California
Wife of California inmate wins $5.6 million after ‘sexual violation’ during strip search
Christina Cardenas won a $5.6 million settlement five years after she underwent a strip search while visiting her incarcerated husband, which she said was a ‘sexual violation.’
After filing a civil lawsuit four years ago, the wife of a California inmate won a $5.6 million settlement concerning an unlawful strip search conducted by the correctional officers during a family visit, according to her attorney.
Christina Cardenas sued the California Correctional Institution (CCI), the California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (CDCR), and Adventist Health Tehachapi over the incident that occurred on Sept. 6, 2019, attorney Gloria Allred said in a statement obtained by USA TODAY.
“There is no recompense that can ever fully heal the pain caused by the sexual violation on Sept. 6th, 2019,” Cardenas said in a statement emailed Tuesday to USA TODAY.
USA TODAY contacted the CDCR and Adventist Health on Tuesday but did not receive a response.
What happened to Christina Cardenas on Sept. 6, 2019?
On the day of the strip search, Cardenas went to a CCI facility for a scheduled family visit with her husband, Carlos Eugene Cardenas, according to Allred. Cardenas traveled four hours to see her husband for their first scheduled visit in about one year as the previous one four weeks before the incident had been canceled without any notice, the attorney said.
When Cardenas arrived at the facility, she was escorted to the back right-hand side of the visiting office, Allred said. She was subsequently interrogated and asked if she “brought anything with her” and whether she “brought any drugs in,” according to the attorney who said her client truthfully denied both questions.
The “emotional damages” began when an officer confirmed to Cardenas that she would be strip-searched, which brought back feelings of when she was the “victim of an unwarranted, degrading and traumatizing search by the State of California on the day of her marriage to her husband,” according to Allred.
“The warrant did limit the scope of potential search in the absence of Christina’s consent, and Christina did not consent to an invasive search of her body,” the attorney said. “It was explicit in the warrant that a body cavity search could only be conducted after an X-ray confirmation of the presence of a foreign object likely to be contraband in the body cavity of Christina.”
Officers told Christina Cardenas to ‘wipe away your tears!’, attorney says
Allred said the officers attempted to intimidate her client by screaming at her, “Oh wipe away your tears! You know what you and your husband have been doing!” Cardenas responded, “Don’t tell me to wipe away my tears, I am innocent, and what you are saying to me is inappropriate,” according to the attorney.
Shortly after the back-and-forth, Cardenas was left in a small room with three officers. While in the room, she was “unlawfully examined by the officers, first by opening her mouth and sticking out her tongue, then by showing her ears and turning her head upside down to shake out her hair,” Allred said, adding that no contraband was found during this part of the search.
Cardenas was told next to remove her top, sports bra and bra, according to Allred. She was then instructed to remove her pants and undergarments, which at this point left her “breasts and genitalia completely exposed,” the attorney said. No contraband was found during this part of the search either.
Officers made Cardenas squat over a mirror placed on the ground and cough, and although she did this, they made her squat wider apart and physically spread her genitalia, according to Allred. Again, no contraband was found so the officers told her to get dressed and sit back down until further instruction, the attorney said.
Before being denied the restroom, an officer asked Cardenas, “Why do you visit, Christina? You don’t have to visit. It’s a choice, and this is part of visiting,” Allred said.
Christina Cardenas sexually assaulted by male doctor at Adventist Health
When officers took Cardenas to Adventist Health’s Emergency Department for possible “emergency surgery,” she was “perp walked” to the back of the hospital, told to complete an unwanted pregnancy test and forced to “urinate in a makeshift toilet consisting of a chair and exposed urinal pan,” according to Allred.
While handcuffed for hours, Cardenas had to answer personal medical history questions in front of officers, which violated her rights to privacy and HIPAA protections, her attorney said. She was also denied water and food, while the officers supervising her snacked and chatted, Allred added.
A handcuffed Cardenas underwent an illegal CT-Scan and X-ray at the hospital, which involved her crying as she lowered her pants in front of Adventist Health and CCI employees, according to Allred. After all these measures to ensure she did not have a foreign substance in her body, a male doctor then sexually assaulted her, the attorney said.
“Christina stated that she was not OK with a male probing her body and that a male probing of her body would be very retraumatizing to her,” Allred said. “Notwithstanding Christina’s objections and protests, the male doctor continued and an officer remained in the room during the unwanted and forceful penetration.”
“Christina was sobbing uncontrollably and in a clear and visibly distressed state as she was forced to sit on a table and spread her legs.”
‘This serves as a beacon to all family and loved ones of the incarcerated’
When Cardenas was driven back to the CCI facility for the scheduled visit, an officer told her the visit had been canceled, according to Allred. She was also forced to pay for the “state-sanctioned torture,” the attorney said.
“My motivation in pursuing this lawsuit was to ensure that others do not have to endure the same egregious offenses that I experienced,” Cardenas said in her statement. “I pray that this landmark settlement serves as a resounding message to all correctional officers that harmful behavior will NOT be tolerated. It is crucial to treat visitors not as criminals, but with humanity and respect for their human rights.”
“I also hope that this serves as a beacon to all family and loved ones of the incarcerated, reminding them that they do not have to endure abuse simply because they are visiting a family member or friend… It is crucial not to criminalize or victimize those who are visiting and supporting true rehabilitation.”
California
California bill would let insurers monitor driving data for discounts
A California bill would let insurers monitor customers’ driving data in exchange for discounted premiums.
Assemblymember Tina McKinnor, the author of AB 311, said the digital monitoring, known as telematics, rewards good driving and would improve safety. In real time, telematics technology would track data such as speed, location and how a vehicle is being driven.
“We have to slow people down,” McKinnor said. “That is the whole purpose for this bill, is driver safety.”
A voter-approved law from 1988, Prop 103, required insurance rates to be based mainly on driving record, miles driven and experience. It made California the only state in the country to prohibit telematics.
McKinnor believes the law is outdated. She argued that her bill would also help good drivers who pay higher rates because of where they live.
“Where I live definitely brings my insurance up,” McKinnor said. “If we both drive the same way, we’ll get charged the same way, instead of by our ZIP code.”
California’s Department of Insurance and consumer groups oppose the bill, citing privacy concerns.
“We can’t look behind the algorithm and see what weight it’s giving to different criteria, which is a big problem,” said Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog. “Auto insurance, otherwise, is transparent. This is why the Department of Insurance is opposed, because of the lack of transparency in the algorithm.”
The proposed savings in exchange for good driving might not be guaranteed. Telematics data from the Maryland Insurance Administration showed that 31% of drivers who opted into the program saw a drop in rates, 24% saw an increase and 45% saw no change to their premiums.
“This collects an awful lot of data about people, more than they know, and it’s like having Big Brother in your back seat,” Court said.
McKinnor insisted that drivers will not be forced to enroll in the program.
“It’s still opt-in in the other 49 states,” she said. “We’re not going to make this mandatory. It’ll be a per-volunteer situation.”
McKinnor’s bill passed through the legislature’s insurance committee. It’s expected to be presented to the full Senate in August.
California
Southern California police vow to quash planned ‘takeover’ event following recent chaos
Huntington Beach police are vowing to prevent a potential “takeover” event being promoted across social media that they believe could get out of control.
Police said they became aware of the event from a flyer online advertising an “end of summer beach bash” in the city.
“Dear ‘Beach Bash’ organizers…” police said in an Instagram post Thursday. “Thanks for the flyer. We’ve seen it too.”
They continued, “We have no intention of allowing that to happen here.”
No further details were provided about when the event was planned to take place or the exact location.
Police and the city of Huntington Beach said they’re working to prevent the event following similar events in Southern California that resulted in violence, vandalism and other criminal activity.
One chaotic event that was held in Newport Beach on the Fourth of July ended with more than 400 people being arrested, according to police. Some partygoers were seen fist fighting, while others allegedly vandalized property and local businesses, including a Pavilions grocery store.
Newport Beach police said social media posts drew a large influx of people to Newport Pier in a short amount of time, and the event got out of control.
Huntington Beach PD warned that anyone who organizes, promotes or participates in criminal activity associated with a takeover event may be arrested or prosecuted. Charges may include incitement to riot, vandalism, theft, assault, reckless driving, unlawful assembly, conspiracy or other applicable offenses.
They also warned that juveniles would not be exempt from punishment, and parents or guardians may also be liable for damages caused by their child’s actions.
The HBPD Special Investigations Bureau has already identified individuals believed to be involved in organizing and promoting the event, according to police.
If you have information regarding this event, you are urged to contact Huntington PD’s Special Investigations Bureau at 714-536-5991.
California
Popular California Fast-Casual Chain Mendocino Farms Opens 100th Location in Santa Barbara – edhat
Santa Barbara has become home to a milestone location for a popular sandwich and salad chain.
Mendocino Farms has officially opened its doors at La Cumbre Plaza, marking the company’s 100th location.
Located at 3851 State Street, the restaurant is Mendocino Farms’ first location in Santa Barbara.
Announcing its new store in a social media post, Mendocino Farms said the restaurant offers chef-curated sandwiches and fresh salads using seasonal ingredients.
“Whether you’re fueling your next adventure or settling in for a sunny lunch with friends, we can’t wait to be part of your community. Here’s to our next chapter, together!” the business wrote on Instagram.
View this post on Instagram
The restaurant features a custom mural by local artist DJ Javier, as shared by Mendocino Farms in an Instagram post.
The store opened on June 30 and marked its first day with a host of activities to celebrate its launch.
The opening day featured a live DJ, activities such as ‘Rodeo Riviera’, a hat bar, live sandwich-making sessions with the chefs, and a postcard station.
The location is open daily between 10:30 a.m. and 9 p.m., according to its website.
Diners can enjoy a special summer menu along with the regular options of sandwiches and salads that Mendocino Farms is known for.
View this post on Instagram
In addition to its menu options, the restaurant also offers catering services with deliveries available from 10 a.m. onwards.
The space occupied by Mendocino Farms earlier housed Panera Bread, which closed in 2025, per the Restaurant Guy.
About Mendocino Farms
The Los Angeles-based fast-casual chain is known for its selection of freshly made sandwiches, salads, wraps, and soups.
Founded in 2005, Mendocino Farms offers classic as well as limited signature items.
The company opened its first location below the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles and has since expanded into a regional brand, according to the Restaurant Guy.
In addition to California, Mendocino Farms has locations in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Texas, and Washington, the company’s website shows.
The restaurants feature a rotating menu of items, along with a range of kids’ menu items that are served with a beverage and a choice of side.
Additionally, the chain offers a variety of dessert options, packaged chips, and packaged beverages.
The company is known for sourcing all its ingredients from ethical local farms and small producers.
All meat and poultry items served are antibiotic-free and humanely raised, while eggs are sourced from cage-free farms, according to its website. Fruits and vegetables are hand-picked, and bread is locally and freshly sourced.
The menu includes a range of items to accommodate all types of diets, such as flexitarian, vegan, and gluten-free.
-
Minnesota4 minutes agoNorthwest Minnesota Foundation awarded $200,000 for child care economic development
-
Mississippi11 minutes agoFamily of Mississippi teen Nolan Wells demand investigation into son’s death
-
Missouri13 minutes agoSEMA sets info sessions for FEMA Public Assistance for late-April storms
-
Montana19 minutes ago8 Most Welcoming Towns In Montana’s Countryside
-
Nebraska26 minutes agoNebraska abortions rose nearly 8% in 2025, mostly due to influx of Iowa patients
-
Nevada29 minutes agoMurder suspect from Montana takes own life when surrounded by police in Nevada
-
New Hampshire34 minutes ago2 transgender girls drop NH lawsuit after Supreme Court ruling, personal hardships
-
New Jersey41 minutes agoNJ Legislators Are Considering a Bill That Could Ban Tesla Robotaxis Due to Their Tech Choice