Connect with us

Montana

FWP to repeal rule requiring liaison with nonprofits

Published

on

FWP to repeal rule requiring liaison with nonprofits


Laura Lundquist

(Missoula Current) Partly due to an ongoing lawsuit, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks wants to eliminate a decades-old rule requiring the department to consult with citizen organizations on its projects and responsibilities.

On Friday, FWP will take verbal comment on the elimination of a rule that requires the department to maintain liaison with citizen organizations active in wildlife and sportsmen’s issues.

Written in 1976, the rule says staff will participate formally or informally with various groups, including “Montana Wildlife Federation, Montana Wilderness Association, Audubon Society, Ducks Unlimited, Trout Unlimited, Sierra Club, Environmental Information Center, Northern Rockies Action Group, various state and local outfitter and guide organizations, local unaffiliated rod and gun clubs, or any other citizen organization.”

Advertisement

The Feb. 8 release announcing Friday’s meeting said FWP wants to repeal the rule, because “it is archaic and no longer reflects how the commission or the department engages with the public in decision-making processes.”

At first blush, the repeal might appear to be an attempt to reduce public participation in the department’s decisions.

Jim Vashro, a retired FWP regional fisheries manager, said FWP manages a public trust – wildlife – for all citizens, so it needs all the communication tools it can get. He sees the rule as important to maintaining the exchange of ideas with the various groups and building understanding and support for proposals from both sides.

“It’s critical that (FWP staff) engage with the people who use the resource,” Vashro said. “Communication is always key. The department would probably still do communication (if the rule is repealed), but it’s nice having that ARM rule just in case something happens.”

During the past few years, there have been several examples of proposals that the department had to walk back because it didn’t ask for input from sportsmen first. For example, the commission had to reverse a 2022 decision to put a daily limit on the number of kokanee caught in Georgetown Lake after fishermen protested.

Advertisement

Another example was when hunters pushed back against a December 2021 proposal to reduce by half the number of special either-sex elk permits and restrict them to public land in eight elk districts in eastern Montana that are over population objectives. During the commission meeting, more than 40 hunters from various groups spoke against the proposal, which many suspected had a connection to the United Property Owners of Montana, a small but deep-pocketed private-property-rights group.

Some concerns about limited public information and input were validated when, during an October 2023 court settlement of a lawsuit alleging that the FWP commission lacked transparency, FWP attorneys acknowledged that the commission’s secretive practices constituted constitutional violations of public participation and the public’s right to know.

The final decree required the commission to attend training on open-meeting laws, post all public comments on proposals, and use only public-issued email addresses and telephones for commission business.

“It just shows that people care about how decisions are made. Without the rule, (FWP) could merely listen to one group, just make a decision, and there’d be no recourse for the other groups,” Vashro said. “Now I agree that, more and more, they use online resources, and in many cases, that’s a good way to meet. But it doesn’t promote good conversation – it’s kind of a one-sided deal.”

But some sportsmen’s groups are not so sure that the rule is still needed. Some say that the rule doesn’t keep FWP from listening to just one group. And now, there are so many more organizations and diverse demands in Montana than what existed in 1976 that interacting with them all is almost impossible. But one group in particular has complained that FWP violated the rule because it hasn’t interacted with them: the United Property Owners of Montana.

Advertisement

Following the previously mentioned December 2021 meeting where resident hunters helped defeat the elk tag proposal, the United Property Owners of Montana sued FWP and the FWP commission in April 2022. They alleged that FWP has failed to keep the elk population under control and that the FWP commission made an unlawful decision in February 2022 when it voted to maintain a limit on the number of hunting permits in nine eastern Montana hunting districts, all of which surround the Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument.

In June 2022, a coalition of Montana hunting and conservation groups filed to intervene on behalf of Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks against the United Property Owners of Montana. The coalition includes Missoula’s Hellgate Hunters and Anglers, Helena Hunters and Anglers, Montana Backcountry Hunters & Anglers, Montana Bowhunters Association, Montana Wildlife Federation, Public Land Water Access Association and Skyline Sportsmen.

The case has moved slowly since then, although oral arguments are finally slated for the end of the month in Fergus County. One of the claims that the United Property Owners of Montana has made in the lawsuit is that FWP staff have never attended one of their meetings, therefore it violated the rule.

If the rule is repealed, that claim becomes moot. And it avoids the risk that other groups would challenge the department with similar claims. Some sportsmen see value in that and dismiss concerns about any loss of communication, saying that groups can still reach out to department staff or submit public comments, as long as FWP adheres to Montana’s public participation laws. Only time would tell if the department or Montanans would notice a difference.

FWP did not respond to requests for comment. FWP paralegal Regina Reynolds has been scheduled to conduct the online hearing on Friday at 10 a.m.  FWP will accept written comments until March 25.

Advertisement

Contact reporter Laura Lundquist at lundquist@missoulacurrent.com.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

University of Montana to host career fair at new dining center

Published

on

University of Montana to host career fair at new dining center


MISSOULA — The University of Montana will be hosting a career fair on campus from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Tuesday, June 4 outside UM’s new dining center on the west end of the Oval.

This campus-wide hiring event will feature over 50 career opportunities, ranging from UM Campus Dining, Athletics and UM Housing to Facility Services and more.

“UM Campus Dining provides an inclusive culture, great work-life balance and wonderful co-workers,” said Kacey Gardipee, associate director of Residential Dining. “Working for UM Campus Dining gives you and your family the best benefits in Missoula! Looking to further your culinary career? The new dining center offers seven micro-concepts showcasing cuisines from around the country and world.”

Representatives from UM Human Resource Services will provide guidance on the recruitment process and answer any questions about job openings currently listed at www.umt.edu/jobs.

Advertisement

In anticipation of the grand opening this summer, UM Campus Dining, the event sponsor, is looking to fill over 24 positions across campus.

Tours of the new dining center, which will open to students and visitors in August, will be provided every hour. Available positions for UM Campus Dining include cashiers, cooks, sous chefs, dishwashers and sanitation technicians and facilities specialists.

UM is committed to “Mission First, People Always,” emphasizing teamwork and collaboration across departments to enhance its educational and work environment.

Employment at UM comes with numerous benefits, including extensive health coverage, free shift meals for Campus Dining employees, partial tuition waivers for employees or their immediate family members, a respectful and collaborative work environment that values diversity, opportunities for advancement, a commitment to safety and well-being, comprehensive retirement plans and a high standard of professionalism.

UM is an equal opportunity and affirmative action employer.

Advertisement

More local news from KPAX





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

From his Montana ranch, a retired lawmaker is angling for a comeback in a crowded House race

Published

on

From his Montana ranch, a retired lawmaker is angling for a comeback in a crowded House race





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Contested primaries across Montana's new state legislative districts

Published

on

Contested primaries across Montana's new state legislative districts


HELENA — In addition to all the statewide elections Montanans will be voting in this year, they’ll also be choosing 125 state lawmakers.

Half of the Montana Senate and the entire Montana House will be up for election, and we already know there will be some differences in the Legislature when they arrive for their 2025 session.

The most obvious change for many Montana voters will be that the legislative districts they live in may have changed. This will be the first election cycle under the new district lines that the Montana Districting and Apportionment Commission finalized last year. All 100 House districts and 50 Senate districts have to be redrawn every ten years, after the release of federal census data, to account for shifting populations.

MTN News

Advertisement

Along with the new lines, there are also going to be more contested legislative primaries this year than in 2022. Out of the 125 races, 44 feature at least two Republican candidates, and 15 have multiple Democrats. That’s compared to 31 contested GOP races and 13 Democratic primaries last election.

Cascade County alone has seven contested Republican primaries, and Flathead County has six. Gallatin, Missoula and Lewis and Clark Counties each have three contested Democratic primaries.

The new lines have many incumbent lawmakers shuffling around and seeking to represent a wholly or partly different district. In addition, in 23 races, an incumbent is facing at least one challenger.

Four districts across the state have two current lawmakers facing off in their primaries – all of them Republicans.

Current Reps. Caleb Hinkle, R-Belgrade, and Jennifer Carlson, R-Manhattan, are running against each other in House District 68, in northwest Gallatin County. Additionally, former House Speaker and Senate President Scott Sales is also in the GOP primary there.

Advertisement

Two House members – Rep. Lola Sheldon-Galloway, R-Great Falls, and Rep. Josh Kassmier, R-Fort Benton – are facing off for an open Senate seat in Senate District 13, which covers Chouteau County and much of rural Cascade County.

In Ravalli County, Sen. Theresa Manzella, R-Hamilton, is running for reelection in Senate District 44. She’s being challenged by Rep. Wayne Rusk, R-Corvallis, as well as a third GOP candidate, Brad Davis of Victor.

In Senate District 38, which covers Powell, Granite and Jefferson Counties, Sen. Becky Beard, R-Elliston, is running for a full term after being appointed to the Senate. The other candidates in the primary include Rep. Greg Frazer, R-Deer Lodge, and Jeremy Mygland of East Helena.

Also of note this year, Gov. Greg Gianforte is weighing in on GOP legislative primaries, giving his endorsement to 58 candidates across the state – including 24 in contested races, and 3 challengers to incumbents. Gianforte backed Sales over Hinkle and Carlson, Kyle McMurray over Rep. Jane Gillette and Randyn Gregg over Rep. James Bergstrom.

Montana Legislative Primaries with Multiple Candidates:

Advertisement

Republicans:

  • House District 2 (Southern Lincoln County and Marion): Thomas Jenkins, Tom Millett
  • House District 7 (Kalispell): Rep. Courtenay Sprunger, Shaun Pandina
  • House District 8 (Evergreen): Rep. Tony Brockman, Lukas Schubert
  • House District 9 (Lakeside and Somers): Lee Huestis, Steven Kelly
  • House District 11 (Eastern Flathead County): Ed Byrne, Rob Tracy
  • House District 16 (Glacier County): Rolland Heagy, Elaine Utterback Mitchell
  • House District 18 (Toole and Pondera Counties and part of Teton County): Rep. Llew Jones, James Coombs
  • House District 19 (Great Falls): Derren Auger, Hannah Trebas
  • House District 20 (Great Falls): Rep. Steven Galloway, Elizabeth Nikolakakos
  • House District 21 (Black Eagle): Rep. Ed Buttrey, James Osterman
  • House District 22 (Great Falls): Rep. George Nikolakakos, Jim Whitaker
  • House District 23 (Great Falls): Pete Anderson, Josh Denully, John Proud, Eric Tilleman
  • House District 26 (Chouteau County and parts of Cascade County): Rep. Russ Miner, Dana Darlington
  • House District 28 (Hi-Line): Eric Albus, former Rep. Wayne Stahl, Mark Wicks
  • House District 29 (Northeastern Montana): Miles Knudsen, Valerie Moore
  • House District 33 (Dawson County and southern Richland County): Rep. Brandon Ler, Kathy Hoiland
  • House District 38 (Musselshell, Golden Valley and northern Yellowstone Counties): Rep. Greg Oblander, Nancy Kemler
  • House District 40 (Lockwood): Mike Vinton, Josh Visocan
  • House District 47 (Billings): Thomas Mahon, Stephanie Moncada
  • House District 53 (Yellowstone County): Rep. Nelly Nicol, David Austin
  • House District 55 (Carbon County): Rep. Brad Barker, Lisa Bennett, Mary Horman
  • House District 63 (Bozeman): Joe Flynn, Mark Lewis
  • House District 68 (Gallatin County): Rep. Caleb Hinkle, Rep. Jennifer Carlson, former Sen. Scott Sales
  • House District 70 (Beaverhead County): Mike Klakken, Shannon Maness, Mary Ann Nicholas
  • House District 76 (Powell and Granite Counties): Rep. John Fitzpatrick, Dave Kesler
  • House District 77 (Broadwater County, Three Forks and Manhattan): Rep. Jane Gillette, Kyle McMurray
  • House District 78 (Central Montana): Rep. James Bergstrom, Randyn Gregg
  • House District 79 (Lewis and Clark County): Demetri Joslin, Jill Sark
  • House District 83 (Helena and East Helena): Wes Feist, Christopher St. Jean
  • House District 84 (Helena Valley): Rep. Julie Dooling, Jon Jackson
  • House District 85 (Southern Ravalli County): Rep. Michele Binkley, Kathy Love
  • House District 86 (Hamilton): Rep. David Bedey, Robert Wallace
  • House District 88 (Northern Ravalli County): Kim Dailey, Greg Overstreet
  • House District 90 (Mineral County and parts of Missoula and Sanders Counties): Curtis Cochran, Steven Delisle, Jeff Stanek
  • Senate District 5 (Southern Flathead County): Marquis Laude, Rep. Matt Regier
  • Senate District 13 (Chouteau County and parts of Cascade County): Rep. Josh Kassmier, Rep. Lola Sheldon-Galloway
  • Senate District 15 (Northeastern Montana): Gregg Hunter, Rep. Rhonda Knudsen
  • Senate District 17 (Southeast Montana): Mike Newton, Rep. Bob Phalen
  • Senate District 27 (Laurel): Sen. Chris Friedel, former Rep. Vince Ricci
  • Senate District 35 (Madison and Beaverhead Counties): Mark McGinley, former Rep. Ray Shaw, Tony Tezak
  • Senate District 38 (Powell, Granite and Jefferson Counties): Sen. Becky Beard, Rep. Greg Frazer, Jeremy Mygland
  • Senate District 44 (Northern Ravalli County): Sen. Theresa Manzella, Brad Davis, Rep. Wayne Rusk
  • Senate District 45 (Mineral County and parts of Missoula and Sanders Counties): Rep. Denley Loge, AnnaMarie White
  • Senate District 47 (Missoula): Abigail Maki, Erica Siate

Democrats

  • House District 3 (Whitefish and West Glacier): Former Rep. Debo Powers, Guthrie Quist
  • House District 31 (Fort Peck and Fort Belknap): Rep. Frank Smith, Lance FourStar
  • House District 58 (Livingston): Jamie Isaly, Dean Williamson
  • House District 62 (Bozeman): Rio Roland, Josh Seckinger
  • House District 63 (Bozeman): John Hansen, Peter Strand
  • House District 65 (Bozeman): Brian Close, Anja Wookey-Huffman
  • House District 79 (Lewis and Clark County): Emily Harris, Luke Muszkiewicz, Anne Woodland
  • House District 82 (Helena): Pete Elverum, SK Rossi
  • House District 84 (Helena Valley): Michele Crepeau, David Williams
  • House District 97 (Missoula): Melody Cunningham, Lisa Verlanic Fowler
  • House District 100 (Missoula): Rep. SJ Howell, Tim Garrison
  • Senate District 16 (Fort Peck, Fort Belknap and Rocky Boy’s): Former Rep. Bridget Smith, Rep. Jonathan Windy Boy
  • Senate District 21 (Crow and Northern Cheyenne): Former Rep. Rae Peppers, Rep. Sharon Stewart-Peregoy
  • Senate District 36 (Butte and Anaconda): Former Rep. Sara Novak, former Sen. Jessica Wicks
  • Senate District 46 (Parts of Missoula, Lake and Sanders Counties): Jacinda Morigeau, CB Pearson





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending