Connect with us

California

America’s falling out of love with its California Dream—and housing costs are a major reason why, report says

Published

on


We all know people moved during the pandemic; with a newfound ability to work from anywhere, many migrated to the Sunbelt. Between April 2020 and July 2023, Census Bureau data shows the population in the South rose by nearly four million people. 

But the real story, according to a Bank of America research note released Monday, is what’s happening in the West. 

“While this rise is sometimes discussed in the context of the pandemic, in many ways it is not new ‘news’—the South’s share of U.S. population has been rising for a long time,” the bank said. “The real story, arguably, is the decline in the share of population of the West…its share of overall U.S. population has flattened, and now appears to be falling.”

For the first time since World War II, the share of Americans living in the West has fallen. 

Advertisement

Bank of America’s data reveals population growth across major metropolitan areas in the West is declining compared to the prior year, with Las Vegas being the exception. “The fall in population growth in the West is more of a Pacific story,” the bank said—with a chart showing declines in population growth across San Diego, Portland, Seattle, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, with the latter two cities leading the declines. 

But why are people giving up on the West Coast, and maybe even their dreams of living in California? It’s simple: housing costs. 

“We believe relative housing affordability remains a key part of the story,” the bank said. Major metropolitan areas with higher median mortgage payments have experienced negative population growth or, at best, weakly positive growth annually, according to Bank of America. 

“Looking at the [metropolitan statistical areas] in the Pacific states in the West, they all tend to have higher-than-average mortgage payments relative to the U.S,” the bank said. “By contrast, in the southern Mountain states, mortgage payments are lower than the U.S. average, so outward migration is potentially a reaction to housing costs.”

San Francisco and Los Angeles experienced the largest population losses, while San Antonio and Austin saw some of the biggest increases. In terms of housing costs, it’s not difficult to understand why that is. The average home value in Los Angeles is $918,087; in San Francisco, it’s $1,216,087. Meanwhile, the average home value in Austin is $527,205. In San Antonio, it’s just $251,545, per Zillow. 

Advertisement

Let’s do the math: The monthly mortgage payment on, let’s say, a million-dollar home after putting 20% down at a 7% 30-year fixed mortgage rate (not including taxes and insurance) would be around $5,300. That’s a lot more than what you’d typically pay living in San Antonio or Austin. 

The relationship between migration and housing costs is not perfect: Phoenix’s population, for instance, fell slightly over the last year, despite the fact the city does not have relatively high mortgage payments. But the metropolitan population is up substantially compared to the first quarter of 2020, which suggests “relative housing costs do exercise some ‘gravitational pull’ on population flows, even if shorter-term factors also make an impact.” 

Over time, Bank of America expects domestic migration flows across the country “to lead to some ironing-out in relative housing costs” among the metropolitan areas losing residents. The bank believes it’s likely those regions would see reduced pressure on home prices and rents, which would eventually equate to cheaper housing costs—although, that’s in comparison to areas currently seeing spikes in their population growth.

“Interestingly, our data also shows a relatively high proportion of higher-income households in the outflow of people from [metropolitan statistical areas] in the West to the South, which could boost demand for housing in southern [metropolitan statistical areas] by more than a straightforward count of the people leaving would suggest,” the bank said. “Likewise, the West may find demand for housing weakening more if higher-income households are leaving.”

More than 40% of people leaving the West for the South had incomes above $125,000, and over 10% had incomes above $250,000. Even so, the bank’s data found that a higher proportion of those leaving the West are one-person households. It’s mostly single-person households leaving Los Angeles and San Francisco. So if we assume they’re flexible to changes in the economy, they might return eventually. 

Advertisement

“Overall, as the pandemic itself fades as an influence, whether the internal migration flows we have observed in Bank of America internal data will continue or ease is an open question,” the bank said. “While current patterns may seem entrenched, over time, we think relative housing cost adjustment is likely to have an impact.”

Subscribe to the CFO Daily newsletter to keep up with the trends, issues, and executives shaping corporate finance. Sign up for free.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Dozens of Mexican mafia members arrested in California

Published

on

Dozens of Mexican mafia members arrested in California


  • Now Playing

    Dozens of Mexican mafia members arrested in California

    02:59

  • UP NEXT

    Unsealed autopsy reveals gruesome details in D4vd murder case

    02:31

  • Two CIA officers killed in car crash after Mexico drug raid

    01:25

  • Chicago collectible store is latest target in Pokemon card crime spree

    01:59

  • Defense to argue text messages show consensual relationship in Weinstein retrial

    03:08

  • FBI says it is looking into whether cases of missing and dead scientists are linked

    01:30

  • Deadly shooting at Mexico tourist site

    00:59

  • Epstein’s other house of ‘horrors’: Zorro Ranch

    14:15

  • Inside look at Jeffrey Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico

    02:20

  • New details about Louisiana gunman’s mental health

    01:19

  • Father in Louisiana mass shooting was convicted felon

    02:51

  • Singer D4vd faces first-degree murder charges

    05:54

  • 8 children killed in Louisiana mass shooting

    01:41

  • Lynette Hooker’s daughter “never imagined” her mom would disappear

    01:31

  • Singer D4vd arrested for murder of 14-year-old girl

    01:26

  • Los Angeles judge: Alec Baldwin to face civil trial over ‘Rust’ shooting

    02:49

  • No charges to be filed against Taylor Frankie Paul’s ex-boyfriend

    03:16

  • Ex-Alabama football player faces charges after wearing makeup and wigs to impersonate NFL players

    02:39

  • Son speaks about mother’s death after operation by surgeon arrested in separate case

    01:47

  • Singer D4vd arrested in connection with murder of teenage girl

    03:36

NBC News NOW

Authorities arrested dozens of Mexican mafia members in California, with charges including kidnapping, racketeering and drug trafficking. The operation involved pre-dawn raids and many of those charged were already in custody. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Top California governor candidates debate in San Francisco as field narrows

Published

on

Top California governor candidates debate in San Francisco as field narrows


Six of the top-polling candidates in California’s race for governor faced off at a debate in San Francisco Wednesday night.

This marked the first debate since former East Bay Congressman Eric Swalwell dropped out of the race for governor and resigned from his seat. Despite Swalwell’s exit as well as the departure of Betty Yee from the race, no clear Democratic frontrunner has emerged.

The debate was hosted by Nexstar/KRON in San Francisco.

The candidates at this debate included four Democrats: former Congresswoman Katie Porter, former California State Attorney General Xavier Beccera, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, and billionaire philanthropist Tom Steyer. The two Republicans at this debate included former Fox News commentator Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco.

Advertisement

All candidates are trying to make an impression ahead of the June 2 primary. Ballots will be mailed out to California voters in early May.

Political analyst Larry Gerston examines the first California governor’s race debate since Eric Swalwell dropped out, hosted by Nexstar/KRON in San Francisco.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Federal appeals court blocks California law requiring federal agents to wear identification

Published

on

Federal appeals court blocks California law requiring federal agents to wear identification


LOS ANGELES — An appeals court has blocked a California law passed in 2025 requiring federal immigration agents to wear a badge or some form of identification.

The Trump administration filed a lawsuit in November challenging the law, arguing that it would threaten the safety of officers who are facing harassment, doxing, and violence and that it violated the constitution because the state is directly regulating the federal government.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an injunction pending appeal Wednesday. It had already granted a temporary administrative injunction to block the implementation of the law.

At a hearing March 3, Justice Department lawyers argued that the California law sought to regulate the federal government, violating the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

The appeals court agreed unanimously, saying the law “attempts to directly regulate the United States in its performance of governmental functions,” in an opinion written by Judge Mark J. Bennett. The panel was composed of two Trump appointees, Bennett and Daniel P. Collins, and Obama appointee Jacqueline H. Nguyen.

California lawyers argued that the law applied equally to all law enforcement officers without discriminating against the U.S. government, and that states could apply “generally applicable” laws federal agents. They also argued that the law was important to address public safety concerns.

Advertisement

People are more likely to attack officers in self-defense if there’s no visible identification letting the public know they are law enforcement, California lawyers said in a brief opposing the injunction.

“This confusion has resulted in federal law enforcement officials being mistaken for criminals and vice versa, creating serious risk of harm to peace officers and members of the public,” they wrote.

The appeals court judges said they did not consider the public safety factors because the federal government has demonstrate its constitutional rights would be violated by the legislation, and “all citizens have a stake in upholding the Constitution,” it ruled, quoting previous case law.

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli called it a “huge legal victory” in a post on X.

The California Attorney General’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

The initial lawsuit also addressed another California measure signed into law last year that would have banned most law enforcement officers from wearing masks, neck gaiters, and other facial coverings. It was blocked by a federal judge in February.

The legislation did not apply to state law enforcement and made exceptions for undercover agents, protective equipment like N95 respirators or tactical gear, and other situations where not wearing a mask would jeopardize the operation.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending