Connect with us

California

California weighs rules giving fast food workers more power

Published

on

California weighs rules giving fast food workers more power


Pedestrians stroll beneath an In-N-Out Burger restaurant sign up San Francisco on Thursday. Greater than a half-million California quick meals staff are pinning their hopes on a groundbreaking proposal that may give them elevated energy and protections. (AP Picture, Jeff Chiu)

Estimated learn time: 6-7 minutes

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Since she got here to California from Mexico 24 years in the past, Maria Bernal has been supporting her household by usually working two jobs at quick meals eating places.

However she says she wound up dwelling in a small Kia along with her two youngest kids, then ages 3 and 15, for six months after she misplaced her housing in 2019 when one among her employers started paying her minimal wage for eight hours even when she labored a 16-hour double shift.

Union organizers and different advocates say such wage theft and different exploitation is widespread within the quick meals business, significantly for girls and racial minorities who make up lots of California’s greater than half-million quick meals staff. The business denies such abuses are widespread.

Advertisement

Bernal and greater than 100 others who just lately rallied outdoors the state Capitol are pinning their hopes on groundbreaking laws that may give quick meals staff elevated energy and protections.

The proposal awaiting remaining motion earlier than the California Legislature adjourns Wednesday would create a brand new Quick Meals Council made up of 4 staff’ delegates alongside 4 employers’ representatives and two state officers that may set minimal requirements for wages, hours and dealing situations in California.

Bernal mentioned she hopes the council would give staff like herself “a seat on the desk the place they may respect us extra and never enable wage theft to occur, and in addition importantly that we cannot be afraid of retaliation.”

Restaurant homeowners and franchisers say the proposal would drive up the value of quick meals. They cite an evaluation they commissioned by the UC Riverside Heart for Financial Forecast and Growth that places the value enhance at 7% to twenty%.

A late wage cap added to the invoice would hold the rise on the low finish of that vary. Late amendments restrict any minimal wage bump to $22 an hour subsequent yr, with price of dwelling will increase thereafter, whereas the statewide minimal will probably be $15.50 an hour.

Advertisement

Different late amendments imply the council would additionally should be authorized by a petition signed by 10,000 quick meals staff, and the council would now disappear after six years until it’s renewed.

Matthew Haller, president & CEO of the Worldwide Franchise Affiliation, dismissed the last-minute revisions as “an try to put lipstick on a pig.”

An earlier model cleared the Meeting in January with no votes to spare after falling quick final yr, and the revised invoice is awaiting consideration within the Senate.

Although California’s effort could be broader, a wage board created by New York’s governor in 2015 led to a rise in quick meals wages there, and related efforts have been tried by some cities. The left-leaning Heart for American Progress says that what are also referred to as staff’ boards, employee requirements boards or business committees might fight financial inequality together with racial and gender pay gaps.

“If we’re profitable right here, staff in Florida, Texas, New York, even Idaho will probably be heartened and so they can replicate our successes,” Democratic Assemblyman Alex Lee mentioned on the staff’ rally.

Advertisement

California’s measure would cowl quick meals eating places with at the very least 100 institutions nationally.

It grew out of the decade-long Struggle for $15 and a Union minimal wage motion and efforts by labor unions to arrange quick meals staff in California and nationwide.

“That is greater than only a labor combat. It is a combat about racial justice, this can be a combat about gender justice,” mentioned Joseph Bryant, government vp of the Service Staff Worldwide Union behind the drive. “Eighty p.c of the employees are individuals of colour who work in quick meals. Two-thirds of the employees are ladies who work in quick meals, and these staff are being exploited.”

Quick meals staff in California are paid almost $3 an hour lower than comparable staff in different service sector jobs, in response to a joint examine launched this month by Harvard and UC San Francisco.

Bernal hopes the California legislation and the continuing effort to unionize quick meals institutions will at some point result in advantages like paid holidays, medical protection and a retirement plan. She filed a wage declare earlier this yr with state regulators in search of $160,000 in again wages and penalties, whereas her son is alleging little one labor legislation violations and threats by a restaurant supervisor.

Advertisement

Staff “are nonetheless preventing for among the basic items that ought to have been occurring a very long time in the past for the quick meals staff who serve our group day-after-day, even by way of a pandemic,” mentioned Democratic Assemblyman Chris Holden, the invoice’s writer.

However Jesse Lara, whose family-owned enterprise operates 34 El Pollo Loco franchises in Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties, mentioned the invoice is pointless and would hurt the corporate’s greater than 1,000 staff.

It unfairly assumes “that we have now to tear off our staff to make a revenue,” when most of the corporations’ managers have promoted from inside, he mentioned. Inflation is “killing us,” he mentioned, and better wages and advantages would drive restaurant homeowners to lift costs and reduce staff’ hours to make ends meet.

The pending invoice targets bona fide abuses, but additionally furthers unions’ objectives of collective bargaining with all the business as a substitute of making an attempt to arrange quick meals chains one restaurant at a time, mentioned Janice Tremendous, a professor of labor research and employment relations who directs Rutgers College’s office justice lab.

Such sector-wide negotiations are widespread in Europe, she mentioned, however uncommon within the U.S.

Advertisement

California already has among the strongest employee safety legal guidelines and laws within the U.S. if not the world, mentioned Matt Sutton, the California Restaurant Affiliation’s senior vp for presidency affairs and public coverage.

He disputed claims that the quick meals sector has a better price of labor, unemployment, well being and security incidents, however mentioned the reply regardless ought to be for lawmakers to place extra money into imposing labor requirements as a substitute of making a brand new council with distinctive regulatory energy over one business.

“There are avenues to punish employers when it is applicable,” Sutton mentioned.

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Division of Finance additionally opposed the invoice in June, citing its potential prices and what it mentioned may very well be “a fragmented regulatory and authorized setting.”

“It’s not clear that this invoice will accomplish its purpose, because it makes an attempt to handle delayed enforcement by creating stricter requirements for sure sectors, which might exacerbate current delays,” the administration warned.

Advertisement

Photographs

Most up-to-date U.S. tales

Extra tales you could be fascinated about



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending