After breakfast, Lurie walked through the Tenderloin with San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott.

“People in the Tenderloin are frustrated,” Lurie told KQED. “People in Bernal Heights are frustrated, so I’m going to commit myself every single day to be tireless in getting people the help that they need, whether it’s into a mental health bed or a drug treatment bed or into a shelter bed.”

It wasn’t Lurie’s first time walking through the Tenderloin, according to Kate Robinson, director of the Tenderloin Community Benefit District. She said he joined her team on multiple morning shifts to ensure kids got to school safely.

“Incoming Mayor Lurie was the very first to request to come back and then come back again,” Robinson said. “That set him apart just for me, personally, seeing the level of care and seeing how genuinely interested he was in talking to the residents, talking to our safety stewards.

“I’m optimistic.”

Scott said the new administration has a lot of ideas and energy, but San Francisco residents will expect the city to move forward.

“When all the ceremony and all that goes away, we still have a job to do, so it’s really important that we stay focused on getting that job done, and that’s where my focus is,” Scott said. “Of course, I’m gonna do the things that the mayor has asked for us to do and do that to the best of my ability.”

Darrell Luckett, who’s lived in the Tenderloin for 40 years, stopped Lurie and urged him to follow through on his promises to clean up encampments and drug use.

“He said he’s gonna do it. All we can do is kick back, and you see what he do,” Luckett said after shaking hands with the mayor.

“A lot of people always say they’re gonna do this stuff,” Deonte Dial added.

At least one thing is crystal clear in the murky waters of mile-high stadium’s future: the Broncos’ new owners are preparing to make a roughly $2 billion investment and Denver’s leaders should pull out – almost — all the stops to make sure that investment is in the city.

All we ask in exchange for this substantial public financial assistance is complete transparency (and of course the continuation of the popular lottery system for affordable tickets to Broncos games).

The elected officials in this state and city must be honest about the value of any proposed land deals, tax breaks, taxing authority or no-bid contractsawarded to some of the wealthiest people in America to help their real estate venture.

The Denver Post launched a four-part special report this month: The $tadium Game. The reporting was stellar as our team looked at the past, the present, and the future of Denver’s sports venues. The city has had some highs in terms of iconic destinations, Coors Field, and some performance lows in the same neighborhood, the Rockies.

The Broncos are not just another sports franchise. The team’s story from the fledgling Bears to the Super Bowl-winning Broncos is an integral part of our history. Losing the team’s downtown Denver presence at a time when urban communities are struggling to rebound from the work-from-home transformation would be dire. Post-COVID, bars, restaurants, and retail stores have struggled in Denver.

In an ideal world, the Broncos would stay where they are. Taxpayers built Empower Field at Mile High using a regional sales tax. The stadium is now debt-free and our investment is ripe to pay off over the next six years of the Bronco’s lease. The historic Mile High location is brilliant: serviced by light rail, close to downtown, and Empower Field recently received $100 million in upgrades thanks to the new owners.

But the clear trend among pro-sporting franchise owners is using their own stadium to anchor a development project worth billions.

Whether it’s Stan Kroenke slow-playing development of vacant fields he leases from Commerce City for $1 a year surrounding his Major League Soccer field, or Stan Kroenke revving up to redevelop the parking lots around his National Hockey League and National Basketball Association arena in Denver, we can’t argue with the dollars and cents calculations driving these mega-ventures.

Billionaires owning not only the team and the venue but also the entire neighborhood is simply the path forward for professional sports in America. The place where that type of venture would be the most profitable (i.e. lowest cost and highest profit) is often on cheaper, easier-to-develop land in one of the many lovely suburbs that ring Denver.

That is why The Denver Post editorial board supports using financial incentives to ensure the Broncos’ new stadium — if one must be built — remains in Denver.

Should the Broncos ownership — the Walton-Penner Group — be interested in state-owned land, like the 58 acres at Burnham Yard just west of the Lincoln Park neighborhood, the public needs to know the appraised value of that land upfront.

The Colorado Department of Transportation purchased the land in 2021 for $51 million, which gives us a ballpark value, but property values have grown quite a bit since then.

The same is true for other lands owned nearby like the Denver Water parcel. Denver Water is a government entity that serves its ratepayers, and if the Walton-Penner Group is interested in some of the utilities’ land, accurate appraisals are essential.

When the Raiders were moved from Oakland to Las Vegas, at least there was a record of every single lawmaker who supported and opposed the deal to give the Raiders $750 million in bonds to be paid back with interest using a hotel-room tax.

On top of helping the Broncos’ owners acquire land downtown with favorable terms, the city is likely to give the Broncos owners’ nearly unlimited taxing authority using a quasi-governmental metropolitan district. The Waltons and Penners — led by heirs to the Walmart fortune Greg Penner and Carrie Walton, who also happen to be related to Kroenke — could use a combination of property taxes, hotel taxes, sales taxes and ticket taxes to pay for the debt of the stadium and other infrastructure projects on the land.

While we are generally opposed to metropolitan districts because of how abused they have been by developers, this structure could make sense for a stadium district, if there was enough oversight to prevent abuse.

The beauty of a taxing district is that the people who use the new stadium and the nearby bars, restaurants, and hotels and live in the new condos would pay for it over time. The City of Denver should not approve a metro district on any land being considered for a new stadium unless the developer agrees that the district’s taxes and spending would have adequate oversight.

This new model for a metro district could have taxpayer dollars overseen by officials elected in a city-wide election rather than a faux election where the landowners just elect their employees to the board to do their bidding. Developers can then spend taxpayer dollars with no oversight.

In Nevada the stadium authority is chaired by appointed public officials to provide just such oversight of the $1.3 billion that will be paid back. And when revenue fell short of making the minimum payments on those bonds last year, the people in Clark County were able to track how much of their other tax dollars were used to backfill the debt payment.

Because the Broncos bring so much to this city — culture, excitement, and economic stimulus — Denver must be willing to invest. We want the Walton-Penner Group to make heaps of money. We want another championship parade in Denver. And we want to know exactly what our tax dollars are buying.

Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.

Originally Published: January 8, 2025 at 11:40 AM MST

With another season in the books, fans of the Seattle Seahawks can look back and once again complain about the poor play of the offensive line. It’s been a common theme for more than a decade, persevering through changes to the coaching staff, scheme and personnel.

The Seahawks have experienced various levels of success during that time period, from hoisting a Lombardi Trophy after dismantling the Denver Broncos in Super Bowl XLVIII, to stumbling into last place with an injured Russell Wilson at the helm in 2021. However, through it all one fact remains true, and that is that as the twenty year anniversary of Walter Jones inking a seven-year, $52.5M contract with Seattle on February 16, 2005, that remains the single largest contract the Hawks have given to an offensive lineman in franchise history.

So minimal has spending on the offensive line for the Seahawks been over the past decade and a half that two of the largest single season cap hits for Seattle offensive linemen in franchise history are from contracts that were signed prior to the adoption of the previous CBA in 2011. For those curious, here are the top twelve largest single season cap hits for offensive linemen in franchise history, and, yes, the list was expanded from ten to twelve for a specific reason.

• 1: Duane Brown (2020: $12.75M)
• 2: Russell Okung (2014: $11.24M)
• 3: Duane Brown (2019: $10.85M)
• 4: Duane Brown (2021: $9.85M)
• 5: Walter Jones (2009: $9.8M)
• 6: Russell Okung (2013: $9.54M)
• 7: Russell Okung (2014: $8.96M)
• 8: Russell Okung (2011: $8.8M)
• 9T: Walter Jones (2007: $8.6M)
• 9T: Walter Jones (2008: $8.6M)
• 11: Justin Britt (2019: $7.92M)
• 12: Luke Joeckel (2017: $7.69M)

The reason this is brought up is because between now and early May the Seahawks front office will need to make a decision on the fifth year option of 2022 first round pick left tackle Charles Cross. As Field Gulls Managing Editor Mookie Alexander noted earlier in January, the fifth year option for Cross is projected to be $18.424M, which would instantly take over the top spot as the largest single season cap hit for a Seahawks offensive lineman in franchise history in pure dollar amounts.

In any case, regardless of where the fifth year option would fall for Cross relative to historic cap hits for Seattle offensive linemen, the reality is that his performance on the field has shown him to be a young up and comer, and with youth on his side an ability to continue to develop. Specifically, the Seahawks left Cross alone on an island at an unusually high rate during the 2024 season, and he outperformed expectations relative to the pass rushers he was tasked with blocking when left without help from a guard, tight end or running back.

So, for those who have questioned what Cross has done to warrant having the fifth year option exercised or to be signed to a large extension, the answer is right here. His on field performance puts him on par with guys like Dion Dawkins, Trent Williams, Kolton Miller, Orlando Brown, Spencer Brown and other high performing, but not quite elite, tackles, and Cross is doing that while having just turned 24 in late November.

In short, he’s performing at a high level, and he’s doing it at a very young age. That’s the type of player that teams more often than not opt to extend, so here is what some of the players who fall in the area around Cross on that chart are earning on non-rookie contracts.

• Dion Dawkins: 3-years, $60.2M
• Kolton Miller: 3-years, $54.01M
• Orlando Brown: 4-years, $64.1M
• Spencer Brown: 4-years, $72M
• Trent Williams: 3-years, $82M

Those numbers, combined with the $18.424M projection for the fifth year option, provide the base level for where the conversation about any extension Cross might sign starts. Now it’s a matter of waiting to see whether John Schneider remains true to past form and opts to let Cross walk, or whether he takes over as the highest paid offensive lineman in franchise history.

It should be a no brainer. But then again, decisions that felt like no brainers in the past haven’t always been made the way fans thought they should have been made.