Connect with us

Colorado

A READER WRITES: Major cuts loom for Colorado River users

Published

on

A READER WRITES: Major cuts loom for Colorado River users


In case you pay any consideration to the information cycle, you might have been bathed within the dangerous information on the Colorado River. A twenty-year drought and the prospect of completely decrease precipitation introduced on by local weather change have drawn down each Lake Mead and Lake Powell to dangerously low ranges.

On June 15, Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Camille Touton raised an alarm equal to a name to battle stations. She suggested all of the contractors on the Colorado River to give you a plan to save lots of 2 to 4 million acre-feet of water subsequent yr. Primarily based on current rainfall patterns, that is 20-40% of the accessible water. If no plan is submitted by August 15, she warned, the Division of the Inside would determine find out how to do it.

Is it attainable for the stakeholders on the River to agree on a plan by then? It’s unlikely, as earlier negotiations for water cuts have taken years, not two months. The stipulations about how water will get distributed from the toughest working river on the planet run to hundreds of pages. Groups of specialists are wanted simply to know all these particulars, a lot much less give you a plan to fulfill all the numerous pursuits that span the gamut from tribes to farmers to cities to energy turbines to environmentalists.

Advertisement

There’s a easy option to do it, after all, and that’s to chop each person’s allocation by some issue to stability the quantity of water that’s accessible with the quantity of water used. Proper now, it’s method out of stability.

A little bit background. The essential divvying up of the Colorado River occurred in 1922 and 1944. 100 years in the past, the Colorado River Fee divided the river between the Higher Basin states of Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and New Mexico and the Decrease Basin states of Arizona, Nevada, and California, awarding 7.5 million acre-feet per yr for every basin. In 1944, Mexico was awarded an extra 1.5 million acre-feet. That totals an allocation of 16.5 million acre-feet.

The science of hydrology was not as superior then as it’s now, nor did the specialists then have the instruments to look very far into the previous. Besides, essentially the most skilled opinions of the day reported that the river’s annual circulation averaged about 15 million acre-feet per yr. From the start, the coverage makers allotted an excessive amount of water.

This main error didn’t matter for a few years. Due to the fast progress of farming right here and improvement in Los Angeles and San Diego, California shortly was capable of attain and exceed its annual allocation of 4.4 million acre-feet. However Arizona, whilst late as 1987 drew solely half of its 2.8 maf allocation, and didn’t draw all of it till 2002. And the Higher Basin states, even after 100 years of improvement, at the moment use 4.0 maf out of their 7.5 maf entitlement.

The precise circulation on the Colorado River within the final 20 years has been 12.3 maf per yr. The Decrease Basin states use 7.5, Mexico makes use of 1.5, and the Higher Basin states use 4.0. That’s a complete of 13 million acre-feet to fulfill the current makes use of. Then we have now to account for one thing that people measuring the river within the Nineteen Twenties didn’t have to consider: evaporation.

Advertisement

With the enormous reservoirs of Lake Mead and Lake Powell and the reservoirs behind the 13 different dams alongside the Colorado River, mom nature extracts one other 2.4 million acre-feet per yr through evaporation.

Which means the River should comprise 15.4 million-acre toes per yr simply to keep up its place at the moment—with each Lake Mead and Lake Powell about 25% full. You may see the place this leads. With 12.3 maf flowing into the river and 15.4 flowing out, the quantity for discount is 3.1 million acre-feet.

The only option to discover these 3.1 million acre-feet is to chop all customers on the River by the identical fee. What % of the present consumptive use of 13 maf yields 3.1 maf? 24%.

How would a 24% minimize have an effect on us right here within the Imperial Valley?

Some farmers will say the IID is exempt from cuts, as a result of our senior water rights. The Regulation of the River says that junior water rights holders like San Diego and Los Angeles have to be minimize earlier than the IID has any cuts. However leaving IID out would imply that San Diego and LA would obtain no water in any respect. One other gambit can be do demand fee for undelivered water.

Advertisement

With the IID additionally contractually obligated to switch over 500,000 acre-feet of water, will these quantities be minimize?

August 15 is coming proper up. This disaster could be very severe enterprise. In case you’re fascinated by legislation college, it’s a superb time to check water legislation. There might be numerous be just right for you.

Brian McNeece is a retired IVC teacher and administrator. He’s a member of the Worldwide Boundary & Water Fee Colorado River Residents Discussion board and a longtime observer of native historical past. He may be reached at bmcneece@gmail.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Colorado

Colorado weather: Wintry mix on the way for Christmas

Published

on

Colorado weather: Wintry mix on the way for Christmas


Colorado weather: Wintry mix on the way for Christmas – CBS Colorado

Watch CBS News


Watch meteorologist Callie Zanandrie’s forecast.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Toyota Game Recap: 12/22/2024 | Colorado Avalanche

Published

on

Toyota Game Recap: 12/22/2024 | Colorado Avalanche


ColoradoAvalanche.com is the official Web site of the Colorado Avalanche. Colorado Avalanche and ColoradoAvalanche.com are trademarks of Colorado Avalanche, LLC. NHL, the NHL Shield, the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup and NHL Conference logos are registered trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P. Copyright © 1999-2024 Colorado Avalanche Hockey Team, Inc. and the National Hockey League. All Rights Reserved. NHL Stadium Series name and logo are trademarks of the National Hockey League.



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado authorities shut down low-income housing developer

Published

on

Colorado authorities shut down low-income housing developer


The Colorado Division of Securities is pursuing legal action against a man whom it claims deceived investors and used the ownership of federally supported low-income housing projects to line his own pockets. 

Securities Commissioner Tung Chan announced its civil court filings against Michael Dale Graham, 68, on Nov. 12. 

Chan’s office filed civil fraud charges against Graham, and also asked for a temporary restraining order and freezing of Graham’s assets and his companies’. A Denver district court judge immediately granted both. Since then, two court dates to review the those orders have canceled; a third is scheduled for mid-January.

Graham operates Sebastian Partners LLC, Sebastiane Partners LLC, and Gravitas Qualified Opportunity Zone Fund I LLC (“GQOZF”), all of which were controlled by Graham during his “elaborate real estate investment scheme,” as described by the securities office in a case document.

Advertisement

The filing states Graham collected more than $1.1 million from eight investors to purchase three adjacent homes in Aurora. The Denver-based Gravitas fund and its investors purportedly qualified for the federal Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ) program with the homes. Qualified Opportunity Zones were created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed by Congress in 2017. The zones encouraged growth in low-income communities by offering tax benefits to investors, namely reductions in capital gains taxes on developed properties.

A file photo of a suburban housing development in the Denver metro area. 

Paul Souders/WorldFoto & Getty Images


Graham formed Gravitas in early 2019 and purchased the three homes located in the 21000 block of E. 60th Avenue two years later. He quickly sold one of them with notifying investors, according to the case document. While managing the other two, Graham and Gravitas transferred the fund’s assets and never operated within QOZ guidelines to the benefit of its investors or the community, according to the state. 

Advertisement

Gravitas also transferred the titles for the two properties to Graham privately. As their owner, Graham obtained undocumented loans from friends totaling almost $600,000. The two loans used the two properties as security. 

Gravitas investors were never informed of the two loans, according to the case document. Also, Gravitas never sent its investors year-end tax reports, the securities office alleges. 

Graham used the proceeds of the loans for personal use. No specific details were provided about those uses.

“Effectively, Graham used Gravitas as his personal piggy bank,” as stated in the case document, “claiming both funds and properties as his own. Graham never told investors about the risks associated with transferring title to himself. On September 1, 2023, he sent a letter to investors, stating that the properties ‘we own’ are doing well and generating growth due to record-breaking home appreciation. But Gravitas no longer owned the properties.

“Gravitas no longer had assets at all.” 

Advertisement

Furthermore, the securities office said Graham failed to notify investors of recent court orders against him in Colorado and California. In total, Graham was ordered to pay more than $1 million in damages related to previous real estate projects.

Graham’s most recent residence is in Reno, Nev., according to an online search of public records. He evidently has previously lived in Santa Monica, Calif., and Greenwood Village.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending