Connect with us

News

Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa visits White House for historic Trump meeting

Published

on

Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa visits White House for historic Trump meeting

Ahmed al-Sharaa — who 20 years ago was thrown into a US detention centre in Iraq after he joined al-Qaeda militants fighting the Americans — on Monday became the first Syrian president to visit the White House since the country’s independence in 1946.

During his meeting with Donald Trump, Sharaa formally joined the 89-country coalition to defeat the militant group Isis, capping an extraordinary transformation for the erstwhile rebel leader who toppled dictator Bashar al-Assad nearly a year ago.

Trump said in the Oval Office on Monday: “He’s a very strong leader. He comes from a very tough place. And he’s a tough guy. I like him, I get along with him. We want to see Syria be successful along with the rest of the Middle East. So I have confidence that he’ll be able to do the job, absolutely.”

Since seizing power last December, Sharaa, 43, has worked hard to court friends and allies after decades of Assad family rule and 14 years of ruinous civil war left Syria internationally isolated.

His charm offensive has largely worked. Western and Arab states — spurred by Washington — have lifted most of the economic sanctions imposed in the Assad era and built closer ties with a state they had long shunned.

Advertisement

Sharaa met privately with the US president for nearly an hour and a half on Monday, after which he was expected to hold meetings with lawmakers in an effort, backed by the White House, to permanently repeal US sanctions.

Sharaa’s government has appealed to western sensibilities by touting free markets and foreign investment, political inclusion and a pluralistic society.

Top US lawmakers in both parties have broadly welcomed his message and have thrown their support behind a vote to repeal Washington’s most stringent sanctions, known as the Caesar Act.

But Sharaa’s government is dominated by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the Islamist insurgent group the Syrian leader once led, and critics say attempts at political inclusion have been superficial.

They also point to eruptions of sectarian violence in Syria over the past year, including clashes between government-backed forces and gunmen from the country’s Alawite and Druze religious minorities in which hundreds of civilians from both communities were killed. The government pledged to hold the perpetrators accountable, but many Syrians, particularly among minority groups, remain sceptical.

Advertisement

Trump in May waived most of the Assad-era sanctions on the country to give the nascent Syrian government “a chance”, after being impressed by the “tough” and “handsome” Syrian leader during a meeting in Saudi Arabia.

After Monday’s meeting, the Trump administration suspended the bulk of the Caesar Act sanctions for a further 180 days, replacing the president’s earlier waiver. The measures will still apply to “certain transactions” relating to Russia and Iran, the Treasury said.

The World Bank estimates it will take more than $200bn to rebuild the war-ravaged nation. Syria’s economic recovery has stalled amid the lingering sanctions, with foreign companies wary of investing until they are fully repealed.

Syrian companies, in turn, have found it difficult to raise funds or import goods because of concerns about complying with sanctions.

The Israeli government and its allies in Washington have warned the White House against placing its trust in Sharaa and have urged Congress not to support a full repeal.

Advertisement

Sharaa “has deep roots in the global jihad”, a pro-Israel advocacy group, the Jewish Institute for National Security of America, warned in a recent report, which called on Congress to slow its “rush to repeal the Caesar Act permanently”.

Sharaa on Sunday met Republican congressman Brian Mast, chair of the House foreign affairs committee and a key Republican holdout on lifting sanctions.

Mast, who lost both of his legs to an improvised bomb while serving as a soldier in Afghanistan, on Monday said he and Sharaa had “a long and serious conversation about how to build a future for the people of Syria free of war, Isis and extremism”.

“He and I are two former soldiers and two former enemies,” Mast said. He added Sharaa told him of his desire to “liberate from the past and have a noble pursuit for his people and his country and to be a great ally to the United States of America”.

Urged on by Washington, the UN Security Council has lifted terror-related sanctions on Sharaa and his interior minister and former al-Qaeda member Anas Khattab. The UK and US followed suit.

Advertisement

Talks between Sharaa and Trump on Monday were expected to focus on security, including Israel, Isis and Kurdish-led forces.

Syria’s formal entry into the global anti-Isis coalition helps to seal Sharaa’s partnership with Washington and strengthens his anti-jihadi credentials with sceptics. While HTS was briefly allied with Isis in the fight to oust Assad, it has fought the group since they parted ways.

Despite no longer having territorial control, Isis cells continue to carry out attacks in Syria. Sharaa’s security forces have conducted raids on the group in recent weeks.

For years, Washington’s main ally in fighting Isis has been the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, which control the country’s north-east. Talks to merge the SDF and Damascus’s security forces have stalled, despite pressure from Washington to come to a resolution.

The US military has increased its co-operation with Damascus on Isis in recent months and is said to be considering an expansion of its military presence in Syria by sending troops to an air base in the Syrian capital. This would be a boost to Sharaa’s fledgling presidency, analysts said.

Advertisement

Syrian analyst Malik al-Abdeh said: “It’s great for Sharaa, in that he will be backed up by a major power, and great for the US in terms of its footprint in the region and having decisive influence over Damascus. It’s a win-win.”

Moscow, a financial and military backer for Assad, has sought to smooth things over with Sharaa’s government over the past year in order to keep its strategically important air base and naval port in the country. Last month, Sharaa met Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Moscow in what was billed as a “reset” in relations.

News

Map: 5.1-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes off the Coast of California

Published

on

Map: 5.1-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes off the Coast of California

Advertisement

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

Advertisement

A moderately strong, 5.1-magnitude earthquake struck in the North Pacific Ocean on Wednesday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 5:45 a.m. Pacific time about 40 miles west of Petrolia, Calif., data from the agency shows.

Advertisement

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Aftershocks detected

Subsequent quakes have been reported in the same area. Such temblors are typically aftershocks caused by minor adjustments along the portion of a fault that slipped at the time of the initial earthquake.

Quakes and aftershocks within 100 miles

Advertisement

Aftershocks can occur days, weeks or even years after the first earthquake. These events can be of equal or larger magnitude to the initial earthquake, and they can continue to affect already damaged locations.

Advertisement

When quakes and aftershocks occurred

 All times are Pacific time. The New York Times

Advertisement

Sources: United States Geological Survey (epicenter, aftershocks, shake intensity); LandScan via Oak Ridge National Laboratory (population density) | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Wednesday, June 3 at 6:03 a.m. Pacific time. Aftershocks data is as of Wednesday, June 3 at 8:01 a.m. Pacific time.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

California’s primary for governor is undecided as candidates vie to be in the top two

Published

on

California’s primary for governor is undecided as candidates vie to be in the top two

Xavier Becerra, Democratic gubernatorial candidate for California, and Steve Hilton, Republican gubernatorial candidate for California, shake hands while arriving for a gubernatorial debate at KRON Studios in San Francisco in April.

Jason Henry/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jason Henry/Getty Images North America

SAN FRANCISCO — The primary election for California governor is too close to call, with vote counting continuing Wednesday. Democrat Xavier Becerra and Republican business executive Steve Hilton lead the field with Democrat Tom Steyer in third place.

In California’s unusual primary system, all candidates, regardless of party, appear on a single ballot open to any registered voter. The top two candidates then move on to the general election, even if they’re from the same party. This year, voters had 60 names for governor to choose from.

Advertisement

The winner will lead the country’s most populous state, where leaders often take on national political prominence. Incumbent Gov. Gavin Newsom is at his two-term limit and could be a Democratic contender for president.

Becerra, former Health and Human Services secretary under President Joe Biden, pitched himself to voters as an experienced political leader who isn’t afraid of President Trump, but his lead caps one of the most surprising and dramatic comebacks in recent state political history. As recently as April, polls were showing Becerra — also a former member of Congress and California attorney general — languishing in single digits in a crowded field.

In his remarks at his watch party in Los Angeles, Becerra noted his underdog status.

“Here in Hollywood’s hometown, we love a good underdog success story,” he said, drawing parallels between his campaign and his immigrant parents’ success story in California. “Guess what? The underdog stayed in the fight. Like my parents, I never gave up. Never stopped putting one foot in front of the other. Never stopped believing in the beacon-like goodness of California. And thankfully, neither did you.”

Hilton is a former Fox News commentator who also served as a political adviser to former British Prime Minister David Cameron. He was endorsed by President Trump in April, helping him to pull ahead of Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, the other major Republican in the race. Hilton has campaigned on the idea that California needs change after 16 years under total Democratic control.

Advertisement

The race is narrowing down after a tumultuous campaign

At his watch party in Huntington Beach, the British-born candidate — who became an American citizen five years ago — said it was the “honor of his lifetime” to receive over 1 million votes so far.

“Change is coming to California and it’s long overdue,” Hilton said. “We’re not there yet, but it’s looking good. It looks very much as if Californians really will have the chance to vote for change in November and take our state in a new direction.”

Democratic billionaire activist Steyer spent more than $213 million of his own money to boost his candidacy and push a progressive, populist message. While he was trailing Becerra and Hilton on Tuesday night, he said at his watch party in San Francisco that he remains confident he can close the gap in the days ahead.

“Together, we’ve scared the hell out of the corporate interests used to getting their way,” Steyer said. “It might take some time to figure out where this is going. We’re going to wait until every ballot is counted. We’re gonna give democracy a time to work. And we know we finished really strong.”

The early results are not certain to hold, in part because of unusual voting patterns in this primary election: Ballot-tracking data heading into Tuesday evening showed that Republicans were more likely to vote early by mail, while Democratic voters in this deep-blue state held onto their mail-in ballots or chose to vote in person. That’s the reverse of recent elections, which saw more Democrats voting by mail and Republicans tending to vote in person on Election Day.

Advertisement

The uncertainty on election night capped a race that remained crowded and unsettled to the end. To some extent, the race was defined by who wasn’t running.

Some of the state’s most high-profile Democrats — former Vice President Kamala Harris, U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla and California Attorney General Rob Bonta — all passed on a potential bid to succeed Newsom.

The race was disrupted in April when then-U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell’s campaign for governor imploded amid allegations of sexual assault and harassment. Swalwell resigned from Congress shortly after the accusations surfaced and has denied assault allegations.

Swalwell had been gaining in polls and racking up high-profile endorsements, and his exit seemed to primarily benefit Becerra, who had been stuck in single digits in many polls. Ultimately, it quieted fears among Democrats who worried that the messy Democratic field could result in Bianco and Hilton winning the top spots in the June primary.

Marisa Lagos covers California politics at KQED and co-hosts the Political Breakdown show and podcast.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court reinstates Republican-favored Alabama congressional districts

Published

on

Supreme Court reinstates Republican-favored Alabama congressional districts

The U.S. Supreme Court

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for Alabama to use a congressional district map favored by Republicans.

The court, in an unsigned order, overturned a three-judge district court panel that found that the map is “tainted by intentional race-based discrimination.” The court’s three liberals publicly dissented.

The ruling means that Alabama’s 2026 midterm elections will feature six Republican-leaning districts and one Democratic-leaning one, as opposed to a map with only five safe Republican seats. Democrat Shomari Figures, who represents Alabama’s Second District, will likely lose his seat as a result of the high court’s ruling.

Advertisement

The story of Alabama’s congressional map is long and tortured. It began in 2021, when the state implemented a new map to account for population changes in the census. The map featured only one majority-black district out of seven, even though the state is more than one-quarter Black.

Voters immediately sued, claiming the map illegally diluted minority votes in violation of the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution. Lower court judges agreed, ruling that the state must draw a map with two districts where Black voters have a realistic chance of electing their candidate of choice. The Supreme Court more than once has ordered Alabama to draw a compliant map.

But the state has refused and instead continued to litigate the case. On Tuesday, that tactic paid off.

What changed? In April, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority all but gutted what remains of the Voting Rights Act, ruling that states cannot purposefully draw districts that are majority-minority.

Alabama then asked the high court to reinstate the state’s old map, under the theory that this new ruling meant that it was permissible to use a map with only one majority-Black district. In an unsigned, unexplained order in May, the high court essentially reversed its previous opinions, and allowed Alabama to use the old map for the upcoming midterm elections.

Advertisement

This set off a flurry of activity in Alabama. By the time the Supreme Court issued its May order, absentee balloting had already begun, using the court-drawn map. So Republican Governor Kay Ivey cancelled elections and scheduled a special primary for August for the affected congressional races.

The case, however, was not over.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court had ordered a lower court panel to continue evaluating Alabama’s map in light of its recent Voting Rights Act decision. And just 15 days after that order, the panel, composed of three Republican judges—two of them Trump appointees—concluded unanimously that even under the Supreme Court’s new standards, the plan for a single black district was “intentionally discriminatory.”

So, once again, Alabama returned to the Supreme Court, arguing that the map was partisan, not racially discriminatory. In short, that the Republican legislature simply drew the map to elect more Republicans. And that under the Supreme Court’s new interpretation of the Voting Rights Act, the GOP map should be allowed to stand.

The court’s conservative agreed, writing that the lower court “did not heed the presumption of legislative good faith.”

Advertisement

The court’s three liberals publicly dissented, castigating the conservative majority for failing to abide by its 2006 decision in the case of Purcell v. Gonzalez. That decision declared that courts should not change election rules too close to an election.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent, said the court “debases the democratic process” and “corrodes the rule of law by rewarding Alabama’s gamesmanship and outright defiance of court orders.”

Tuesday’s decision is the latest in a series of Supreme Court rulings that could well reshape the 2026 midterm elections, making it much harder for Democrats to prevail.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending