Connect with us

California

Wife of California inmate wins $5.6 million after ‘sexual violation’ during strip search

Published

on

Wife of California inmate wins .6 million after ‘sexual violation’ during strip search



Christina Cardenas won a $5.6 million settlement five years after she underwent a strip search while visiting her incarcerated husband, which she said was a ‘sexual violation.’

After filing a civil lawsuit four years ago, the wife of a California inmate won a $5.6 million settlement concerning an unlawful strip search conducted by the correctional officers during a family visit, according to her attorney.

Christina Cardenas sued the California Correctional Institution (CCI), the California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (CDCR), and Adventist Health Tehachapi over the incident that occurred on Sept. 6, 2019, attorney Gloria Allred said in a statement obtained by USA TODAY.

“There is no recompense that can ever fully heal the pain caused by the sexual violation on Sept. 6th, 2019,” Cardenas said in a statement emailed Tuesday to USA TODAY.

Advertisement

USA TODAY contacted the CDCR and Adventist Health on Tuesday but did not receive a response.

What happened to Christina Cardenas on Sept. 6, 2019?

On the day of the strip search, Cardenas went to a CCI facility for a scheduled family visit with her husband, Carlos Eugene Cardenas, according to Allred. Cardenas traveled four hours to see her husband for their first scheduled visit in about one year as the previous one four weeks before the incident had been canceled without any notice, the attorney said.

When Cardenas arrived at the facility, she was escorted to the back right-hand side of the visiting office, Allred said. She was subsequently interrogated and asked if she “brought anything with her” and whether she “brought any drugs in,” according to the attorney who said her client truthfully denied both questions.

The “emotional damages” began when an officer confirmed to Cardenas that she would be strip-searched, which brought back feelings of when she was the “victim of an unwarranted, degrading and traumatizing search by the State of California on the day of her marriage to her husband,” according to Allred.

Advertisement

“The warrant did limit the scope of potential search in the absence of Christina’s consent, and Christina did not consent to an invasive search of her body,” the attorney said. “It was explicit in the warrant that a body cavity search could only be conducted after an X-ray confirmation of the presence of a foreign object likely to be contraband in the body cavity of Christina.”

Officers told Christina Cardenas to ‘wipe away your tears!’, attorney says

Allred said the officers attempted to intimidate her client by screaming at her, “Oh wipe away your tears! You know what you and your husband have been doing!” Cardenas responded, “Don’t tell me to wipe away my tears, I am innocent, and what you are saying to me is inappropriate,” according to the attorney.

Shortly after the back-and-forth, Cardenas was left in a small room with three officers. While in the room, she was “unlawfully examined by the officers, first by opening her mouth and sticking out her tongue, then by showing her ears and turning her head upside down to shake out her hair,” Allred said, adding that no contraband was found during this part of the search.

Cardenas was told next to remove her top, sports bra and bra, according to Allred. She was then instructed to remove her pants and undergarments, which at this point left her “breasts and genitalia completely exposed,” the attorney said. No contraband was found during this part of the search either.

Officers made Cardenas squat over a mirror placed on the ground and cough, and although she did this, they made her squat wider apart and physically spread her genitalia, according to Allred. Again, no contraband was found so the officers told her to get dressed and sit back down until further instruction, the attorney said.

Advertisement

Before being denied the restroom, an officer asked Cardenas, “Why do you visit, Christina? You don’t have to visit. It’s a choice, and this is part of visiting,” Allred said.

Christina Cardenas sexually assaulted by male doctor at Adventist Health

When officers took Cardenas to Adventist Health’s Emergency Department for possible “emergency surgery,” she was “perp walked” to the back of the hospital, told to complete an unwanted pregnancy test and forced to “urinate in a makeshift toilet consisting of a chair and exposed urinal pan,” according to Allred.

While handcuffed for hours, Cardenas had to answer personal medical history questions in front of officers, which violated her rights to privacy and HIPAA protections, her attorney said. She was also denied water and food, while the officers supervising her snacked and chatted, Allred added.

A handcuffed Cardenas underwent an illegal CT-Scan and X-ray at the hospital, which involved her crying as she lowered her pants in front of Adventist Health and CCI employees, according to Allred. After all these measures to ensure she did not have a foreign substance in her body, a male doctor then sexually assaulted her, the attorney said.

“Christina stated that she was not OK with a male probing her body and that a male probing of her body would be very retraumatizing to her,” Allred said. “Notwithstanding Christina’s objections and protests, the male doctor continued and an officer remained in the room during the unwanted and forceful penetration.”

Advertisement

“Christina was sobbing uncontrollably and in a clear and visibly distressed state as she was forced to sit on a table and spread her legs.”

‘This serves as a beacon to all family and loved ones of the incarcerated’

When Cardenas was driven back to the CCI facility for the scheduled visit, an officer told her the visit had been canceled, according to Allred. She was also forced to pay for the “state-sanctioned torture,” the attorney said.

“My motivation in pursuing this lawsuit was to ensure that others do not have to endure the same egregious offenses that I experienced,” Cardenas said in her statement. “I pray that this landmark settlement serves as a resounding message to all correctional officers that harmful behavior will NOT be tolerated. It is crucial to treat visitors not as criminals, but with humanity and respect for their human rights.”

“I also hope that this serves as a beacon to all family and loved ones of the incarcerated, reminding them that they do not have to endure abuse simply because they are visiting a family member or friend… It is crucial not to criminalize or victimize those who are visiting and supporting true rehabilitation.”

Advertisement



Source link

California

California man arrested for alleged lewd acts, exploitation involving juveniles

Published

on

California man arrested for alleged lewd acts, exploitation involving juveniles


A California man was arrested on suspicion of committing lewd acts and exploiting minors through online platforms.

The Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office identified the suspect as Edward “Eddie” Alessandro Zarate, 20, of Santa Maria.

On May 28, authorities began investigating Zarate over allegations that he was communicating with underage girls online and exchanging sexually explicit material with them.

Detectives later learned that Zarate allegedly communicated with minor victims through mobile phone apps such as Whipd, Purp, Wizz and Snapchat, along with exchanging text messages.

Advertisement
Edward “Eddie” Alessandro Zarate, 20, of Santa Maria, was arrested for alleged lewd acts and online exploitation of minors. (Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office)

Zarate’s profiles appeared to portray him as a juvenile. 

“Once he established communication with minors, he would often encourage them to move conversations off the platform and continue communicating via text message,” the sheriff’s department said. “During these conversations, Zarate would disclose his true age and identity.”

So far, authorities are aware of two female juveniles who have met with Zarate in person and reportedly engaged in lewd acts. 

He is accused of communicating with minors in multiple states including California, Florida and Illinois. In California alone, detectives believe Zarate contacted minors from Los Angeles, Oxnard, Santa Barbara, San Diego, Santa Maria, Lompoc, Paso Robles, Nipomo, Arroyo Grande and San Francisco.

Based on the scope of the investigation, detectives believe there may be additional survivors who have not yet been identified,” authorities said.

Advertisement

On June 10, Zarate was arrested and booked on multiple felony charges including oral copulation with a person under 18 years of age, unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, sending harmful matter to a minor, and two counts of possession of obscene material depicting a minor.

Anyone who may be a victim, has communicated with Zarate online or through text or has information on the case is asked to call Sheriff’s Detectives at 805-681-4150. Anonymous tips can be provided to the SBSD’s tipline at 805-681-4171 or online at SBSheriff.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

2 Northern California universities made U.S. News ‘Best Global’ list

Published

on

2 Northern California universities made U.S. News ‘Best Global’ list


play

To the surprise of perhaps no Californians, several California universities appeared in the top rankings of the world’s best universities in the latest U.S. News and World Report rankings released on June 16.

Of the more than 2,250 worldwide research institutions that U.S. News & World Report evaluated for this list, six California universities ranked in the top 50 globally, with an even split among Northern and Southern California institutions.

Advertisement

The 2026 list includes universities from more than 100 countries, with the following countries receiving the most schools in the overall rankings:

  • China: 409
  • United States: 275
  • India: 123
  • United Kingdom: 93
  • Japan: 86

Did your California alma mater appear among the top global universities?

U.S. News and World Report methodology

When determining a university’s placement on the list, U.S. News & World Report considered factors more relevant to research-oriented institutions than to undergraduate-focused metrics like bachelor’s degree graduation rates.

It focused on aspects like academic institutions’ research and reputation, number of publications, the quality of publications and citations. It considers other factors, including location, campus culture, the strength of particular programs, and cost, which are also very important.

Advertisement

“For students seeking universities with strong academic excellence and global recognition, the Best Global Universities rankings offer an essential comparative resource,” said LaMont Jones, Ed.D., managing editor for Education at U.S. News.

“Our methodology focuses on a school’s research mission and scholarly impact, helping students identify institutions that are truly at the forefront of global knowledge creation.”

Out of the top 10 global universities, two California institutions made the list:

  1. Harvard University
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
  3. Stanford University
  4. University of Oxford
  5. University of Cambridge
  6. Tsinghua University
  7. University of California Berkeley
  8. Yale University
  9. University College London
  10. Columbia University

How did California colleges rank in U.S. News and World Report’s Best Global Universities 2026 list?

Outside of the top 10 universities, California saw a handful of other institutions rank highly on U.S. News & World Report list.

Notably, the University of California – Los Angeles just missed the top 10 list, ultimately ranking as the 11th-best global university and the second-best public institution on the list. It was beaten out as the best public institution by its academic counterpart, the University of California, Berkeley, which was ranked the 7th-best global university.

Advertisement

Additionally, a number of University of California schools made the top of the list, ultimately reaffirming the quality of the institutions’ public campuses across the state.

“Research from the University of California is vital to work that benefits all Americans, from breakthroughs in the treatment of Parkinson’s to the science behind previously unimagined successes in fighting cancer and the development of quantum computers that will enable the critical advances of the 21st century,” the University of California said in a press release about its rankings.

Here’s the list of California universities that made the top 100 list:

  • 3. Stanford University
  • 7. University of California Berkeley
  • 11. University of California – Los Angeles
  • 22. University of California – San Francisco
  • 23. (Tied) California Institute of Technology
  • 23. (Tied) University of California – San Diego
  • 74. University of Southern California
  • 95. University of California – Davis
  • 99. University of California – Irvine
  • 100. University of California – Santa Barbara

Noe Padilla is a Northern California Reporter for USA Today. Contact him at npadilla@usatodayco.com, follow him on X @1NoePadilla or on Bluesky @noepadilla.bsky.socialSign up for the TODAY Californian newsletter or follow us on Facebook at TODAY Californian.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Is California’s ‘Big One’ coming soon? Maps show growing danger.

Published

on

Is California’s ‘Big One’ coming soon? Maps show growing danger.


The most significant seismic event in California’s history – an earthquake of 7.9 magnitude – occurred in 1857 and ruptured about 225 miles on the San Andreas Fault. That earthquake, dubbed the last “Big One,” killed two people and produced shaking that lasted between one and three minutes.

Since then, California has exploded in population and been has been rattled by many major earthquakes. But Californians have also grown familiar with the existential dread of another “Big One” looming.

Researchers have long warned there will be another massive earthquake in Southern California. They just don’t know when.

A recent study says warning signs continue to grow in 2026. The San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems have reached the highest stress levels seen in the past 1,000 years, according to a study conducted at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.

Advertisement

The San Andreas fault runs throughout the state, passing through San Francisco and San Bernardino, while the San Jacinto fault is in Southern California and runs through Riverside, San Diego and Imperial Counties.

Unable to view our graphics? Click here to see them.

Why the San Andreas Fault is so risky

Faults rupture on the San Andreas Fault approximately every 150 years, according to UCLA professor Jonathan Stewart, who studies earthquake engineering.

But it’s been over 300 years since the last “large rupture” occurred south of the 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake, Stewart said. “As far we know it didn’t produce a large rupture since around 1690. To the present that’s a lot more than 150 years, so there’s a lot of build-up. That doesn’t mean it’s going to happen immediately, it just means there is more stress built-up.”

Advertisement

When the earthquake happens, it is likely to cause a lot of damage. One major concern is the state’s water systems.

“An earthquake like this would rupture most, if not all of the major aqueducts bringing water into Southern California,” Stewart said. “Most people will not be in a collapsed structure after this earthquake, but everybody’s going to be affected by water problems.”

Study highlights longstanding risk

To investigate the probability of an earthquake occurring, researchers built a physics-based simulation and fed it the earthquake history from the region. By doing so, they were able to estimate how much stress has built up along the southern San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems.

The results suggest that catastrophe may be near.

Advertisement

“Right now, with stress at historically high levels across the region and more than 160 years elapsed since the last major rupture, the system is in a critically loaded state,” lead author Liliane Burkhard said.

Most importantly, the Cajon Pass, at the junction of the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults, could facilitate a joint rupture of the two faults. This scenario, according to the study, would probably be “significantly more damaging” than a single-fault event.

How is earthquake safety considered?

Seismic hazard assessments are critical for the safety of the millions of residents in California’s densely-populated and earthquake-prone areas.

Seismic Hazard maps show the relative hazard associated with earthquakes using information on past faults, the behavior of seismic waves and the near-surface conditions of specific locations, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Larger values indicate a stronger level of earthquake shaking. A peak ground velocity of 269 cm/sec would correspond to extreme shaking and heavy damage. For reference, the largest ground velocity recorded in Taiwan’s 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake reached 318 cm/sec and had a magnitude of 6.7.

Advertisement

That earthquake killed more than 2,000 people and incurred approximately $14 billion in damage.

How do the fault lines rupture?

The San Andreas and San Jacinto faults are strike-slip faults, which typically cause horizontal displacement. Both faults comprise the geologic boundary between the Pacific Plate and the North American Plate.

If a major earthquake occurs on the San Andreas fault, it is likely to produce surface rupture, which occurs when a fault breaks through to the surface. Most earthquakes, however, do not produce surface rupture, according to USGS.

In a major rupture, strong shaking could cause severe damage near the fault and in areas built on soft or water-saturated soils, which can amplify shaking. Rupture can directly offset roads, buildings, and other structures that span the fault trace.

Although the study helps explain the risk associated with the California fault lines, Burkhard emphasized that it shouldn’t serve as a forecast.

Advertisement

“This is not a prediction of when an earthquake will happen,” Burkhard said. “However, studies like this are important contributions to national and global earthquake hazard research in that we are using rigorous, quantitative science to better understand the risk facing millions of people.”

Contributing: Brandi D. Addison, USA TODAY NETWORK



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending