Connect with us

New Mexico

New Mexico denies Alec Baldwin's ‘Rust’ movie $1.6m tax incentive

Published

on

New Mexico denies Alec Baldwin's ‘Rust’ movie $1.6m tax incentive


Producers of the western movie “Rust” may have to forgo a robust economic incentive as they try to sell the film to distributors and fulfill financial obligations to the immediate family of a cinematographer who was fatally shot by Alec Baldwin during rehearsal in 2021.

New Mexico tax authorities denied an application this spring by Rust Movie Productions for incentives worth as much as $1.6 million, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. A late July deadline for producers to appeal the decision is approaching.

Meanwhile, Baldwin is scheduled to go on trial starting next week on an involuntary manslaughter charge in Halyna Hutchins’ death. The lead actor and co-producer of “Rust” was pointing a gun at Hutchins when it went off, killing her and wounding director Joel Souza.

Melina Spadone, an attorney representing the production company, said the film production tax incentive was going to be used to finance a legal settlement between producers and Hutchins’ widower and son.

Advertisement

“The denial of the tax credit has disrupted those financial arrangements,” said Spadone, a New York- and Los Angeles-based senior counsel at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. She helped broker the 2022 settlement that rebooted the stalled production of “Rust” in Montana with some of the original cast and crew, including Baldwin and Souza. Filming wrapped up last year.

Terms of the settlement are confidential, but producers say finishing the film was meant to honor Hutchins’ artistic vision and generate money for her young son.

Court documents indicate that settlement payments are up to a year late, as attorneys for Hutchins’ widower determine “next steps” that include whether to resume wrongful death litigation or initiate new claims. Legal representatives for Matthew Hutchins did not respond to telephone and email messages seeking comment.

The prosecution of Baldwin and the film’s tax incentive application both have financial implications for New Mexico taxpayers. The Santa Fe district attorney’s office says it spent $625,000 on “Rust”-related prosecution through the end of April.

The state’s film incentives program is among the most generous in the nation, offering a direct rebate of between 25% and 40% on an array of expenditures to entice movie projects, employment and infrastructure investments. As a percentage of the state budget, only Georgia pays out more in incentives.

Advertisement

It includes a one-time option to assign the payment to a financial institution. That lets producers use the rebate to underwrite production ahead of time, often layering rights to the rebate and future movie income into production loans.

Among the beneficiaries of the rebate program are the 2011 movie “Cowboys and Aliens” and the TV series “Better Call Saul,” a spinoff of “Breaking Bad.” As for current productions, New Mexico is the backdrop for a new film starring Matthew McConaughey and America Ferrera about the rescue of students in a 2018 wildfire in the town of Paradise — the most destructive in California’s history.

Charlie Moore, a spokesperson for the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department, declined to comment specifically on the “Rust” application, citing concerns about confidential taxpayer information. Applications are reviewed for a long list of accounting and claim requirements.

During a recent 12-month period, 56 film incentive applications were approved and 43 were partially or fully denied, Moore said.

Documents obtained by AP show the New Mexico Film Office issued a memo in January to “Rust” that approved eligibility to apply for the tax incentive, in a process that involves accounting ledgers, vetting against outstanding debts and an on-screen closing credit to New Mexico as a filming location. Taxation officials have final say on whether expenses are eligible.

Advertisement

Spadone, the attorney for “Rust,” said the denial of the application is “surprising” and could disrupt confidence in the tax program with a chilling effect on rebate-backed loans that propel the local film industry.

Alton Walpole, a production manager at Santa Fe-based Mountainair Films who was not involved in “Rust,” said he faults the movie’s creators for seemingly cutting corners on safety but officials have an obligation to review its tax credit application based on legal and accounting principles only — or risk losing major projects to other states. Movies are inherently dangerous even without firearms on set, he noted.

“They’re going to say, ‘Wait, are we going to New Mexico? They could deny the rebate,’” Walpole said. “They’re watching every penny.”

“Popular opinion? I’d say don’t give them the rebate. But legally, I think they qualified for it all,” he said.

At least 18 states have enacted measures to implement or expand film tax incentives since 2021, while some have gone in the opposite direction and sought to limit the transferability and refundability of credit.

Advertisement

Under Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, New Mexico has raised annual spending caps and expanded the film tax credit amid a multibillion-dollar surplus linked to record oil and natural gas production. Film rebate payouts were $100 million in the fiscal year ending in June 2023 and are expected to rise to nearly $272 million by 2027, according to tax agency records and the Legislature’s budget and accountability office.

Democratic state Sen. George Muñoz has criticized the incentive program and asked whether taxpayers should be responsible for unforeseen expenses.

“If we’re going to do tax credits and there’s a problem on the film or the set, do they really qualify or do they disqualify themselves?” said Muñoz, chairman of the lead Senate budget writing committee.

“Rust” does not yet have a U.S. distributor as producers shop the newly completed movie at film festivals.

Subscribe to the CEO Daily newsletter to get global CEO perspectives on the biggest stories in business. Sign up for free.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Mexico

Kira Miner: Storms possible as gusty canyon winds die down

Published

on

Kira Miner: Storms possible as gusty canyon winds die down


We’re going to see a more active day in New Mexico after a dry Fourth of July. See the latest conditions at KOB.com/Weather.

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Gusty canyon winds will die down Friday afternoon but some strong to severe storms will start to pop up at that point.

Those storms are possible in southeastern New Mexico. Hail and damaging winds are the main concern.

Elsewhere, we will stay mostly dry and more seasonably warm. Santa Fe, Las Vegas, Tucumcari and Angel Fire could see a chance of rain and storms.

Advertisement

Another chance of rain and storms is possible next week.

Meteorologist Kira Miner shares all the details in her full forecast in the video above.

MORE:



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Mexico

Fewer beds and smaller earnings will hurt New Mexico hospitals as new state law goes into effect • Source New Mexico

Published

on

Fewer beds and smaller earnings will hurt New Mexico hospitals as new state law goes into effect • Source New Mexico


Smaller New Mexico hospitals will soon start missing out on government funding due to their fewer number of beds and smaller financial performance.

Senate Bill 17 signed into law earlier this year is set to go into effect this summer, redefining how the state calculates its portion of the Medicaid match for hospitals. The Healthcare Quality Delivery and Access Act establishes that 60% of the state’s match is based on “Medicaid service volume” or beds while 40% is based on performance, which is determined by the Health Care Authority based on reports from the hospitals.

“Ultimately, the bill aims to improve and increase access to healthcare services within the state. However, hospitals that do not have significant Medicaid service volume will not see much benefit,” reads a Legislative Finance Committee report.

According to the report, smaller hospitals with fewer beds care for fewer Medicaid patients, compared to bigger hospitals with a larger capacity to treat Medicaid patients.

Advertisement

“Given the structure of the act, hospitals most at risk of down-sizing may not see much benefit. Generally speaking, hospitals that are not fiscally-challenged will receive the bulk of the financial aid based on bed count,” the report reads. “Ultimately, the act does not target hospitals that are financially struggling, and instead helps larger hospitals which are generally already profitable.”

The LFC report uses Rehoboth McKinley Christian Hospital in Gallup as an example. The smaller hospital lost around $20 million in 2022 and will receive about $6.5 million from the new law.

Rehoboth has made headlines recently by being ordered to pay over $100 million in medical malpractice damages. The civil case was filed in 2019 following a patient’s botched hernia surgery left them with life-long complications.

Gallup hospital says it is ‘indigent’ ahead of court order to find more than $100M 

“This will not cover the full extent of the losses that Rehoboth faces and they will still have a negative net margin of more than $13 million,” the LFC report reads.

Advertisement

On the other hand, the larger Eastern New Mexico Medical Center reported a profit of about $80 million in 2022 and will receive over $37 million from the law. The report said if the Roswell hospital’s earnings remain on track, it could see over $117 million in combined profits and matched funding from the state.

Twelve New Mexico hospitals which qualify for funding under the new law reported net losses in 2022. Four of them will not receive enough state match funding to turn a profit. These include Rehoboth, Presbyterian Hospital in Albuquerque, Santa Fe Medical Center, and Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Albuquerque.

In Southern New Mexico, Artesia General Hospital reported a nearly $3 million loss in 2022 and is only projected to receive $5.6 million in match funding. The hospital will be profitable at $2.7 million, which is low compared to other larger hospitals in the region.

The report also noted that public funds made up about 70% of total hospital revenue in 2022 and this number is projected to reach 74% by 2025. These include funding from Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare Advantage and state subsidies.

“As the state continues to increase hospital subsidies, New Mexico is in a unique position to ensure hospitals use their revenue to improve patients’ outcomes and access to healthcare,” the report reads.

Advertisement

During a Legislative Health & Human Services Committee meeting this week, Rep. Tara Lujan (D-Santa Fe) said the report raised several “red flags” for the lawmakers.

“We don’t always have all the answers when we come up with legislation. But I knew that we worked together with institutions, with legislators, with the executive office particularly on this bill,” Lujan said. “It looks like we need to make some adjustments.”

When asked by Rep. Pamelya Herndon (D-Albuquerque) about solutions the legislature should consider, LFC Analyst Allegra Hernandez said lawmakers need to make sure there are measures in place to hold hospitals accountable, and to improve care.

She added that the goal should be to make sure New Mexico hospitals are in a financially “healthier place” in five years, and that she does not believe Senate Bill 17, as it is currently written, will do that.

Hernandez offered one solution – the rural emergency hospital designation through Medicare. This designation was established through the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 by Congress. The idea is that smaller, often rural hospitals would transition to become a rural emergency hospital and only offer emergency care to patients. This would limit access to broader services for patients seeking care.

Advertisement

“The rural emergency designation possible by (Medicare) is one potential answer, although it’s not necessarily the most popular answer as it would close hospital beds and only allow for emergency services,” Hernandez said.

Hospitals that choose to transition to this designation would receive another 5% in Medicare funds and a monthly facility payment of about $272,000. According to the LFC report, Guadalupe County Hospital is the only hospital in the state that has chosen to make this transition.

“The state and hospitals will likely need to continue to make difficult decisions about when it is necessary to close hospitals or sections of hospitals,” Hernandez said. “(The rural emergency designation) is an option, although, as I said, it is controversial,” Hernandez said.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Mexico

New Mexico environmental regulators say majority of Permian Basin operations are violating air quality – Oklahoma Energy Today

Published

on

New Mexico environmental regulators say majority of Permian Basin operations are violating air quality – Oklahoma Energy Today


New Mexico officials contend that at least 60% of the Permian Basin oil and gas operations they inspected  were in violation of EPA air quality standards.

The New Mexico Environment Department announced the results of a six-month inspection initiative done in partnership with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. It found 75 of the 124 facilities investigated had emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and could be subject to monetary penalties and other actions necessary to comply with requirements pursuant to federal Clean Air Act and state Air Quality Control Act.

Suspected criminal violations will be referred to New Mexico’s Environmental Crimes Task Force for further investigation and potential criminal prosecution of companies or individuals.

During this time, EPA and NMED analyzed data from satellites, regulatory reports and other sources to identify specific sites in the Permian Basin prior to conducting on-site inspections. In April 2024, 14 EPA inspectors and five NMED inspectors took part in joint investigations.

Advertisement

“The results of our federal and state oil and gas investigations are cause for alarm, with a meager 40% compliance rate,” Environment Department Cabinet Secretary James Kenney said. “With the impacts of climate change ravaging our state and air quality degrading, we have no choice but to increase sanctions on polluters until we see a commitment to change behavior.”

The on-site investigations took place at multiple companies’ operations in the Permian Basin. These companies include Chevron U.S.A. Inc, Earthstone Energy, Inc, Franklin Mountain Energy, Inc, Kaiser Francis Oil Company, Marathon, Permian Resources, Tap Rock and XTO Energy, Inc. Approximately 112 facilities are located in communities with environmental justice concerns due to exposure to higher levels of ozone pollution.

VOCs contribute to the formation of ozone, which causes health problems for New Mexicans, including asthma, lung infections, bronchitis and cancer. Air quality has degraded to unsafe levels in several New Mexican counties, including Lea and Eddy Counties in the Permian Basin. This could result in federal sanctions by the EPA on these counties that will require NMED to institute more restrictive regulations on New Mexico’s industry.

NMED currently regulates over 55,000 facilities with 30 permitting staff and six enforcement staff which results in an untenable workload. In fact, it would take NMED 9.6 years to inspect all permitted sources in New Mexico which is why the Department is currently seeking to raise permit fees and hire additional staff.

Given NMED’s lack of adequate permit fees to expand air quality staff, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the EPA will lead in resolving these enforcement matters. For such cases, at least half of the civil penalties collected in these matters by the DOJ and EPA are paid to the U.S. Treasury as opposed to the New Mexico general fund. In short, if NMED had appropriate resources to take on more cases itself, more money would be going back to the New Mexico legislature for the benefit of New Mexicans.

Advertisement

“Currently, six people are now managing over 114 active enforcement matters which take thousands of hours, so I welcome the resources provided to us by the EPA and DOJ to hold these polluters accountable,” Compliance and Enforcement Section Chief Cindy Hollenberg said.

 “As of today, 15% of New Mexico’s Permian Basin oil and gas production is under a federal settlement.”

“NMED has not raised its air quality permit fees in two decades, yet our permitting workload has increased a staggering 2,234 percent,” Director of the Environmental Protection Division Michelle Miano said.

“Our proposal to increase fees paid by the industry is our best chance to help the one in seven New Mexicans who suffer from respiratory ailments to breathe clean air.”

As part of NMED’s efforts to avoid federal sanctions resulting from degrading air quality, the Department has increased its oversight of the oil and gas industry. As a result, NMED has observed compliance rates of around 50%, meaning roughly one out of every two facilities inspected is in violation of federal and state rules. Settlements with the oil and gas industry include the following:

Advertisement
  • April 2024 – Ameredev II LLC agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle alleged violations of state air regulations. This is the largest civil penalty collected by the Department with an oil and gas company and the total civil penalty was deposited in the state’s general fund as the DOJ and EPA did not assist in this matter.
  • February 2024 – Apache Corporation agreed to pay $4 million in civil penalties and undertake projects expected to cost at least $5.5 million to ensure 422 of its oil and gas well pads in New Mexico and Texas comply with state and federal clean air regulations and offset past illegal emissions. Under the federal/state settlement, the U.S. Treasury received $2 million of the civil penalty and state’s general fund received $2 million.
  • December 2023 – Oxy USA, Inc. agreed to pay $1.2 million in civil penalties for operating its facility at major source levels without applying for and obtaining a Title V permit and for exceeding federal standards for oil and gas facilities.
  • August 2023 – Mewbourne Oil Company agreed to pay a $5.5 million penalty and to spend at least $4.6 million for projects to ensure 422 of its oil and gas battery pads in New Mexico and Texas comply with state and federal clean air regulations. Under the federal/state settlement, the U.S. Treasury received $2.75 million of the civil penalty and state’s general fund received $2.75 million.
  • March 2023 – Matador Production Company agreed to pay $1.15 million in civil penalties and undertake projects expected to cost at least $5.05 million to ensure compliance with both state and federal clean air regulations at all 239 of its New Mexico oil and gas well pads to resolve liability alleged in a civil complaint filed today under the Clean Air Act and state regulation Under the federal/state settlement, the U.S. Treasury received $650,000 of the civil penalty and state’s general fund received $500,000.

The EPA’s inspection reports are available online here: https://www.epa.gov/nm/enforcement-and-compliance-assurance-documents-new-mexico.

Source: press release



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending