Connect with us

West

More than 500,000 Californians demand voting overhaul, back ‘straightforward’ ID law

Published

on

More than 500,000 Californians demand voting overhaul, back ‘straightforward’ ID law

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: More than 500,000 California voters have signed a petition to amend the state’s constitution to enforce voter ID laws for all elections, leaders of a coalition called Californians for Voter ID told Fox News Digital. 

“We had a dog that voted in the last couple elections in Costa Mesa,” Republican California state Sen. Tony Strickland told Fox News Digital in a Wednesday phone interview about California’s persistent voter integrity concerns. “We don’t clean up our voter rolls. There are so many times where people move, college kids go out of state, or people move and they don’t clean up the voter rolls. And we mail out to everybody, and so you have a lot of live ballots with ballot harvesting.”

“Our initiative will now clean up the voter rolls throughout the state,” he added. 

Strickland, who represents a district that includes portions of Orange and Los Angeles counties along the Southern California coast, is helping lead the charge to collect more than one million petition signatures from California voters in order to force the issue on the ballot for the 2026 election. The signature collection kicked off Oct. 1, meaning the group collected support from more than half-a-million voters in a one-month span. 

Advertisement

CALIFORNIA REPUBLICANS LAUNCH VOTER ID BALLOT PUSH, NEED 875K SIGNATURES BY DEADLINE

More than 500,000 California voters have signed a petition to amend the state’s constitution to enforce voter ID laws for all elections. (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The Californians for Voter ID initiative specifically would amend California’s constitution and require voters to present government-issued IDs before casting a ballot in all future elections in the state. 

California voters would be required to present a government-issued ID before voting in-person, or provide the last four-digits of a government ID if voting by mail. Election officials, under the initiative, would be required to verify a voter’s citizenship to ensure only legal residents register to vote or receive ballots. 

Democrats historically have opposed voter ID laws over claims it disenfranchises minority voters, while conservatives argue it will ensure only legal residents are able to cast ballots and further bolster voter integrity. Thirty-six states have voter ID laws already on the books, though such laws vary and have some exceptions.  

Advertisement

Californians for Voter ID leaders, however, say the issue is not a partisan one, but an effort to protect democracy for all Americans. 

The lead strategist for the effort, Ryan Erwin, told Fox News Digital that recent polling shows 70% of Californians across the political spectrum support elections requiring IDs to vote, while underscoring the outpouring of support that has led to more than 500,000 signatures already secured. 

“We are on pace to qualify for the ballot faster than any measure in the history of California,” Erwin said. “Voter ID is a commonsense way to build trust in the election process by requiring election officials to use government data to verify citizenship and voter eligibility, while also requiring identification for every vote counted.” 

OBAMA ENDORSES NEWSOM CALIFORNIA REDISTRICTING PROP 50

“Californians of all political stripes are eager to improve trust in the system by eliminating abuse and errors while protecting every eligible vote,” he continued. “The volunteer effort is overperforming, we have signatures from all 58 counties, and are on pace to qualify well ahead of our goal.”

Advertisement

The group needs a total of 874,641 in order to land the initiative on the 2026 ballot in the Golden State, but is aiming to secure 1.2 million signatures to ensure the support is certified by county officials who will go through the data before it is permitted to land on the ballot. Organizers have until March to secure the needed signatures before potentially getting on the ballot — with Strickland reporting he’s confident they will get the needed support. 

State Sen. Tony Strickland, a Republican from California, is confident they will get the needed support to get the voting initiative on the ballot. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“You have to be a citizen in order to register to vote,” Strickland said of the nuts and bolts of the amendment itself, calling it “very straightforward.” 

“You have seven forms of documentation, you get to choose what form of documentation that you use in terms of the last four digits of whatever the documentation is,” he said. “When you go to the polls, you show your ID, and if you mail in your ballot, you show that proof of the documentation of the last four digits that you choose.” 

“The other part of this initiative is we have a mandatory audit (to) all 58 counties of their election rules after every election,” he added. 

Advertisement

Strickland is no stranger to voter ID efforts in the deep blue state, including championing a voter ID ballot initiative in Huntington Beach, California, in 2024, when he served on the city council. Voters approved the amendment forcing voters to show their ID when casting ballots in local elections, but the California Court of Appeals struck down the law in November. 

If the statewide voter ID effort is approved by voters on the ballot in 2026, local lawmakers will be compelled to comply with voter ID laws set forth in the initiative. 

TRUMP SAYS HE WILL REQUIRE VOTER ID WITH EXECUTIVE ORDER

Strickland said the massive amount of support the initiative already has received is on par with a 1978 initiative, Proposition 13, “when the legislature was out of touch with the people, the people rose up” and passed the ballot measure that fundamentally changed how property taxes were assessed and limited in California. 

Strickland also compared it to the successful recall of former Democratic Gov. Gray Davis in 2003 — California’s first and only successful recall of a governor. Strickland was the first legislator to endorse Davis’ recall as energy and economic woes rocked the state. 

Advertisement

If the California voter ID effort is approved by voters on the ballot in 2026, local lawmakers will be compelled to comply with voter ID laws set forth in the initiative. (Gary Leonard/Getty Images)

“Speaking around the state of California, I would equate what’s going on today with voter ID and voter integrity to those two movements in California,” he said. 

The California state senator also praised California Republican Assemblyman Carl DeMaio and his group, Reform California, for their ongoing efforts championing voter ID laws in the state, describing DeMaio’s work as “relentless.” Strickland and DeMaio are joint authors of the voter ID push and have teamed up to meet with voters at various events to rally support, including a recent event in Santa Barbara, where the people couldn’t get through the door because it was so packed, he said. 

VOTER ID LAW IN TEXAS WINS AT APPEALS COURT AFTER BIDEN ADMIN LAWSUIT

California’s voting laws have fallen under the Trump administration’s critical eye just this week, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt posting to X Tuesday that the Golden State has the “WORST laws for securing elections in the entire nation.” 

Advertisement

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that California is facing a “very serious legal and criminal review” over claims the state’s special election to redraw congressional district lines was mired in corruption. Voters passed the measure to redistrict on Tuesday, with Gov. Gavin Newsom celebrating 

“California doesn’t require voters to show photo ID before casting a ballot – despite nearly 90% of Americans supporting photo ID laws,” Leavitt posted in a lengthy message detailing issues she sees with the state’s election process. “California uses universal mail-in-balloting, which we know is extremely vulnerable to fraud and abuse. In the 2024 election alone, California mailed nearly 10 million mail-in ballots that were never returned.”

The Heritage Foundation keeps a database compiling cases of known voter fraud — namely cases that have led to criminal convictions — and found California has at least 68 cases of voter fraud since 2001. The examples include individuals who fraudulently used absentee ballots for duplicate votes, non-resident voting and fraudulent voter registration. 

The database shows other states, such as Illinois and Texas, have more instances of confirmed voting fraud, at more than 100 cases each, while other states such as Nebraska have seen only at least three instances of confirmed voter fraud in recent years. 

Press secretary Karoline Leavitt takes a question from a reporter during the daily briefing at the White House on Nov. 4, 2025. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Newsom has countered the claims, arguing California’s elections are fair and secure while slamming Trump over his remarks. 

“He also announced today, right when polls were opening, that this election was rigged. Of course, those are familiar words. It’s exactly what Donald Trump said after Jan. 6, that day of love, where he tried to light democracy on fire, he tried to wreck this country,” Newsom said Tuesday after polling showed the state passed Proposition 50 to redistrict. 

“I hope it’s dawning on people the sobriety of this moment,” Newsom continued. “What’s at stake. Tonight, as I said, is an extraordinary moment for our party, but again, it’s an extraordinary moment affirming those principles. Our Founding Fathers did not live and die to see the kind of vandalism to this republic and our democracy that Donald Trump is trying to perpetuate.” 

A ballot initiative championed by Gov. Gavin Newsom to redistrict California’s congressional lines passed in a special election Nov. 4, 2025. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

For Strickland, he championed that the voter ID initiative will move ahead with the help of grassroots efforts and a little “homework.” 

Advertisement

“I’m going to speak to two groups today, and I give them homework assignments, just saying, ‘Please take those packets. We’re planning to go get 50 signatures, go get 100.’ And I use a sports analogy. I say, in baseball, if you hit two times out of every 10, you’re barely making the major leagues. You’re probably going down the minor leagues. But if you get three hits every 10, you’re an all-star. And I’m asking everybody to get that extra hit in life,” Strickland said. 

Read the full article from Here

Wyoming

Man killed in Nov. 28 pickup–pedestrian collision

Published

on

Man killed in Nov. 28 pickup–pedestrian collision


LARAMIE, Wyo. — A Wyoming man was killed by a pickup truck Nov. 28 after he walked onto the highway in Albany County near Laramie.

According to a report from the Wyoming Highway Patrol, 35-year-old Matthew Walker, wrapped in a brown blanket, walked into the road along U.S. Highway 30 near mile marker 326.

At shortly past 7 p.m., Walker was struck by a northbound Chevrolet 2500, which hit him with the front passenger quarter-panel.

The WHP reports that the driver initially believed they had struck a deer or other animal until he turned around and saw the blanket in the road. There are no possible contributing factors listed in the WHP incident report.

Advertisement

This marks the 11th pedestrian fatality in Wyoming this year.


This story contains preliminary information as provided by the Wyoming Highway Patrol. The agency advises that information may be subject to change.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

West

Alaska hits back at insurers accused of using ‘woke’ underwriting to reshape energy policy as ANWR reopens

Published

on

Alaska hits back at insurers accused of using ‘woke’ underwriting to reshape energy policy as ANWR reopens

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: The state of Alaska sent warning letters Monday to four major insurance firms, saying their climate-related policies may violate state insurance and consumer-protection laws by creating an uneven playing field for energy projects.

The news comes as Alaska’s congressional delegation led a successful effort to disapprove – or overturn – Biden-era restrictions placed on energy exploration in Section 1002 of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) on Thursday, effectively lifting those restrictions. 

Alaska Attorney General Stephen Cox and Commerce Commissioner Julie Sande warned AIG, Zurich, Chubb and The Hartford that some of their policies may conflict with state rules designed to protect Alaska’s status as a leading investment destination, particularly for energy production.

“Alaska’s insurance code is built on a central premise: underwriting decisions must rest on risk, and that means no discrimination based on extra-legal political, environmental, or long-range policy commitments,” the beginning of each of the four letters read.

Advertisement

CLIMATE LAWFARE CAMPAIGN DEALT BLOW IN SOUTH CAROLINA

The Alaska pipeline parallels the famous ‘ice-road-trucker’ Dalton Hwy in Alaska. (Lance King/Getty Images)

“And where the insurance code doesn’t reach, our consumer-protection statute prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices, which could include misrepresentations of compliance with Alaska law in contractual dealings.”

Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy told Fox News Digital his administration is taking a close look at “friction points” that may make it harder to build things in the Last Frontier.

“With respect to how our projects get insured, we’re concerned that some of the underwriting standards being applied today—particularly broad Arctic exclusions and long-range climate-driven policy restrictions—may be shutting out responsible Alaska projects for reasons that have nothing to do with actual risk,” he said.

Advertisement

TRUMP ADMIN IMPLODES LITERAL BIDEN ROADBLOCK WITH POTENTIAL TO UNLEASH MAJOR MINING WINDFALL

Dunleavy said the letters are foremost meant to start a dialogue with the four insurers so that he and officials in Juneau can better understand their policies and underwriting criteria – and clear up any “misconceptions about our state.”

In the state’s letter to AIG CEO Peter Zaffino, Alaskan officials wrote of “substantial concerns” about the insurer’s treatment of the state’s oil and gas sector, amid documentation it published committing to “phasing out” underwriting of existing operation insurance risks and halting new investments for clients deriving 30% or more revenue from coal or oil-sands by 2030.

The company also cited a 2050 net-zero greenhouse gas emissions standard for its policies in a separate document footnoted in the letter.

TRUMP ADMIN ANNOUNCES BIG STEP TOWARD ‘ENERGY DOMINANCE’ WITH MASSIVE ALASKA LNG PROJECT ALLIANCE

Advertisement

“AIG’s net-zero underwriting goal necessarily will result in emissions requirements that do not appear to be tied to short-term actuarial risk within the policy period,” Juneau’s letter read.

“AIG’s goal appears to be an effort to reshape a lawful sector according to AIG’s long-term environmental commitments.”

In a sentiment expressed to The Hartford, Juneau officials wrote that, “when an insurer adopts blanket exclusions based on geography or on long-range public policy objectives untethered to risk, those exclusions function as de-facto prohibitions on investment.”

TOP INSURANCE COMPANY IN HOT SEAT AS BLISTERING NEW AD CAMPAIGN EXPOSES ‘RADICAL WOKE IDEOLOGY’

In its letter to Zurich’s North America executive Kristof Terryn, Alaska also cited a reported “net-zero” goal of 2050, writing that “whatever the merits of those commitments, Alaska law requires insurers to treat insureds with like risk characteristics alike and to base underwriting decisions on risk—not on corporate climate-policy preferences or extra-legal standards developed to “[l]imit… average temperature increases” in line with the Paris Agreement,” citing a company document.

Advertisement

It warned that Zurich in the future may run afoul of the Alaska Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, but stressed “we do not reach that conclusion here, but it is part of our broader review.”

Alaska took issue with Chubb’s March 2025 announcement that it would no longer underwrite oil and gas projects in International Union for the Conservation of Nature management categories one through four – which it noted included ANWR.

AG LEADING SUIT AGAINST NY EFFORT TO PUNISH ENERGY FIRMS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE WARNS OF MAJOR REPERCUSSIONS

Cox and Sande wrote that the underwriting prohibition on ANWR is one that “uniquely affects Alaska” and that “Alaska has invested years of planning and permitting work to open responsible opportunity in the ANWR… no other state faces this kind of prohibition.”

Consumers’ Research executive director Will Hild told Fox News Digital that the situation reveals “woke capitalism masquerading as risk management.”

Advertisement

“[I]t threatens jobs, consumers, and President Trump’s energy agenda. Consumers’ Research applauds the Alaska delegation for standing up to these woke insurers and defending Alaskan consumers from political ideology.”

As a response to potential criticisms from a macro level, Juneau officials said Alaska is home to modern transmission systems, well-trained operators and “robust” environmental protection rules.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

ANWR is shown. (Fox News/On The Record)

In prior statements, Chubb CEO Evan Greenberg assured observers that his company will continue supporting energy development through its underwriting.

Advertisement

“We’re continuing to insure oil and gas because the world needs energy,” Greenberg said. “We don’t yet have great alternatives to gas and oil. And it would be irresponsible of us not to continue to insure those in a responsible way.” 

ChubbFacts, a noted fact-check site supporting the insurance giant’s arguments in cases such as this, pushed back on claims of “wokeness” and other critiques, saying that it insured some of President Donald Trump’s legal cases, as well as oil companies, manufacturers, construction firms, and American farmers as a leading agricultural insurer—regardless of politics.”

“We’ve taken heat from climate activists for continuing to insure energy companies, but our focus never shifts,” the company wrote on ChubbFacts.com.

Fox News Digital reached out to media contact addresses for The Hartford, AIG, Zurich and Chubb for additional comment.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Man critically injured after being shot by South San Francisco police

Published

on

Man critically injured after being shot by South San Francisco police



A man is in critical condition after being shot by police responding to a disturbance in South San Francisco early Monday morning.

Around 5:10 a.m., officers received a 911 call about a disturbance involving a person who was reportedly under the influence of drugs. Police said the person had armed himself with a knife and was making suicidal statements.

Officers then responded to a home on the 900 block of Sandra Court, near Susie Way. When police arrived, they spoke with the reporting party outside the home when a man in his 20s exited the residence.

Advertisement

The officers attempted to speak with the man to de-escalate the situation. Police said the man initially complied and approached the officers but suddenly removed a knife that was concealed on his person and brandished it.

Officers used less lethal force in the form of a stun gun and ordered the man to drop the knife.

“The taser was ineffective, and the subject ignored further commands before advancing at officers,” police said in a statement.

The officers said they gave additional commands for the man to drop the knife, but the man charged towards officers with the knife raised. Police said two officers then discharged their weapons and struck the man.

After the shooting, life-saving measures were performed on the man. Firefighters transported the man to a local trauma center.

Advertisement

In a statement Monday morning, police said the man is in critical condition. No injuries to officers or members of the community were reported.

Additional details about the incident were not immediately available.

Police said the department’s Detective Bureau is investigating the man’s actions, while the San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office is investigating the police shooting.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending