Sommers said lawmakers should pursue policies that encourage, not restrict, oil and gas producers in the U.S.

He said recent requirements could curb American energy production without providing adequate environmental benefit.

More: Civitas Resources’ $2 billion sale closes, Permian Basin merger wave continues in 2024

Sommers’ comments came during the Institute’s annual “State of the Energy” conference that sees oil companies, political leaders and others convene to discuss global energy market and policy trends.  

He called on government leaders to lease more public land to the industry, speed up permit approvals and walk back policies that tightened environmental requirements.

Advertisement

“We produce more energy than any country in the world,” Sommers said. “This benefits our economy, our national security and is our insurance in a volatile time. This is our American energy advantage. It didn’t happen overnight, and it can’t be sustained without the right policies from Washington.”

More: $450 million Permian Basin merger announced between Battalion Oil and Fury Resources

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, herself an ardent supporter of tougher environmental rules, voiced support for the EPA’s latest regulations during the United Nations Climate Change Conference last month in Dubai.

She touted New Mexico’s rules as laying the groundwork for federal action to address the purported damage oil and gas was causing to the environment.

Advertisement

“New Mexico embarked on drafting our oil and gas rules at a time when the United States’ climate leadership was lagging. Thanks to President Biden and his administration, we are once again leading,” Lujan Grisham said in as the rules were announced in December.

“We are proud to have laid the foundation for this national rule, which will not only reduce emissions, but spur innovation and economic development across the country.”

Adrian Hedden can be reached at 575-628-5516, achedden@currentargus.com or @AdrianHedden on the social media platform X.





Source link

Advertisement

New Mexico

Opinion: Applauding Heinrich for bi-partisan permitting reform work – New Mexico Political Report

Published

on

Opinion: Applauding Heinrich for bi-partisan permitting reform work – New Mexico Political Report






Opinion: Applauding Heinrich for bi-partisan permitting reform work – New Mexico Political Report












Advertisement



Advertisement





Skip to content

Advertisement


Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

New Mexico lawmakers, leaders respond to federal lawsuit

Published

on

New Mexico lawmakers, leaders respond to federal lawsuit


ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — State lawmakers and leaders released the following statements in response to the federal lawsuit against New Mexico and the City of Albuquerque.

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez

“House Bill 9 is a constitutional exercise of state authority, and this office will defend it.  

The New Mexico Legislature passed this law after extensive consideration of documented harms occurring in immigration detention facilities operating in this state — inadequate medical care, deaths in custody, and conditions that fell well below acceptable standards. The Legislature made a considered judgment that New Mexico’s government, its employees, and its publicly funded facilities should not be instruments of a detention system that has caused serious and preventable harm to people held within our borders. That is precisely the kind of policy judgment that belongs to the states.  

Advertisement

The Constitution reserves to the states the power to govern their own affairs — including how state and local personnel are deployed and how publicly funded facilities are used. Federal agents remain free to enforce federal immigration law. They may make arrests, conduct investigations, and carry out removals. What they may not do is compel New Mexico’s officers, employees, and institutions to administer federal enforcement priorities the state has chosen not to adopt. The federal government has its own personnel and its own resources. It does not have a constitutional right to New Mexico’s.  

This lawsuit asks a federal court to override a democratically enacted state law because the administration disagrees with the policy choice the Legislature made. That is not a constitutional argument. It is an attempt to use federal litigation to reverse an outcome the administration dislikes. We will see them in court.” 

Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller

“I will always stand up for the safety, rights, and dignity of Albuquerque residents. Our policies ensure ALL families can call 911, send their kids to school, and access City services without fear, while making clear that City resources are not tools for federal immigration raids. We are ready to defend our community, our values, and our public safety in court,”

City Councilor Dan Lewis

Advertisement

“Mayor Keller deserves to be sued for his reckless promotion of dangerous sanctuary policies that undermine cooperation between law enforcement agencies and put everyone at risk. Sanctuary laws don’t protect; they create more victims. I opposed Keller’s so-called ‘Safer Community Places’ ordinance from the beginning. It’s nothing more than obstruction of law enforcement and this mayor chose his radical ideology over public safety. Most people in our City agree that there is a public safety benefit when local, state and federal law enforcement work together to enforce the law and protect innocent people.”

Deb Haaland

“As ICE continues threatening communities across the country, the state is the first line of defense against the Trump administration. In New Mexico, we are lucky that the state and localities worked to lawfully pass legislation to protect New Mexicans and their families from ICE. We can’t let the federal government continue to exert their will on New Mexico and we won’t let them intimidate us. We are a multicultural state, we must stand strong with our neighbors. That means as governor, I will do anything in my power to stop ICE from tearing families apart and committing crimes in our streets while advocating for strong, common sense immigration and border security reform.”

The Democratic Party of New Mexico

“The Immigrant Safety Act passed both legislative chambers and was signed into law constitutionally, within our rights as a state, concerning New Mexico’s own personnel, facilities, and resources. The Trump Administration may not like that New Mexico stands for the safety of all the families in our communities and against inhumane and dangerous conditions in for-profit detention centers, but they have to respect our rights as a state.  

Advertisement

The fact of the matter is that the Trump Administration is overstepping its authority as they continue to force a violent, clumsy immigration agenda onto communities it has terrorized across the country against their will.”   

Republican Party of New Mexico

“The lawsuit filed by the United States against the State of New Mexico, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, Attorney General Raul Torrez, the City of Albuquerque, and Mayor Timothy Keller confirms what many New Mexicans have feared for months — that House Bill 9 and Albuquerque’s Safer Community Places Ordinance were driven by partisan politics rather than the safety, stability, and economic well-being of our communities.

Legislators who pushed HB9 chose political ideology over common sense and over the people they were elected to represent. This legislation appears to have been crafted not to improve public safety or immigration outcomes, but to advance an anti-Trump political agenda at any cost. In doing so, they ignored the serious consequences these policies would have on New Mexico families, local economies, county governments, and the very immigrants they claim to protect.

The federal government’s complaint makes clear that these laws threaten decades-long partnerships between local governments and federal authorities that have been essential to maintaining public safety and enforcing immigration law. These partnerships support jobs, economic activity, and critical infrastructure in communities like Otero County, where nearly 300 jobs are now at risk because of these reckless political decisions.

Advertisement

New Mexico legislators also failed to consider the financial burden these measures place on counties and municipalities already struggling with limited resources. Instead of working collaboratively to address immigration challenges responsibly and humanely, they chose confrontation and obstruction.

Most troubling is the complete disregard for the safety of New Mexicans. Policies that intentionally interfere with federal immigration enforcement risk creating greater instability, undermining law enforcement cooperation, and putting thousands of residents at risk. At the same time, these policies do nothing to improve the care, processing, or long-term outcomes for immigrants being housed in detention and processing facilities.

The people of New Mexico deserve leadership focused on public safety, economic security, and lawful solutions — not political theater designed to score partisan points. When elected officials prioritize ideology over citizens, communities suffer. The consequences of HB9 and related sanctuary-style policies are now being challenged in federal court, and New Mexicans are left to deal with the damage caused by leaders who appeared more interested in opposing President Trump than protecting the people of this state.

And now, after advancing policies that threaten jobs, hurt counties financially, undermine law enforcement cooperation, and divide communities, these same legislators want taxpayers to pay them for their failing policies. Instead of moving New Mexico forward, too many elected officials have focused solely on advancing their own political agendas while ignoring the real needs of working families, local governments, and public safety.

This election season, New Mexicans have an opportunity to speak loudly at the polls. The primary elections matter, and voters must carefully choose strong Republican candidates willing to go to Santa Fe and fight against harmful policies that put politics above people. New Mexico deserves leaders who will protect communities, strengthen the economy, support law enforcement, and put citizens first — not politicians who continue to gamble with the future of this state.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

Phoebe Bridgers Debuts New Music at First Show in Three Years

Published

on

Phoebe Bridgers Debuts New Music at First Show in Three Years


Phoebe Bridgers played her first solo show in three years on Friday night at The Liberty in Roswell, New Mexico. And if reports are to be believed, the singer’s next album/creative era could truly be out of this world.

The intimate, 13-song set at the 400-capacity venue served as Bridgers’ first solo performance since May 2023 when she opened for Taylor Swift at New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium. According to posts from several attendees, Bridgers described the evening (which strictly forbid all recording devices) as a “test” for her third album (and follow-up to 2020’s excellent Punisher).

In addition to hits like “Motion Sickness” and “Kyoto,” Bridgers debuted three to four new songs. One attendee described the new music, which included one track tentatively-titled “This is Gonna Kill Me,” as “very sad folk.” Harmonica arrangements were also featured prominently across the new music, provided by Christian Lee Hutson, who served as part of Bridgers’ band.

Related Video

Advertisement

Reddit user BSismyname said that the “new songs sounded f**king great and also very sad.” They also mentioned that at least one song might be about Bridgers’ much-publicized relationship with Bo Burnham, and another number detailed the death of her father from just a couple years ago. The Burnham song supposedly also made lyrical references to watching movies on the couch (Bridgers is set to make her acting debut this fall in the A24 crime drama Primetime alongside Robert Pattinson).

Musically speaking, though, one of the biggest takeaways was less to do with the song’s respective subject matter and more to do with Bridgers’ performance. The phoebe daily X/Twitter account reported that during the show, Bridgers “experimented with new vocal techniques.” In further describing those same techniques, BSismyname said that Bridgers was “more ‘on her voice,’” and that she sounded “less breathy and with more power.” However, BSismyname said that the largest difference is the overall “atmosphere” facilitated by this new smattering of music.

The word “atmosphere” also carried some extra weight given everything surrounding the show. The venue was decorated with neon-colored alien imagery, including a large banner/mural on the stage. Several pieces of merch also featured similar alien imagery and iconography, and there was at least one song with even more celestial references (“Now I can’t see any stars in the sky/When a dream comes true, a fantasy dies”). And if aliens/space aren’t a theme, why else would Bridgers return at a venue in Roswell, New Mexico?

While there wasn’t any official word on an album title or a release date for this new music, many attendees did leave with one special gift. Those who chose to store their phones in Yondr pouches at the show were gifted a card that could be “combined to make up the artwork for Bridgers’ next release” ( either a single or the album proper). Similar imagery depicted on the cards were also featured on certain pieces of merch.

Part of the reason for Bridgers’ solo “absence” was her work with boygenius (her indie supergroup with Julien Baker and Lucy Dacus). After debuting in 2018, and then undergoing a hiatus, the trio spent much of 2023 touring and promoting The Record. Boygenius, however, then returned to the shelves with their indefinite hiatus in October 2023.

Advertisement

Below, check out the full setlist and some accompanying photos of the merch and puzzle pieces. In the meantime, keep watching the heavens and stay tuned for more announcements as they come.

Phoebe Bridgers at The Liberty on May 8th Setlist:
Motion Sickness
Garden Song
Kyoto
Moon Song
Funeral
“Chinese Satellite
**Four New Songs**
Scott Street
Graceland Too
I Know The End





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending