Nevada
Nevada’s “citizen Legislature” is anything but – The Nevada Independent
Nevada’s founding fathers, once they first drafted our state’s Structure, had what they believed to be a cleverly progressive thought: What if, as an alternative of getting an expert physique of legislators beholden to their very own pursuits, Nevada as an alternative elected residents who legislated part-time?
The considering behind this concept was both cynical or sensible — or maybe a little bit of each.
As our state’s founding fathers acknowledged, all people has pursuits, a truth which is simply as true for skilled full-time legislators, equivalent to congressional representatives, as it’s for cattle ranchers or miners. Skilled full-time legislators, if left to their very own units lengthy sufficient, will optimize their habits and the habits of their legislative physique to advance their pursuits and the pursuits of their legislative physique, finally on the expense of the remainder of us.
Certain, there may be a number of good, altruistic males (Nevada’s Structure was written in 1864 — the primary lady wouldn’t serve in a state legislature till Colorado elected three girls to the state’s Home of Representatives in 1894 following Colorado’s adoption of girls’s suffrage) who may be keen to serve, however, eventually, they’d be performed for fools and run out of workplace by legislators with far fewer scruples and much more thirst for energy. Given sufficient time, a physique {of professional} legislators is liable to show right into a constructing filled with crooks.
So, what if, as an alternative of getting skilled full-time legislators, our state as an alternative had part-time, poorly paid legislators with jobs and careers again dwelling that they had been strongly inspired to return to? Absolutely the worst case, or so the considering went, was that the legislators would every be beholden to their monetary pursuits — miners can be within the tank for mining, ranchers can be within the tank for ranching, and so forth — and the Legislature would consequently mirror the competing pursuits of the state it ruled. Even when the Legislature was full of thieves sooner or later down the highway, they’d be thieves serving their very own industrial pursuits as an alternative of their political pursuits as a result of their industrial pursuits had and all the time would pay higher and provides them extra energy — and if that’s the case, their industrial pursuits may profit somebody exterior of Carson Metropolis.
In different phrases, our state’s founding fathers tried to design a Legislature round scientist and science fiction author Jerry Pournelle’s oft-quoted Iron Regulation of Paperwork almost 150 years earlier than he ever put it to paper. That’s some first rate foresight, all issues thought of. Sadly, our industrial and labor markets have modified a bit within the intervening century and a half or so since our Structure was first telegrammed to Washington D.C.
For starters, taking 120 days from work (or extra if there’s a particular session) off — double the period of time the Nevada Legislature constitutionally permitted itself to fulfill within the nineteenth century — and anticipating to have a job whenever you come again is laughably unrealistic for many Nevadans, myself included. Even anticipating to discover a new job in the identical discipline may be troublesome. Given a selection between using somebody who can focus solely on a day job and somebody who’s consistently distracted by interim committees, particular periods, and different legislative ephemera, who would you rent?
(In the event you’re my supervisor and also you’re studying this week’s column, fake I didn’t ask.)
Moreover, Nevada’s economic system is reasonably totally different than it was in 1864. In response to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, mining employment within the state now barely accounts for 1 % of Nevada’s complete nonfarm employment. In response to the final U.S. Division of Agriculture Ag Census, in the meantime, Nevada’s farms and ranches make use of just a few thousand Nevadans — not sufficient to even rely as a rounding error in opposition to the million and a half Nevadans in our state’s labor pressure. The times when Nevadans largely labored seasonally or within the nineteenth century’s model of the gig economic system digging by varied short-lived mining claims ended a number of many years in the past. Gaming — our state’s largest employer — wasn’t even legalized till 1869, and it didn’t flip Nevada into the 24-hour state everyone knows (and notice we love the moment we go to someplace else and be taught the arduous manner that bars and grocery shops usually have closing instances) till someday after World Conflict II.
Now go work for a on line casino or a distribution middle — Nevada’s two main employment sectors, which, put collectively, make use of almost half of Nevada’s workforce — and attempt to take 120 days off. Even if you happen to handle or run a on line casino or warehouse, taking that form of time away from work isn’t a mere non-professional inconvenience. It’s profession suicide and straight harms your 24/7 enterprise’s backside line. On condition that, it shouldn’t be a shock that just one particular person within the Legislature not too long ago labored in one in all Nevada’s two main employment sectors — Assemblywoman Susie Martinez (D-Las Vegas), who labored within the hospitality business till she was elected government secretary-treasurer of the Nevada AFL-CIO.
As an alternative, our citizen Legislature, which is meant to be consultant of the inhabitants of Nevada it serves, is populated by these whose jobs and careers are, let’s consider, a bit extra versatile. There are some enterprise house owners, previous and current. There are quite a lot of attorneys. There are a number of retirees. Oh, and sure, a lot to each Nevada Coverage Analysis Institute’s and a fellow columnist’s annoyance — and the chagrin of a minimum of two members of the Nevada Supreme Court docket — there are a number of authorities staff serving within the Legislature as nicely.
I’m not going to chime in on whether or not authorities staff needs to be allowed to serve within the Legislature — that’s Michael Shaus’ beat. If he isn’t opining on the topic this week, I’ve little question he’ll have one thing to say on the topic throughout the subsequent week or two. He strikes me as the kind who would recognize my said dedication to comparative benefit anyway.
I’ll observe, nonetheless, three factors.
First, authorities staff serving within the Legislature is a bipartisan sample of habits. When state Sen. Heidi Gansert (R-Reno) first ran for her present seat through the 2016 election (disclosure: I ran in opposition to her), for instance, it was extensively speculated that her election can be a boon to her then-employer: UNR, for which she labored as an government director. She didn’t depart that job, by the way in which, till 2021. Two different Reno-area Republicans — Assemblywomen Jill Tolles and Lisa Krasner — nonetheless function adjunct professors for UNR and Truckee Meadows Neighborhood Faculty, respectively.
Second, like Sen. Gansert, some Democrats are beginning to make different profession plans for what’s showing to turn into an more and more inevitable ruling imposing Article 3, Part 1 of our state’s Structure. Senate Chief Nicole Cannizzaro (D-Las Vegas), for instance, is now a private damage lawyer, whereas Sen. Melanie Scheible (D-Las Vegas) not too long ago introduced she’s leaving her job — each used to work collectively within the Clark County district lawyer’s workplace. Each senators are performing as in the event that they imagine the Supreme Court docket is prone to, at a minimal, prohibit government-employed attorneys from serving within the Legislature. Relying on the scope of that ruling, it could additionally apply to Sen. James Ohrenschall (D-Las Vegas), who presently works as a deputy public defender — or it could broaden to incorporate each single present public worker serving within the Legislature. If dominated broadly, the prohibition will change the careers of a minimum of half a dozen members (or, if you happen to desire, a minimum of 10 %) of our Legislature, a method or one other.
Third and eventually, Nevada’s by no means had a lot respect for its Legislature. As Mark Twain vividly described in Roughing It, Nevada’s first territorial Legislature almost convened within the desert as a result of no one trusted in its capacity to pay for lodging; Abraham Curry took pity and lent a brick constructing in Carson Metropolis situated the place the state jail now stands. These days, as I identified a number of years in the past, now we have a Legislature that meets for at least 120 days however is simply paid for 60 each two years, and Nevada’s voters have taken each probability to tie the fingers of the Legislature by the generations. And now a number of the identical individuals who maintain calling for the ropes to get tighter surprise why the chief department, which meets and works as typically because it likes, has the facility to routinely force-march the Legislature by lots of of thousands and thousands of {dollars} in spending and tax giveaways — together with, most not too long ago, $250 million in American Rescue Plan funding for inexpensive housing — and situation emergency laws for 2 years.
Nevada, for higher or worse, has precisely the Legislature we voted for — I say “voted for” as a result of lots of the restrictions our Legislature operates beneath are the product of voter initiatives and referendums handed over the previous seven many years.
We’ve got a “citizen Legislature” that, in lots of respects, is unrepresentative of the residents it governs, and of which a minimum of a tenth of its members may not even be constitutionally eligible to serve. We’ve got a Legislature that’s paid simply sufficient to maintain the Carson Metropolis Nugget’s resort within the black full of members we assume flip rotten as quickly as they get greater than two working years of legislative expertise beneath their belt — nicely, until a legislator switches homes and will get six extra 120-day periods beneath the belt. We’ve got a Legislature that works solely as soon as each two years — nicely, until the governor needs to unfold the “credit score” (learn: blame) on a tax giveaway round or the phrase “interim” is magically sprinkled on to a committee.
In brief, whether or not authorities staff ought to get to serve within the Legislature is the least of our state’s issues with what’s purported to be a coequal department of presidency. I’m glad we’re lastly attending to that drawback almost 160 years after the prohibition was first put to paper. Hopefully we don’t have to attend one other 160 years to begin addressing the remainder of them.
David Colborne ran for workplace twice and served on the chief committees for his state and county Libertarian Get together chapters. He’s now an IT supervisor, a registered nonpartisan voter, the daddy of two sons, and a weekly opinion columnist for The Nevada Unbiased. You may observe him on Twitter @DavidColborne or electronic mail him at [email protected].
Nevada
One last look back: Top takeaways from Nevada's 2024 political year in review
LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — 2024 was a huge year for politics, especially here in swing-state Nevada.
Not only did a former president regain the White House for only the second time in history, but there were some unusual developments in state politics, as well.
Here’s our list of the top 13 political stories of 2024.
1. Donald Trump wins all the things.
You can erase the “former” from Trump’s title because as of noon on Jan. 20, he will be the president once again. Trump will be the first and only president since Grover Cleveland in 1892 to win a non-consecutive term.
Not only did Trump win Nevada, but he also won all the other swing states — Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Arizona — flipping six of them back to the GOP after they went for Democrat Joe Biden in 2020.
Trump beat his past performances in Nevada, too, beating Vice President Kamala Harris by 3.1 percentage points and more than 46,000 votes. Even more remarkably, Trump came within about 27,000 votes of beating Harris in Democrat-rich Clark County.
Nationally, Harris logged 6.2 million fewer votes than Biden in 2020, a deficit that allowed Trump to win the popular vote, albeit narrowly, 49.9% to 48.4%.
2. Republicans change their voting habits.
One of the factors behind Trump’s victory in the Silver State was the GOP changing its tune on voting. In past years, Republicans everywhere discouraged early and mail voting in favor of in-person voting at the polls on Election Day.
But this year, Republicans embraced early voting like never before. Nevada Republicans cast more than 247,000 ballots during early voting, far outpacing Democrats’ 150,000. And they kept pace with mail voting, too: Democrats posted 268,000 ballots by mail, while the GOP sent in 202,000. Election Day voting — the least popular method of voting — was about even.
That change, which for some Republicans was a long time coming, erased the advantage Democrats formerly enjoyed using mail and early voting and will change turnout efforts going forward.
3. Trump’s short coattails in Nevada.
But if Trump’s victory was solid, his ability to help other Republicans on the ticket was limited.
For example, Republican U.S. Senate candidate Sam Brown, who campaigned with Trump and JD Vance during their visits to the Silver State, lost his race to Democratic incumbent Jacky Rosen. Brown, in fact, earned 74,000 fewer votes than Trump did statewide.
And in Southern Nevada’s congressional districts, all three Republican challengers lost: Mark Robertson in Congressional District 1, Drew Johnson in Congressional District 3 and former North Las Vegas Mayor John Lee in Congressional District 4 all fell short by margins ranging from 2.7 to 8 percentage points.
In the state Legislature, Republicans gained a single seat in the Assembly, with Dr. Rebecca Edgeworth capturing Assembly District 35 after the Democratic incumbent chose not to seek re-election.
The numbers suggest Trump’s brand is unique and that other Republicans — even those who vocally support Trump — may not enjoy as much support from their party as he does.
4. Candidates talk…mostly.
One of Nevada’s advantages as a swing state is that locals get to hear directly from presidential candidates at big rallies and small gatherings alike. This year was no different.
Trump made several visits, including one at Sunset Park in the June heat. He met with Channel 13 in September at the Trump International Hotel to answer questions about how his plans would affect local voters.
WATCH: We asked Donald Trump questions on the issue that matters most to locals in Southern Nevada
We asked Donald Trump questions on the issue that matters most to locals in Southern Nevada
Vance didn’t do a one-on-one interview, but he did take questions from local reporters, including Channel 13, at the end of an October rally at the Treasure Island hotel-casino.
WATCH: JD Vance speaks on housing crisis at a Las Vegas rally
Vance: To fix housing, fix the border
Then Democratic vice presidential candidate Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz took time after a small October rally in downtown Henderson to speak to Channel 13 about the Harris economic agenda.
WATCH: We asked Tim Walz questions on the issues that matter most to Southern Nevadans
Gov. Tim Walz in Las Vegas valley for early voting events
Harris, for her part, made more visits to Southern Nevada than any of the other candidates for the White House, but did not do individual interviews with local media here. In August, she held a rally at the Thomas & Mack Center that attracted thousands.
5. Lombardo saves his veto pen.
Although Gov. Joe Lombardo recruited a number of candidates for legislative seats, he only succeeded in turning over two: Senate District 11 in Las Vegas, where Lori Rogich defeated Democratic state Sen. Dallas Harris, and Edgeworth’s victory in Assembly District 35.
But those victories were enough for him to keep his veto power, as the state Senate is now divided 13-8 and the Assembly 27-15, both in favor of Democrats. That means neither house has the two-thirds majority needed to override a gubernatorial veto or pass a tax bill over the objections of Republicans.
Meanwhile, with 15 veteran lawmakers not returning to Carson City, the Nevada Legislature lost more than a century of political experience.
6. Fake electors of 2020 become real electors of 2024.
After the 2020 election, as Democratic electors met and signed official certificates of election attesting to Joe Biden’s victory, a group of six Republican electors met in Carson City and signed certificates of their own, falsely claiming Donald Trump had won the election.
Those fake certificates were sent to all the places the state sent the real ones, including the secretary of the U.S. Senate. It was part of a nationwide scheme to cloud the results of the election and keep Trump in power, a plan that fizzled after the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol.
Attorney General Aaron Ford ultimately indicted the six on charges of filing a false instrument and uttering a forged document, both felonies. But he sought the indictment from a Clark County grand jury, when the alleged crimes had taken place in Carson City and Douglas County. As a result, a Clark County judge ruled she lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the case.
At year’s end, Ford was appealing that dismissal, and had filed new charges in Carson City just before the statute of limitations on uttering a forged document expired.
In the meantime, two of the electors who signed the fake certificates were once again selected to serve as real electors for Trump this year. So, despite being under indictment and facing new charges in Carson City, Nevada Republican Party Chairman Michael McDonald and Clark County Republican Party Chairman Jesse Law were able to sign real Electoral College certificates on Dec. 17.
WATCH: Four years later, Nevada’s ‘fake electors’ become real ones
Four years later, ‘fake electors’ become real ones
7. Changing of the guard at City Hall.
After 25 years, the rule of the Goodmans is over on Main Street. A term-limited Carolyn Goodman turned over the gavel to former Congresswoman Shelley Berkley in December.
Berkely won after defeating Councilwoman Victoria Seaman, who emerged from the June primary. The two debated frequently, agreeing on the need to settle the contentious Badlands litigation. (At year’s end, a settlement was nearing approval.)
Following Berkley’s victory — and that of newly elected Ward 5 Councilwoman Shondra Summers-Armstrong, a former Assembly member — the Las Vegas City Council is composed nearly entirely of women. The only man is Ward 1 Councilman Brian Knudsen.
8. Fiore faces justice.
Speaking of the City Council, former Councilwoman Michele Fiore was convicted of wire fraud charges stemming from money she raised for a police memorial, but which she actually used for personal expenses, including plastic surgery.
WATCH: Chief investigator Darcy Spears breaks down the allegations against Michele Fiore
Deception goes deep: Federal prosecutors add fraud charges against Michele Fiore
Fiore had long been under scrutiny by the FBI. In 2021, agents searched her home for evidence in the case.
Fiore, who considered running for mayor, had previously lost bids for Congress and for state treasurer. She was ultimately appointed as a justice of the peace in Nye County, a job she was suspended from with pay after charges were filed. After her conviction, she lost the pay from the Nye County post. She’s expected to be sentenced in March, although she’s appealing her conviction.
9. ‘Big Dan’ in big trouble.
Former Nevada congressional candidate Dan “Big Dan” Rodimer — who lost a bid for Congressional District 3 in 2020 — was charged with murder in Las Vegas after a fight at Resorts World in October 2023.
Rodimer, who turned himself in after an arrest warrant was issued, allegedly assaulted Christopher Tapp in a dispute about cocaine that was allegedly given to Rodimer’s stepdaughter. Tapp later died of his injuries. Rodimer has denied all the charges.
After his 2020 loss to Democratic Rep. Susie Lee, Rodimer sued to question the election results, although his case was later dismissed. He also lost a bid for Congress in a Texas special election in 2021.
10. Board of Regents spark controversy.
The Nevada System of Higher Education Board of Regents earned some negative publicity thanks to comments made by several members during the year.
First, Regent Patrick Boylan in March went out of his way to say that transgender athletes were “men masquerading as women” and insisted he would continue to speak out on the subject. He ignored calls to resign and remains on the board.
Second, in June, Regent Donald McMichael objected to an anti-discrimination policy by saying Jewish people were trying to “set themselves up in a higher position than everyone else in the United States” and that they should “get in line” because members of other groups had faced discrimination for longer periods.
Finally, in September, Regent Stephanie Goodman faced criticism for posting a doctored clip from the movie “Tropic Thunder” aimed at Harris’s presidential candidacy. Goodman quickly apologized for the post and said it was “irresponsible.”
But the incidents didn’t hurt the regents when it came to an issue on the November ballot: Question 1 would have removed the regents from the state constitution and put them into state statute, where the Legislature would have greater control over their management of the state’s colleges and universities. But Question 1 failed, 54.5% to 45.5%.
11. Voters adding to the constitution.
Speaking of constitutional amendments, voters began the process of inserting two items — one liberal, the other conservative — into the state’s governing document.
Question 7, which passed with 73% of the vote, would require voters to show an ID when voting in person or to write an ID number on their mail-in ballot. The measure comes after several attempts to enact voter ID in the Legislature were ignored by majority Democrats.
Question 6, which passed with 64 percent, would protect abortion rights in Nevada. Although voters already approved an abortion-rights statute in 1990 (a law that cannot be changed without another vote of the people), putting those rights into the constitution would make them harder to change in the future and insulate the state in the event a federal law is passed restricting abortion.
Both Questions 6 and 7 will have to be approved again by voters in 2026 in order to go into effect.
12. Clark County School District budget whiff draws criticism.
Although the Nevada Legislature provided the district with additional money during the 2023 session, school trustees still ended the year with a budget deficit, both at local schools and in its central office.
Officials blamed unexpected litigation and cybersecurity costs for the central office shortfall and said a miscalculation of teacher pay caused local schools to overspend. Trustees fired the district’s chief financial officer after the budget problems came to light and were able to find money to cover the expenses.
But that didn’t stop Senate Majority Leader Nicole Cannizzaro from incredulously grilling district officials for more than an hour at year’s end, demanding explanations and declaring “that just cannot happen again.”
Afterward, Cannizzaro said she was introducing an education accountability bill in the upcoming 2025 session of the Nevada Legislature.
13. The Culinary Union’s longest campaign ends.
On a spring evening in March 1999, the Culinary Workers Union Local 226 held a protest on the sidewalk in front of the yet-unopened Venetian hotel-casino. They objected to Las Vegas Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson’s refusal to negotiate with the union at his property.
Flash forward 25 years: The Venetian has expanded, adding the Palazzo. Adelson has died, and the hotel has a new owner.
But the Culinary Union isn’t outside anymore. Instead, union officials and workers were inside, celebrating the signing of the resort’s first contract with the union with acting U.S. Secretary of Labor Julie Su in September.
Ted Pappageorge, the union’s secretary-treasurer, said the long wait demonstrates the union’s tenacity.
“But it also says that, look, when there is something that is the right thing to do, the Culinary Union, we’re going to stick with workers until the very end,” he said. “We don’t care how long it takes, and how hard it is, and how much work there is involved. We’ll outlast folks, and we’ll do whatever it takes to make sure workers have their voice.”
At year’s end, with every Strip casino represented by the union, Culinary Workers were once again on the picket line, this time outside the Virgin hotel-casino.
If you have questions about any of our 2024 political takeaways — or want to share your opinion — submit your question or comment to Ask Steve.
Nevada
Nevada football to host Montana State in 2026
RENO, Nev. (KOLO) – Nevada football will be hosting FCS school Montana State in 2026.
The non-conference game will be on Sept. 12, 2026 in Reno.
The agreement to play completes Nevada’s 2026 non-conference schedule for that year. Nevada will host Western Kentucky in their 2026 home opener on Sept. 5, then travel to Los Angeles to play UCLA on Sept. 19, then to Murfreesboro, Tennessee to play Middle Tennessee on Sept. 26.
The meeting with Montana State will be the first between the two since 1996 when Nevada won 31-7 in Reno.
For Nevada head coach Jeff Choate, it would be his first time playing against the team where he served as head coach for four seasons. He led the Bobcats to a combined record of 19-9 over his two final seasons, making consecutive appearances in the FCS playoffs with a run to the semifinals in 2019.
This season, Montana State will play North Dakota State in the FCS Championship on Jan. 6.
Copyright 2024 KOLO. All rights reserved.
Nevada
5 new laws that take effect in 2025
As Nevadans ring in the new year with fireworks and festivities, new laws passed by the Legislature a year and a half prior will take effect, from a diaper tax exemption to a wage requirement for employees with disabilities.
Five laws — or provisions within them — officially go into effect Wednesday. Here’s a rundown of what each of them do:
1. Exempts sales tax on diapers
With the passage of ballot Question 5 in the 2024 election, Senate Bill 428 that proposed to exempt child and adult diapers from the state’s sales tax goes into effect in the new year.
The bill had passed unanimously in the 2023 legislative session, but it required passage from Nevada voters to take effect. The ballot question passed overwhelmingly, 69 percent to 32 percent.
Nevada families spend on average $1,000 on diapers per child each year and pay up to $84 in sales tax on those diapers, according to the ballot question guide released by the secretary of state’s office.
2. Implements wage requirements for employees with disabilities
Assembly Bill 259 phases out subminimum wage payments to people with intellectual or developmental disabilities by January 2028.
The law requires job providers to develop a plan to transition people earning less than the minimum wage to earning at least the state minimum wage, which is $12 an hour.
Effective Wednesday, providers of job and day training services cannot enter into a contract that pays an employee a wage below the state’s minimum.
Organizations that receive subminimum wage certificates will no longer be recognized by the state of Nevada, according to Assemblywoman Tracy Brown-May, the bill’s sponsor. Many organizations, however, already have gotten rid of such certificates, she said.
“It’s important we work to evolve how to support people with disabilities,” the Democratic assemblywoman from Las Vegas said. “Nobody should have the ability to exploit a person with a disability.”
The law also allows for the Department of Health and Human Services’ Aging and Disability Services Division to provide Medicaid benefit counseling services to people with developmental or intellectual disabilities so they can have access to benefits planning and can understand how many hours they can work while still maintaining their federal benefits under Medicaid, Brown-May said.
3. Prohibits state purchases of drones from entities deemed U.S. enemies
Senate Bill 11, relating to state agencies’ use of drones, prohibits a state agency or law enforcement agency from operating, purchasing or acquiring drones from entities that the U.S. Department of Defense determines to be enemies of the country, particularly those associated with the Chinese military.
The law required the Department of Public Safety to adopt regulations establishing a list of countries and businesses from which a state agency or law enforcement agency cannot purchase drone equipment, based on the William M. Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021.
After Wednesday, Nevada law enforcement and public agencies can only purchase drone equipment from a country, business or entity approved by the Defense Department.
The law also allows state agencies to use drones for fire code and inspection services, while prohibiting the public agency from collecting any photograph with the drone during the inspection.
4. Revises penalties for motorcyclists driving without proper license
Nevada law prohibits residents from driving a motorcycle on the highway unless they hold a valid motorcycle driver’s license or a motorcycle permit. If someone violates the law, they are guilty of a misdemeanor.
Senate Bill 423 requires courts to allow a person found in violation to complete a course of motorcycle safety in lieu of imposing a fine.
The law also changed eligibility requirements for instructors in the Education of Motorcycle Riders program, removing the requirement that they be a Nevada resident or a member of the military stationed in Nevada, as well as the requirement that they hold a motorcycle driver’s license for at least two years.
5. Establishes caregiving program for Medicaid recipients with dementia
Assembly Bill 208 established a program to provide structured family caregiving to certain recipients of Medicaid. It required the Department of Health and Human Services to apply for a home and community-based services waiver to include structured family caregiving for recipients of Medicaid suffering from dementia.
Nevada law already required the DHS to apply for a waiver to cover family home caregiving for recipients of Medicaid with physical disabilities, and Assembly Bill 208 expanded that to include Medicaid recipients with dementia.
It required the department to include an authorization for an applicant to choose his or her caregiver and the residence where they will receive caregiving. It also required the caregiver to become an employee of an agency to provide personal care services in the home or an intermediary service organization and receive a daily stipend through that employer.
Contact Jessica Hill at jehill@reviewjournal.com. Follow @jess_hillyeah on X.
-
Technology1 week ago
There’s a reason Metaphor: ReFantanzio’s battle music sounds as cool as it does
-
News1 week ago
France’s new premier selects Eric Lombard as finance minister
-
Business7 days ago
On a quest for global domination, Chinese EV makers are upending Thailand's auto industry
-
Health3 days ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology3 days ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
World1 week ago
Passenger plane crashes in Kazakhstan: Emergencies ministry
-
Politics1 week ago
It's official: Biden signs new law, designates bald eagle as 'national bird'
-
Politics5 days ago
'Politics is bad for business.' Why Disney's Bob Iger is trying to avoid hot buttons