Nevada
Nevada Supreme Court rules Green Party will not be on the state’s general election ballot
The Nevada Supreme Court has ruled 5-2 that Nevada Green Party candidate Jill Stein will not appear on the state’s presidential ballot because their petition failed to meet the minor party’s access requirements.
The Nevada Democratic Party filed a lawsuit in June against the Nevada Green Party for alleged invalid signatures.
The Green Party submitted 29,500 petition signatures so its candidates could be included on the ballot, which was roughly three times as many as needed. Nevada Democratic Party then sued, claiming some were signed too far in the past or seem altered, making them invalid.
The district court in Carson City denied the lawsuit in August. The Democrats amended the original lawsuit because the language used the improper affidavit. The case was then taken to the Nevada Supreme Court.
The state Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s ruling to allow the Green Party to stay on the Nevada general election ballot. According to the court documents, the petition contained the “circulator affidavit for initiative and referendum petitions, instead of the circulator affidavit for minor party ballot access” which is what the Nevada Democratic Party amended their lawsuit to say.
The problem: The Green Party submitted the petition that does not swear that they believe each person signing the petition is a registered voter in the county of their residence. In order to be added to the ballot, all minor parties must include this verification. The Green Party did not, so the Nevada Democratic Party added this to their lawsuit and the Nevada Supreme Court ruled to not let them on the ballot for not meeting all requirements.
“The circulator affidavit used by the Nevada Green Party omitted a legally required element: the attestation that each signatory was a registered voter in the county of his or her residence,” the document said.
However, Justices Douglas Herndon and Justice Kristina Pickering voted against the ruling, saying they believed the Nevada Secretary of State’s Office made an “egregious error” when they accidentally sent the Green Party an affidavit with the incorrect requirements.
The secretary of state’s office originally sent the Nevada Green Party the wrong sample petition, which did not include the affidavit requiring voter registration verification, according to the documents. With the wrong affidavit, the Green Party’s petition would not meet the requirements of a minor political party to be on the ballot.
The party still managed to submit the petition with the right affidavit the first time, by not using the same form the secretary of state’s office provided them. However, this petition did not include a blank space for signers to put their petition district, so the office sent it back and notified the Nevada Green Party that they needed the petition district, and emailed the party new instructions.
The employee who provided the Green Party with further guidance told them they had an “older version,” according to the dissenting judges’ opinion. The employee asked the Green Party to use this “newer” form — with the wrong affidavit — to collect signatures.
The dissenting justices claim the Nevada Green Party was “affirmatively directed” by the secretary of state’s office to use this incorrect form because the employee told them to use the wrong form.
Still, the secretary of state’s online guide for minor political parties to apply to be on the ballot states the petition needs the verification that signatures are from people who are actual registered voters. So even without the proper affidavit, the state supreme court ruled that they should’ve done their research into what was required for them to be on the ballot.
The court acknowledged the miscommunication of improper materials on the behalf of the secretary of state’s office, but classified the situation as an unfortunate event that could’ve been remedied with a more in-depth review.
“There is no evidence that the email was anything but an unfortunate mistake or that the (s)ecretary intended to mislead the Green Party,” the documents said.
“If the Green Party had reviewed the petition before using it, it would have discovered the incorrect circulator affidavit …This is an unfortunate oversight on the part of both the secretary of state’s office and the Green Party.”
Herndon and Pickering said they believed the secretary of state’s office’s mistake would be the result of a “tremendous injustice.”
The secretary of state’s office told the RGJ in an email that they took “no position” on whether the Green Party’s petition was legal.
“We respect the decision of the Justices, and are working with the counties to ensure the decision is carried out,” Cecilia Heston, spokesperson for the secretary of state’s office, said.
“Providing accurate information to the public is a priority for our office, and we will continue to review and improve all guides and documentation.”
The last time Green Party had any candidates on the Nevada ballot was in the 2008 presidential election, when Cynthia McKinney received about 1,400 votes compared with Democratic nominee Barack Obama’s 532,000.
Co-chair of the Nevada Green Party Margery Hanson told the RGJ due to the court events today, she “would not be voting this cycle.”
The Nevada Democratic Party did not respond to the RGJ’s request for comment.
It was more than just Mary Sickler‘s gown that was sparkling onstage.
As the current Miss Nevada USA took the stage at the Miss USA preliminaries Oct. 22, she decided to leave her chocolate brown wig backstage for the evening wear portion of the competition.
While Mary—who was diagnosed with alopecia universalis in December 2024—first stepped out in a red bikini and a brunette wig for the swimsuit round, she decided to embrace her baldness for her final look.
Indeed, she dazzled in a jewel-encrusted headpiece that matched her blue and silver form-fitting gown. She completed the look with sparkling teardrop earrings and a smoky makeup look.
Following the powerful onstage moment, the 22-year-old—who was crowned Miss Nevada USA in July—reflected on being the first woman with alopecia to compete in the national beauty pageant.
“This dream has been so many years in the making, and to finally step into this moment feels surreal,” she wrote on Instagram Oct. 22. “I never imagined I would walk that stage in this way, but I always hoped I would do it with confidence, authenticity, and grace.”
Submit an opinion column or letter to the editor at the RGJ
Learn how to submit an opinion column or letter to the editor at the RGJ
Recently, two headlines caught my eye. The first: Nevada plans to roll out the Hollywood red carpet with public tax breaks for private studio companies — Sony Pictures and Warner Bros. The other: The University of Nevada, Reno plans a new 400-unit public-private apartment complex near campus for faculty, staff and students.
Both proposals utilize tax-credit financing to incentivize businesses to meet Nevada’s needs.
To my mind, if it becomes a question of what is our most pressing priority, I would pick an affordable supply of homes for our Nevada towns over the lure of Tinseltown coming to our southern desert.
When I think of the future of a Nevada film industry, I don’t see it becoming a blockbuster. Gone is the glamour and dream-like entity that once was embodied by Hollywood. A successful sequel to the magic of movie-making success seems unlikely — whether it’s located in Studio City, California, or Summerlin, Nevada.
The curtain appears have come down on that once glorious period. Like the end of the the Old South’s saga in Hollywood’s “Gone with the Wind,” a bygone era of mystique and dominance is likely no more.
The slow death of cinemas
Hollywood was once the symbol of creative genius. Movies served as the vehicle for global storytelling. It was the place where human’s dreams were brought to life. Films in local movie theaters were once the crown jewel of the film industry. It’s hardly the case these days.
For me, it’s partly because the two cinemas where Shin and I used to spend Friday nights — dinner and a movie — are now shuttered. Reno’s downtown Riverside Theatre and Lake Tahoe’s Heavenly Cinema have both closed amid declining ticket sales, increased competition from streaming services and changing consumer habits, such as favoring movies at home. More than 1,000 U.S. theater screens have closed since 2019, and total box-office revenue remains well below pre-pandemic levels.
Hollywood’s demise has a lot to do with what has appeared on movie screens in recent times. Instead of creative, bigger-than-life sagas of the human spirit in all its varied forms — in war, peace, romance and even crime — today’s Hollywood films typically rely upon remakes, sequels and prequels of past glories, computer-generated comic book super heroes extravaganzas or horror flicks designed to frighten, or simply disgust. Call me old-fashioned. The fact is, this once avid filmgoer has become just plain disinterested. Many of my younger friends seem much the same, for their own reasons.
Even famed Oscar-winning Hollywood film director Martin Scorsese has soured on all the comic book super-hero types now frequently served-up by today’s bottom-line studios. In an interview with GQ Magazine, Scorsese says, “Superhero movies are “not cinema,” comparing them to theme parks rather than the art form of human emotion and psychological experience. He argues that they prioritize spectacle and commercial interests over artistic expression and that Hollywood’s financial dominance by these “franchise pictures” is pushing other types of films to the margins. The Oscar-winning director went on to say: “Theaters have become amusement parks.”
The last time I checked — some of those theme parks are closing as well.
Is a Nevada film industry a good investment?
In a recent Wall Street Journal story titled “L.A.’s Entertainment Economy Is Looking Like a Disaster Movie,” the newspaper reports: “The entertainment industry is in a downward spiral… Work is evaporating, businesses are closing, longtime residents are leaving and the heart of L.A.’s creative middle class is hanging on by a thread. Hollywood’s downturn has rippled through the region’s economy.”
Which is why some Nevadans believe luring struggling Hollywood film studios here could be a wise pursuit. As reported by The Nevada Independent, a PAC funded with $1 million by a coalition of building trades unions is preparing “to spend big to shape public and legislative opinion to pave the way for film tax legislation” if a special session is convened by the governor.
Incentives to motivate companies to relocate to Nevada have always been a tax tool in the state’s arsenal. A low-tax, limited-regulatory business environment has benefitted Nevada’s growth spurts throughout its history.
Transferable tax credits were a device to bring the Teslas of the world to Nevada. Acting like coupons that could be sold to other companies to help offset a company’s initial investment, they’ve worked effectively to attract major new industries and sports franchises to Nevada — even though libertarian organizations like the Nevada Policy Research Institute have consistently opposed having government “pick winners and losers.” Pick we did in the case of Tesla, and overall, I believe Nevada ended up a winner with the electric-vehicle company that helped usher the state into the era of advanced manufacturing.
I’m not so sure bringing Hollywood studios here would yield the same return on investment. Beyond the turmoil in California’s film industry, other states — such as New York and Georgia, with far larger economies and infrastructure, and nearby New Mexico and Utah — are already far ahead of Nevada in attracting films to be made outside of Hollywood.
While I support the livelihoods of construction workers — whose well-being is tied to the state’s overall health and the ancillary benefits of growth and development — I believe there are more pressing needs and far better opportunities for Nevada than becoming another annex for an on-the-ropes Hollywood.
Why not incentivize housing instead of Hollywood?
Two times, movie studio executives have tried to pass legislation to expand Nevada’s film tax credit program. They hope a Special Session, expected to be called soon, may be their third-time charm.
Should the public, through its elected representatives from both political parties, fail to get on board with the latest “central casting” call from Hollywood executives, I’d recommend another way to get creative.
Like UNR just did.
The national housing crisis manifests in many forms, but most impactful is the severe shortage of affordable housing units. State and local municipalities are increasingly taking action to build and preserve affordable housing. Localities can deploy a wide range of tools and investments: tax abatements and exemptions, tax increment financing, payments in lieu of taxes, public land contributions, low-interest rate loans, voucher deployment and more.
Instead of $1.4 billion over the next 15 years in tax credits for a film studio complex and related businesses, why not use those potential transferable tax credits as an economic development tool to help finance and provide a source of equity to fund construction of housing or rehabilitation for affordable housing for key segments of the economy, such as teachers, medical professionals and seniors. Large industrial partners like Tesla could be incentivized or make good on the “housing and infrastructure” promise Elon Musk made to the region and his own employees.
Better we do things for Nevadans who are already here than for those we hope to migrate here from Los Angeles.
Legendary Hollywood filmmaker Frank Capra (“It’s a Wonderful Life”), once said, “Only the daring should make films. Only the morally courageous are worthy of speaking to their fellow men for two hours, and in the dark”.
Nevada could use a little of that daring and courage. Hollywood may not be the answer. But the housing needs of many of our own families certainly are.
Your thoughts? At: tahoeboy68@gmail.com.
“Memo from the Middle” is an opinion column written by RGJ columnist Pat Hickey, a member of the Nevada Legislature from 1996 to 2016.
Nevada
New FEC reports reveal Nevada House members’ strength — and challengers who pose a threat – The Nevada Independent
Campaign finance documents submitted to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) last week are beginning to reveal what the 2026 midterms will look like in Nevada’s four congressional districts — including the incumbents’ strength, the challengers to watch and the sources of funding voters might want to know about.
What stands out in the October quarterly filings is the sheer number of self-funders taking on Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV) and Rep. Steven Horsford (D-NV) in the 3rd and 4th Districts, respectively. Though these seats look swingy on paper, Republicans have not won either of them in a decade. A nominee who can pour hundreds of thousands of dollars of their own money into ousting the incumbents would take some of the investment pressure off the party apparatus. Several candidates fit the bill.
Of course, for self-funded candidates, high numbers do not indicate broad support. One way to better gauge early interest in candidates is the amount of unitemized donations they report. The FEC requires candidates to itemize donors’ contributions when they exceed $200, so unitemized contributions can be a good proxy for small-dollar donations.
Here’s what we noticed in each district.
Lee has lots of cash — and will need it
Lee posted strong fundraising numbers this quarter, bringing in $612,000 and ending the quarter with $1.7 million total, the most she’s ever had on hand at this point in the election cycle. Her team said that the median contribution was just $11, which signals widespread grassroots support, as does her volume of unitemized donations.
Lee’s fundraising encompasses thousands of dollars from House colleagues, especially members of the Democratic Women’s Caucus, and $5,000 from the leadership PAC of Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear (D), a possible 2028 presidential contender.
Andreessen Horowitz venture capitalists Ben Horowitz and Chris Dixon contributed as well. Horowitz surprised many when he endorsed President Donald Trump last summer before giving to Vice President Kamala Harris. Dixon this year attended a White House crypto summit and announced a major investment in Kalshi, a prediction market of the sort Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) has criticized. Lee also received $1,000 from travel guide writer Rick Steves.
As one of just 13 Democrats to win a Trump-voting district last year, Lee is considered the state’s most vulnerable Democrat and will likely need money for an expensive campaign. She has attracted the widest field of Republican challengers, and the spendiest.
It includes numerous self-funders, such as neurosurgeon Dr. Aury Nagy, who loaned his campaign $1 million on the last day of the third quarter. That amount was dwarfed by the $3 million video game composer Marty O’Donnell gave his own campaign back in the spring, but O’Donnell only added a little more this quarter, making a $7,000 contribution. Former Las Vegas mayoral candidate Tera Anderson and businessman Joshua Walters are investing thousands in their campaigns as well.
Those aren’t Lee’s only notable opponents. Since she was elected in 2018, Lee has not faced a primary challenger who reported raising any money. Cardiologist Dr. James Lally (D) changed that this month by raising $90,000, including $32,000 in unitemized donations.
His website slams Lee’s “bipartisan approach,” accusing her of voting with MAGA and taking money from casino bosses and lobbyists for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Lee received $5,000 from the committee this quarter and thousands more from gaming industry figures including former Las Vegas Mayor Jan Jones Blackhurst (D), Shawn Cardinal, Diana Bennett and Yvette Landau. Lally counts political commentator and former congressional candidate Krystal Ball (D-VA) among his donors.
Horsford’s fundraising dips, but he’s still got big money
Horsford is the only Nevada House Democrat who has seen his fundraising fall and his cash on hand drop compared to this point last cycle — he raised a little more than half a million dollars and has $573,000 on hand. The difference might have to do with the fact Horsford is no longer the Congressional Black Caucus chair. But his fundraising this year is still strong, just closer to what it was before.
More than half of his donations came from PACs, including thousands of dollars from House colleagues and Beshear’s PAC. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D), another possible presidential hopeful, donated $7,000. Horsford also received $5,000 from BET Media Group CEO Scott Mills, $2,500 from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, $1,000 from Clark County Commissioner Tick Segerblom (D), and money from Horowitz and Dixon.
Horsford’s biggest individual spend was a $40,000 list purchase from BCom; such lists can help candidates reach the voters they want to. He spent tens of thousands more paying Sena Kozar Strategies and the Strathdee Group.
The congressman has drawn two Republican challengers who have poured six figures of their own money into their campaigns, small-business owners David Flippo and Cody Whipple. They now trail Horsford in fundraising, but both have gotten support from elected officials, though from different wings of the GOP.
Flippo brought in $191,000 this quarter and has $375,000 on hand, much of which he loaned himself. His website advertises a campaign rally with Nevada GOP Chairman Michael McDonald and former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) in Las Vegas this Saturday. He also has endorsements from Reps. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), Trent Kelly (R-MS) and former Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC). Jim Chilton, an Arizona rancher who spoke about illegal immigration at the Republican National Convention last year, also donated to his campaign. Flippo has been spending on radio ads on The Steve Sanchez Show and donating to groups such as the Las Vegas Young Republicans, the Republican Jewish Coalition and the Texas-based Latinos for America First.
Whipple raised $55,000 this quarter and has $185,000 after loaning himself $100,000 last quarter. His site boasts endorsements from Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT), former Rep. Cresent Hardy (R-NV) and retired Esmeralda County Sheriff Ken Elgan. The latter two gave to his campaign this quarter. Elgan’s wife, Cindy, a Republican elections clerk who Trump supporters targeted after 2020, gave to the campaign as well, as did the Agricultural Retailers Association PAC and the National Chicken Council PAC.
Titus brings in the medium bucks
Rep. Dina Titus (D-NV) is not known for posting gangbuster numbers in non-election years, and the $172,000 she raised this quarter in the 1st District is respectable, if not impressive. What’s more striking is her $610,000 cash on hand, which is the most she’s ever had by October of an off-year.
The bulk of her money, more than $81,000, came from other political committees. Much like her Democratic colleagues, she received money from other House members and from Beshear’s PAC.
Titus has already attracted several challengers, but the standout is state Sen. Carrie Buck (R-Henderson), whose fundraising fell just short of the congresswoman’s with $146,000 raised.
More than a fifth of that sum, $32,000, came from unitemized donations, indicating Buck could see wide support from voters. Former congressional candidate Flemming Larson (R), who lost the 2024 GOP primary in this district, donated the maximum $7,000 allowed to Buck’s campaign. Several real estate and education professionals gave as well.
Amodei sitting pretty
In the safely Republican 2nd District, quarterly fundraising reports show little for Rep. Mark Amodei (R-NV) to worry about.
He raised $175,000 this quarter and is sitting on a bigger war chest than he’s ever had at this point in the election cycle, $521,000. The two other 2nd District candidates who filed statements of candidacy, Kathy Durham (D) and Heath Fulkerson (R), did not submit quarterly reports.
Amodei received about a third of his money this quarter from PACs, including ones associated with the National Rifle Association to the Environmental Defense Action Fund. One of his donors is Jonathan Evans, president and CEO of Lithium Americas. Amodei has supported the company’s Thacker Pass project as it renegotiated a deal with the federal government this fall.
The congressman’s spending includes $1,000 transfers from his campaign committee to committees for Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-IA) and Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA), both of whom announced Senate bids. Amodei also ordered fundraiser supplies in late July from two cigar companies. His campaign has spent money on at least one of the two every year since 2015.
A few things to consider before committing a museum heist
Intel’s tick-tock isn’t coming back, and everything else I just learned
Hegseth says US conducted another strike in Eastern Pacific targeting alleged narco-traffickers
Grassley releases memo showing DOJ ‘unleashed unchecked government power’ on Trump associates
Cancer survival appears to double with common vaccine, researchers say
Why Marjorie Taylor Greene was ‘kicked out’ of the Freedom Caucus according to Rep. Buck
Colorado Rockies game no. 116 thread: Zac Gallen vs José Ureña
See it: Tesla crashes into Columbus convention center at 70 mph
Fox News Politics: Georgia the whole day through
Death of missing Oregon girl found in stream ruled homicide
Grassley releases memo showing DOJ ‘unleashed unchecked government power’ on Trump associates
Trump says all trade talks with Canada are terminated over Reagan ad
Trump backs away from sending federal agents to San Francisco | CBC News
Video: Inside Our Reporter’s Collection of Guantánamo Portraits
AOC, Sanders rake in millions as far-left cements grip on Democrat Party
-
World3 days agoIsrael continues deadly Gaza truce breaches as US seeks to strengthen deal
-
News2 days agoVideo: Federal Agents Detain Man During New York City Raid
-
Technology3 days agoAI girlfriend apps leak millions of private chats
-
News3 days agoTrump news at a glance: president can send national guard to Portland, for now
-
Business3 days agoUnionized baristas want Olympics to drop Starbucks as its ‘official coffee partner’
-
News2 days agoBooks about race and gender to be returned to school libraries on some military bases
-
Politics3 days agoTrump admin on pace to shatter deportation record by end of first year: ‘Just the beginning’
-
Science3 days agoPeanut allergies in children drop following advice to feed the allergen to babies, study finds