Connect with us

West

Las Vegas, New Orleans attacks not connected: police

Published

on

Las Vegas, New Orleans attacks not connected: police

This story discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please contact the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or 1-800-273-TALK (8255).

Local and federal authorities said back-to-back attacks in Las Vegas and in New Orleans were not connected.

In a press conference Friday afternoon, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Sheriff Kevin McMahill revealed why authorities aren’t considering the attacks connected.

“The simple answer to that is we don’t find anything to actually point us in that direction,” McMahill said. “There are those coincidences that we have spoken very openly about, but we have not found throughout this entire investigation anything that ties the two attacks directly together.”

Online speculation soared after it was revealed Shamsud-Din Jabbar, the New Orleans attack suspect, and the driver of the Tesla Cybertruck, Livelsberger, both spent time at the large military base formerly called Fort Bragg in North Carolina.

Advertisement

NEW ORLEANS TERRORIST, MAN IN LAS VEGAS CYBERTRUCK EXPLOSION SHARED MORE LINKS IN ATTACKS JUST HOURS APART

The driver of the Tesla Cybertruck that blew up outside Trump International Hotel Las Vegas New Year’s Day was identified as active-duty U.S. Army soldier Matthew Livelsberger, right. Livelsberger’s attack took place within hours of Jabbar’s in New Orleans. (Fox News)

Local and federal enforcement also revealed that the U.S. Army Green Beret wrote it was “time to wake up” in notes penned before his death.

Police officials released sections of Livelsberger’s “manifesto,” and said they would release the full document later.

“This was not a terrorist attack, it was a wake up call” Livelsberger wrote, according to the cropped notes shared by Las Vegas police. “Americans only pay attention to spectacles and violence. What better way to get my point across than a stunt with fireworks and explosives?

Advertisement

BOMBMAKING MATERIALS FOUND AT NEW ORLEANS AIRBNB POTENTIALLY TIED TO BOURBON STREET TERRORIST: REPORT

“Why did I personally do it now? I needed to cleanse my mind of the brothers I’ve lost and relieve myself of the burden of the lives I took,” he wrote.

“We are the United States of America, the best country people to ever exist! But right now we are terminally ill and headed towards collapse.”

The driver of the Tesla Cybertruck that blew up outside Trump International Hotel Las Vegas New Year’s Day was identified as 37-year-old Matthew Alan Livelsberger (Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department)

Livelsberger likely had PTSD and ongoing family problems that contributed to his actions, sheriff’s officials said.

Advertisement

“Although this incident is more public and more sensational than usual, it ultimately appears to be a tragic case of suicide involving a heavily decorated combat veteran who is struggling with PTSD and other issues,” McMahill said.

WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT VICTIMS OF NEW ORLEANS TERRORIST ATTACK

The Las Vegas chief said this is why authorities are prioritizing the mental health of law enforcement officials and veterans.

“Quite frankly, this is the reason why we started our wellness bureau here at Metro and taking care of the heart, mind, body and soul of the people that are out there doing this work, because they’re exposed to things, they see things, they hear things, they feel things and they smell things that most normal people don’t have to do,” McMahill said. 

“And the heroes that are serving in the military and on the front lines of America’s policing are challenged that way,” he said. “And, so, I think we need to really pay attention to those individuals, pay attention to what mental health in America looks like.”

Advertisement

Livelsberger did not appear to dislike President-elect Trump, local and federal authorities said.

“There’s a variety of different reporting out there,” McMahill said. “Notable on what some of the people around him and what their particular political views were. I think when you read some of these documents, you’ll see that he actually calls it a stunt. 

“In one of these documents that we’re going to release to you … he was trying to get the attention of the American people because he was upset about a number of different things.

“I’m not conclusively telling you anything about his political affiliations at this point, but I think there’s … more to come on that.”

WHO IS MATTHEW LIVELSBERGER? WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT THE TESLA CYBERTRUCK EXPLOSION SUSPECT

Advertisement

Police noted Livelsberger was considering other locations, pointing to excerpts from his manifesto.

“I think when you read through some of that, you might find that, you know, there were some other considerations as well for other locations,” McMahill said. “We can’t verify all of that at this point. And, so, that’s why I haven’t talked about that publicly.

“There was one, one location in Grand Canyon that was specifically talked about, but we haven’t been able to verify that.”

The driver of the Tesla Cybertruck that blew up outside Trump International Hotel Las Vegas on New Year’s Day was identified as 37-year-old Matthew Alan Livelsberger. (Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department)

Documentation that Matthew Alan Livelsberger was carrying at the time of the Tesla Cybertruck explosion in Las Vegas Jan. 1, 2025. (Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department)

Advertisement

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Assistant Sheriff Dori Koren said Livelsberger died from a self-inflicted gunshot. He noted that the suspect placed gun in his mouth and discharged it

 

“We know also, as mentioned by the sheriff yesterday, there was a self-inflicted gunshot wound by the suspect,” Koren said. “The coroner was very specific in saying it was an intro orbital gunshot wound, which essentially means that the suspect put the firearm in his mouth and discharged the gun. And, ultimately, the wound came out the left side of his head.”



Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Medley of Errors Causes Alaska Pilot’s Downfall

Published

on

Medley of Errors Causes Alaska Pilot’s Downfall


It was the last day of the hunting season. Tanks of fuel stashed at a remote Alaskan airstrip had to be retrieved. Time was short since a storm was approaching. A Cessna 206 landed on a gravel bar in the Porcupine River, and the pilot began loading 15-gallon fuel containers into the plane. To save time, she asked two hunters, who were waiting there for a different airplane, to empty two of the containers into her wing tanks. The whole operation lasted 12 minutes.  

Seconds after the 206 became airborne, its engine sputtered. It banked steeply, and its right wingtip struck the surface of the river. The airplane cartwheeled before coming to rest, partially submerged. The powerful current and icy water of the river prevented the two hunters from getting to it. By the time a raft had been brought from the nearest base, 60 miles away, an hour and a half had passed. The pilot, 28, was dead.

Accident investigators minutely examined the 206’s engine and found nothing wrong with it. What was wrong was that there was water—in some places more water than avgas—in the fuel system, including parts that river water had not been able to enter.

Advertisement

A pilot who later inspected one of the smaller fuel containers found about a cupful of water in 8 gallons of fuel. Since the plane had arrived without any trouble, it was pretty clear that the water in the fuel system had been added along with the fuel during the hasty stopover on the sandbar and caused the engine to lose power soon after it went to full throttle.

What looked like one cause, however, was really several.

The fuel cache, which had been set up two months earlier, consisted of 55-gallon metal drums from which fuel was pumped into 15-gallon plastic containers that were easier for the pilot to handle. Fuel would be transferred from those containers into the airplane’s wing tanks by a battery-operated pump. 

When the cache was originally established, the pump had a filter to trap debris. In addition, a Mr. Funnel was provided. It contained both a screening filter and hydrophobic membrane that allowed fuel to pass through but not water. 

Advertisement

During the course of the hunting season, the pump’s filter became clogged and was removed. It was not replaced, even though the fact that it had gotten clogged seems to suggest that a filter was needed. The water-excluding funnel also was “lost”—whatever that means on an unfrequented sandbar—and it too was not replaced. Thus, nothing remained to ensure that fuel pumped into planes would be clean and free of water. 

In principle, a final line of defense existed in the form of the airplane’s fuel drains. In this 1975 206 those were four in number (later Cessnas, whose integral fuel tanks can hide water behind ribs, have as many as 13). Two were, as you would expect, on the undersides of the wings at the inboard ends of the tanks. One was on the fuel strainer, or “gascolator,” at the firewall. The fourth drained a small collector tank located in the bottom of the fuselage. 

The accident pilot, and other pilots who worked for the same flying service, were aware of the lack of filtration at the remote site and had “numerous conversations” about the danger of water contamination in fuel and the need to check the sumps after refueling. The 206 was equipped, however, with a belly pod that covered the fuselage sump drain, so that it might be necessary to shift or remove cargo in order to get at the drain. The accident pilot had repeatedly complained about the difficulty of draining the fuselage sump, and she was said to habitually skip that step despite “talks at great length” urging her not to.

Since the fuel pickup in each wing tank is located slightly above the bottom of the tank, small amounts of water could be taken from the quick-drains without any of that water having found its way to the fuselage tank. But if sufficient water got into a wing tank, some of it could run down into the fuselage tank, water being heavier than fuel. The fact that the engine ran for some time before stumbling suggests, however, that the fatal water came from the wings, not the fuselage tank.

According to the pilot’s colleagues, it was “company policy” that only the pilots themselves do the refueling at remote sites and not delegate it to anyone else. The hunters who pumped fuel into the 206 for the pilot recalled that she did not check the sumps before taking off and that there was no mention of the possibility of water in the fuel.

Advertisement

So, one by one, the conditions for the accident had been put into place. The mere fact that there had been “numerous conversations” about the danger of fuel contamination suggests that the company’s pilots knew that a potentially serious problem existed. The clogged fuel filter had not been replaced. The fuel storage tanks, even if they were impervious to rain, were likely to accumulate water from repeated cycles of condensation, and yet the water-filtering funnel was gone too. Why a replacement was not obtained is unclear. Amazon offers Mr. Funnel filters for around $40, delivered tomorrow (or, in the bush, maybe a few days later).

The National Transportation Safety Board blamed the accident on the pilot’s “inadequate preflight inspection,” with the company’s failure to replace the fuel filters a contributing circumstance.

The NTSB’s report omitted mention of a third factor.

The accident occurred on a meander in the river. The sandbar from which the 206 took off was oriented directly toward a broad gravel bank on the opposite shore. The immediate cause of the crash seems to have been the pilot’s decision to turn back, which led to the right wingtip hitting the water. If she had continued straight ahead, she might have made the far shore or at least ditched under control in the river. She might have lost the airplane in the process but saved her life.

A retired fighter pilot, who at one point during his career in the Air Force had the job of test-flying F-100s after they emerged from maintenance, told me that he wouldn’t hesitate to punch out of an airplane that failed of its own accord but would be very reluctant to abandon one whose problems he himself had caused.

Advertisement

In her haste, the pilot had not checked for water in the fuel, even though it had been a topic of much discussion. When the engine stumbled, she probably guessed the reason instantly. She switched on the fuel pump in hope that the engine would come back to life. Trying to save the airplane, she banked back toward the runway. But then…


This column first appeared in the December Issue 965 of the FLYING print edition.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Six Arizona Lottery winners hit big over the holidays

Published

on

Six Arizona Lottery winners hit big over the holidays


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Over the holidays, six lucky Arizona Lottery players hit big across the state. Here’s where and when the winning tickets were sold.

Tuesday, December 23, 2025

  • Two $20,000 Mega Millions winners were sold at:
    • Fry’s Food Store: 39508 N Daisy Mountain Drive in Anthem
    • Circle K: 1542 E Highway 70 in Safford
  • One $205,000 Fantasy 5 jackpot winner was sold at:
    • Bashas’: 10325 E Riggs Road in Sun Lakes

Christmas Eve: Wednesday, December 24, 2025

  • Three $50,000 Powerball winners were sold at:
    • Fry’s Food Store: 15950 S Rancho Sahuarita Blvd in Sahuarita
    • Circle K: 2816 E University Drive in Mesa
    • Walmart: 1606 S Signal Butte Road in Mesa (Power Play doubled the prize to $100,000)

If you think you have one of these winning tickets, sign the back, keep it in a safe place and contact the Arizona Lottery for claim instructions.

More information on games and prizes can be found on the Arizona Lottery website.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Advertisement

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California drops lawsuit seeking to reinstate federal funding for the state’s bullet train

Published

on

California drops lawsuit seeking to reinstate federal funding for the state’s bullet train


OAKLAND, Calif. — California this week dismissed a lawsuit officials filed against the Trump administration over the federal government’s withdrawing of $4 billion for the state’s long-delayed high-speed rail project.

The U.S. Transportation Department in July slashed funds for the bullet train aimed at connecting San Francisco to Los Angeles. The Trump administration has said the California High-Speed Rail Authority had “ no viable plan ” to complete a large segment of project in the state’s farm-rich Central Valley.

The authority quickly filed a lawsuit, with Democratic. Gov. Gavin Newsom calling the federal government’s decision “a political stunt to punish California.”

The authority said this week it would focus on other funding sources to complete the project estimated to cost more than $100 billion.

Advertisement

“This action reflects the State’s assessment that the federal government is not a reliable, constructive, or trustworthy partner in advancing high-speed rail in California,” an authority spokesperson said in a statement.

The Transportation Department did not respond to a request for comment on California dismissing its lawsuit. President Donald Trump and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy have both previously slammed the project as a “train to nowhere.”

“The Railroad we were promised still does not exist, and never will,” Trump wrote on Truth Social in July. “This project was Severely Overpriced, Overregulated, and NEVER DELIVERED.”

The authority’s decision to drop the lawsuit comes as the group seeks private investors to support the bullet train. The project recently secured $1 billion in annual funding from the state’s cap-and-trade program through 2045.

The program sets a declining limit on total planet-warming emissions in the state from major polluters. Companies must reduce their emissions, buy allowances from the state or other businesses, or fund projects aimed at offsetting their emissions. Money the state receives from the sales funds climate-change mitigation, affordable housing and transportation projects, as well as utility bill credits for Californians.

Advertisement

The rail authority said its shift in focus away from federal funding offered “a new opportunity.”

“Moving forward without the Trump administration’s involvement allows the Authority to pursue proven global best practices used successfully by modern high-speed rail systems around the world,” a spokesperson said in a statement.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending