Connect with us

Colorado

Judge rules in favor of Colorado wolf reintroduction to continue

Published

on

Judge rules in favor of Colorado wolf reintroduction to continue


play

A federal judge in Denver denied an 11th-hour lawsuit to delay Colorado’s wolf reintroduction by livestock groups Friday evening as state wildlife officials assembled to capture wolves in Oregon and bring the first wolves back to the state.

Advertisement

Judge Regina M. Rodriguez ruled in favor of wildlife conservation groups in allowing the reintroduction effort to continue. The hearing started Thursday and a decision was expected then but Rodriguez needed additional time to render her decision.

The Colorado Cattlemen’s Association and Gunnison County Stockgrowers Association on Monday sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Colorado Parks and Wildlife in an effort to delay reintroduction based on a claim that the agencies failed to properly conduct environmental impact reviews regarding reintroduction resulting in “significant costs on the industry.”

Rodriguez wrote she recognized the rancher groups’ concerns regarding impacts but that their claims did not validate halting the reintroduction. That process has been in the making since voters in 2020 narrowly passed a ballot initiative to reintroduce wolves by the end of this year west of the Continental Divide.

That vote was decided on a sharp divide between urban and rural areas of the state.

The judge wrote environmental policies were conducted properly and that claims of livestock losses were “speculative.”

Advertisement

“The court finds that, while the Petitioners who have lived and worked on the land for many years are understandably concerned about possible impacts of this reintroduction, neither these possible impacts nor their assertions under the Administrative Procedures Act are sufficient for this Court to grant the extraordinary relief they seek,” Rodriguez wrote.

Wildlife conservation groups applauded the judge’s decision.

“We are thrilled that Colorado’s state-led wolf reintroduction program will continue to move forward despite these last-minute, flimsy attempts to sabotage this historic effort,” Michael Saul, Rockies and Plains Program Director at Defenders of Wildlife, said in a news release. “We will have paws on the ground this winter and that is something we can all applaud.”

Delaney Rudy of Western Watersheds Project said in a news release the groups are looking forward to the return of wolves to Colorado.

Advertisement

“The agencies went through the full and proper process, and while none of us are 100 percent happy with the management plans for wolves in Colorado, trying to thwart the will of the voters with this last-minute maneuver was poor form,” he said.

Colorado Parks and Wildlife is in the process of capturing as many as 10 wolves in northeast Oregon to serve as initial release animals into Grand, Summit and Eagle counties. Under the state’s wolf recovery plan, the state’s goal is to reintroduce up to 50 wolves over the next several years in hopes of reestablishing a sustainable population.

Ruling comes days after Colorado granted permission to kill wolves in certain situations

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s 10(j) rule under the Endangered Species Act went into effect in Colorado Dec. 8.

That rule designates gray wolves in Colorado as experimental and provides state officials and livestock producers more management flexibility of the animals, including killing wolves in situations where the predator is caught in the act of killing livestock or where chronic depredation is occurring.

Wolves also can be killed if threatening human life.

Advertisement

Colorado paid the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service $1 million to complete the environmental impact statement required under the National Environmental Policy Act. That process usually takes two to three years but was accomplished in a little over a year-and-a-half so the rule would be in effect prior to wolves being reintroduced.

The federal 10(j) rule accompanied wolf reintroductions in Yellowstone National Park and Idaho in the mid-1990s, and litigation accompanied the rule implementation. In that case, the ruling judge allowed for the reintroduction to continue while the legal process played out.

Colorado has paid nearly $40,000 in loss of livestock compensation due to wolves

Two wolves that naturally migrated from Wyoming into Colorado gave birth to the first wolf pups in Colorado in 80 years in spring of 2021 in Jackson County.

The North Park pack included the two parents and six pups. Several of the pups were legally shot in Wyoming and it is believed the breeding female is dead.

At present, Colorado Parks and Wildlife only recognizes two wolves in the state, the pack’s breeding male and one offspring. Both of those wolves are collared, allowing wildlife officials to track their movements. Jackson County ranchers claim they have seen more wolves than the two collared ones.

Advertisement

Over the past two years, pack members have been confirmed to have killed 20 livestock, including 14 cattle, three sheep and three working cattle dogs over the last two years, the latest incident reported Dec. 13.

Before the latest incident, Colorado had compensated livestock producers around $40,000.

Other claims have been denied due to insufficient evidence.

As of Dec. 8, wildlife officials have more management options to determine if it wishes to act on mitigation efforts, nonlethal or lethal, involving the North Park pack.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Colorado

Villanova plays Colorado following Poplar's 25-point outing

Published

on

Villanova plays Colorado following Poplar's 25-point outing


Colorado Buffaloes (14-20, 5-19 Big 12) vs. Villanova Wildcats (19-14, 12-10 Big East)

Las Vegas; Tuesday, 8:30 p.m. EDT

BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Wildcats -3.5; over/under is 141.5

BOTTOM LINE: Villanova hosts Colorado after Wooga Poplar scored 25 points in Villanova’s 73-56 loss to the UConn Huskies.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Villanova averages 73.4 points and has outscored opponents by 5.9 points per game.

Colorado allows 71.5 points to opponents and has been outscored by 1.6 points per game.

Villanova scores 73.4 points per game, 1.9 more points than the 71.5 Colorado gives up. Colorado has shot at a 44.5% clip from the field this season, 1.4 percentage points higher than the 43.1% shooting opponents of Villanova have averaged.

TOP PERFORMERS: Eric Dixon is shooting 42.2% from beyond the arc with 2.9 made 3-pointers per game for the Wildcats, while averaging 23 points and 5.2 rebounds. Poplar is shooting 41.8% and averaging 15.5 points over the past 10 games.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Andrej Jakimovski is averaging 10.4 points for the Buffaloes. RJ Smith is averaging 1.2 made 3-pointers over the last 10 games.

LAST 10 GAMES: Wildcats: 6-4, averaging 69.0 points, 27.6 rebounds, 11.2 assists, 5.4 steals and 1.7 blocks per game while shooting 44.5% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 67.3 points per game.

Buffaloes: 5-5, averaging 69.2 points, 33.7 rebounds, 12.8 assists, 6.3 steals and 4.0 blocks per game while shooting 43.7% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 70.3 points.

___

Advertisement

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Liquid eggs sold in Colorado recalled for possible bleach contamination

Published

on

Liquid eggs sold in Colorado recalled for possible bleach contamination


The maker of Egg Beaters and Bob Evans liquid eggs is recalling thousands of pounds of product that may be contaminated with a bleach cleaning solution, including those sold in Colorado, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Michigan-based Cargill Kitchen Solutions announced the recall of 212,268 pounds of liquid eggs on Friday after someone submitted a tip to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service.

Liquid eggs sold in Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois and Iowa and sent to distributors in Ohio and Texas were also included in the recall, and it’s possible the product was distributed nationwide.

Federal officials do not expect any health impacts from eating contaminated products and there have not been any confirmed reports of adverse reactions. Anyone with a recalled product in their fridge should throw it away or return it to the store.

Advertisement

Product covered by the recall include:

  • 32-ounce carton of Egg Beaters Original Liquid Egg Substitute with a use-by date of Aug. 10, 2025;
  • 32-ounce carton of Egg Beaters Cage-Free Original Liquid Egg Substitute with a use-by date of Aug. 9, 2025;
  • 32-ounce carton of Egg Beaters Cage-Free Original Frozen Egg Substitute and No Enjualadas Original Sustituto de Huevo Congelado with a use-by date of March 7, 2026;
  • 32-ounce carton of Bob Evans Better’n Eggs Made with Real Egg Whites with a use-by date of Aug. 10, 2025.

Products under the recall are also inked with the number “G1804” on the carton, according to the USDA.

Get more Colorado news by signing up for our daily Your Morning Dozen email newsletter.

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Is this town really the worst place to live in Colorado? Find out why a study says so

Published

on

Is this town really the worst place to live in Colorado? Find out why a study says so


play

Clifton, an unincorporated town of about 20,000 people on Colorado’s Western Slope, was named the worst place to live in the state by financial news site 24/7 Wall St.

Advertisement

The site’s study picked the worst place to live in every state, compiling its rankings using 22 factors such as poverty rates, household income and deaths from substance abuse. The data sources for the rankings include the U.S. Census Bureau, the FBI and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Here’s what the numbers say about Clifton — nestled between Grand Junction and Palisades — and what supporters of the city like about it.

Why did Clifton rank poorly?

Clifton fell well behind the rest of the state by several financial metrics. Its poverty rate of 17.6% was almost twice the state’s 9.6%. The median home value of $166,900 was less than half the state average of $397,500. And the median household income of $49,350 was a little above 60% of the state’s average of $80,184.

Clifton actually had slightly less drug-induced mortality, with 25.5 deaths per 100,000 people, compared with the state’s average of 26.5 per 100,000.

What brings people to Clifton?

By virtue of its location, Clifton provides easy access to the agriculture-rich region of southwest Colorado. It sits near wineries, orchards and farms with all varieties of seasonal produce, as well as access to good locations for outdoor recreation, according to online travel guide Uncover Colorado.

Advertisement

What are the worst places to live in neighboring states?

The 24/7 Wall St. report taps New Kingman-Butler, Arizona; Price, Utah; Riverton, Wyoming; Española, New Mexico; Lexington, Nebraska; Poteau, Oklahoma; and Augusta, Kansas, as the worst cities in their respective states.     

Nate Trela covers trending news in Colorado and Utah for the USA TODAY Network.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending