Connect with us

Denver, CO

Denver mayor agrees to restore some funding to city clerk’s office, but casts doubt on election concerns

Published

on

Denver mayor agrees to restore some funding to city clerk’s office, but casts doubt on election concerns


Denver Mayor Mike Johnston’s administration agreed to restore some funding for the Office of the Clerk and Recorder, but called malarkey on Clerk Paul López’s claim that election integrity was in danger for the 2026 midterms.

After Johnston proposed cutting his budget by $210,000, López last month blasted the mayor, saying he would have to close eight ballot drop boxes and a polling center for the 2026 election as a result.

But in his letter to the City Council on Monday, Johnston wrote that “little evidence” had been presented to support the argument that the clerk’s funding request was necessary or that services would need to be “meaningfully reduced” under the proposed budget.

“Providing millions in new funding to the clerk when every other department is making cuts would result in even steeper cuts to other programs and personnel,” he wrote.

Advertisement

The budget proposed for the clerk in 2026 would have marked a reduction of nearly $4.5 million, or 24%, from the 2024 budget, when there was a presidential election. But the proposed amount was also 3% higher than the clerk’s budget was in 2022, the year of the last midterm election.

In his letter Monday, Johnston said he would add $800,000 to the clerk’s office budget.

López said he had provided proof of increasing costs and that the latest proposal was still $2.7 million short of what his office needs.

“Even after our own cuts, the shortage proposed by the mayor will harm Denver voters and undermine turnout in the 2026 primary and general midterm elections,” he said Monday.

López asked the City Council to amend the 2026 budget to add $2.7 million to his office’s spending plan.

Advertisement

The quarrel between elected officials comes as Denver is facing a bleak budget outlook for 2026. The city is expected to bring in $200 million less in revenue than originally anticipated. Already, Johnston’s office has imposed layoffs, a hiring freeze and service changes to help make up for that shortfall.

The mayor, whose office has wide latitude to write the city’s spending plan, proposed his 2026 budget — with $77 million in contract and service cuts — on Sept. 16. The City Council then voted to recommend 16 changes, amounting to $18.7 million more in spending, on Oct. 10.

Johnston ultimately addressed 11 of the council’s recommendations and added $4 million in additional spending.

Those extra dollars will come from interest earned on federal grant dollars awarded through the American Rescue Plan Act, Johnston wrote. He noted that funding is a one-time infusion that won’t be available next year.

Here are some of the other recommendations the mayor’s office accepted:

Advertisement
  • Johnston agreed to add $2.9 million to the Temporary Rental and Utility Assistance Program, bringing it to $15.1 million in spending for 2026. The council had asked him to add $7 million. The mayor’s office will also add $2 million for this year’s budget, bringing 2025 funding for the program to $16 million.
  • The Department of Transportation and Infrastructure will create a new system for residents to appeal parking citations without having to attend court. Johnston’s proposal originally abolished the city’s parking magistrates, eliminating any non-court options for residents who want to appeal their ticket. There is no new cost associated with this item.
  • Johnston’s team agreed to add the full $125,000 that council requested to the Denver Immigrant Legal Services Fund. That brings the budget for those services to $750,000 in 2026.
  • The mayor’s office will restore $120,000 to the Auditor’s Office budget. The council requested the restoration of nearly $500,000.
  • Mayoral appointees will be moved under the mayor’s office budget rather than being spread out among various departments. This change has no cost.

City Council president Amanda Sandoval said she received the letter and was “eager to review the details” with the rest of council.



Source link

Denver, CO

Sandwich shop owed more than $40,000 in taxes before seizure, city says

Published

on

Sandwich shop owed more than ,000 in taxes before seizure, city says


Long-running Denver lunch spot Mr. Lucky’s Sandwiches, which closed in December after Denver’s Department of Finance seized its two locations, owes more than $40,000 in unpaid taxes, according to the city agency. Galen Juracek, who owns the shops in Capitol Hill and the Highland neighborhood, specifically owes $40,556.11.

Multiple notices posted to the door of Mr. Lucky’s Capitol Hill location showed that the city demanded payment for the back taxes starting in July. But the city’s “distraint warrant” — a legal notice that a business owner owes a specific amount, and that the business could be seized if they don’t pay it — notes the shops, at 711 E. 6th Ave. and 3326 Tejon St., were forced to close on Tuesday, Dec. 23.

Mr. Lucky’s had already decided it would close its two locations by the end of 2025, said Laura Swartz, communications director for the Department of Finance. But the city’s seizure of the business shows that it had not been keeping up on basic requirements, with a $39,956 bill for unpaid sales taxes and $600.11 in “occupational privilege” taxes, which fund local services and allow a business to operate within a specific area.

“When businesses charge customers sales tax but then do not submit that sales tax to the city, the city is responsible for becoming involved,” she said in an email to The Denver Post

Advertisement

Juracek did not respond to multiple phone calls from The Denver Post requesting comment. His business, which is described on its website as a “go-to spot for handcrafted sandwiches since 1999, roasting our meats in-house and making every bite unforgettable,” is listed on the documents as G&J Concepts.



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Suspects sought in Denver shooting that killed teen, wounded 3 others

Published

on

Suspects sought in Denver shooting that killed teen, wounded 3 others


Denver police are searching for suspects in a Saturday night parking lot shooting that killed a 16-year-old and wounded three men, at least one of whom is not expected to survive, according to the agency.

Officers responded to the shooting in the 10100 block of East Hampden Avenue about 10:30 p.m. Saturday, near where East Hampden intersects South Galena Street, according to an alert from the Denver Police Department.

Police said a group of people had gathered in a parking lot on the edge of the city’s Kennedy neighborhood to celebrate the U.S. capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro when the shooting happened.

Paramedics took one victim to a hospital, and two others were taken to the hospital in private vehicles, police said. A fourth victim, identified by police as 16-year-old William Rodriguez Salas, was dropped off near Iliff Avenue and South Havana Street, where he died from his wounds.

Advertisement

At least one of the three victims taken to hospitals — a 26-year-old man, a 29-year-old man and a 33-year-old man — is not expected to survive, police said Tuesday. One man was in critical condition Sunday night, one was in serious condition and one was treated for a graze wound and released.



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Denver’s flavored vape ban sends customers across city lines

Published

on

Denver’s flavored vape ban sends customers across city lines


The new year in Colorado brought new restrictions for people who vape in Denver. As of January 1, a voter-approved ban on flavored nicotine products is now in effect in Denver, prohibiting the sale of flavored e-cigarettes and vaping products within city limits.

Just outside the Denver border, vape shops say they’re already feeling the ripple effects.

Advertisement

CBS


At Tokerz Head Shop in Aurora, located about a block and a half from the Denver city line, owner Gordon McMillon says customers are beginning to trickle in from Denver.

“I was in shock it passed, to be honest,” McMillon said. “Just because of how many people vape in Denver. But we’re hoping to take care of everybody that doesn’t get their needs met over there anymore.”

One of those customers is Justin Morrison, who lives in the Denver area and vapes daily. He stopped by the Aurora shop a day after the ban went into place.

Morrison says the ban won’t stop him from vaping. It will just change where he buys his products.

Advertisement

“I’m going to have to come all the way to Aurora to get them,” he said. “It’s pretty inconvenient. I smoke flavored vapes every day.”

The goal of the ban, according to public health advocates, is to reduce youth vaping.

Morrison said flavored vapes helped him quit smoking cigarettes, an argument frequently raised by adult users and vape retailers who oppose flavor bans.

“It helped tremendously,” he said. “I stopped liking the flavor of cigarettes. The taste was nasty, the smell was nasty. I switched all the way over to vapes, and it helped me stop smoking cigarettes completely.”

McMillon worries bans like Denver’s could push some former smokers back to cigarettes.

Advertisement

“If they can’t get their vapes, some will go back to cigarettes, for sure,” he said. “I’ve asked people myself, and it’s about 50-50.”

While McMillon acknowledges it will bring more business to shops outside Denver, he says the ban wasn’t something he wanted.

“Even if it helps me over here in Aurora, I’m against it,” he said. “I feel like adults should have the rights if they want to vape or not.”

More than 500 retailers in Denver removed their flavored products. For many, they accounted for the majority of their sales. Denver’s Department of Public Health and Environment says it will begin issuing fines and suspensions to retailers found selling flavored tobacco products.

Both McMillan and Morrison say they’re concerned the ban could spread to other cities. For now, Aurora vape shops remain legal alternatives for Denver customers.

Advertisement

Despite the added drive, Morrison says quitting isn’t on the table.

“It’s an addiction. You’re going to find a way to get it. That’s why I don’t see the point of banning it here,” Morrison said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending