Will this be the team that gets Arizona back to the Final Four for the first time in 25 years, and maybe go further? Who knows. But one thing is for certain, no Wildcats squad has had a better regular season than this one.
Colorado
Mushroom startups prepare to brave new world of Colorado’s untested psilocybin healing industry
Just a few blocks from Union Station in Denver, a new psilocybin mushroom healing center called The Center Origin occupies a sunny office suite on the third floor of a brick building above a dental surgery clinic. Elizabeth Cooke, the CEO and co-founder, has carefully decorated each room. There are plants, abstract paintings, cushy couches and “zero gravity” recliners. One room sports a small yoga studio and a shelf of literature on the psychedelic experience.
Just one thing is missing: patients.
But that will soon change. With the last piece of the supply chain finally falling into place, healing centers are on track to open their doors to the customers on their waiting lists in a matter of weeks.
In early May, the Colorado Natural Medicine Division issued a psilocybin mushroom testing facility license to Nordic Analytical Laboratories, a Colorado company that previously tested cannabis products in Denver and Pueblo. At the time of writing, five healing centers and three psilocybin mushroom cultivators have also received licenses. All that’s left is for the mushrooms to grow and get tested.
“When you get licensed you have to start fresh,” Adrian Martinez, the owner of a newly licensed psilocybin mushroom grow operation called Druids Choice, told The Colorado Sun last month. “It will take nine to 12 weeks to get a usable product.”
The number of leads we have talked to in Colorado is astronomical. When we really break down the numbers, and tell them what’s transpired in Oregon, 80% are either pausing the project or abandoning it all together.
— Michael Mayes, psilocybin business consultant
Colorado was the second state to legalize supervised psilocybin use, after Oregon did the same in 2020. Healing centers in Oregon opened in the summer of 2023. The industry is still young and some businesses have faced challenges getting started. Michael Mayes, the CEO of a psilocybin and cannabis business consulting firm called Quantum 9, said cultivators and healing centers face dual challenges from an inherently limited customer base and costly overhead expenses.
“The number of leads we have talked to in Colorado is astronomical,” Mayes said .“When we really break down the numbers, and tell them what’s transpired in Oregon, 80% are either pausing the project or abandoning it all together.”
But regulators have mitigated some of the challenges that Oregon’s regulations presented, and Colorado businesses say they have learned from the hurdles faced by their counterparts in Oregon. Both groups remain hopeful that Colorado can create a sustainable industry around psilocybin healing.
A low barrier to entry
In November of 2022, Colorado voters passed Proposition 122, a ballot measure that legalized psilocybin healing centers and directed the state to create a regulatory framework for the new industry. Since then, the newly formed Colorado Natural Medicine Division has been hard at work designing rules that balance various interests, including those of health care systems, traditional indigenous practitioners and local municipalities.
One overarching goal, according to deputy director Kyle Lambert, was to keep the required licensing fees and paperwork to a bare minimum for prospective psilocybin entrepreneurs.
“We really had a goal of trying to create the lowest barrier to entry for potential operators, while still acknowledging that the state licensing authority had to establish a cash fund for the Natural Medicine Division and the state,” Lambert said.
In a move representative of this intention, the division pared down the number of full-time positions in the department from 19, the number proposed in a 2023 senate bill, to just nine. The state rules, finalized in October, set fees for natural medicine licenses ranging from $4,000 for a micro healing center to $8,000 for a product manufacturing facility in 2025.
“We think this is the minimum necessary to carry out the obligations we have to be protective of public safety and implement the program,” Lambert said.
According to Mayes, the division has been somewhat successful in its goal to keep the licensing process from becoming burdensome.
“In the world of RFPs, it’s incredibly light on what you have to submit to get the ball rolling,” he said.

Colorado lawmakers also made a move to avoid a policy that has hamstrung the natural medicine industry in Oregon. Under Oregon’s law, local municipalities are allowed to prohibit cultivators and healing centers from operating within their jurisdictions, which led to more than 100 local bans. Colorado’s law, on the other hand, stipulates that local jurisdictions cannot ban natural medicine businesses, even through overly restrictive zoning ordinances.
“Whatever zoning or time-placement restrictions they do put in place cannot be so restrictive as to effectively prohibit the operation,” Natural Medicine Division director of policy and regulatory affairs Allison Robinette said.
Another challenge for psilocybin businesses, however, was baked into Colorado’s original ballot measure. The measure also legalized production and possession of psilocybin mushrooms for personal use — something that is still prohibited in Oregon.
How Colorado’s broad legalization of psilocybin might affect natural medicine businesses is yet to be seen. But Cooke, the owner of The Center Origin, worries that, without consequences, potential patients might seek out the black market due to the high price of sessions with a licensed facilitator at a healing center. Cooke says patients could spend more than $3,500 on a psilocybin experience when The Center Origin opens its doors.
“There’s going to be a lot of people that say, ‘I can’t afford this,’ because the regulated model is so expensive,” she told The Sun. “I think it’s going to do a lot of harm to the industry for sure.”

To compound this, the price difference between visiting a healing center and growing psilocybin mushrooms at home is likely to be dramatic. Experts say that mushroom cultivation is actually relatively simple and cheap. However, mushrooms are likely to come with a hefty price tag at healing centers, as they have in Oregon where the cost for a single dose is nearly $70. That’s because manufacturing medicine in a state-licensed facility comes with a host of other associated costs.
Cultivating psilocyben
Adrian Martinez went to trade school for collision repair straight out of high school and worked in the industry for 16 years. But, when Proposition 122 passed, he immediately knew he wanted to change careers.
“Something hit me inside,” he said. “I was like, I want to do that. I saw it as an opportunity to provide a service that could help people.”
Martinez had no background in counseling, a prerequisite for the facilitators that work at health centers, but he figured he could be a cultivator. Over the next two years, he taught himself how to grow mushrooms. Not just Psilocybe cubensis, but culinary mushrooms like enokis, oysters and shiitakes, too.
In February, he quit his job and devoted himself to getting his Psilocybe cubensis cultivation business, called Druids Choice, up-and-running. In April, he signed a lease on a warehouse in Aurora, and Druids Choice became the second licensed cultivation facility in the state. So far, he has funded the business entirely with his own savings — nearly $20,000 in total so far.
“I’m very excited and a little scared,” he told The Sun.

Because recreational sales of psilocybin mushrooms remain illegal in Colorado, businesses like Druids Choice can sell only to healing centers. As such, their income will be entirely reliant on the healing centers’ ability to bring in clients.
According to Hayes, the challenges facing cultivators are compounded by the fact that psilocybin experiences only require a small amount of mushrooms, usually taken infrequently. The standard course of treatment at a healing center includes just one dose of mushrooms, which is limited to 5 grams in Colorado.
“The premise of a healing center is to have breakthrough therapy,” Hayes said. “If it works you might not need it again. In terms of profit, everything’s kind of working against these places. ”
In Oregon, healing centers had sold 25,553 psilocybin products to date at the time of reporting, totaling $1.26 million in sales over 17 months, according to the Oregon Health Authority. Mushroom sales in Oregon are dwarfed by cannabis sales, which totaled more than $960 million in 2024 alone.
Despite these modest sales figures, a small cohort of mushroom cultivators seem to have carved out a niche in Oregon. At the time of writing, there are 10 licensed cultivators and one product manufacturer in the state.
Martinez hopes to do the same in Colorado. Druids Choice was the second cultivator to receive a license and, so far, it’s one of only three. The same day that Druids Choice received its license, Martinez inoculated jars of corn with Psilocybe cubensis spores. A month later, Martinez estimated that Druids Choice would produce its first batch of mushrooms within a few weeks. The batch will be among the first in the state.

While mycelium spreads through the jars in his incubation tent, Martinez is making phone calls and scheduling meetings with healing centers. If Druids Choice is going to survive the startup phase, it will have to start bringing in money soon. He says his vision for the company isn’t particularly competitive or profit oriented. He just wants to build a sustainable business that provides a public benefit.
“I just want to provide a service and pay my own mortgage and living expenses,” he said. “And, any employees that I have in the future, I want them to be properly compensated.”
Creating other revenue streams
At the other end of the supply chain, healing centers like The Center Origin are working to hire facilitators and design protocols for guiding patients through psilocybin experiences.
According to clinical director Mikki Vogt, the center’s patients will start with two one-hour prep sessions to develop rapport with their facilitators, set intentions for their healing journeys, complete state-required screenings and learn about psilocybin experiences. Then they will come in a third time for a culminating half-day psilocybin experience.
“The client experiences three-and-a-half to four hours in a very internal state, where they’re engaged with the innate healing intelligence of the mushroom and the facilitator is by their side,” Vogt explained.
As the mushrooms wear off, the facilitator begins a “reintegration session” meant to distill useful insights from their psilocybin experience. Patients can opt to follow the experience with additional sessions or not.
Research on the benefits of psilocybin-assisted therapy is an active and controversial field, but some trials have found it useful for combating addiction, depression and other mental health disorders. Psilocybin has also been used in traditional healing practices by indigenous groups for over 1,000 years, long before the field of clinical pharmacology came to be.
“What I have personally seen in this work is profound healing, transformation, self-actualization and resolution that clients couldn’t find relief from for years and years of different approaches,” Vogt said.
Like cultivators, healing centers also face a unique set of business challenges. Before admitting clients, each center must fulfill a long list of state requirements. Among them, they have to build a secure storage room, install a surveillance system and submit an environmental, social and governance plan. Each proprietor and facilitator also has to apply for and pay for individual licenses on top of the facility license.
According to Cooke, though, the state requirements are actually just a small fraction of startup and overhead costs. What worries her more is liability insurance. Because psilocybin healing is a relatively new and untested medical field, few insurers offer plans, and those that do charge a hefty premium.
When Cooke was finally able to land a policy for The Center Origin, she immediately had to raise the center’s prices to compensate. On top of that, each facilitator must carry professional liability insurance. Vogt says that she was quoted more than $5,000 per year. That’s nearly eight times as much as she already pays as a licensed professional counselor.
“Insurance costs, we’re finding, are going to be astronomical,” Vogt said. “Insurance companies are scared. It’s hard to anticipate what will happen.”
In order to offset costs and diversify income, Cooke says the center is focused on “building out verticals.” In addition to healing sessions, the center plans to offer mushroom cultivation classes, facilitator training and microdosing group sessions. She is also developing product lines of essential oil-infused topicals and medicinal mushroom supplements.
“In Oregon, the healing centers that only provided room rentals and didn’t have anything else available really struggled,” Cooke said. “The ones that offered training and other opportunities made it, and we’re trying to learn from that.”
Offsetting costly services
In the end, costly overhead may be passed along to clients. Cooke says that The Center Origin will charge incoming clients $3,500 start-to-finish, that’s in addition to the cost of mushrooms. Clients that opt to work with a supervised facilitator in training will pay $2,100.
In an effort to make inherently costly psilocybin healing services more accessible, the nonprofits Althea and Tricycle Day have partnered to create the Forward Fund for Psychedelic Healing. Prospective patients can apply to have psilocybin healing services subsidized or paid for by the fund. Vogt says that The Center Origin will guide clients through the application process if they can’t pay for healing services themselves.
“It’s an awesome setup they have,” she said. “Based on their level of need and cost of services, we can help them get whatever coverage they need.”
The forward fund is a “weighted lottery system,” meaning that patients are ranked based on their responses to a questionnaire and entered to receive funding. It’s unclear, as of yet, what portion of applicants might receive funding, but Althea has committed to publishing a quarterly report documenting allocations.
Hayes, the consultant, says that the cost of psilocybin healing services is likely to come down over time if Colorado’s industry evolves similarly to Oregon’s. He estimates that the cost for a session in Colorado could eventually stabilize at around $800.
“In the beginning of the program, that’s where you’re going to see really high per-session prices,” he said. “They’ll eventually come down.”

Cooke says that she hopes to lower prices as soon as possible. Like Martinez, she says that her goal was never to reap large profits. She wants to build a sustainable business that practices responsibly and pays its employees well. In the beginning, she hopes to bring in just eight to 10 clients a month — just enough to keep the center going.
“We wouldn’t make a ton of money, but we would cover costs and feel like we’re bringing a little money in,” she said.
Cooke’s goals may not be profit-minded, but they are ambitious. Through the classes and groups offered at The Center Origin, she envisions fostering a like-minded community of psychedelic enthusiasts.
“This can be part of a greater lifestyle, experience and community” she said. “It can be as big or as little as you want it to be, and we’re here for that.”
In the future, the center’s offerings could even expand beyond psilocybin to other psychedelics. Proposition 122 actually legalized five different psychedelic compounds. Two are psilocybin and psilocin, the psychoactive chemicals in psilocybin mushrooms. The other three are ibogaine, mescaline (the psychoactive component in peyote) and dimethyltryptamine, or DMT, the psychoactive component in ayahuasca).
As of yet, it’s unclear if the state will open up these other psychedelics to a regulated healing industry, as they have with psilocybin mushrooms. But, Robinette says that the Natural Medicine Advisory Board will broach the subject of ibogaine at the beginning of 2026.
“The board will be taking up those natural medicines, starting with ibogaine, for consideration of whether they should be included in the regulatory program and, if they are, what that looks like,” she said. “It would require statutory changes and it might require an expansion of (the Natural Medicine Division’s) authority.”
By then, the state will have nearly a year of regulatory experience with psilocybin to draw from. And, businesses like The Center Origin and Druids Choice, may be poised to provide services never before seen in legal American commerce.
Colorado
Outraged over incentives for data centers that are no good for Colorado (Letters)
Data centers: What good are they for Colorado?
Re: “Dueling policies for data centers,” March 1 news story
The Denver Post article about two competing bills in the legislature regarding new data centers in Colorado seems to start with the presumption that we want the data centers.
Why do we want them and who wants them? Is it the politicians wanting bragging rights about our state becoming another Silicon Valley? Perhaps they want more businesses so they can collect more taxes from the new residents. Alternatively, they just want more power in Washington by increasing our population. Has anyone stopped to ask why we want to attract more people to our state?
Colorado is in a fight with other Western states to obtain more water for our growing population. Our wildlife is being crowded out by the increased urbanization. The roads are so crowded that it is not uncommon to come to a complete stop on our interchanges during rush hour. We have a serious housing shortage. The air is being polluted by the increased number of cars. These are all the result of a growing population. Did anyone stop to ask why we want more people?
During my 53 years living in Colorado, I have never heard anyone (other than politicians) say, “We need more people.” On the contrary, the conversation is more often about how we are becoming overcrowded. I would like the politicians to explain why we need more businesses and more people in our state. It should not be a presumption that more is better! Are our elected representatives truly reflecting the wishes of their constituents?
Doug Hurst, Parker
Anger and disbelief were our reactions when we read about House Bill 1030, which is under consideration at the statehouse. This outrageous corporate welfare bill would provide some of the world’s wealthiest corporations with massive state tax reductions to build monstrous resource-thirsty data centers. Analysts projected a $92.5 million tax loss in just three years if a bunch of these data centers are built. Just one 160-megawatt facility would gobble up as much power as 176,000 homes once completed. Consider for comparison that the entire DIA airport uses around 45 megawatts of power!
As the state legislature grapples with bone-deep budget cuts, we cannot afford to exempt data centers from paying their own way nor allow their unregulated construction. Taxpayer-funded corporate handouts would entail massive hits to tax revenue that should be used for our schools, roads, infrastructure, and valid state needs. What essential services will potentially be cut or axed to cover the lost revenue to the state from this corporate giveaway?
These data centers also demand massive amounts of our water. A CoreSite data center in Denver alone will use approximately 805,000 gallons of water per day to air-condition its computers. That is the same as the average daily indoor water use of 16,100 Denver homes.
I pray our state legislature will condemn HB-1030 to the corporate welfare hell where it belongs in. Instead, they should support Senate Bill 102 that will hopefully properly regulate these tax-eating, water-wasting, and electricity-gobbling monstrosities.
Terry Talbot, Grand Junction
As a pediatrician, I’ve noticed one key issue missing from the data center debate: public health.
Data centers are extraordinarily energy- and water-intensive. Nationally, they already consume about 4% of U.S. electricity — a figure expected to more than double by 2030. Much of that power still comes from burning fossil fuels. Without strong safeguards, that growth means more air pollution. In my clinical practice, I see firsthand how health is shaped by the air we breathe. More pollution means more asthma attacks, heart disease, and premature deaths, especially in communities already burdened by poor air quality.
Water use is another concern. Large data centers can use enormous amounts of water for cooling. In a drought-prone state like Colorado, this raises serious questions about long-term drinking water reliability and heat resilience.
Energy affordability is also a health issue. When infrastructure is built to serve massive corporate users, costs can shift to households. I see the effects of energy insecurity in families forced to choose between cooling their homes, buying medication, or putting food on the table.
Colorado has an opportunity to get this right. Senate Bill 102 would establish guardrails to protect ratepayers, limit pollution, and ensure large electricity users pay their full infrastructure costs. Other states, including Michigan and Virginia, are reconsidering generous tax incentives after seeing how quickly public costs can outpace public benefit.
Colorado can welcome innovation without sacrificing clean air, clean water, affordable energy, and community health. Public health must be a priority, not an afterthought.
Clare Burchenal, Denver
As the story makes clear, data centers in our communities have real impacts on our health, our pocketbooks and our quality of life. I’m a mom of two small children who are counting on the adults in the room to make responsible decisions that impact their futures. It’s dizzying to see the pace of data centers sweeping the country and confusing as to why leaders are rushing to accommodate them without taking into consideration all of the impacts these massive industrial complexes have on communities.
It’s critical that data centers are powered by clean-burning renewable energy, not fossil fuels. We are in a no-snow winter in Colorado, and we have no safeguards in place against data center water use. Energy infrastructure should be paid for by the billion-dollar big tech companies that will profit from it, not by unfair rate increases for our families and small businesses.
There is a way to do this right. Senate Bill 102 has some important protections for our families and communities while still allowing for the responsible construction and operation of data centers built in appropriate places in our state. It is unacceptable that our leaders do nothing to protect us from big tech excesses. SB-102 will protect all Colorado kids – and their parents and communities. Join me in urging our legislators to pass this important bill.
Sara Kuntzler, Arvada
U.S. women’s hockey players above the game and politics
Re: “Trump tore athletes down on the world’s stage,” March 1 commentary
Dear Megan Schrader,
Thank you for your column on how the president disrespected the U.S. women’s Olympic hockey team. Your excellent commentary hit and sent the puck into the back of the net, so to speak.
To take it a step further, I believe the women’s choice not to visit the White House was more than meets the eye. Ostensibly, they declined the invitation because of the timing, specifically the resumption of play in the professional women’s hockey league.
Yet, I would like to believe it was more an expression of contempt for the president and his policies.
The women were smarter and braver and truer to their values than were the men’s Olympic hockey team, who, with the same timing issues, chose to accept the invitation to the White House. That visit and the visit to the State of the Union Address only helped bolster the president’s optics. An exception was the Colorado Avalanche’s own Brock Nelson, who declined to accompany the men’s team because he valued his family time more than a public charade.
In sports — as in life — we need more people like the women hockey players who will elevate their values above the games and politics.
Bill Allegar, Denver
Backing up to park for safety?
Re: “Do you back into a parking spot or back out?” March 1 feature story
I read this with slight amusement. For someone who has traveled a bit, and especially in Asia (Japan in particular), backing into a parking space is a very common practice (not a new trend) and has been for decades. On my first trip to Japan, around 1992, I was told it was what most people did.
As for the company Imminent Threat Solutions recommending “tactical parking” because they should “prevail against all threats,” seems like marketing hype of the biggest kind, building fear into your daily life of running errands and going to work. Has there been bad behaviour, shootings, and whatnot in a parking lot? Sure, but let’s not build fear for something that happens rarely to the average individual.
Randy DeBoer, Denver
To add to the parking procedures article in Sunday’s paper, there is another option, one that I use and recommend; it’s the “drive-through” to an open space.
After having been hit and having a rental car damaged (a three-month hassle to resolve) by a driver who backed out of an opposite space without looking, I don’t drive into a parking space if I can help it. What I do instead is find an open space where I can drive in straight and continue to a back-to-back adjoining space where I can park and then drive ahead to depart. These parking spots are typically a longer walk to my destination, and I benefit from the additional steps.
G. E. Cole, Centennial
I enjoyed your article on discussing whether to back in or pull straight into parking spaces. Our oldest son is a backer-inner, and I am starting to be one too. What is missing from your analysis, though, is the grocery store, much less Costco or Home Depot. Almost nobody is a backer-inner in these places, since you’re typically loading stuff in your backseat, hatch, or pickup bed. I guess the backer-inners are just not going to be able to escape as quickly once they’ve picked up 50 pounds of dog food, 25 rolls of paper towels, or five sheets of 4′ x 8′ plywood. Hope they survive.
Tim Hickisch, Highlands Ranch
You can support immigrants and the law
Re: “Faith communities show support for immigrants,” Feb. 22 news story
Faith communities do show support for immigrants. I don’t agree with those who stand against the law and ICE. While we may support all people made in the image of God, we should not be for illegal immigrants. They have broken the law, and some are doing great harm while living here. Legal immigrants, please come. Illegal immigrants, please go home and come here legally.
Deanna R Walworth, Brighton
Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.
To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.
Colorado
Skier killed in avalanche in Colorado’s Boss Basin, first ski death of the season
Early Sunday morning, Colorado rescue crews found the body of a missing skier who was killed in a recent avalanche.
The skier was reported missing in the Boss Basin area in the upper portion of Resolution Creek on March 7.
Summit County Rescue Group, Vail Mountain Rescue and the Summit and Eagle County Sheriff’s Offices began searching the area and discovered the site of the avalanche. They noticed that nearby ski and snowmobile tracks led up to where it occurred.
The Colorado Avalanche Information Center says Flight for Life helped with the search. They found the body of the missing skier in the avalanche debris on Sunday, around sunrise.
CAIC staff said the avalanche started near the treeline on a northeast-facing slope and was about two feet deep. The slope angles ranged from 33 to 36 degrees.
According to CAIC data, this is the first person killed in an avalanche during the 2025-2026 ski season.
Avalanche danger in some parts of the high country is considerable, particularly on north- and east-facing slopes and on large open slopes just below ridgelines.
The CAIC Forecast for Sunday says:
“The avalanche danger will stay at CONSIDERABLE (3of5) on Sunday for the places that picked up the most snow in this last storm (Elk and Sawatch Ranges). Areas that received less than 8 inches will go back to MODERATE danger, but this may vary significantly from drainage to drainage and with elevation. Assume a higher danger if you find a foot or more of new snow. Across the region, wind-drifted slopes will remain the most dangerous regardless of the danger. In the shallower areas (Elks and Sawatch), we’re more concerned about avalanches in motion breaking deeper, failing in buried facet layers.
On Sunday, as the sun pops out, remember that a strong spring sun can make sunny slopes unstable rather quickly. Keep an eye out for roller balls as an indication of a forthcoming shed cycle of loose avalanches.”
Colorado
Arizona men’s basketball shakes off poor start to win at Colorado in regular season finale
Second-ranked Arizona rallied from down 11 late in the first half to win 89-79 at Colorado on Saturday night, putting the finishing touches on its first Big 12 title. The 29 victories are the most in school history during the regular season, breaking a mark done four previous times including in 2021-22 in Tommy Lloyd’s first year running the program.
Brayden Burries had a career-high 31 points, 22 coming in the second half, while Koa Peat scored 19 of his 25 in the first half. The freshmen combined to make 21 of 31 shots and Burries added an 11-of-12 performance at the foul line, and Burries added seven rebounds, five steals and an assist.
Tobe Awaka, Ivan Kharchenkov and Motiejus Krivas each had 10 for Arizona, which shot 70.4 percent in the second half and 55.9 percent for the game. The Wildcats had a 54-26 edge on points in the paint and finished plus-5 on the boards after being down four at the half.
Jaden Bradley went scoreless for the first time this season, missing all three of his shots, but he made up for it with six of the UA’s 22 assists.
Colorado (17-14) got 28 points from Isaiah Johnson, who set the school freshman season scoring record. The Buffaloes shot 40.6 percent and made 7 of 22 from 3 but only hit one triple after halftime.
The UA trailed 38-36 at halftime, only the fourth time this season it has been down after 20 minutes, after being down 11 late in the first half. A Burries 3 tied it at 44, thenKharchenkov gave the Wildcats their first lead at 48-46 with 16:59 remaining.
Arizona got the lead up to five before Colorado fought back. Six straight by Bangot Dak put the Buffaloes ahead 54-52 but then Dak picked up his fourth foul and had to sit.
That began a 4-minute stretch with 10 lead changes before Arizona got a stop and Burries drained a 3 on the other end to put the UA up 66-62 with 9:17 left. The Wildcats made six straight shots, including back-to-back baskets inside byAwaka to make it 73-64 with 7:15 remaining.
A 3 from Kharchenkov put Arizona up 10 with 5:48 to go. The Buffaloes got within six before Peat dunked through a zone defense, and a Burries layup again got the lead to double digits.
Peat had 12 of Arizona’s first 14 points in the first seven minutes, but none put the Wildcats in the lead. The Buffaloes never trailed in the first half, jumping out to an 8-point edge with 8:08 left before halftime and extending that to 36-25 with 4:21 to go in the half, both on 3s by Johnson.
Colorado hit six 3-pointers in the first half, three by Johnson, while Arizona was 0 for 6 from deep
A 9-0 run, capped by a 3-point play by Burries, got the UA within two in the final minute, setting the stage for the second half.
Arizona now gets a few days off before heading to the Big 12 Tournament in Kansas City. As the No. 1 seed it has a double bye into Thursday’s quarterfinals, where it will face either No. 8 UCF, No. 9 Cincinnati or No. 16 Utah. They beat those teams this season by seven, 26 and 19 points, respectively.
2026 Big 12 Tournament schedule
No. 12 ASU (16-15) vs. No. 13 Baylor (16-15), 9:30 a.m. (ESPN+)
No. 9 Cincinnati (17-14) vs. No. 16 Utah (10-21), 12 p.m. (ESPN+)
No. 10 BYU (21-10) vs. No. 15 Kansas State (12-19), 4 p.m. (ESPN+)
No. 11 Colorado (17-14) vs. No. 14 Oklahoma State (18-13), 6:30 p.m. (ESPN+)
ASU/Baylor winner vs. No. 5 Iowa State (25-6), 9:30 a.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)
Cincinnati/Utah winner vs. No. 8 UCF (20-10), 12 p.m. (ESPNU)
BYU/Kansas State winner vs. No. 7 West Virginia (18-13), 4 p.m. (ESPNU)
Colorado/Oklahoma State winner vs. No. 6 TCU (21-10), 6:30 p.m. (ESPN2/ESPNU)
ASU/Baylor-Iowa State winner vs. No. 4 Texas Tech (22-9), 9:30 a.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)
Cincinnati/Utah-UCF winner vs. No. 1 Arizona (29-2), 12 p.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)
BYU/Kansas State-West Virginia winner vs. No. 2 Houston (26-5), 4 p.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)
Colorado/Oklahoma State-TCU winner vs. No. 3 Kansas (22-9), 6:30 p.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)
Quarterfinal 1 winner vs. Quarterfinal 2 winner, 4 p.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)
Quarterfinal 3 winner vs. Quarterfinal 4 winner, 6:30 p.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)
Semifinal winners, 3 p.m. (ESPN)
-
Wisconsin1 week agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts6 days agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Maryland1 week agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Florida1 week agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Pennsylvania4 days agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Oregon1 week ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
News1 week ago2 Survivors Describe the Terror and Tragedy of the Tahoe Avalanche
-
Sports4 days agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death

