Idaho
Opinion: Greater Idaho effort won’t prevail, but we should hear movement’s message
Norman R. Williams
Williams is the Peterson Professor of Constitutional Regulation at Willamette College School of Regulation. He lives in Salem.
Earlier this month, voters in three counties in japanese and southern Oregon voted on whether or not they needed to secede from Oregon and be a part of Idaho. Voters in Douglas and Josephine counties rejected the thought, however Klamath voters authorised it, becoming a member of eight different counties in japanese Oregon which have already endorsed the thought. Although it has prompted some derision within the state Capitol, the so-called “Better Idaho” motion shouldn’t be a joke.
To be clear, this motion, which seeks to carve out roughly two-thirds of the japanese a part of Oregon to hitch Idaho, is destined to fail. However the common resentment and alienation amongst rural, japanese Oregonians that has fueled the motion can not and shouldn’t be ignored.
First, let me clarify why japanese Oregon gained’t be becoming a member of Idaho anytime, now or later. As a authorized matter, it might take the approval of the Oregon Legislature, the Idaho Legislature, and Congress to comply with shift the Oregon-Idaho border. Every of these our bodies has causes to reject such a change.
For the Oregon Legislature, few lawmakers from western Oregon would need to flip over two-thirds of the state’s land mass to Idaho – state pleasure issues. Considerably, even the residents of japanese Oregon’s Wallowa County voted towards the measure two years in the past. The truth is, collectively, extra voters within the 12 japanese and southern Oregon counties which have taken up the query have voted towards the thought than in help of it.
For Idaho, the problem could be the associated fee. Oregon shouldn’t be merely going at hand over a lot land (and every little thing that’s in it) to Idaho freed from cost. The state authorities owns virtually 1 million acres of land and dozens of buildings, for which it might count on to be paid. Oregon would additionally count on Idaho to imagine a share of Oregon’s $11 billion state debt, a portion of which was incurred for the advantage of japanese Oregon. Final however not least, Oregon’s state pension system covers 1000’s of state and native authorities employees in japanese Oregon, whose pension advantages will not be absolutely funded presently to the tune of billions of {dollars}. Idaho could be anticipated to choose up the price of these pension obligations for these employees. Now, are Idaho legislators keen to pay billions of {dollars} to Oregon for this proposed border change? In all probability not.
As for Congress, effectively, you’ll be able to make certain that Democrats would vote towards the measure for one, easy motive: the influence on the presidential election. The proposed change would switch one presidential elector vote from reliably Democratic Oregon to reliably Republican Idaho. One vote might not be a lot within the 538-vote Electoral School, however, given how shut a few of the previous presidential elections have been, Democrats in Congress haven’t any motive to comply with a change that may put President Biden (and all future Democratic candidates) one vote behind.
If japanese Oregon shouldn’t be going wherever, why then ought to we care? The Better Idaho motion is emblematic of the rising political polarization within the U.S. The answer to this political alienation and marginalization, nonetheless, can’t be redrawing state borders each time a political minority – Republican or Democratic, rural or city – feels aggrieved. Alabama Democrats would certainly want being a part of, say, New York, however rewriting state borders to lump Republicans with fellow Republicans in a Republican-dominated state (and the identical for Democrats) would simply improve the partisan polarization in each the reconfigured states and nation usually. Democrats in a larger Idaho and Republicans in a rump Oregon, for example, would solely really feel – and certain be – extra disregarded. The answer to marginalization shouldn’t be additional isolation and due to this fact polarization.
Somewhat, we should all relearn the virtues of democratic engagement and compromise. Democratic authorities depends upon the power of the federal government to signify the wants and pursuits of all its residents, not simply the voters who put nearly all of the Legislature or the governor (or president) into energy. A minority won’t get all that it needs, nor ought to it in a system of majority rule, however neither ought to the bulk merely dismiss the pursuits of the minority on the grounds that they’re a minority.
People must relearn methods to hearken to these with whom we disagree and to deal with their wants and considerations, even when we will accomplish that solely partially. If we don’t, we needs to be ready to see extra efforts just like the Better Idaho motion. And, whereas these efforts could also be doomed to fail for a similar causes because the Better Idaho motion, that solely makes issues worse – the alienation and marginalization fueling these actions will solely develop, and the centrifugal forces fraying the democratic material of our nation will solely improve. The issue shouldn’t be our state borders; it’s our politics.
Share your opinion
Submit your essay of 500-600 phrases on a extremely topical problem or a theme of specific relevance to the Pacific Northwest, Oregon and the Portland space to commentary@oregonian.com. Please embrace your electronic mail and cellphone quantity for verification.
Idaho
Legislative committee introduces bill to address DEI programs at colleges and universities in Idaho
BOISE, Idaho — An Idaho legislative committee is reviewing a draft bill titled the “Freedom of Inquiry in Higher Education,” presented by Republican Senator Ben Toews. The proposal aims to remove diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offices from state-funded colleges and universities and redirect those resources to academic support programs for all students.
“My goal is to work together with our higher education partners to move us in the right direction of guaranteeing the freedom of speech and freedom of thought, which I actually believe we all desire to have on our college campuses,” Toews said.
The drafted bill would prohibit public universities from funding or supporting identity-based DEI offices, with the exception of tribal centers. It would also prevent schools from requiring students to take DEI courses unless they are part of a chosen academic program.
Toews said the bill is modeled after policies in other states.
“We’re looking for what’s worked in other places to attempt to make sure that our universities and higher education institutions have that freedom of thought that we want,” he said.
However, Senate Minority Leader Melissa Wintrow, a Democrat, criticized the proposal, saying the committee’s focus is misplaced.
“It doesn’t feel like a productive working group. And in fact, it’s really troubling that we’re spending this amount of time and resources on talking about something that the government really shouldn’t have a role in,” Wintrow said. “We should really be focusing on what’s important to students—and that’s affordability, making sure they can pay for school, get to school, find a place to live and study and thrive.”
Josh Whitworth, executive director of the Idaho State Board of Education, said it’s important to support all students without isolating specific identity groups.
“The question is, as an institution, we want to make sure that the services that they need are not focused down on their identity, but focused on what they need,” Whitworth said. “The idea is don’t just create little groups. How do you give the support of all students to engage together and really create that holistic environment?”
The committee will continue reviewing the draft bill in the coming weeks.
Idaho
A 5% raise could be coming to most Idaho state workers
Most Idaho state employees could see about a 5% raise come July in a recommendation approved by a legislative committee Thursday.
Specifically, the proposal calls for a $1.55 hourly pay bump. That works out to at least a 5% raise for those earning less than $64,500 annually.
Democrats on the Change in Employee Compensation Committee, like Sen. Janie Ward-Engelking (D-Boise), voted against the measure, saying it didn’t go far enough – especially for higher paid workers.
“I’m worried that they’re not even going to keep up with the cost of living and that’s really a problem for me,” Ward-Engelking said.
After experiencing some of the highest rates of inflation in the country in 2022, prices in the Mountain region rose just 1.7% from November 2023 to November 2024.
The latest data from an Idaho Department of Human Resources labor market study show state workers here, on average, earn 15.1% less than the median wage of public and private sector employees in the region.
That’s also factoring in healthcare and retirement benefits, which are more generous than the private sector.
Base salaries across Idaho state workers are 25.1% below average compared to the median regional public and private sector employees.
The CEC Committee approved an 8% pay raise for Idaho State Police troopers to help retain and recruit more officers.
“It takes years of training and expense to produce a trooper with the experience to handle all the things that a trooper has to handle and this has become, in my opinion, a public safety issue,” said Sen. Dan Foreman (R-Viola).
Nurses and healthcare staff would get a 3% raise under the plan, with IT workers earning up to 4.5% pay hikes.
The Joint Finance and Appropriations Committee will consider the recommendation before finalizing a bill.
Copyright 2025 Boise State Public Radio
Idaho
After receiving support during Idaho's wildfire seasons, our firefighters are headed to California • Idaho Capital Sun
Idaho firefighters are making their way to assist and protect communities threatened by wildfires burning in the greater Los Angeles area in southern California.
More than 100,000 people have been evacuated from their homes, and at least five fires are burning covering more than 45 square miles there, according to NBC News.
The state of Idaho is mobilizing five task forces in a response to a request from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services through the Emergency Management Assistance Compact, according to a press release from the Idaho Office of Emergency Management.
“The Idaho Office of Emergency Management and the Idaho Fire Chiefs Association have coordinated efforts to evaluate available resources across the state,” and ” stand ready to provide additional assistance as needed,” the press release said.
As of Wednesday evening, 104 firefighters and 25 fire engines from Idaho were preparing to deploy this morning to support California’s response efforts, and the task forces are set to arrive in southern California on Friday, the press release stated. The task forces were mobilized from fire agencies throughout the state, including personnel from the city of Emmett and Kootenai County, as well as the Idaho National Laboratory in southern Idaho.
“Emergencies like these remind us of the critical importance of teamwork and mutual aid,” said Idaho Fire Chiefs Association President Kirk Carpenter in the release. “Idaho firefighters are prepared to join the fight in California, standing shoulder to shoulder with our partners to protect communities in harm’s way.”
The assistance compact has been invaluable to states facing wildfire, “ensuring that states can rely on each other during crises,” said Idaho Office of Emergency Management Director Brad Richy said in the release.
“After receiving support during our own wildfire seasons, Idaho is proud to return the favor by providing resources and personnel to help protect California’s communities,” he said.
The Emergency Management Assistance Compact was ratified by the U.S. Congress (Public Law 104-321) in 1996 and applies to all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The compact’s members can share personnel and resources from all disciplines, protect personnel who deploy to emergencies and be reimbursed for mission-related costs, according to the compact’s website.
“The EMAC is a vital interstate compact that provides a proven mutual aid framework allowing states to share resources during times of disaster or emergency,” the release stated. “All costs associated with deploying resources under EMAC are paid for by the requesting state.”
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
-
Business1 week ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health4 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades