News
Amid Trump, Musk blowup, canceling SpaceX contracts could cripple DoD launch program – Breaking Defense
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, accompanied by U.S. President Donald Trump (R), and his son X Musk, speaks during an executive order signing in the Oval Office at the White House on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON — If President Donald Trump were to follow through on his threat today to cancel all government contracts with billionaire Elon Musk, it would likely derail Pentagon and Intelligence Community space operations, and specifically in the near term cripple the Space Force’s National Security Space Launch (NSSL) program, due to the US government’s reliance on SpaceX rockets.
Trump and Musk, formerly a close advisor, engaged in a bitter and escalating war of words this afternoon on social media following Musk’s sharp criticism on X of Trump’s giant budget reconciliation package self-dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill.”
“The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!” Trump posted on his own social media site in response to Musk’s criticisms and Musk’s suggestion he might consider backing the creation of a third political party.
Musk fired back, “Go ahead and make my day!” in a post on X, and followed up with another saying, “In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.”
It’s unclear, on both sides, how much of the social media spat is bluster destined to blow over — not to mention the myriad contractual and legal complexities that would be involved in actually disentangling the US government from business with Musk in a number of areas.
But any decommissioning of SpaceX’s Crew Dragon spacecraft would immediately be felt by NASA, which uses the craft to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station.
Beyond that, any potential freezing of contracts for SpaceX equipment and operations also would have far-reaching impact on the DoD and IC. NSSL is the primary acquisition program for space launches by the Space Force and IC, namely the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) that builds the nation’s spy satellites. And at the moment, SpaceX’s Falcon series are the Space Force’s go-to rockets for putting the most critical payloads into orbit.
Killing SpaceX’s DoD contracts wouldn’t quite ground the Space Force, but it likely would significantly slow things down. Back in 2020, the Space Force contracted SpaceX and the Lockheed Martin-Boeing joint venture United Launch Alliance (ULA) as the only two providers able to compete for NSSL missions under the Phase 2 program, covering launches from fiscal year 2022 to 2027.
For the earlier missions in that time frame, ULA was offering its Delta IV and Atlas 5 for launches of medium- and heavy-lift missions, but for later years the company intended to use its new Vulcan rocket — which unlike the Delta and Atlas is using US-made engines rather than Russian ones banned by Congress as of the end of 2022.
However, ULA has had years of setbacks with Vulcan’s development. The rocket was technically certified by the Space Force for NSSL launches only in March. However, a senior Space Force officer on May 14 told the House Armed Services Committee that the company still has “open work” to finish before actually taking on NSSL missions.
“Risk reduction plans have been agreed to and signed between the Space Force and ULA to reduce known risks to flyable ‘Low-Medium’ prior to the first NSSL Vulcan launch,” said Maj. Gen. Stephen Purdy, acting assistant secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration.
The first Vulcan mission is USSF-106, slated to go up in July.
The Space Force recently switched two earlier planned missions to launch new GPS satellites from Vulcan to SpaceX’s Falcon 9 to help remediate a backlog caused by the delay in getting Vulcan certified. The latest of the two, the launch of GPS III Space Vehicle-08, successfully lifted off on May 30 with a record turn-around time of only three months.
The Space Force further has issued contracts for critical launches under the follow-on NSSL Phase 3 Lane 2 program, for launches between fiscal 2027 and 2032, to ULA, SpaceX and newcomer Blue Origin with its New Glenn rocket.
Under the new awards, SpaceX is “anticipated” to undertake 28 NSSL Phase 3 Lane 2 missions, about 60 percent of the launches contracted from FY25-FY29, for a sum of around $5.9 billion, and ULA 19 missions, about 40 percent, Space Systems Command (SSC) announced April 4. Blue Origin, “is projected to be awarded seven Phase 3 Lane 2 missions starting in Order Year 2,” of FY26, SSC added.
The future NSSL program also envisions that a number of small- and medium-launch providers will compete for less critical missions going to lower orbits, under the Lane 1 acquisition track. Lane 1 launch providers face fewer requirements to be certified by the Space Force than those qualified to launch under NSSL Phase 3 Lane 2. So far, the Space Force has given SpaceX, ULA , Blue Origin, Rocket Lab and Stoke Space the thumbs up to participate.
But the bottom line is that SpaceX has been, and appeared up to now to be for the near future, the dominant US space launch provider. The company was responsible for 98 of the total 109 US military, civil and commercial launches in 2023 and 138 out of 145 US launches in 2024, according to Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist with the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who maintains the world’s largest open-source database on space launches.
That’s before evening getting into the potentially thornier issue of military use of SpaceX’s Starlink satellite communications and the reported use of Starshield buses for the NRO’s new constellation of hundreds of satellites in low Earth orbit.
News
Graham Platner makes it official in Maine, submitting paperwork to leave Senate race
Now-former Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner speaks at his primary election night event on June 9 in Blue Hill, Maine. Platner officially dropped out of the race July 10 following rape allegations from a former romantic partner that he denies.
CJ Gunther/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
CJ Gunther/Getty Images
Graham Platner, Maine’s Democratic nominee for Senate, is officially out of the race.
The Maine Secretary of State said Platner filed the necessary paperwork to withdraw his candidacy two days after he announced he planned to do so following an accusation of rape by a former romantic partner. Platner denies the allegation.
The Maine Democratic Party has until July 27 to pick Platner’s replacement.
In his withdrawal notice, Platner said “people are desperate for change” and that’s why they voted “for a new kind of politics” by making him the Democratic nominee. He expressed gratitude for those who supported his campaign and said that he will continue to fight for “the movement we have built together and the future we believe in.”
He ended his notice with a strong statement aligned with the progressive platform.
“F*ck ICE. Free Palestine. Up the Hearts.”
Platner announced his plan to withdraw from the race in an 11-minute video he posted to social media on July 8. He said he had no choice but to suspend his campaign, citing it was no longer viable financially.
“We are going to lose our ability to fundraise. We are going to lose our ability to access voter data. We are going to lose all of the things that any campaign needs on the basic level simply to function,” he said.
Platner added that dropping out was not an admission of guilt. Rather, the decision, he said, is to keep the progressive movement in Maine alive to defeat Republican Sen. Susan Collins in November. Platner blamed the “political establishment” for his downfall and argued the goal was to force him out of the race.
“We built a campaign. We engaged in electoral politics. We motivated people. We banded together. We did it the way that we were told we are supposed to make change and we won. And now they are not going to let us have it. Not if it’s me,” he said.
Many powerful Democrats and progressives, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent, urged Platner to step down.
Platner has had to answer to a waterfall of scandals since he launched his Senate bid. Despite those, he ran away with the nomination in the June 9 primary, securing more than 150,000 votes — more than any other Democratic Senate candidate in Maine’s history.
Platner ran on a progressive platform centered on affordability, universal health care and getting corporate money and influence out of politics. During his campaign, he generated an undeniable amount of enthusiasm, something the Maine Democratic Party will have to harness if it hopes to beat Collins in the general election.
Multiple people have already launched campaigns to replace Platner, including former state Sen. Troy Jackson and former CDC official Nirav Shah, who both ran unsuccessful bids for governor.
Platner called on the replacement process to reflect “the Mainers who on June 9 turned out and showed that they are desperate for a different kind of politics.”
“We were asking for real democracy, and we did it the right way. And we won. But now the ball is in the court of the Democratic establishment,” he added.
The Maine Democratic Party said that it intends to hold a new nominating convention where around 600 delegates will select Platner’s successor. Candidates have until July 15 to declare their intent to seek the nomination and gather signatures from at least 8 of Maine’s 16 counties. Party leadership added they will make the nomination process public and transparent.
News
Waymo called the cops on teen riders, raising privacy concerns
A Waymo robotaxi drives in San Francisco’s North Beach neighborhood this week.
Heather Diehl/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Heather Diehl/Getty Images
Police in San Mateo, Calif., posted Monday on social media that they had apprehended a pair of teenagers from a Waymo driverless robotaxi after the company alerted authorities to suspected criminal activity. It’s the latest incident involving video surveillance of passengers and others by autonomous vehicles — raising questions about the limits of privacy in such vehicles.

The Facebook post by the San Mateo County Police said: “Parents do you know where your teens are? @waymo does!”
The 15-year-olds were allegedly drinking alcohol and shooting toy guns from the car, according to the police. They said Waymo’s systems detected behavior that then triggered a safety response, after which the company disabled the vehicle and contacted police.
Waymo’s cars, equipped with an array of cameras, microphones and other sensors to monitor passengers and other nearby vehicles, are becoming more common in cities across the United States. Experts say the detention of the two teens in San Mateo highlights a potential — but not inevitable — trade-off between privacy and convenience. It also questions the extent to which companies similar to Waymo are required to hand over private data, including audio and video of passengers, in situations where a crime is suspected.
NPR reached out to Waymo, which is owned by Alphabet, the parent company of Google, for comment on the details of the San Mateo incident and how the company responded, but did not hear back. But on its website, the company says that as many as 29 cameras in its autonomous cars provide an all-around view and “are designed with high dynamic range and thermal stability, to see in both daylight and low-light conditions, and tackle more complex environments.”
“There already exist laws that govern duty to report or even duty to protect” for carriers such as Waymo, according to Alessandro Acquisti, a professor of information technology at the MIT Sloan School of Management. “The privacy problems arise when and if driverless carrier companies used such laws or ethical obligations as a pretext for blanket, indiscriminate accumulation of identifiable data for unspecified future purposes.”
That includes not just monitoring people inside the cars, but outside too. Take, for example, a hit-and-run investigation last year in Los Angeles. Media reported that the police inquiry was aided by video captured by a Waymo taxi that had a clear view of the crime. Critics suggested at the time that authorities were using the company’s vehicles as a mobile surveillance platform. And during 2025 protests in Los Angeles against Immigration and Customs Enforcement crackdowns, demonstrators vandalized Waymos, apparently angry that video recorded by the vehicles could be used by police, although there is no evidence that happened.
In a transparency report, Google says it received nearly 290,000 requests from governments worldwide in the first six months of 2025 for disclosure of user information across all its platforms, including Waymo. The company says that in more than 80% of the requests in those six months, some information was disclosed. “Google carefully reviews each request to make sure it satisfies applicable laws. If a request asks for too much information, we try to narrow it, and in some cases we object to producing any information at all,” the company says.
In an email to NPR, San Mateo Police Department spokesperson Jeanine Luna said that detaining the teens in the Waymo on Monday was “wholly appropriate” under the circumstances. “We received the call of a ‘firearm’ being shot from a moving vehicle,” she said. “Furthermore, the occupants were described as being possibly ‘intoxicated.’” she said.
“Being that the vehicle was disabled (the occupants had every right to exit the vehicle before police arrival, but they did not), a high-risk traffic stop was conducted to ensure the safety of all involved,” Luna added. “They were not arrested and were released to their parents, however, potential charges are still pending dependent on what the video from inside the vehicle shows.”
Autonomous taxis represent an ethical gray area
Robotaxis began to roll out across the U.S. in December 2018, when Waymo launched in Phoenix. These services have been used for less than a decade — so the norms surrounding them aren’t settled, experts agree.
The Facebook post may make Waymo passengers wonder what triggers a police intervention, says Irina Raicu, director of the Internet Ethics program at Santa Clara University. She has used Waymo’s driverless taxis and says ethically, the privacy issues surrounding them sit in a gray area. “There’s something about being in a car without another person that makes you think it’s private.”
“With all these recording devices, we don’t see them, [and] they’re not these obvious things being stuck in our faces,” Raicu adds.
That brings up a key issue: informed consent, Acquisti says.
“It is not clear the extent to which passengers … are reminded that when they step into the car, that they are being monitored, and most likely they are not told in its entirety how the data will be used,” he says.
Bruce Schneier, a cybersecurity and privacy expert and professor at the Munk School at the University of Toronto, believes that Waymo does have a compelling interest in protecting its vehicles. He compares monitoring a robotaxi via cameras to a human taxi driver keeping an eye on passengers in the rearview mirror.
“Maybe the driverless car comes back … and it has all of its cushions slashed, and it’s like, ‘Who the hell did that? Let’s go and look at the tape,’” Schneier suggests. “You can’t have sex in the back of a taxi, right? Someone would say, ‘Stop it.’”
He concludes that some supervision makes sense. In an Uber rideshare, he notes, “most of the time there’s a camera recording the back seat.” (Uber says on its website that it allows drivers to install such cameras for the purpose of “fulfilling transportation services.”)

Waymo robotaxis, while a fairly common sight in the San Francisco Bay Area, are still a novelty in much of the country. And many people are hesitant to ride in one, according to a Pew Research Center poll published this month. The survey found that only 5% of Americans had ever ridden in a driverless car. Meanwhile, 71% of those polled said they would feel uncomfortable in one, with only 7% saying they would be “extremely or very comfortable” riding in one.
For that reason, experts who spoke with NPR said they were optimistic that it’s not too late to shift gears on privacy norms and policies surrounding these vehicles.
Acquisti doesn’t see why privacy measures can’t be built into driverless vehicles.
“I would immediately challenge the notion that people have to be monitored,” he says, noting that privacy-preserving technologies exist and can be installed.
“Driverless cars are coming, but they don’t have to come in this particular incarnation,” Raicu says. “They’re still being designed and redesigned. It’s early days.”
News
Trump fires last members of election commission, inciting fears of midterm ‘chaos’
Donald Trump has terminated the remaining members of the independent, federal commission that assists election administration officials nationwide just a few months before the midterm elections, multiple outlets reported Thursday.
The remaining three commissioners of the four-member bipartisan commission were forced out on Thursday in different ways. The one Republican appointee resigned and the other two, Democratic appointees were notified of their terminations via email from the White House presidential personnel office.
“On behalf of President Donald J Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as Commissioner of the Election Assistance Commission is terminated, effective immediately. Thank you for your service,” the email, seen by Reuters, said.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Election Assistance Commission serves as a “national clearinghouse of information on election administration”, accredits testing laboratories and certifies voting systems, and maintains the national mail-voter registration form developed by the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, according to the commission’s website. The terminations follow Trump and top administration officials’ advocacy to change vote-by-mail requirements and investigations into the 2020 election outcome, which Trump lost to Democrat Joe Biden.
“It is irresponsible and dangerous that this Administration remains dead set on causing chaos for our election officials across this country,” Arizona secretary of state Adrian Fontes said in a Thursday statement. “This move undermines the integrity of nonpartisan election administration.”
The 2002 law that established the commission, the Help America Vote Act, states the president can appoint replacements to the commission.
It is unclear how Trump will move ahead with the commission.
Reuters contributed reporting
-
World4 minutes ago
Meta appeals landmark jury verdict that found it to blame for social media addiction for young users
-
Politics14 minutes ago
Trump Promotes ‘Freedom Fuel’ Gas Stations as Gas Prices Rise Again
-
Science26 minutes ago
China Launches Reusable Rocket in Race With SpaceX
-
Lifestyle44 minutes ago
Iris van Herpen Reaches for the Stars
-
Technology56 minutes agoNo, Flock isn’t threatening people for debating surveillance
-
World59 minutes agoIsrael signals readiness for another Iran strike as Trump declares ceasefire over
-
Politics1 hour agoKelley Paul: America’s Founders were the ‘first civil rights heroes’
-
Health1 hour agoYour resting heart rate could reveal more about your health than you think, doctors say