Connect with us

New Mexico

Former Trump attorney John Eastman keeps low profile in NM

Published

on

Former Trump attorney John Eastman keeps low profile in NM


John Eastman, a lawyer for former President Donald Trump, seems throughout a video deposition to the Home choose committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol on the June 16 listening to on Capitol Hill in Washington. (Home Choose Committee/Related Press)

Copyright © 2022 Albuquerque Journal

SANTA FE – John Eastman, a lawyer who suggested former President Donald Trump in his failed bid to overturn the 2020 presidential election outcomes, is a registered New Mexico voter with a residence in one of many state’s most liberal enclaves.

State voting data present Eastman is a registered Republican who has forged ballots in each native and statewide New Mexico election since November 2018 – together with casting an Election Day poll on this 12 months’s June 7 main election.

His residence in Santa Fe is within the capital metropolis’s north aspect – not removed from the state Governor’s Mansion.

Advertisement

A person who answered the intercom at Eastman’s gated home on Thursday afternoon stated Eastman was not accessible.

Attorneys for Eastman additionally didn’t reply to Journal questions on his New Mexico residence and his position in Trump’s post-election try to stay president.

Eastman has been a central determine within the U.S. Home Choose Committee’s investigation into the riot on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 of final 12 months, which has revealed a number of New Mexico connections.

On Thursday, data launched by the committee confirmed former White Home Chief of Workers Mark Meadows had despatched to appearing Legal professional Basic Jeffrey Rosen a listing of voting-related complaints compiled by New Mexico Republican Social gathering Chairman Steve Pearce. Within the e-mail, Meadows instructed Rosen to ahead the allegations to his “staff” for assessment.

The allegations embody unsubstantiated claims of voting irregularities, equivalent to a number of alleged instances of lifeless individuals voting.

Advertisement

As for Eastman, his signed declaration to the congressional panel investigating the occasions of Jan. 6, 2021, was executed in New Mexico on Jan. 22 of this 12 months, in response to a replica of the doc.

Amongst different issues, Eastman drafted a authorized memo that sought to construct a case for ex-Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the outcomes when electoral votes have been to be licensed on Jan. 6, 2021.

Pence in the end rebuffed the strain and authorized outcomes that confirmed Democrat Joe Biden because the winner of the 2020 election.

Eastman, who was a legislation professor in California and beforehand clerked for Supreme Courtroom Justice Clarence Thomas, later sought a preemptive presidential pardon for his post-election actions from Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, however reportedly didn’t obtain one.

“I’ve determined I must be on the pardon record if that’s nonetheless within the works,” Eastman wrote in an e-mail that was offered as proof by the Jan. 6 committee.

Advertisement

Whereas he has been underneath nationwide scrutiny, Eastman seems to have stored a low political profile in New Mexico.

Alex Curtas, a spokesman for Secretary of State Maggie Toulosue Oliver, stated the workplace has not had any communication with him.

A spokesman for New Mexico’s Republican Social gathering declined to remark Thursday as as to if Eastman has performed any official or unofficial position within the state GOP in recent times.

The state GOP spokesman additionally wouldn’t touch upon whether or not Eastman was concerned in New Mexico’s 5 designated Republican presidential electors convening in December 2020 to forged votes for Trump, regardless of that Biden received New Mexico and its 5 electoral votes by a snug margin of 11 share factors – or greater than 99,000 votes.

New Mexico was one among seven states received by Biden wherein designated GOP presidential electors convened to forged votes for Trump after the 2020 election.

Advertisement

In contrast to New Mexico, nevertheless, the six different states wherein Republican electors convened to signal election certificates have been all hotly-contested “swing” states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Prosecutors in a number of of these states, together with New Mexico, have referred to federal legislation enforcement allegations that Republicans submitted a false doc meant to ship extra electoral votes to Trump.

As well as, Thomas Lane, who labored on behalf of the Trump marketing campaign in Arizona and New Mexico, was one among a number of individuals who have been hit with grand jury subpoenas this week as a part of a U.S. Justice Division probe into the Trump staff’s plan to overturn the 2020 election outcomes, in response to studies from the Washington Put up and New York Occasions.

Underneath New Mexico legislation, it’s a fourth-degree felony for designated electors to forged their poll for anybody apart from the presidential candidate who obtained nearly all of the votes forged within the state.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, the 5 New Mexico GOP electors added a caveat to their 2020 certification that they have been solely casting votes within the occasion that authorized challenges modified the end result of the presidential election.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Mexico

Alec Baldwin sues New Mexico prosecutors, investigators for civil rights violations

Published

on

Alec Baldwin sues New Mexico prosecutors, investigators for civil rights violations


play

Alec Baldwin, whose involuntary manslaughter case was dismissed last summer over suppressed evidence, is taking the fatal 2021 “Rust” set shooting back to the court room.

The actor on Thursday filed a civil lawsuit in Santa Fe County District Court alleging prosecutors violated his civil rights and defamed him. The defendants named in the filing included special prosecutor Kari Morrissey, personnel within the district attorney’s office for New Mexico’s First Judicial District and members of the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office.

Advertisement

The complaint detailed Baldwin’s claims that prosecutors and investigators “conspired to procure a groundless indictment against Baldwin” by not following the proper criminal process and also intentionally kept exculpatory evidence from the defense.

In a statement to USA TODAY, Morrissey said, “In October 2023 the prosecution team became aware that Mr. Baldwin intended to file a retaliatory civil lawsuit. We look forward to our day in court.”

USA TODAY has reached out to lawyers for Baldwin as well as the DA’s office for comment. The sheriff’s office declined to comment.

Last summer, Baldwin’s lawyer Alex Spiro forewarned the sheriff’s office and prosecutor in letters sent to the parties on July 12 to preserve evidence for “potential for future litigation,” according to copies obtained at the time by USA TODAY.

Advertisement

The actor and producer’s attorney advised Morrissey and Santa Fe County Sheriff Adan Mendoza to preserve all “devices, hard drives, emails, text messages, and other electronic communications” in addition to “documents, records, electronically stored information (‘ESI’), and other materials and data existing in any form whatsoever, that are actually or potentially relevant or relate in any way to the investigation(s) and/or prosecution(s) conducted by the State in connection with the death of Halyna Hutchins.”

The filing comes nearly six months after First Judicial District Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer abruptly dismissed the criminal case against Baldwin on the grounds that prosecutors and law enforcement withheld evidence that might be favorable to the actor’s defense. In October, she upheld her dismissal; though prosecutors appealed the judge’s decision in November, they withdrew the notice of appeal the following month.

Baldwin’s criminal charge stemmed from an Oct. 21, 2021, incident in which Baldwin’s prop gun, which he said he’d been told did not contain live ammunition, discharged during a rehearsal for the movie, killing 42-year-old cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza.

Advertisement

‘No verdict’ can ‘undo the trauma’ of criminal case against Alec Baldwin, lawsuit says

Baldwin’s legal complaint accused New Mexico investigators and prosecutors of being ” blinded by their desire to convict Alec Baldwin for all the wrong reasons, and at any cost, for the October 2021 accidental shooting of Halyna Hutchins.”

“Defendants sought at every turn to scapegoat Baldwin for the acts and omissions of others, regardless of the evidence or the law,” the filing continued.

Baldwin seeks a jury trial and an award of financial compensation for his “injuries suffered” as well as punitive damages against the defendants.

“Defendants must now be held accountable for their malicious and unlawful pursuit of Baldwin,” the lawsuit states. “Although no verdict in this civil case can undo the trauma the State’s threat of conviction and incarceration has inflicted, Alec Baldwin has filed this action to hold Defendants responsible for their appalling violations of the laws that governed their work.”

Advertisement

Why was Alec Baldwin’s involuntary manslaughter case dismissed?

The conclusion of Baldwin’s case with the state of New Mexico arrived more than two years after the on-set tragedy. Sommer dismissed the charge with prejudice, meaning prosecutors cannot refile the same claim.

Baldwin’s lawyers alleged in their filing that Santa Fe sheriffs and state prosecutors “concealed” evidence that could be linked to the source of the bullet that killed Hutchins. Prosecutors and sheriffs argued the evidence had no relevance or value to Baldwin’s case.

The judge reprimanded Morrissey and her team as “they have continued to fail to disclose critical evidence to the defendant.”

“The state’s willful withholding of this information was intentional and deliberate,” Sommer said. “If this conduct does not rise to the level of bad faith, it certainly comes so near to bad faith as to show signs of scorching.”

Advertisement

Testimony revealed withheld evidence in ‘Rust’ case

On July 12, Baldwin’s lawyers said the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office was in possession of live rounds they argued might be connected to the one that killed Hutchins but failed to list them as evidence in the “Rust” investigation file or disclose their existence to defense lawyers.

On July 11, testimony revealed Troy Teske, a friend of “Rust” armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed’s stepfather, had delivered Colt .45 live rounds to the sheriff’s office on March 6. Baldwin’s team claimed this was evidence that could have established a connection to Seth Kenney, the prop supplier for “Rust.”

Baldwin’s attorneys alleged the rounds were evidence that the bullet that killed Hutchins came from Kenney. Kenney has denied supplying live ammunition to the production and has not been charged in the case.

Baldwin’s team has blamed Gutierrez-Reed, who is serving 18 months in prison for involuntary manslaughter, and first assistant director Dave Halls for negligence that led to Hutchins’ death. Meanwhile, prosecutors argued Baldwin handled the gun irresponsibly, exhibited “bullyish behavior on set” and changed his story to cast blame on others.

Advertisement

Contributing: Andrew Hay, Reuters



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

New Mexico Supreme Court Strikes Down Local Abortion Restrictions

Published

on

New Mexico Supreme Court Strikes Down Local Abortion Restrictions


By Jasper Ward (Reuters) – The New Mexico Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against several local ordinances in the state that aim to restrict distribution of the abortion pill. In a unanimous opinion, the court said the ordinances invade the legislature’s authority to regulate reproductive care. “Our …



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

Snowy and slick Thursday expected in New Mexico

Published

on

Snowy and slick Thursday expected in New Mexico


We’re expecting widespread light snow Thursday in New Mexico. See the latest forecast at KOB.com/Weather.

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — The snow was falling and the roads were slick to start Thursday in parts of New Mexico and it’s likely that will continue throughout the day.

We’ll see on and off scattered snow showers, especially in parts of southern New Mexico. That will become more widespread with blowing snow possible.

A winter weather advisory is still in effect until Friday morning for 1-3 inches of snow expected and 5-6 inches of snow in higher-elevation areas. It encompasses most of southern New Mexico and stretches just above Interstate 40 near Tucumcari, heading toward the Texas state line.

Advertisement

High temperatures will be at least 10° below average for pretty much everyone.

Meteorologist Kira Miner shares all the details in her full forecast in the video above.

MORE:



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending