California
California-mandated ethnic studies sparks curriculum clash
California’s public schools will be required to offer a full-year course in ethnic studies beginning in the 2025-26 school year. And by 2030, students won’t be able to graduate without it.
But school districts, including some in the Bay Area, are caught up in a curriculum crossfire that’s landed some in hot water — and court.
Ethnic studies examines the history of race and ethnicity in the United States, with an emphasis on the experiences of people of color. But as public schools face heightened tensions stemming from the Israel-Hamas war, the clock is ticking for educational leaders to address how to teach the state’s new mandate — especially when it comes to Israel, Palestine and the ongoing conflict.
The state took five years and four drafts to approve an ethnic studies “model curriculum” for schools to follow. But districts are not required to implement it as long as their curriculums don’t reflect or promote bias, discrimination or religious doctrine.
There are two competing visions of ethnic studies at the heart of the conflict: critical or “liberated” ethnic studies — often taught at universities — and “constructive” ethnic studies, which the state’s model now closely resembles.
The key difference between the two courses comes down to politics, said Elina Kaplan, co-founder of the Alliance for Constructive Ethnic Studies, an advocacy group pushing for schools to implement constructive ethnic studies.
The liberated model “focuses on power structures, repression, imperialism, colonization,” Kaplan said. “Everything else is what we would call constructive ethnic studies. Think of it as the depoliticized version of ethnic studies.”
When the state unveiled the first draft of its curriculum in 2019, the material was largely criticized for being antisemitic, loaded with politically correct jargon and not inclusive enough about the histories of Jewish, Armenian, Sikh and other communities.
“It was very clear that it did not represent all of the communities that needed to be included,” said Marc Levine, a former state Assembly member and the Central Pacific regional director for the Anti-Defamation League. “In fact, it had discriminatory language specifically about Jews and Israel.”
The draft received over 20,000 public comments, most of which objected to the omission of Jewish Americans and antisemitism, while Israeli persecution of Palestinians was highlighted. The 2019 draft also included sample topics focusing on strikes and protests for Palestine and calling for the boycott, divestment and sanctions of Israel.
One source material included a song by Ana Tijouz and Shadia Mansour, with the lyric, “for every free political prisoner, an Israeli colony is expanded.”
Gov. Gavin Newsom described the curriculum as “insufficiently balanced and inclusive” and said the draft needed to be substantially amended.
In 2021, he approved a bill that revised the model ethnic studies curriculum and removed content Jewish groups found harmful. Palestine isn’t mentioned once in the finalized 700-page curriculum model or 30 sample lessons, although lessons on the Holocaust, antisemitism and Jewish American identity are included.
The original course was designed by a group of 19 ethnic studies experts who were selected by the California Department of Education. After the state revamped the curriculum, some members of the group joined with other educators and activists to develop and implement their own course, the Liberated Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum Coalition.
The group did not respond to The Bay Area News Group’s request for comment, but in a statement on its website said that the ethnic studies model curriculum that the state Board of Education approved in March 2021 “bears so little relation to the original draft” that every member of the advisory council “demanded that their name be removed.”
The coalition complained that the state’s new curriculum “sanitizes” the course by removing or redefining terms like capitalism and revolution, erases all mention of Palestine and fails to depict the impact of the Black Lives Matter movement and the true causes of police brutality.
But the liberated coalition’s model also has been widely criticized as antisemitic.
StandWithUs, an international nonprofit promoting Israel education, said the coalition was trying to “exploit” the state’s new requirement as a “platform for antisemitism, anti-Israel propaganda and other forms of bias.” The Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism said the model’s promotion of a specific political view violates the California Constitution and Education Code.
Several California school districts are already facing lawsuits over material some find objectionable.
The Deborah Project, a law firm advocating Jewish civil rights, has sued Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District and Hayward Unified High School District, citing “overtly” antisemitic teaching materials.
The firm has also sued the coalition for pushing antisemitic and anti-Zionest materials in Los Angeles public schools.
Sequoia Union High School District, Morgan Hill Unified School District and Berkeley Unified School District are also facing backlash from community members for their ties to the liberated coalition’s model.
While both course models focus on four areas — Black studies, Asian American and Pacific Islander studies, Chicanx/Latinx studies and Native American studies — Liberated’s material largely excludes the histories of ethnic groups who may be considered White.
The Liberated Coalition explained that its course material does not include European-American ethnic groups, including Jews, because while those groups have faced discrimination, “their experiences differ from the contemporary and historical experiences of radicalized communities in the U.S., especially their experiences with racism and colonialism.”
Liberated also focuses heavily on activism in its student assignments. For one lesson on redlining and U.S. housing discrimination, the course has students write a persuasive letter to county leaders calling for reparations.
The group responded to criticism of its course saying that students are aware of their surroundings — including racism and injustice — from a very young age.
“Ethnic studies doesn’t tell students what to think, but it is a framework for understanding their reality,” the group said.
But co-founder of the Alliance for Constructive Ethnic Studies, Kaplan, said the model stands to do more harm than good in the long run.
“Ethnic studies is good and it’s healthy and it’s the right thing for our students to be learning,” Kaplan said. “They should just be learning it in the way that the legislators intended, which is in this positive empowering way to learn about each other and to confront racism and discrimination.”
California
California regulator proposes cutting power bills 5% after doubling rates since 2014 – Washington Examiner
(The Center Square) – Following an executive order from California Gov. Gavin Newsom to explore how to reduce energy prices that have doubled since 2014, California’s energy regulator issued proposals it said would cut rates by 4% to 5% in the first year but grow significantly over time.
These proposals include reforming the program that will pay homeowners $8.5 billion this year for solar panel energy, phasing out funding of non-energy related social programs such as “food deserts” assistance from energy budgets, and reducing capital expenditures.
Under current regulations, utilities’ profits are capped relative to the value of their capital investments, which the report says incentivizes utilities to spend and borrow as much money as possible to increase their profit allowance – at ratepayers’ and taxpayers’ expense.
According to the California Public Utilities Commission’s latest electricity rate report, rates for the state’s three largest utilities have increased by an average of 96% since January 2014 and 42% since January 2021.
“California’s electricity rates have surged beyond inflation, straining households and businesses hindering decarbonization efforts,” wrote the CPUC. “Wildfire mitigation measures, costly infrastructure investments, and rooftop solar subsidies all contribute to rising costs. Without changes in how utilities recover expenses, rates will continue to climb.”
The governor’s order put significant constraints on the CPUC’s scope of recommendations, requiring the recommendations “reduce costs to electric ratepayers without compromising public health and safety, electric grid reliability, or the achievement of the State’s 2045 clean electricity goal and the State’s 2045 economywide carbon neutrality goal.”
Within these constraints, the CPUC made four recommendations on how to reduce rates by 4-5% within the first year, with future rate reductions growing over time.
First, CPUC recommended minimizing “expensive construction projects,” explaining how current regulations encourage utilities to choose expensive options that allow them to raise their CPUC-regulated profit allowance.
“There is a profit motive for utilities to pursue capital-intensive projects, as they earn a ‘return on equity’ on these investments which increases overall costs for ratepayers,” wrote the CPUC, which must approve utility projects. “Without proper oversight, this profit motive can lead to prioritizing expensive projects over more efficient alternatives.”
In addition to recommending choosing lower cost options, the CPUC also suggested securitizing some higher cost projects, which would require bonds to be issued, and paid back by ratepayers — which would not come with ROE provisions. CPUC estimates this change on just undergrounding of power lines could save customers $41 million per year in 2025, and $310 million per year by 2026.
CPUC suggests significantly reforming the rooftop solar subsidy plan that will issue $8.5 billion per year by the end of 2024 — up from $3.5 billion per year in 2021 — to energy customers with solar panels installed.
Under the existing plan, solar-equipped customers “receive payments at retail electricity rates for their exported energy, often exceeding its actual market value.”
Utilities often must pay other operators to take excess solar energy, on top of paying solar customers the retail rate for the negative-value solar energy, leaving non-solar customers with the bill.
“These growing subsidies, paid for by non-rooftop solar customers, contribute to higher electricity rates and result in a higher cost burden to non-[solar] customers,” wrote the CPUC. “Additionally, rooftop solar customers do not contribute their fair share of fixed grid costs, such as maintaining power lines and ensuring grid reliability.”
An earlier CPUC report found 15% of non-solar customers’ energy bills went towards payments to solar customers.
The CPUC recommends reducing the solar compensation rates and transitioning buyers of property with high-reimbursement agreements to the current lower rate.
CPUC further recommended that utilities “phase out non-cost-effective programs from electricity rates,” that it says often have “very little to do with reducing energy consumption,” which means “funding them through customers’ energy bills effectively acts as a regressive tax.”
The CPUC said “programs addressing food deserts or supporting high school and community college courses, while socially beneficial, are better suited for taxpayer funding than ratepayer funding.”
It also pointed to a “state-administered grant program for school infrastructure improvements,” and energy efficiency programs, finding, “Despite increasing investment, many of the programs funded today are not cost-effective and do not primarily focus on cutting energy use.”
The recommendations align with concerns raised by some state lawmakers — especially Republicans, about inequitable energy costs.
“It’s no secret that the benefits of wind and solar energy are not equally enjoyed in some communities,” said California Senate Utility, Energy and Communications Vice Chair Brian Dahle, R-Bieber, in an earlier interview with The Center Square on solar payments. “It’s time for energy resources, renewable or not, to stand independently without offsetting costs by adding more fees and relying heavily on taxpayers’ support.”
California
California store’s ingenious anti-theft technique leaves would be robbers scratching their heads
A California store developed a unique security system to stop the brazen, heartless thieves that have been breaking in recently, causing damage and harm to the business.
Roman Gonzales – the owner of Fresno-based DripOnDrip – was heartbroken when a group of robbers broke into his old shoe store in Nov. 2023, looting arms full of merch.
So he implemented a simple — yet fool-proof plan — to stop his merchandise from getting into the hands of the unwanted, late-night guests.
Instead of locking the store up with military-grade mechanisms, Gonzales clears out the store’s display floor each night and moves the empty, open cash registers to the front of the store in view from outside.
On Dec. 30, two white sedans pulled up to the front of the store just after 4 a.m., as one of the drivers rammed through the storefront, creating a hole for several masked and hooded menaces to run inside.
Security cameras throughout the store recorded the brazen robbery and captured unidentified raiders’ shock when they discovered there was nothing for them to steal, according to video obtained by KSEE.
Gonzales ridiculed the attempted thieves’ thoughtless actions for destroying his storefront.
“If they would have looked through the window, they would have saved themselves some time and energy,” the store owner told the outlet. “They would have noticed that there is nothing here on the floor for them to take.”
Gonzales intentionally leaves out a wall display of right-footed shoes.
“There’s no value once you take this shoe. I mean, you can’t just buy a left-foot shoe online either. So you’re not going to be able to use that item or even resell it. It’s just pointless,” Gonzales added.
The thieves did snatch a few backpacks that had been laying around and two of the valueless right-footed shoes.
Although Monday’s break-in wasn’t the first time Gonzales’ store was destroyed by thieves, he still hasn’t gotten used to it.
“Seeing the building that you’re working out of almost every day…just be damaged. It’s shocking,” he said.
An alarm was triggered by the thieves, alerting security at the River Park shopping center as agents immediately responded to the store.
By the time Gonzales arrived at 6 a.m., the store had been boarded up.
The gracious owner credited the complex security’s quick response as their presence made him feel safe enough to continue operating in the area, the outlet reported.
Additional security would be implemented to patrol the shopping center overnight, River Park confirmed to KSEE.
Safety poles have been considered to be placed in front of Gonzales’ store to stop cars from driving on the sidewalks.
California
More rain, snow chances for Northern California expected by Friday after mild start to New Year
It was another cold, cloudy morning to ring the new year. Clouds have returned to the region thanks to a storm system passing across the northern Sacramento Valley.
The first few days of 2025 will remain dry for many before another storm system arrives by Friday.
Friday’s system may be the last for the next week as a drier pattern returns for the first part of January.
New Year’s Day weather forecast
A weak storm system is bringing more rain to Northern California’s North Coast and northern Sacramento Valley on New Year’s Day, while Sacramento starts 2025 mainly dry.
Clouds became more widespread on New Year’s Day as a storm system passed north of Sacramento. This system will bring enough for a few light showers across the Sierra and foothills, but for the valley, many stay dry.
Some in and around Sacramento may get a few showers through the early evening. Yet, amounts will be less than a tenth of an inch.
Our current weather pattern continues to deliver cold nights and mornings to the valley. Thanks to recent rain, some patchy to dense fog will be possible in the Valley in the next few days. Visibility could be reduced to a quarter of a mile or less.
Many will drop back into the 30s by early Thursday before highs climb back to the 50s by the afternoon.
When is the next time it will rain in Northern California?
Thursday stays quiet as clouds linger and the afternoon stays dry. By Thursday night, our next storm system approaches the North Coast, bringing more rain to the valley and snow to the Sierra.
In the valley, rain chances start Friday morning. Between 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. rain becomes more widespread as it moves further south.
Showers begin across the Sierra in the morning becoming heavier by the afternoon. Snow levels will start above 8,000 feet at first then drop to 5,500 feet by Friday afternoon.
Snow will impact drivers over mountain passes from the afternoon through the early evening. Expect travel delays, chain controls, and slick conditions.
We are expecting our heaviest rain around 1 p.m. clearing out by 3 p.m. in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley. Once the cold front sweeps across, our storm is over and we may see more sunshine by the early evening.
Light showers linger across the foothills and Sierra through early Saturday but will stay light.
Saturday we clear out with mostly sunny skies likely by afternoon and Sunday will look similar. Dry and cool with highs in the 50s.
How much rain and snow is expected?
Rain and snow totals will be on the lower side with this incoming storm as it does not stick around for long.
By Saturday, most in the valley can expect 0.10” to one inch of rain, with our highest totals north of I-80.
In the foothills and Sierra, amounts will also be higher the further north you are of I-80. However, most can expect 0.25” to two inches of precipitation by Saturday morning.
With snow levels starting high, snow will take a little longer to stick. But once it does, our highest impacts will be over the mountain passes.
Many spots above 6,000 feet can expect three to six inches of snow by Sunday, with up to eight inches for Sierra peaks.
Long-range weather forecast for Northern California
After Friday’s storm system, we begin another quiet pattern for the first full week of 2025. Long-range models are keeping Northern California quiet through Jan. 15 as high-pressure rebuilds over the West Coast.
There may be a few opportunities for some light precipitation over the foothills and Sierra, but generally expect a dry pattern with mild temperatures.
High pressure starts to move mid-month and it may be enough to let another system sneak in.
Stay with the CBS Sacramento First Alert Weather team for changes and updates to our weather pattern.
-
Technology1 week ago
There’s a reason Metaphor: ReFantanzio’s battle music sounds as cool as it does
-
News1 week ago
France’s new premier selects Eric Lombard as finance minister
-
Business1 week ago
On a quest for global domination, Chinese EV makers are upending Thailand's auto industry
-
Health4 days ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology4 days ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
World1 week ago
Passenger plane crashes in Kazakhstan: Emergencies ministry
-
Politics1 week ago
It's official: Biden signs new law, designates bald eagle as 'national bird'
-
Politics6 days ago
'Politics is bad for business.' Why Disney's Bob Iger is trying to avoid hot buttons