Connect with us

Colorado

Proposed drilling near suburban Denver Superfund site raising flags • Colorado Newsline

Published

on

Proposed drilling near suburban Denver Superfund site raising flags • Colorado Newsline


This story originally appeared at Capital & Main.

A proposed 166-well oil and gas project in suburban Denver could imperil a decades-long, multimillion-dollar effort to prevent carcinogenic chemicals stored on one of the nation’s most contaminated industrial sites from leaking into groundwater, letters from federal and state officials show.

Regulators expressed concern in May that drilling underneath and near the Lowry Landfill Superfund Site could cause small cracks in bedrock cradling millions of gallons of toxic waste in 78 unlined trenches. These fissures could allow contaminants to enter an aquifer system that millions of Coloradans rely on, wrote the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to Civitas, the operator requesting permission to drill. The EPA oversees a complex 40-year effort to protect the health of millions of people living around the site.

The agency’s concerns stem from the issues that have long surrounded hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a drilling process that has led Colorado in the last decade to become the nation’s fourth largest oil-producing state. The method involves pumping sand and millions of gallons of water and chemicals roughly a mile under the surface to crack shale, and release oil and gas.

Advertisement

“The EPA is concerned that hydraulic fracturing surrounding and underneath the site could lead to a significant unintended release of hazardous substances,” the agency wrote in May to Dan Harrington, who leads Civitas’ development initiatives. This “contamination is held in place by a bedrock layer which could, under certain conditions, be subject to microfractures from fracking.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement

In response, Civitas sent a letter to the EPA in September and committed not to drill under the site, saying: “This precaution is not due to any risk associated with oil and natural gas development, but a desire to protect the Superfund remedy that is in place and operating effectively.”

The EPA cited the company’s commitment when asked if it is still apprehensive about Civitas’ plans to drill near the site and said in an email that it will “continue to coordinate with all parties to evaluate these and other site concerns.” Civitas did not return repeated requests for comment.

Natural gas production likely cause of southern Colorado earthquakes, experts say

The operator’s agreement not to drill under the Superfund site failed to reduce the anxiety of scores of households near the 50-square-mile proposed oil and gas project, which includes wells near the Aurora Reservoir. The facility is part of a system of reservoirs that store drinking water for about 390,000 people and is a popular recreation area.

Advertisement

Drilling currently exists about five miles from the Superfund site. Civitas is proposing well pads much closer — within about two miles. But horizontal pipes that extend beneath the proposed production area could come even closer to the site boundary.

The potential for Civitas’ Lowry Ranch oil and gas plan to disturb sensitive Superfund containment efforts brought to the fore long-running uncertainty among technical experts about whether nearby industrial operations, such as fracking, could trigger seismic activity. The U.S. Geological Survey and state agencies mapped faults near the site, as well as near the Aurora Reservoir’s dam.

Questions remain about the presence, and possible growth, of a fault at the northern end of the Superfund site and whether it’s in part responsible for allowing chemicals to leak and create a three-mile-long underground plume. The EPA says this plume doesn’t present a risk to groundwater or surface water.

Scientists have attributed earthquakes in Colorado, Oklahoma and Texas, to a surge in oil and gas operations over the last decade. These temblors were caused by injection wells, which companies drill deep into the earth and use to dispose of millions of gallons of wastewater that flows back up from fracking operations, studies found.

Hydraulic fracturing features a brief application of pressure to rock formations to release oil and gas, while wastewater injection is “an ongoing process that injects significant volumes of wastewater over long periods of time,” said Jill Carlson, an engineering geologist at the Colorado Geological Survey.

Advertisement

“While weak seismic events associated with fracking can be detected by seismometers, I am not aware of any surface shaking, movement or surface/near surface damage caused by fracking,” added Carlson, who is the survey’s deputy director and land-use program manager.

Uncertainty About Oil and Gas Drilling Effects on Public Health 

The Lowry Ranch oil and gas project is proposed on land owned by the Colorado State Land Board on the fringes of Aurora, the state’s third largest city. Much is at stake: Energy companies are planning massive projects ever closer to Denver suburbs, where the industrial activity exposes hundreds of thousands of residents to air pollution, spills, truck traffic and other hazards.

Proposed drilling near a Superfund site also raises new health and safety concerns residents say aren’t adequately addressed in state or local regulations. Increasingly, residents are demanding stricter rules about where fracking can take place and detailed studies that provide benchmarks for how much activity should be allowed.

“The county must insist on studies to understand the potential risks associated with fracking-induced seismicity on both the Lowry Landfill Superfund Site — and the Aurora Reservoir Dam,” wrote Kevin Lynch, an associate professor of law at the University of Denver Environmental Law Clinic, in an October letter to Arapahoe County commissioners on behalf of residents and conservation groups.

Civitas’ refiled its drilling plan on Feb. 23 after making a series of revisions requested by state regulators.  A 60-day public comment period ends April 23, and a hearing on the proposal is scheduled in front of the Energy & Carbon Management Commission for June 26.

Advertisement

The company’s original proposal, filed in 2022, prompted the Arapahoe County Board of County Commissioners to overhaul its  oil and gas rules. The five-member body voted 3 to 2 in November to increase setbacks between wells and reservoirs and occupied structures to 3,000 feet, and to require operators to file water quality plans and to do routine on-site air quality and noise testing.

Seismicity is a critical issue … No one is dealing with it.

– Marsha Kamin, a homeowner near Lowry Ranch

Advertisement

The county’s new rules are allowed under a 2019 law that requires the state’s oil and gas regulator to prioritize public health and the environment over fostering energy development.

County officials said they plan to study seismicity and other issues this year when staff and commissioners start reviewing a second round of rules aimed at limiting fracking’s impacts on neighborhoods.

This rulemaking will include a proposal to ban wastewater injection wells, “which have been linked to induced seismicity in Colorado,” wrote Anders Nelson, a county spokesperson, in an email.

“We will consider other seismicity concerns as we develop the regulations,” he added, “and seek advice on that topic from the Colorado Geological Survey, EPA and the Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission.”

Advertisement

The state land board, which has owned the 26,000 acre Lowry Ranch adjacent to the Lowry Landfill Superfund Site since the 1960s, does not have regulatory or permitting authority over Civitas’ project, wrote Kristin Kemp, the land board’s outreach and communications officer, in an email.

The land board’s assets include 4 million acres of subsurface minerals. Mineral extraction leases accounted for 80% of the $2 billion the agency earned in the last decade and provided as grants to fund capital construction at schools, she said.

“Currently, more than a dozen different operators ranging from agriculture, renewable energy, recreation and mineral extraction hold leases at Lowry Ranch,” Kemp said. A company purchased by Civitas “has held an oil and gas lease on the majority of the Lowry Ranch since 2020.”

On a November conference call, Civitas executives said they are pleased with the firm’s ability to drill farther, faster and with greater production in the Denver Julesburg Basin, the state’s largest oil play along the eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains.

“We’re very excited with how 2024 is shaping up,” said Chief Executive Officer Chris Nolan of the company’s plans to expand drilling operations in the region.

Advertisement

A 40 Year Containment Effort Continues in Perpetuity

As controversy over the safety of new industrial activity near the Lowry Landfill Superfund Site continues, myriad local, state and federal agencies, and companies, responsible for keeping chemicals contained on the site and out of residents’ groundwater and air, never stop working. A five-year review published in 2022 found that the site remedies are “currently protective of human health and the environment.”

The city and county of Denver, which owns the 507-acre site, works with the operator Waste Management to contain pollution. Efforts to reduce and monitor contamination in soils, groundwater and surface water are overseen by the EPA and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.

Containing the more than 138 million gallons of sewage, pesticides, industrial solvents and dozens of other hazardous substances dumped there requires an annual multimillion dollar coordinated effort. It also involves expensive infrastructure, such as a plant that removes methane emitted on the site and 500 regularly monitored water wells installed in the region’s aquifers.

Multiple barriers were built to hold pollution on the site including a slurry wall, a landfill cover, a groundwater extraction trench and a subsurface clay barrier. The EPA isn’t the only agency concerned about how Civitas’ oil and gas drilling proposal might impact the site. The state’s health department and the region’s Democratic congressman, Jason Crow, also expressed concern — both alerted to the issue by homeowners.

“Seismicity is a critical issue,” said Marsha Kamin, a homeowner who was unaware that wells contained in the Lowry Ranch project could be drilled within a mile of her subdivision when she moved in a year ago. “No one is dealing with it.”

Advertisement

On a brisk, gray January afternoon, Kamin joined other residents in a clubhouse with a panoramic view of the ice-choked Aurora Reservoir. They represented the leadership team for Save the Aurora Reservoir, or STAR — created about 18 months ago after Civitas announced its Lowry Ranch drilling proposal. The group recently retained a geologist and an environmental attorney to help them push for stricter rules.

STAR, with more than 1,000 members signed up to receive action alerts on its Facebook page, asked Crow to write a letter to the EPA in October asking what the agency plans to do about the risks posed by oil and gas operations close to the Superfund site.

The agency responded in November that it obtained an agreement from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management not to lease its minerals under the Superfund site, in addition to the acknowledgment from Civitas that it won’t drill below the site. When asked by Capital & Main about the agency’s response, Crow’s office said it will follow the drilling plan as it goes through the state and county approval processes.

“The EPA will need to monitor the Lowry Landfill Superfund Site for decades to come, and thoroughly monitor the impact of this and any proposed projects close to the site,” Crow said in an email response to an interview request. “There should be no question about the safety of Coloradans’ water.”

Copyright Capital & Main 2024

Advertisement



Source link

Colorado

Colorado breweries warn new tax hike bills could lead to more small business closures, job losses

Published

on

Colorado breweries warn new tax hike bills could lead to more small business closures, job losses


A bartender pours a beer at a bar in Summit County on Thursday, Feb. 29, 2024. A new bill intended to provide funds for alcohol-related addiction prevention, treatment and recovery programs could cost small breweries and wineries up to 160% in taxes and fees.
Andrew Maciejewski/Summit Daily News

Colorado brewers are raising red flags over new bills that could increase taxes and fees on small alcohol businesses, many of which are already struggling to keep their doors open.

House Bill 1271, known as the Alcohol Impact & Recovery Enterprises bill, creates three government-run enterprises designed to fund programs for alcohol-related addiction prevention, treatment and recovery programs — all funded through fees imposed on alcoholic beverages. The bill is sponsored by four Democratic lawmakers.

Colorado per capita alcohol consumption is higher than the national average. The state also has one of the higher alcohol-related death rates in the country, with around 24 deaths per 100,000 residents as of 2023, according to data from Trust for America’s Health. 



Data from the Colorado Health Institute shows not everyone who could benefit from treatment for alcohol use disorders currently receives it, largely due to factors like cost, accessibility and stigma.

Advertisement

Were the bill to pass, manufacturers and wholesale distributors would have to pay five cents in fees per gallon of beer, cider and apple wine, seven cents per liter of wine and 35 cents per liter of spirits to be used toward alcohol-related treatment and recovery programs. As state lawmakers plan cuts to balance a $850 million budget deficit, advocates for these programs argue the funding from the bill could help offset any potential losses.



For local breweries and wineries in the mountains, however, this would be a significant financial blow to an already struggling industry.

“This is not the time for us to be implementing new taxes on an industry that is hurting right now,” said Carlin Walsh, owner of Elevation Beer Company and chair of the Colorado Brewers Guild. “As a brewer, I feel like the state is looking a gift horse in the mouth.”

Beer, wine, cider and spirits generate around $22 billion in economic activity for Colorado, according to the Colorado Beverage Coalition. The state is home to nearly 420 breweries, 145 wineries, nearly 20 cideries and 100 distilleries. 

Faced with rising costs and waning appetites, however, over 100 Colorado breweries have shuttered their doors since 2024, marking the first time since 2005 that more breweries closed than opened. Meanwhile, national surveys confirmed alcohol consumption in the U.S. is at a 90-year low.

Advertisement

Walsh said breweries already pay eight cents per gallon in taxes, which for a company like Elevation translates to roughly $30,000 in taxes annually. Fees from the new bill would add another $12,000 to its yearly expenses.

“The alcohol industry at large is one of the most regulated industries in the United States, period. We already pay a very heavy tax,” Walsh said, adding that breweries provide tens of millions of dollars to Colorado’s general fund. “Our position is that there’s already money available. Those dollars go to the general fund, and it’s really up to the state to manage what we already provide and to decide what is their priority. We don’t feel like it should be on our shoulders to increase the amount that we pay to the state just because the state wants to endeavour on new programs.”

The Colorado Beverage Coalition said the imposed fees would be a 60% cost increase on alcohol businesses. Paired with an estimated 100% increase in taxes from a referred ballot measure proposed last week — House Bill 1301 — the impacts would be disastrous for the industry, Walsh said.

House Bill 1301 would refer a measure to the November ballot that would increase excise taxes on alcohol and increase sales and excise taxes on marijuana in order to fund a mental health hospital in Aurora.

“Our brewery and so many other breweries, we just don’t have capacity for that. We’re already a low margin business to begin with,” Walsh said. “If this happens, this is going to drive further consolidation amongst our members. It’s going to drive further closures.”

Advertisement

Larger alcohol companies may be in a better position to absorb some of the costs from increased fees, said Shawnee Adelson, executive director for the Colorado Brewers Guild. Small businesses in rural resort markets, on the other hand, are not in that position.

“At a certain point when costs just keep going up and up and up, there’s no more place to cut,” Adelson said.

Colorado jobs, tourism could see ripple effects

The Colorado Beverage Coalition estimates House Bill 1271 could impact several of the 131,000 brewery, winery and distillery jobs in the state.

The Colorado Beverage Coalition estimates House Bill 1271 would jeopardize 131,000 brewery, winery and distillery jobs in the state, in addition to “greatly increasing cost on consumers.” Walsh said an average brewery would “no doubt” have to cut jobs if either, or both, bills were to pass.

“Depending on the size of a brewery, it could be the cost of a full-time staff or multiple full-time staff to cover the cost of these (fees), so there is a real concern about job losses due to increased costs,” Adelson added.

The Colorado Distillers Guild also argues the bill would be a blow to the tourism industry, as visitors could be deterred by increased consumer costs and a dwindling beer culture.

“A lot of (breweries) will either have to absorb that cost or pass it on to the consumer. And right now, in the current state of the economy, we understand that a lot of consumers are price conscious right now, which is also contributing to lower consumption,” Adelson said. “Passing on that price is going to be really hard for consumers to swallow as well.”

Advertisement

The bill is not entirely new, as similar legislation by the same name was proposed in 2024. The original bill, which died in committee, received significant pushback from Gov. Jared Polis due to concerns that it would end up raising prices for consumers. Polis also requested that sponsors exempt beer companies from the fees.

Aside from a stakeholder meeting ahead of the bill’s introduction, Adelson said the Colorado Brewers Guild had not been contacted by lawmakers about the plan for an excise fee increase.

“We’ve had two years to sit down and have discussions with lawmakers about this. Nobody has reached out. Nobody has sat down with us to say, ‘Hey, this is our goal. We wanna get this done. How can you guys meet us halfway?’” Walsh said.

Being an enterprise fee rather than a tax, House Bill 1271 would not go to voters for approval. Instead, the change would be implemented through legislation only and automatically go live in July 2027. Because the bill would create three separate enterprise fees for beer, wine and spirits — each capped at $20 million annually per state law — the state could collect up to $60 million from all three.

The bill would also create a new 11-member board appointed by the governor to oversee the three enterprises, which would be made up of alcohol industry representatives, behavioral health professionals, public health experts and individuals in recovery.

Advertisement

On top of feeling that a financial change of that magnitude should be left up to voters, Walsh said he’s heard from businesses that are concerned about the potential for the board to increase fees in the future.

“There are very few guard rails around how this enterprise can operate, including the ability for them to raise the tax price that we’re currently paying. There’s very few restrictions within this bill that control how much they can increase that tax,” Walsh said. “In two years they could come back and say, ‘Oh we’re going to increase it another five cents or 10 cents.’”

For Adelson, the fees would impact more than just manufacturing facilities and business  operations.

“They’re community gathering spaces and they’re third places,” Adelson said. “They give back a lot and so I think I just want to make sure that the consumer realizes that we’re not just talking about production facilities, but your local neighborhood brewery that’s down the street and that your neighbours own or your friends work at.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

New affordable housing communities in Colorado aim to serve families with the greatest need

Published

on

New affordable housing communities in Colorado aim to serve families with the greatest need


LONGMONT, Colo. — For Skye Beck and her husband, the decision to uproot their family of five from Nebraska and relocate to Colorado for a new job wasn’t easy — especially when it came to the cost of living.

“It was looking like it maybe was not going to be an affordable option for us to come out here,” she said. “We did find one eventually, but it was still just the two-bedroom apartment, and that was just a little tight for us for the year.”

After a year of cramped living, the Beck family moved into a much more spacious apartment at Ascent at Hover Crossing in Longmont. The newest affordable housing development in Boulder County, which officially opened its doors on Tuesday, includes four-bedroom units — a rarity in affordable housing.

“I think they only have six of those [units],” said Beck. “To have that much space for the five of us is a blessing.”

Advertisement

Katie Pung, housing development project manager for the City of Longmont, said the larger units were a deliberate priority.

“Having those larger units for families really came together in a way that we feel like is going to be meaningful for Longmont families,” Pung said.

The mixed-income apartments are available for a variety of incomes, with units ranging from 30% to 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) — about $31,650 to $84,400 for a one-person household.

The development also includes an early childhood education (ECE) center on site, giving families an affordable childcare option.

OUR Center, a longtime local nonprofit specializing in subsidized early education for low-income families, will operate the center. The facility is set to open later this year, with availability for both residents and the broader Longmont community.

Advertisement

It reflects a growing statewide push to incorporate childcare into housing projects through state funding and technical assistance for developers.

p2-aff-housing-projects_030326AKB.mp4

A similar effort is underway in Denver’s Berkeley neighborhood, where the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless is partnering with the Denver Housing Authority to develop Charity’s House, a family housing development with 135 new units — also with an on-site child care center.

Advertisement

At least 40% of the units will be reserved for families earning 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI) — currently $37,850 for a family of three and $42,050 for a family of four in Denver. All units will be income-restricted to those at or below 60% AMI.

Cathy Alderman, chief communications and public policy officer for the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, said land partnerships help reduce both cost and construction time.

“If we can enter into a partnership with another organization that owns land, and we can build on that, that cuts our cost and time down considerably,” Alderman said.

The DHA Delivers for Denver (D3) bond program, a partnership between DHA and the City of Denver, has funded 11 property acquisitions since its inception in 2019, according to Denver Housing Authority Chief Real Estate Officer Erin Clark.

“It is public partnerships like that and public-private partnerships that, even us, working with a nonprofit here, that are what deliver more housing across the community,” said Clark. “It’s just people thinking outside of the box and leveraging resources and saying, ‘What do you do best, and what do we do best, and how can we work together to make all this happen?’”

Advertisement

Construction is slated to begin in late 2027.

Denver7 has heard from multiple experts through the years about the lack of affordable housing options for families and seniors.

Years-long waitlists and housing lottery odds often make it tougher. More than 15,000 children and youth are currently experiencing homelessness in Denver.

Colorado has been making significant housing investments since the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to more affordable housing developments across the state. But Alderman said there is still more work to be done.

“My biggest concern is that not all of that housing is being targeted for those households in the greatest need,” Alderman said.

Advertisement

Longtime Longmont resident Karen Howerton remembers a time when rents hovered in the $600 range.

“When I came back to Longmont six years ago, I was surprised at how much inflation had happened here and how big the town had grown,” she said.

The last affordable housing development she lived in didn’t quite fit all her needs.

Now, she joins the Becks as one of the first tenants at Ascent at Hover Crossing.

“What I wanted to come over here for was a washer and dryer — I didn’t have that at my other place — and the little balcony, you know,” she said. “I’ve met a few of the neighbors already, and I can’t say enough about it. It’s just a great place to be, for sure.”

Advertisement

Howerton and Beck say the little comforts go a long way toward making a place feel like home.

“I mean, everyone deserves to have a space and be able to afford it without worrying about all the other parts of life,” Beck said. “I feel like here we’re able to finally rest a bit and able to enjoy life, but it shouldn’t be limited to just a waitlist.”

Coloradans making a difference | Denver7 featured videos


Denver7 is committed to making a difference in our community by standing up for what’s right, listening, lending a helping hand and following through on promises. See that work in action, in the videos above.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado weather: Up to 14 inches of snow forecast for mountains

Published

on

Colorado weather: Up to 14 inches of snow forecast for mountains


Snow started Monday night in Colorado’s mountains and will continue throughout the week, likely making its way into the Denver area on Friday, according to the National Weather Service.

Colorado’s mountain roads, including Interstate 70 at the Eisenhower-Johnson Tunnel and Berthoud Pass, were already snow-covered Tuesday morning, according to the weather service.

“With more snow to come throughout the day, a Winter Weather Advisory was issued for the Front Range Mountains,” forecasters said.

That advisory will be in effect until 8 p.m. Tuesday for parts of Jackson, Larimer, Boulder, Grand, Gilpin, Clear Creek, Summit and Park counties, including Rocky Mountain National Park. Additional snow accumulations between 6 and 14 inches are possible on Tuesday, forecasters said in the alert.

Advertisement

As of Tuesday, the weather service’s snow forecasts included:

  • 2 inches on I-70’s Vail Pass, with up to 3 inches possible
  • 3 inches in Winter Park, with up to 4 inches possible
  • 4 inches in Eldora and on U.S. 6’s Loveland Pass, with up to 5 inches possible
  • 4 inches on U.S. 40’s Berthoud Pass near Winter Park, with up to 7 inches possible
  • 5 inches at Bear Lake in Rocky Mountain National Park, with up to 7 inches possible
  • 6 inches on U.S. 34’s Milner Pass in RMNP, with up to 8 inches possible
  • 7 inches on Colorado 14’s Cameron Pass near Fort Collins, with up to 8 inches possible
  • 9 inches on Mount Zirkel, the highest summit of Colorado’s Park Range of the Rocky Mountains, with up to 11 inches possible

“Travel could be very difficult,” weather service forecasters stated in the winter weather advisory. “The hazardous conditions will impact the Tuesday morning and evening commutes.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending