Connect with us

California

After party rift on shutdown, California Democrats try to refocus budget fight on Medicaid

Published

on

After party rift on shutdown, California Democrats try to refocus budget fight on Medicaid


After a bruising Washington battle that averted a government shutdown but broke their party in two last week, leading California Democrats are trying to project a unified front on a central issue in the next big budget fight: Medicaid.

Republicans have already signaled their intention to cut hundreds of billions of dollars from the healthcare program for low-income residents, people with disabilities and other vulnerable groups in order to pay for tax cuts for the rich, the Democrats said — and must be stopped.

“Our budget should be a statement of our national values. What is important to us should be reflected in that budget. But what we see now is an assault on our values as they make this assault on our budget,” Rep. Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday at a UC San Francisco medical facility in her district, flanked by several other members of Congress, local doctors, community advocates and Medicaid recipients.

The event was part of a broader nationwide effort among Democrats to align on a clear message about Republican budget priorities that they say are threatening the well-being of average Americans — and before the frantic final days of negotiations or any vote in Washington.

Advertisement

They do not want to repeat the mistakes of last week, when Democrats split over the GOP’s stopgap measure to avoid a federal government shutdown.

Party leaders were accused of putting out muddled messaging about what was at stake, capitulating to Republicans in a rare moment when they had leverage, and handing President Trump and his party an important win at a time when they are running roughshod over the federal government and normal, bipartisan processes for funding it.

The episode exposed deep fissures in Democratic Party strategy, with former House Speaker Pelosi even making a rare and unsuccessful plea to Democratic senators to break with their leader, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, and oppose the stopgap measure.

But on Tuesday, Pelosi and Schumer appeared aligned once more, if not on last week than at least on how to move forward. Pelosi’s event was part of a “Medicaid Day of Action” that Schumer had touted hours earlier on ABC’s “The View.”

“We have senators and congressmen going to all different parts of their states and districts talking about how bad the Medicaid cut would be,” Schumer said.

Advertisement

“We don’t agonize, we organize, and this day, today, we have scores of events across the country, starting in New York,” Pelosi echoed hours later. “And we’ll have them tomorrow and the next day and the next day.”

A host of Democrats held smaller events and roundtable discussions with healthcare providers in their own districts, including Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove in Los Angeles and Rep. Ted Lieu in Redondo Beach. Protesters also decried Medicaid cuts outside the Anaheim Hills office of Republican Rep. Young Kim.

The Democrats say their hyper-focus on Medicaid is not just bluster — though Republicans have framed it as such.

Trump has repeatedly said that his party is not going after people’s Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security benefits, and the White House has acted exasperated by claims otherwise, saying the administration supports only the elimination of fraud and abuse in such programs.

“What kind of a person doesn’t support eliminating waste, fraud and abuse in government spending that ultimately costs taxpayers more?” it said.

Advertisement

Republican members of Congress have made similar arguments, accusing Democrats of lying about Medicaid cuts just to rile up their base and win political points.

A protester holds a sign outside Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s office last week after he said he would vote to advance a GOP-written funding patch to avert a government shutdown, saying it was the better of two bad options.

(Michel Nigro / Pacific Press / LightRocket via Getty Images)

However, Republicans brought on the concern themselves by passing a budget resolution last month aimed at extending 2017 tax cuts, including by finding trillions of dollars in spending cuts to pay for them.

Advertisement

That resolution does not explicitly require Medicaid cuts, but it instructs the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid, to cut spending by $880 billion over the next decade.

Democrats say simple math makes clear that the only way the committee will be able to find that level of cuts is by cutting Medicaid, unless they want to cut Medicare, the health program for seniors, which Republicans have also said is off the table. The committee could cut everything else in its budget — completely — and still wouldn’t reach the savings Republicans have called for, an independent analysis by the Congressional Budget Office concluded.

At Pelosi’s event, Rep. Mike Thompson (D-St. Helena), the ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means subcommittee on tax policy, said Republicans who are denying that their budget resolution calls for cuts to Medicaid aren’t telling the truth.

“We’re here because this president and the Republicans in Congress want to decimate Medicaid. They say no, they’re not going to touch Medicaid. That is a bald-faced lie,” Thompson said.

Medi-Cal, California’s version of Medicaid, covers nearly 15 million Californians, or more than a third of the state’s population, according to recent estimates from state health officials. Many of those patients are children.

Advertisement

But, as Thompson and others at the event noted, many others in the state would be affected by Medicaid cuts as well, because they would kneecap health systems and hospitals — particularly in rural and other poor communities where Medicaid patients make up a larger percentage of patients.

“We need to make sure our colleagues in red districts across the state understand this and they speak out,” Thompson said.

Sen. Adam Schiff agreed, calling such cuts “absolutely devastating to healthcare around the country, and most particularly to states like California that have so many of our residents who utilize Medicaid.”

Schiff said that healthcare systems throughout the state, especially in rural areas, are already in a “precarious position” financially, and that cutting Medicaid funding would set into motion a “cascading set of closures of hospitals and clinics.”

Dr. Josh Adler, executive vice president and chief clinical officer at UCSF Health, said more than 70% of the system’s in-patient care is roughly split between Medicare and Medicaid patients. Last year, he said, 58% of emergency department patients and 35% of the system’s in-patient population relied on Medicaid.

Advertisement

The cuts envisioned in Congress would “severely weaken the healthcare system that millions of Californians rely on for high-quality primary care and secondary care, while increasing the uncompensated care costs for hospitals that are already financially stressed,” he said.

Dr. Amy Herold, an OB-GYN and chief administrative and chief medical officer for Providence Queen of the Valley Medical Center in Napa, said her region is known for its tourism but is really a rural farming and service community — which is reflected in her system’s users.

Herold said 75% of the hospital’s patients are on Medicare or Medicaid, with more than 30% on Medicaid, and “that goes up to over 50% when you look at our pregnant ladies having their babies, including the one I delivered two days ago.”

The proposed cuts would make it difficult for her hospital to stay open, she said, despite the fact that it is the only one in her county with a trauma center and a labor and delivery center.

“There will be a healthcare desert, so not only do the people that are on Medi-Cal/Medicaid not have access to care, anyone — regardless of your insurance status — will not have access to care,” she said. “This is what keeps me up at night.”

Advertisement

Sascha Bittner, who serves on San Francisco’s Disability and Aging Services Commission and who is quadriplegic and has a speech disability and a vision disability from cerebral palsy, credited Medicaid with saving her life by providing her with home and community-based support and an array of healthcare services. In 2013, she said, she spent five months in the hospital with lymphoma, which would have cost her life or bankrupted her family without Medicaid.

“There are disabled children, elderly and other vulnerable people like me who depend on Medicaid,” Bittner said, “and the Republican plan to gut this crucial support is an attack on our very lives.”



Source link

Advertisement

California

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly

Published

on

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly


Wednesday, March 4, 2026 4:43AM

CA bill to keep police from moonlighting with ICE advances

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KABC) — A bill that would prevent police officers from moonlighting with federal immigration enforcement agencies, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is advancing through the California State Assembly.

AB 1537 passed the State Assembly’s committee on public safety on Tuesday.

The bill also requires that officers report any offers for secondary employment related to immigration enforcement to their place of work.

Those failing to comply could face decertification as a peace officer in California.

Advertisement

The bill was introduced by Assemblymember Isaac Bryan, whose district includes Mar Vista, Ladera Heights, Mid-Wilshire and parts of South Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say

Published

on

Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say


play

California Democrats running for governor, your party has a message for you. Think carefully about your candidacy and campaign ahead of the swiftly approaching filing deadline.

California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks urged candidates looking to assume the state’s highest office to “honestly assess the viability of their candidacy and campaign” as March 6, the final day to declare candidacy, nears. Hicks said that concerns about the crowded field of Democrat candidates “persist” in an open letter on Tuesday, March 3.

Advertisement

It comes as five leading candidates, several of which are Democrats — Katie Porter, Eric Swalwell, and Tom Steyer — are in a “virtual tie” per a recent poll, the Desert Sun reported, which is part of the USA TODAY Network.

Two Republican candidates pushing out California democrats in the gubernatorial bid may be “implausible,” but “it is not impossible,” Hicks said of the reasoning behind his latest message. Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, both Republicans, lead in RealClear Polling’s average of various polls.

The party chair spotlighted the need for California Democrats’ leadership, particularly over Proposition 50, the voter-approved measure that will temporarily implement new congressional district maps, paving the way for Democrats to secure more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“If in the unlikely event a Democrat failed to proceed to the general election for governor, there could be the potential for depressed Democratic turnout in California in November,” Hicks said. “The result would present a real risk to winning the congressional seats required and imperil Democrats’ chances to retake the House, cut Donald Trump’s term in half, and spare our nation from the pain many have endured since January 2025.”

Advertisement

During a press conference on March 2, Gov. Gavin Newsom said that when he is out in communities, people aren’t talking about the governor’s race. It’s an observation he called “interesting,” considering voting in the primary election starts in May.

“It’s been hard, I think, to focus on that race,” Newsom said, pointing to the attention on President Donald Trump, redistricting, and other matters.

What exactly is California Democratic Party asking of candidates?

In his open letter, Hicks gave directions to candidates.

First, assess your candidacy and campaign. If you don’t have a viable path to the general election, don’t file to get your name on the ballot for the primary election in June. Also, be prepared to suspend your campaign and endorse another candidate by April 15 if you decide to file but can’t show “meaningful progress towards winning the primary election.”

Advertisement

When is the next California election? Primary election in 2026

California voters will trim the field of candidates for governor on June 2. Only the two candidates who receive the most votes, regardless of party preference, will move on to the November election.  

Paris Barraza is a reporter covering Los Angeles and Southern California for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at pbarraza@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Supreme Court blocks California law limiting schools from telling parents about trans students

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks California law limiting schools from telling parents about trans students


The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a California law that limited when schools could require staff to disclose a student’s gender identity, clearing the way for schools to tell parents if their children identify as transgender without getting the students’ approval.

Rear view of multiracial students with hands raised in classroom at high school

The decision came after religious parents and educators, represented by the Thomas More Society, challenged California school policies aimed at preventing staff from disclosing a student’s gender identity.

Erwin Chemerinsky, dean and professor of law at the University of California Berkeley School of Law, said the ruling favors parents’ ability to be informed. “The Supreme Court today rules in favor of the claim of parents to be able to know the gender identity and gender pronoun of the children,” Chemerinsky said.

Advertisement
FILE:{ }transgender flag against blue sky background { }(Photo: AdobeStock)

FILE:{ }transgender flag against blue sky background { }(Photo: AdobeStock)

The decision temporarily blocks a state law that bans automatic parental notification requirements if students change their pronouns or gender expression at school. The Thomas More Society called the decision a major victory for parents, saying the court found California’s policy likely violates constitutional rights.

Chemerinsky said the Supreme Court’s action is an emergency ruling. “This law is now put on hold. So what this means is that schools can require that teachers and other staff inform parents of the gender identity or gender pronouns of children,” he said.

scotus.PNG

Kathie Moehlig, founder and executive director of Trans Family Support Services, said she is concerned about how the ruling could affect students who do not have supportive families.

“I am really concerned about our kids that do come from these non affirming homes, that they know that they’re going to get in trouble, that they’re going to possibly have violence brought against them possibly kicked out of their homes,” Moehlig said.

Moehlig said parents should eventually know, but that the conversation should happen when a student feels safe. “Our students are going to be less inclined to confide in any adults that might be able to help to get them access to mental healthcare, to a support system. They may still tell their peers but they’re certainly not going to tell any other adult,” she said.

Advertisement

Equality California, a LGBTQ+ civil rights organization, shared a statement:

Equality California, the nation’s largest statewide LGBTQ+ civil rights organization, released the following statement from Executive Director Tony Hoang in response to today’s U.S. Supreme Court shadow docket ruling in Mirabelli v. Bonta regarding California’s student privacy protections for transgender youth. Today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in this case is deeply disturbing. By stepping in on an emergency basis, the Court has effectively upended California’s student privacy protections without hearing full arguments and before the judicial process has run its course. While not surprising, this move reflects a dangerous willingness to short-circuit the established judicial process to dismantle protections for transgender youth. While this case continues to be litigated, the ruling revives Judge Benitez’s prior decision, which broadly targets numerous California laws protecting transgender and gender-nonconforming students — threatening critical safeguards that prevent forced outing and allow educators to respect a student’s affirmed name and pronouns at school. These protections exist for one reason: to keep students safe and ensure schools remain places where young people can learn and thrive without fear. To be clear: today’s decision does not impact California’s SAFETY Act, which prohibits school districts from adopting policies that forcibly out transgender students. The SAFETY Act remains in full effect, and we will continue defending it. Transgender youth deserve dignity, safety, and the freedom to learn without fear. We will never stop fighting for transgender youth and their families. Equality California will continue working with parents, educators, and advocates to ensure schools remain safe, welcoming, and focused on the success and well-being of every student.

The case now returns to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which will decide whether the California law is constitutional.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending