Colorado
Colorado has spent $360M preserving its history since 1990. Here are some success stories.
Story first appeared in:
BUENA VISTA
For decades, Avery-Parsons Elementary in Buena Vista had a building problem.
It wasn’t the school, but the old gymnasium next door.
The school district owned the McGinnis Gym, but it was a wreck. And the deeply underfunded district was at a loss for what to do with it.
The long, brick building that had once been Buena Vista’s main gathering space was not only an eyesore but it was filled with asbestos and lead. It was built in 1936 through the Public Works Administration program that employed Americans during the worst days of the Great Depression. But it fell out of use in 1986 and was condemned in 2008.
In the decades since, water had seeped into the roof and the cancer-causing asbestos in the drywall and joints. Lead paint covered 5,000 square feet of the walls and floors.
The roof wasn’t even attached anymore, said Katy Welter, a Buena Vista resident and co-founder, with her husband, Rick Bieterman, of Watershed, Inc., a nonprofit that restores buildings for public benefit. “And it sat, like, 50 feet from the elementary school, so it was perilously close to there being an asbestos spill on the campus. It was posing a threat to our most sensitive population.”
The McGinnis Gym was also a repository for memories created over the 50 years it was in use, Welter said. “People held reunions and funerals and weddings and proms, and nobody wanted to see it torn down, but they couldn’t figure out what to do with it.”
So when the school district put out a call for help with the gym in 2021, she did what any transactional lawyer, owner of a working hay farm and mother of two kids under age 5 would have done: She ran through her knowledge of historic preservation, looked up state and federal funding sources for such projects and told the school, “I think we might be able to do something.”


FIRST PHOTO: The outside of the recently open and restored, 1930s McGinnis Gym in Buena Vista. This was a 2-year restoration campaign accomplished by Watershed. SECOND PHOTO: Katy Welter, the president of Watershed, walks with daughter, Millie, 4, inside of the McGinnis Gym on Nov. 11. (Anna Stonehouse, Special to The Colorado Sun)
There began a two-and-a-half-year project that included gutting the building and making it usable again. The total cost was around $3 million, said Welter, contributed to by the Environmental Protection Agency brownfields grant program, the Colorado State Historical Fund, the Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade historic preservation tax credits and the Buena Vista School District.
But when Watershed and the school district turned it back to the community Nov. 11 it wasn’t a “new” McGinnis Gym.
It was renovated, toxin-free and gleaming, but it retained its original character. Now peals of laughter will bounce off the walls as kids race in for afterschool programs. The town rec department will use it for things like pickleball. It’ll be a space for the performing arts. And it’s already doing one of historic preservation’s most important jobs, said Pat Howlett, president of the Trinidad-Las Animas County Chamber of Commerce, another beneficiary of historic preservation funding in Colorado.
“When you start resurrecting some of these incredible buildings, it sets the tone in a community for what’s possible,” he said. That’s vital to rural towns like Trinidad, which has struggled to shake its historic boom-and-bust economy. “You can see what a town is investing in by driving around,” he added. Projects like McGinnis Gym, and the East Street School in Trinidad, “bring hope to a community. They reverse trends in a community, and they show the way forward to a community.”
Since Colorado’s State Historical Fund was created in 1990, History Colorado has awarded $365,439,294 in historic preservation grants and the Office of International Trade and Economic Development has issued $57 million in historic preservation tax credits to projects in each of the state’s 64 counties. Some are further along than others. But many are proving what proponents have always known: When you pour time, money and passion into carefully preserving history, things that might appear dead can breathe new life into communities.
Not just for asbestos-ridden buildings
In 2023, History Colorado awarded $11,041,369 to 119 historic preservation projects through taxes on gaming in three historic mountain towns: Black Hawk, Cripple Creek and Central City.
A total of $5,947,841 was spent on 62 projects in rural communities. The grants ranged from $50,000 to $250,000 in general grants to mini grants of $50,000 or less.
Rebecca Goodwin, preservation officer of Otero County’s historic preservation board, urges people to avoid thinking of historic preservation as “just about buildings.”
“It’s also about sites and landscapes and structures and all of the things that go with it,” she said. “For example, we did a project to document an African American homestead community south of Manzanola in Otero County, called The Dry, and there are no buildings remaining.”
Without physical evidence, The Dry’s history had been largely forgotten. So Otero County contracted with archaeologist Michelle Slaughter to work with the University of Denver graduate program on an archeological field school and public outreach through a youth archaeology workshop, Goodwin said. The goal was “to let kids see what archeologists do and to relay why it matters that if you see something on the ground you don’t pick it up. Like a piece of pottery or small toy by a homestead. Pick that up and lose it, and now you’ve lost the story.”

— Pat Howlett, president of the Trinidad-Las Animas County Chamber of Commerce
The State Historical Fund also funded the development of a National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Valley View-Hillcrest Cemetery in Rocky Ford that was once two cemeteries that were built between the 1890s and 1920s and laid out in two completely different designs. One was laid out in a pattern of overlapping ovals and the other in a grid, Goodwin said.
Otero County wanted the cemetery preserved “because the contrasting designs tell the story of what was happening in the country at the time,” Goodwin added. “But more importantly, we wanted a national register designation because there were a lot of pioneers and business people and notables there, but also a lot of early Hispanics and a very large Japanese American section with over 250 burial sites, many with Japanese writing on them,” she added.

In the past year, History Colorado awarded other structureless projects. A $178,000 grant went to Historic St. Elmo and Chalk Creek Canyon Inc., a nonprofit dedicated to preserving the ghost town of St. Elmo and various other historic sites in Chaffee County’s Chalk Creek Canyon.
Another $187,316 is helping Dolores River Boating Advocates conduct an ethnographic study to identify sites along a 241-mile span of the Dolores River associated with Native American Tribes with ancestral homelands.
And $114,636 went to The Community Foundation of the San Luis Valley, which we’ll get to later.
But all preservation is “basically about people,” Goodwin said. Which includes another person who used historic preservation benefits to revive a key building in Leadville.
Fancy cabins named for female sex workers and an event center for quinceañeras
For decades, Nan Anderson and her husband Dave have been preserving the past in projects across the country through their architectural firm, Anderson Hallas Architects.
Many of them are internationally renowned, including a refresh of the visitor center displaying 148-million-year-old fossils at Dinosaur National Monument, the 40 National Register Historic Structures project in the Denver Mountain Parks System, and a modernization project in the Colorado capitol building’s legislative chambers that retained its original character, among others.

But several years ago, the Andersons discovered a different kind of project: a beat-down, boarded-up railroad depot just off Harrison Avenue, the main drag in Leadville.
It’s called Freight and they transformed it into a rustic-chic event space with several cabins for rent with help from OEDIT’s historic preservation tax credit incentive.
They first saw it on a walk with their grandchildren in 2017, and acting on instinct, they broke in.
“We have kind of a history with that, because of our preservation work,” Nan said. Once inside, they fell in love.
Nevermind the filthy interior, the floor riddled with holes or the fact that there was no running water, sewer, electricity or a real ceiling. What they saw was an opportunity to bring a building that had been crucial to life in Leadville in the 1880s back to service in a way that current residents and visitors could appreciate.
To fund the project, they invested $367,000 of their money to buy the old lumberyard on which the depot sat, plus the depot and a couple of outbuildings. Cleaning the depot, fitting it with modern utilities and restoring it cost around $2 million. And they choose not to disclose the cost of the handful of cabins they built, each honoring a female sex worker from the 1800s and rentable for a reasonable nightly price, because they created those without help from OEDIT.
OEDIT awarded them $435,000 in historic preservation tax credits for qualifying rehabilitation expenses on the depot. Nan said rural projects like theirs receive 35% of the expenditures back as a tax rebate compared to 25% if they’re in urban areas.
“But frankly, it’s really hard to make a business proposition for having enough income in the hinterland to justify such a huge expenditure,” she said.
Yet Freight is a tribute to a time gone by and a place Leadville residents come to dance, watch ski movies, get married, discuss important issues, and, for the many nonprofits that keep the community up and running, to hold fundraisers in a beautifully restored event center (the depot) for free or at a discounted rate.
That’s the beauty of Freight for Adam Ducharme, tourism and economic development director for the town of Leadville.


FIRST PHOTO: Nan Anderson, co-owner of Freight, and CEO Amber Rossman, make up a bed in one of The Freight’s cabins on Nov. 14. SECOND PHOTO: A view of a fully restored event space at Freight. (Anna Stonehouse, Special to The Colorado Sun)
“We actually need three Freights. I can’t have enough Freights in our community,” he said. “The in-kind services that they donate is equivalent to, like, 50 grand a year. They host everything from quinceañeras to a public forum to discuss issues that affect our whole community. I just think it’s an incredible space that is set up to do so many different things, and the fact that they’re also a very successful hotel and event space is just brilliant.”
The real tally of in-kind services Freight gave Leadville in 2024 is far greater, according to CEO Amber Rossman. There were 22 nonprofit events in 2024, for which beneficiaries paid $7,950, while the market rate was $61,750, she said.
“Additionally, we gave significant discounts to the local school district and local government,” by holding six events for which beneficiaries paid $2,150, compared to the market rate of $14,000.
The money harkens back to something Sara Kappel, preservation tax credits and incentives specialist for the State Historic Preservation Office, said about the return on investment for historic preservation. Several studies have shown “in general, it’s one dollar for every four dollars spent.”
Funding pieces of the whole

In the years since OEDIT started the historic tax credit program, it has helped fund projects in every corner of Colorado.
Some have seen quick success and others are pieces of a whole that will take longer to bring to fruition.
One of the latter is the People’s Market in San Luis, known formerly as the R&R Market. For eight generations the little store built in 1857 was up and running. But in 2022, its last proprietors retired and turned it over to the Acequia Institute, a nonprofit with plans to make it both a thriving store and health hub for the community.
The sale went through with funding from state and federal grants as well as private sources. Part of the vision was to have local farmers grow crops they could sell in the market, so residents could have fresh food without having to travel to other towns to get it.
But renovation of the building was stalled by various problems including black mold, asbestos, and plumbing problems, said Jason Medina, executive director of the Community Foundation of the San Luis Valley.
Project workers “pulled out all of the refrigeration because there had been some stuff that was leaking and they found asbestos in some of the floor tiles, so abatement for all of that happened,” he added. But the renovation problems continued until “they had to completely stop and start all over.”
By October, progress had been made on the market. But it still needed money to complete the renovation. Medina said that could come from the State Historical Fund, but only if the new owners “make sure what they’re going to do will be completely historically accurate.”
In order to do that, they need to know exactly what the original store looked like. So the Acequia Institute applied for a State Historical Fund preservation grant and was awarded $114,336 to create comprehensive construction documents that will guide the ongoing development.
The end goal is “to rejuvenate one of the state’s earliest, and most unique Spanish-influenced communities, provide a roadmap for other rural communities looking to build self-sufficiency and to give us healthy food options,” Medina said. “There are literally no food options left within a 60-mile radius besides the Family Dollar in San Luis and the Dollar General in Fort Garland, where everything is canned or frozen or full of preservatives. ”
An arts school for artists of all kinds
A hundred miles east of San Luis is one of those successful projects.
At least that’s how it appears on the outside, and what you would imagine if you knew the person behind it.
Dana Crawford is known as a development genius, a preservation guru and in her own words a “nice nag” who gets things done. In her six-decade career, she has redeveloped some of Colorado’s most historic buildings. Think Larimer Square. Think Union Station. Think East Street School in Trinidad, which functioned as an elementary school from 1919 until it closed in 2002, only to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2007 and transformed into housing geared toward artists in 2023.
Lisa Evans, a longtime friend and colleague of Crawford and manager of the East Street School project, said Crawford saw the building during a trip to Trinidad around 2018 and saw its potential to “get a new lease on life.” She connected with the RedLine Contemporary Arts Center in Denver through artist Clark Richert, and brought them in as partners. When she learned that the school sat in one of OEDIT’s Opportunity Zones, she went to Four Points Funding, which invests in the zones, “while knowing she was also going to go for the historic preservation tax credits,” Evans said.


FIRST PHOTO: The East Street School in Trinidad was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2007. Opened in 1919, the building stood idle for 20 years until 2023 when developers transformed it into 15 live-work units, artist studio rentals and a culinary arts space. SECOND PHOTO: Shelby Smith brings in a load of clothing as she moves into her loft apartment in the building. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)
The project received a $4 million grant from Colorado Creative Industries, another OEDIT program. The rest of the $9.3 million has been coming in different chunks, including a $1.9 million loan from a new market tax credit lender and $1 million in historic preservation tax credits for phase one, rehabilitating the roof, exterior walls and first floor, according to Evans.
Phase two included completion of the second floor interior, outdoor landscaping and “all of the horizontal work around the building,” Evans said, for which the project received another historic tax credit of $575,000. Four Points Funding brought $1.8 million in equity.
“In very simple terms, the construction costs of the project are double what they would have been in Denver. So if it weren’t for the grants and tax credits this building would have been demoed and gone to the dump,” she added.
Instead, it has become a version of what Crawford envisioned, if not the exact thing.
It’s a two-story building preserved, like all qualifying projects, according to the Interior Department’s historic preservation standards and guidelines.
It was built with artists in mind, so some of the 15, private live/work units have an elevated platform where residents can put things like a potter’s wheel or a painter’s easel. Although “artist” at the East Street School has many different meanings.
Jake Liuzzo, the property manager, said “the vision has been slow to be realized.” What he means is currently only two artists are living in the apartments; “the rest are working-class folks: a doctor, a dentist, a short-order cook and someone in auto detailing.”

If it weren’t for the grants and tax credits this building would have been demoed and gone to the dump.
— Lisa Evans, Manager of the East Street School project
But Evans said a doctor is in “the medical arts.” Carry that forward and a dentist is in the “oral hygiene arts.” A short-order cook? Culinary artist. Auto-detailer? Car painter.
And one of the unexpected benefits of the school is that because landlords can’t discriminate when choosing tenants, anyone is legally entitled to live there.

This story first appeared in
Colorado Sunday, a premium magazine newsletter for members.
Experience the best in Colorado news at a slower pace, with thoughtful articles, unique adventures and a reading list that’s a perfect fit for a Sunday morning.
That opens up clean, safe, affordable housing in the form of 550- to 1020-square-foot loft apartments and studios that run from $950 to $1,450 per month in a town where much of the available housing “is old and certainly not up to what a lot of folks want,” Liuzzo said.
“The units are gorgeous and it’s a really pretty building,” he added. “So it’s serving folks that are working class with a nice place to live. The leasing company and RedLine are also incredibly responsive to fixing anything that has gone wrong.” And it’s still fulfilling the original vision, just not in a linear way.
“A very diverse bunch” of artists have come through East Street, Liuzzo said. “One fellow from the African American arts community was in need of housing, so he ended up getting a space.” Currently a Native American artist lives there, “and getting away, for him, is a big deal,” Liuzzo added. A traveling mural painter “who wanted to see some real mountains and do some real painting,” came through. And if you want to see artists’ work-in-progress, you can drop in and cruise through day studios on the lower level.
“It’s been kind of a neat gift for Trinidad in that way,” Liuzzo said.
Colorado
Boebert takes on Trump over Colorado water
Colorado
Colorado attorney general expands lawsuit to challenge Trump ‘revenge campaign’ against state
Attorney General Phil Weiser on Thursday expanded a lawsuit filed to keep U.S. Space Command in Colorado to now encapsulate a broader “revenge campaign” that he said the Trump administration was waging against Colorado.
Weiser named a litany of moves the Trump administration had made in recent weeks — from moving to shut down the National Center for Atmospheric Research to putting food assistance in limbo to denying disaster declarations — in his updated lawsuit.
He said during a news conference that he hoped both to reverse the individual cuts and freezes and to win a general declaration from a judge that the moves were part of an unconstitutional pattern of coercion.
“I recognize this is a novel request, and that’s because this is an unprecedented administration,” Weiser, a Democrat, said. “We’ve never seen an administration act in a way that is so flatly violating the Constitution and disrespecting state sovereign authority. We have to protect our authority (and) defend the principles we believe in.”
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Denver, began in October as an effort to force the administration to keep U.S. Space Command in Colorado Springs. President Donald Trump, a Republican, announced in September that he was moving the command’s headquarters to Alabama, and he cited Colorado’s mail-in voting system as one of the reasons.
Trump has also repeatedly lashed out over the state’s incarceration of Tina Peters, the former county clerk convicted of state felonies related to her attempts to prove discredited election conspiracies shared by the president. Trump issued a pardon of Peters in December — a power he does not have for state crimes — and then “instituted a weeklong series of punishments and threats targeted against Colorado,” according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit cites the administration’s termination of $109 million in transportation grants, cancellation of $615 million in Department of Energy funds for Colorado, announcement of plans to dismantle NCAR in Boulder, demand that the state recertify food assistance eligibility for more than 100,000 households, and denial of disaster relief assistance for last year’s Elk and Lee fires.
In that time, Trump also vetoed a pipeline project for southeastern Colorado — a move the House failed to override Thursday — and repeatedly took to social media to attack state officials.
The Trump administration also announced Tuesday that he would suspend potentially hundreds of millions of dollars of low-income assistance to Colorado over unspecified allegations of fraud. Those actions were not covered by Weiser’s lawsuit, though he told reporters to “stay tuned” for a response.
Weiser, who is running for governor in this year’s election, characterized the attacks as Trump trying to leverage the power of the executive branch to exercise unconstitutional authority over how individual states conduct elections and oversee their criminal justice systems.
In a statement, a White House official pushed back on Weiser’s characterization.
“President Trump is using his lawful and discretionary authority to ensure federal dollars are being spent in a way that (aligns) with the agenda endorsed by the American people when they resoundingly reelected the President,” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said.
Stay up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.
Colorado
US Fish and Wildlife backed Colorado plan to get wolves from Canada before new threats to take over program, documents show
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service backed Colorado’s plan to obtain wolves from Canada nearly two years before the federal agency lambasted the move as a violation of its rules, newly obtained documents show.
In a letter dated Feb. 14, 2024, the federal agency told Colorado state wildlife officials they were in the clear to proceed with a plan to source wolves from British Columbia without further permission.
“Because Canadian gray wolves aren’t listed under the Endangered Species Act,” no ESA authorization or federal authorization was needed for the state to capture or import them in the Canadian province, according to the letter sent to Eric Odell, CPW’s wolf conservation program manager.
The letter, obtained by The Colorado Sun from state Parks and Wildlife through an open records request, appears to be part of the permissions the state received before sourcing 15 wolves. The agency also received sign-offs from the British Columbia Ministry of Land, Water and Resource Stewardship and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna.
In mid-December, however, the Fish and Wildlife Service pivoted sharply from that position, criticizing the plan and threatening to take control over Colorado’s reintroduction.
In a letter dated Dec. 18, Fish and Wildlife Service Director Brian Nesvik put CPW on alert when he told acting CPW Director Laura Clellan that the agency violated requirements in a federal rule that dictates how CPW manages its reintroduction.
Colorado voters in 2020 directed CPW to reestablish gray wolves west of the Continental Divide, a process that has included bringing wolves from Oregon in 2023 and British Columbia in 2025.
The federal rule Nesvik claims CPW violated is the 10(j). It gives Colorado management flexibility over wolves by classifying them as a nonessential experimental population within the state of Colorado. Nesvik said CPW violated the 10(j) by capturing wolves from Canada instead of the northern Rocky Mountain states of Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Washington, eastern Oregon and north-central Utah “with no warning or notice to its own citizens.”
CPW publicly announced sourcing from British Columbia on Sept. 13, 2024, however, and held a meeting with county commissioners in Rio Blanco, Garfield, Pitkin and Eagle counties ahead of the planned releases last January. The agency also issued press releases when the operations began and at the conclusion of operations, and they held a press conference less than 48 hours later.
Nesvik’s December letter doubled down on one he sent CPW on Oct. 10, after Greg Lopez, a former Colorado congressman and 2026 gubernatorial candidate, contacted him claiming the agency violated the Endangered Species Act when it imported wolves from Canada, because they lacked permits proving the federal government authorized the imports.
That letter told CPW to “cease and desist” going back to British Columbia for a second round of wolves, after the agency had obtained the necessary permits to complete the operation. Nesvik’s reasoning was that CPW had no authority to capture wolves from British Columbia because they aren’t part of the northern Rocky Mountain region population.
But as regulations within the 10(j) show, the northern Rocky Mountain population of wolves “is part of a larger metapopulation of wolves that encompasses all of Western Canada.”
And “given the demonstrated resilience and recovery trajectory of the NRM population and limited number of animals that will be captured for translocations,” the agencies that developed the rule – Fish and Wildlife with Colorado Parks and Wildlife – expected “negative impacts to the donor population to be negligible.”
So despite what Nesvik and Lopez claim, “neither identified any specific provision of any law – federal, state or otherwise – that CPW or anyone else supposedly violated by capturing and releasing wolves from British Columbia,” said Tom Delehanty, senior attorney for Earthjustice. “They’ve pointed only to the 10(j) rule, which is purely about post-release wolf management, and applies only in Colorado.”
More experts weigh in
In addition to the 2024 letter from the Fish and Wildlife Service, documents obtained by The Sun include copies of permits given to CPW by the Ministry of British Columbia to export 15 wolves to the United States between Jan. 12 and Jan. 16, 2025.
These permits track everything from live animals and pets to products made from protected wildlife including ivory.
The permit system is the backbone of the regulation of trade in specimens of species included in the three Appendices of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, also called CITES. A CITES permit is the confirmation by an issuing authority that the conditions for authorizing the trade are fulfilled, meaning the trade is legal, sustainable and traceable in accordance with articles contained within the Convention.

Gary Mowad, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife agent and expert on Endangered Species Act policies, said “obtaining a CITES certificate is unrelated to the 10j rule” and that in his estimation, CPW did violate both the terms of the 10(j) and the memorandum of agreement with the Fish and Wildlife Service, because “the 10(j) specifically limited the populations from where wolves could be obtained, and Canada was not authorized.”
Mike Phillips, a Montana legislator who was instrumental in Yellowstone’s wolf reintroduction that began in 1995, thinks “the posturing about a takeover seems like just casually considered bravado from Interior officials.”
And Delahanty says “Nesvik and Lopez are making up legal requirements that don’t exist for political leverage in an effort that serves no one. It’s unclear what FWS hopes to accomplish with its threatening letter,” but if they rescind the memorandum of agreement, “it would cast numerous elements of Colorado’s wolf management program into uncertainty.”
Looking forward
If Fish and Wildlife does as Nesvik’s letter threatens and revokes all of CPW’s authority over grey wolves in its jurisdiction, “the service would assume all gray wolf management activities, including relocation and lethal removal, as determined necessary,” it says.
But Phillips says “if Fish and Wildlife succeeds in the agency’s longstanding goal of delisting gray wolves nationwide,” a proposition that is currently moving through Congress, with U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert’s Pet and Livestock Protection Act bill, the agency couldn’t take over Colorado’s wolf program. That’s because “wolf conservation falls back to Colorado with (its voter-approved) restoration mandate.” And “the species is listed as endangered/nongame under state law,” he adds.
If the feds did take over, Phillips said in an email “USFWS does not have staff for any meaningful boots-on-the-ground work.” Under Fish and Wildlife Service control, future translocations would probably be “a firm nonstarter,” he added, “but that seems to be the case now.”
A big threat should Fish and Wildlife take over is that lethal removal of wolves “in the presence of real or imagined conflicts might be more quickly applied,” Phillips said.

But it would all be tied up in legal constraints, given that gray wolves are still considered an endangered species in Colorado, and requirements of the 10(j) and state law say CPW must advance their recovery.
So for now, it’s wait and see if CPW can answer Fish and Wildlife’s demand that accompanies Nesvik’s latest letter.
Nesvik told the agency they must report “all gray wolf conservation and management activities that occurred from Dec. 12, 2023, until present,” as well as provide a narrative summary and all associated documents describing both the January 2025 British Columbia release and other releases by Jan. 18., or 30 days after the date on his letter. If they don’t, he said, Fish and Wildlife “will pursue all legal remedies,” including “the immediate revocation of all CPW authority over gray wolves in its jurisdiction.”
Shelby Wieman, a spokesperson for Gov. Jared Polis’ office, said Colorado disagrees with the premise of Nesvik’s letter and remains “fully committed to fulfilling the will of Colorado voters and successfully reintroducing the gray wolf population in Colorado.”
And CPW maintains it “has coordinated with USFWS throughout the gray wolf reintroduction effort and has complied with all applicable federal and state laws. This includes translocations in January of 2025 which were planned and performed in consultation with USFWS.”
-
Detroit, MI6 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology3 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX4 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Health5 days agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits
-
Iowa3 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Nebraska3 days agoOregon State LB transfer Dexter Foster commits to Nebraska
-
Nebraska3 days agoNebraska-based pizza chain Godfather’s Pizza is set to open a new location in Queen Creek
-
Oklahoma1 day agoNeighbors sift debris, help each other after suspected Purcell tornado