Connect with us

California

A California doctor said his wife died in an accidental fall. Her injuries told a different story.

Published

on

A California doctor said his wife died in an accidental fall. Her injuries told a different story.


On Nov. 13, 2016, Dr. Eric “Scott” Sills, a renowned California fertility doctor, called 911 and reported finding his wife and business partner Susann Sills unresponsive at the bottom of the stairs.  An initial investigation revealed some evidence that was consistent with an accidental fall. But as “48 Hours” correspondent Tracy Smith reports, other evidence pointed to something more sinister.

A PUZZLING SCENE

On that Sunday morning, Orange County Sheriff’s Homicide Detectives Eric Hatch and Dave Holloway had more questions than clues.

Tracy Smith: At that point in time that morning November 13th, was Scott Sills a victim or a suspect?

Det. Dave Holloway: To us … he was a victim. … We were going to a house where two kids and a husband just lost their wife and mother.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith: Is it a steep stairway?

Det. Eric Hatch: Yeah, it’s pretty high. I believe it was 13-and-a-half feet from the floor to the top of the stairs.

Tracy Smith: Did it seem plausible that a 45-year-old woman, in pretty good shape, would’ve fallen down the stairs to her death?

Det. Eric Hatch: At the time, it sounded believable.

Det. Dave Holloway: Susann had injuries to pretty much her whole body. … Her face … was all bruised up. Her … back was bruised up. … Both arms and legs were — had bruising and abrasions.

Advertisement

And around her body was an odd collection of items — a stainless steel soup pot, a purse and  an empty medication bottle. A scarf was found  off to the side.

Det. Eric Hatch: They definitely stood out … especially that steel pot. … It almost looked like it was placed there. It wasn’t upside down or leaning against anything.

Det. Dave Holloway: We had to … figure out why those things were there.

The detectives say Scott Sills didn’t seem nervous that a homicide team was in his home asking questions.

Det. Eric Hatch: He was just kind of going with the flow.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith: How cooperative was he?

Det. Dave Holloway: Oh, very. … Everything we asked of him … he, he gave us.

Det. Eric Hatch: He signed a consent form, that … gave us the permission to search his house.

And when they interviewed the Sills’ children, 12-year-old twins Mary-Katherine and Eric, each told a similar story to their dad — that Susann Sills had not been feeling well that night.

Det. Dave Holloway: Susann … had a history of migraines. … They were typically debilitating … requiring … a dark room, quiet … and bed rest. And she had been suffering from a migraine that weekend.

Advertisement
Sills soup pot evidence
“We could see the other things laying around like this stainless-steel soup pot … a purse … an empty medication bottle,” said Det. Dave Holloway.

Orange County Superior Court


The migraine seemed to explain that large pot.

Det. Dave Holloway: Sometimes she carried around a bowl … in order to have it near her bedside in case she threw up in the middle of the night.

And the empty pill bottle was for a pain medication Scott Sills said his wife took to treat her migraines.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith: So, did that make it sound more possible that she could’ve fallen down the stairs because she was suffering from a migraine?

Det. Eric Hatch: Maybe.

And there seemed to be nothing in the couples’ relationship to suggest another reason.

Tracy Smith: What did you learn about the Sills’ marriage?

Det. Eric Hatch: According to Scott, everything was fine. They had a, you know, a good relationship.

Advertisement

Both children attested that their parents loved each other — and said they rarely argued and were never violent. Detectives started piecing together a timeline of the weekend.

Det. Dave Holloway: Saturday night … she … was on the couch. … Eric came down to see her, check on her, make sure she was OK.

It was around midnight when Eric Sills and his mom went back upstairs, after Eric said she put the dogs away in their crate. Mary-Katherine had gone to bed in her parents’ bedroom. Susann Sills was going to spend the night in Mary-Katherine’s room, which was the quietest.

Det. Dave Holloway: It was … Mary-Katherine’s idea for Susann to spend the night in that room. It was clean … according to Mary-Katherine … and done up … like a little hotel suite … for Susann to convalesce in there.

Mary-Katherine had left a note on her door with what would be her last words to her Mom. “I know you are tired,” she wrote, “but you need to know that I love you …” 

Advertisement
Dr. Eric Scott Sill and Susann Sills
Dr. Eric Scott Sill and Susann Sills

Sandi Roberts


Around 4 a.m., Eric Sills said he woke to the sound of his parents arguing in the next room.

Det. Dave Holloway (pointing up at windows outside Sills home): The two windows, that’s … Eric’s room.

Tracy Smith: So Eric is right next (to) Mary-Katherine’s room … where his mom was.

Advertisement

Det. Dave Holloway: Yeah.

Tracy Smith: And what did he tell you he heard?

Det. Dave Holloway: Well, he heard loud voices arguing, but … he didn’t describe hearing any physical confrontation.

Eric Sills told detectives that after about five minutes he decided to go to sleep in the main bedroom with his sister. According to Mary-Katherine’s statement, she thought he’d come in around 3:40 a.m. and told her their parents were arguing about a work email.

DETECTIVE: How do you know she — she got an email?

MARY-KATHERINE SILLS: Because Eric said they were talking about that.

Advertisement

DETECTIVE: Oh, OK. So Eric told you that she got an email and that she was, it was about something …

MARY-KATHERINE SILLS: Something about work.

Scott Sills told detectives he had argued with his wife because he found her working late on her laptop, which made her migraines worse.

Tracy Smith: When you heard that they had an argument shortly before she was found at the bottom of the stairs dead, what was going through your mind?

Det. Dave Holloway: Well, again that’s … one more piece of data that we’re gonna collect. … It doesn’t mean one way or the other that it was a murder. But that’s definitely an avenue that we would have to pursue.

Advertisement

Neither Eric nor Mary-Katherine heard their dad return to the bedroom.

MARY-KATHERINE SILLS:  I woke up and my dad was just like on the covers just laying there like there wasn’t enough room to get in I guess. So, he was just laying there.

DETECTIVE: On top of it?

MARY-KATHERINE SILLS: Yeah.

It was around 6:30 a.m. the next morning when Scott Sills and the twins woke up. He asked them if they wanted to go to the pool and get some doughnuts. Mary-Katherine said when she left the bedroom and looked over the banister, she saw her mom’s body at the bottom of the stairs — that long red and white scarf around her neck.

Det. Dave Holloway: That was … Mary-Katherine’s scarf … It was found in the same room as … Susann’s body.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith: But the scarf wasn’t on her body?

Det. Dave Holloway: When we arrived, it was not. … Mary-Katherine told us that she had to remove the scarf. And she did that … not to impede mom’s breathing.

Sills scarf
Mary-Katherine Sills said when she saw her mom’s body at the bottom of the stairs — a red and white scarf was around her neck. She told police she removed it.

Orange County Superior Court


Adding to the mystery were the injuries to Susann Sills’ neck the deputy coroner had noticed during a preliminary examination of the body earlier that morning.

Advertisement

Det. Eric Hatch: Especially with the ligature mark across her neck … it just didn’t make sense.

Tracy Smith: Is it possible that she could have fallen down the stairs and then somehow the scarf strangled her?

Det. Dave Holloway: Could have caught on a banister … sure I suppose so, but we didn’t have any evidence of that.

As detectives continued their investigation, the questions mounted.

Tracy Smith: Did anybody in the house hear a fall down the stairs?

Advertisement

Det. Dave Holloway: No. Nobody described hearing a fall down the stairs. Or, if Susann had been carrying that … stainless steel pot, no one heard that bounce down the stairs or land on the tile floor.

Det. Dave Holloway: There was no evidence on the stairs of someone going down, uh, like broken baluster or anything like that.

And something else the detectives thought was strange.

Det. Eric Hatch:  It was a warm day even though it was November. But when we spoke with Scott, and during the whole time we were … in the house doing our investigation, he was wearing a beanie over his head. … And he said that he slept with it ’cause it was cold.

Tracy Smith: Did you ask him to remove the beanie?

Advertisement

Det. Eric Hatch: Yes.

As it turned out, Susann wasn’t the only one with injuries that morning.

BLOOD FOUND IN A BEDROOM

Det. Dave Holloway: We discovered that Scott had some injuries … He had … a … cut up here on his forehead. … and on his arm, he had … a bruise.

Scott Sills said there was a simple explanation for the injuries. He had hurt himself while working on his car in the garage with his son, Eric. There was just one problem.

Det. Dave Holloway: Eric told us dad didn’t hurt himself.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith: Did he say to you, I left the garage so maybe he hurt himself while I was gone?

Det. Dave Holloway: No. He told us they came in the house together.

And investigators said they found something Scott Sills couldn’t explain on that day.

Tracy Smith: You found blood?

Det. Eric Hatch: Yes.

Advertisement
Sills blood evidence
Blood can be seen on curtains in Mary-Katherine’s bedroom where her mom had been sleeping. Blood was also found on the wall and nightstand.

Orange County Superior Court


Blood in Mary-Katherine’s room — where Susann Sills had been staying — on the curtains, the wall, and the nightstand.

Tracy Smith: So, that morning when you asked Scott about the blood, what did he say?

Det. Eric Hatch: He didn’t know where it came from. … He was unaware of it.

Advertisement

Mary-Katherine told investigators the room was “perfect” when she left it. She also said she’d turned down the bed, but now it was made.

Det. Eric Hatch: It didn’t really make sense. … Why would Susann … take the time to make the bed in the middle of the night?

Tracy Smith: So if you found blood in Mary-Katherine’s bedroom, you know that there are ligature marks on Susann … why not take him down to the station at this point and question him?

Det. Dave Holloway: Once you arrest somebody … that starts processes that … you can’t stop. … Besides the blood in the bedroom … we didn’t really have … enough evidence of a fight occurring. … So, at the end of the day, there wasn’t enough probable cause legally to arrest him.

Susann Sills’ autopsy four days later didn’t provide any definitive answers.

Advertisement

The forensic pathologist noted that Susann Sills had injuries all over her body that could have resulted from a fall, including a fractured C3 vertebra near the base of her neck, which can be fatal. Then there was that ligature mark across her neck and hemorrhaging of the blood vessels in her eyes, which pointed to strangulation. It would take months to make an official ruling.

Det. Dave Holloway: It’s … not something they wanna rush into. It’s not something they wanna make a rash judgment on. … The doctor … wanted to examine the whole case more clearly.

In the meantime, detectives requested DNA testing on evidence collected from the Sills home, and forensic analysis on Susann Sills’ phone and laptop. They also dug deeper into who the Sills were.

Det. Dave Holloway: None of their immediate neighbors knew anything about the family. …

Eventually… we … contacted whoever we could out of their contact list to try and find out more.

Advertisement

Sandi Roberts: In high school I thought this must be what genius means … his humor, his quick wit.

Sandi Roberts and Jamie Aikens have known Scott Sills since their high school days in Harriman, Tennessee.

Sandi Roberts: He was something we had never seen before. In a small town in Tennessee at that age … He was very special.

Jamie Aikens: He was hilarious … How many people come to class in a three-piece suit … and it’s not dress-up day.

Sandi Roberts: He’s flamboyant. He’s bigger than life. … He was very, very kind.

Advertisement

Jamie Aikens: I grew up, uh, pretty poor, I didn’t have a car in high school or anything like that and a lot of times no lunch money. … And he always pulled out his wallet and paid for it. It just wasn’t a question.

His future seemed limitless. He was accepted to both law school and medical school.

Sandi Roberts: We were kind of all … on the edge of our seat, wondering what he was going to decide to do.

Dr. Eric Scott Sills
Dr. Eric Scott Sills was a beloved infertilty doctor.

Scott Sills/Facebook

Advertisement


And it was no surprise when the hometown boy became a renowned IVF specialist – a profession that would lead him to Susann.

Chris Solimine: Susann was going through fertility treatment, trying to get pregnant with her first husband.

Chris Solimine met Susann Arsuaga in business school, where she earned an MBA. She had confided in him about her struggles to get pregnant.

Chris Solimine: Having kids was everything to Susann. … She’d cry about it. I mean, it was so important to her. … And … Eric Scott Sills was her fertility doctor.

But soon, Solimine says, they were a couple.

Advertisement

Chris Solimine: She started talking about Dr. Sills after she had told me she was getting divorced … and that she was now dating him. … I just remember her saying … he’s a … brilliant doctor.

Scott Sills, who was also coming out of a previous marriage, seemed to have met his match.

Chris Solimine: Susanne was … smart, witty, sarcastic, but not in a mean way, you know, just enough to – to dig at you. … incredibly driven, a loyal friend.

Sandi Roberts: She … was so … classy, so beautiful … very engaging.

Jamie Aikens: Seemed like to me he found one that — it was a good fit.

Advertisement

Susann Arsuaga fit right in at Scott’s 20th high school reunion.

Sandi Roberts: She danced the whole time. … They were lovely together. …  He just seemed really … happy.

Sills family
Scott and Susann Sills with twins Eric and Mary-Katherine and dogs Annabelle and Buddy.

Susann Sills/Patrick.net


The couple married and welcomed twins through IVF, adding to Dr. Sills’ two older kids. And eventually, Susann Sills’ business acumen would lead them to start their own IVF practice in April 2015.

Advertisement

Chris Solimine: She started the business … She built it. … Susann pretty much ran everything with the exception of actually doing the procedures. 

The practice soon took off. And Dr. Sills was often featured on the TV program “The Doctors,” which was distributed by CBS.

Dr. Julio Novoa: He was in many eyes, a saint. … He was loved by his patients.

Dr. Julio Novoa is an OB/GYN who co-authored a book with Dr. Sills.

Dr. Julio Novoa: Dr. Sills … was a great doctor … And Susann was a — a great advocate for women as well. … They were a team not just married, but a team and working well together.

Advertisement

But about a month before her death, Rick Leeds, another of Susann Sills’ friends, says she left him a troubling message.

Rick Leeds: She sounded like she was whispering … It was so different from the happy, jovial, excited voicemails I got before. This one was definitely … things weren’t good.

When they spoke, Leeds says it sounded like there was tension over a photo.

Rick Leeds: She said it was a topless photo of her that had appeared on a … blog. … this was some discussion she didn’t wanna have.

IN SEARCH OF A MOTIVE

When news of Susann Sills’ death reached her friends, they were stunned.

Advertisement

Rick Leeds: It was devastating.

Chris Solimine: I couldn’t believe it. … It didn’t seem plausible to me that she just fell down the stairs with a migraine headache.

It didn’t sound like the vibrant Susann they knew. Scott Sills’ friends say they were equally perplexed.

Sandi Roberts: Scott would not discuss anything with us.

Jamie Aikens: He quickly changed the subject. … We never spoke again. … you don’t know how tragedies affect people.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith:  What were your impressions of Scott Sills throughout the investigation?

Det. Dave Holloway: I would describe him as emotionless. … He never … acted as though Susann was even his wife … He talked about what a good manager she was and how she kept  … their business flowing. … But he never once mentioned that she was a good mother or that he loved her …

Tracy Smith: All very businesslike?

Det. Dave Holloway: Yeah.

In fact, the day after Susann Sills’ death, the doctor had gone to work.

Advertisement

Joanie Rickers: I was shocked. … Who goes to the office the next morning when your wife died.

Joanie Rickers’ daughter was a nurse at the Sills’ IVF clinic and had called her in a panic.

Joanie Rickers: She said her patients are in cycle and they have to be treated.

Rickers volunteered to help manage the office — something Susann Sills did — and ended up working there for two years.

Tracy Smith: Did Dr. Sills talk about his wife?

Advertisement

Joanie Rickers: Oh, never.

Tracy Smith: Didn’t ever say how she died?

Joanie Rickers: Oh, we — it was never discussed.

Pretty soon, she says the doctor started changing his appearance.

Joanie Rickers: He started to dress like a movie star. … I mean, he was very simple before.

Advertisement

And she says the once-balding doctor now had a full head of hair.

Sandi Roberts:  We definitely noticed, um, new hair.

Scott Sills
Scott Sills’ changing behavior and new appearance raised red flags.

Scott Sills/Facebook


They also noticed Dr. Sills’ flashier online persona.

Advertisement

Sandi Roberts: I said to one of my friends, now is Sills a doctor or a model? … I personally don’t know any doctors on social media…  that are takin’ selfies in the gym … in their — blazers and their sunglasses and in their Porsches … I mean, it was a little much.

Rick Leeds: All of a sudden, there started to be another woman in photos, and he was out on dates and they were going around town.

The behavior raised eyebrows, but it was hardly evidence. Then, in November 2017, a year after Susann Sills’ death, there was finally news from the coroner’s office: Susann’s cause of death was cited as ligature strangulation and the manner a homicide.

Dr. Sills was now the prime suspect. DNA results on the blood in Mary-Katherine’s room showed a mixture of his and Susann’s DNA.

Det. Dave Holloway: They were both there.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith: There was a fight.

Det. Dave Holloway: There’s a fight. And he killed his wife.

On Aug. 8, 2018, nearly two years after Susann Sills’ death, Detectives Holloway and Hatch made a surprise house call at the doctor’s home.

Tracy Smith: Did you ask Dr. Sills at this point, just flat out, did you kill your wife?

Det. Eric Hatch: Yes. … He … started stressing — started sweating. … He became more defensive.

Advertisement

They say the doctor denied killing his wife. And he now offered an explanation for his blood in Mary-Katherine’s room: he said he had injured himself replacing a window screen.

Tracy Smith: Wouldn’t Mary-Katherine have seen the blood that he left from replacing the screen?

Det. Eric Hatch: For sure.

Tracy Smith: And she didn’t mention it?

Det. Eric Hatch: Nope.

Advertisement

Despite the death being ruled a homicide, detectives said they still had more investigating to do, like finding a motive. A search of Susann Sills’ phone provided some clues. Text messages hinted at problems in the marriage.

Det. Dave Holloway: There was one in particular where she … had some pretty strong words towards Scott.

In texts sent in late August, less than three months before her death, Susann Sills wrote, “I am trapped”… “You are killing me”… “I just want out” and “We just aren’t right for each other.

And about a month before her death, Susann had confided in Rick Leeds.

Rick Leeds: She and Scott were in a really rocky place and she was thinking about leaving him. 

Advertisement
sills-full.jpg
Susann Sills

Susann Sills/Patrick.net


He said Susann Sills was also upset about a photo she had posted online.

Rick Leeds: Whatever was going on between her and Scott … and this picture … was just … a pivotal point for her.

Susann Sills  had posted a topless photo after making a bet in a political chatroom called Patrick.net.

Advertisement

Det. Dave Holloway: Susann apparently was one of the few women who was involved in this forum. … She … kind of threw out … that … if Donald Trump won the presidential nomination, that she would post a picture of her bare breasts.

And on the day of her death, detectives had found a printout in Dr. Sills’ home office of an exchange between Susann and another Patrick.net member from Aug. 30, 2016, discussing the photo. The man, who went by “tenpoundbass” wrote: “All I’ve got to say is you must have a super cool husband.”

Susann Sills aka “turtledove” replied, “He’s exhausted, actually. It isn’t easy being married to a woman who is partially naked and posing alluringly, all the time …”

Dr. Sills denied that he had printed that chat. But when investigators later searched his phone, they found a photo of the same exchange.

Tracy Smith: Does this sound like this could lead to motive?

Advertisement

Det. Dave Holloway: Yes, … if it’s … something that’s building up in him, some kind of anger … or jealousy about … what his wife’s doing online without him …

Tracy Smith: Enough to kill her?

Det. Dave Holloway: Mm-hmm.

Detectives also learned that Dr. Sills had tried to collect on a $250,000 life insurance policy on Susann, but he claimed the insurance company had called him.

Det. Eric Hatch: He wasn’t able to collect because … ’cause that death certificate was ruled as a homicide.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith: Do you think Scott Sills thought he’d gotten away with it?

Det. Eric Hatch: I think so.

Det. Dave Holloway: Every day that went by, he felt a little bit more at ease, I think.

On April 25, 2019, nearly two-and-a-half years after Susann’ Sills’ death, Dr. Sills was arrested for her alleged murder on his way to surgery. He quickly posted a million dollar bond. But investigators were about to get an unexpected tip from a woman who said she had met Dr. Sills while Susann was still alive.

Det. Eric Hatch: They met through Facebook … He was infatuated with her.

Advertisement

She shared an email Scott Sills had sent her about two weeks after Susann Sills’ death.

Tracy Smith (reading email): “Pour ma chère Marie.”

Det. Eric Hatch: Yes.

Tracy Smith: So it’s … in French: “This is probably the most important manuscript I have ever written….I am asking you to seriously rethink our suspended, but once intense relationship.”

Tracy Smith: When you first read that email … what was your reaction?

Advertisement

Det. Eric Hatch: I thought … I was shocked … This is a motive.

Tracy Smith: So could Dr. Sills have killed his wife to get her out of the way?

Jack Earley: Oh, I just don’t see that at all.

Dr. Sills’ defense attorney Jack Earley denies that there was a romantic relationship. And he says that email was merely a devastated father’s desperate attempt to find a new mother for his children.

Tracy Smith: Did you feel in your gut that you could win this case?

Advertisement

Jack Earley: Oh, yes.

THE DEFENSE OFFERS A UNIQUE THEORY 

In November 2023, just over seven years after Susann Sills’ death, Scott Sills – now stripped of his medical license — went on trial for her murder. The Orange County District Attorney’s Office declined our request for an interview, but cameras were allowed in court for portions of the trial where Senior Deputy D.A. Jennifer Walker laid out her case to the jury.

JENNIFER WALKER (in court): November 13th of 2016 … this man killed his wife and hid it.

Walker argued that Scott Sills beat, and then strangled, Susann Sills to death before staging the scene to make it look like she had fallen down the stairs.

JENNIFER WALKER (in court): This is a murder, not an accident.

Advertisement

The prosecution’s case relied heavily on Susann Sills’ autopsy. But Scott Sills’ defense attorney, Jack Earley, came to court armed with a unique theory. He suggested that Susann fell — either going up or down — the stairs and that one or both of the family dogs then tugged on the scarf that was wrapped around her neck.

Tracy Smith: Do you honestly think that the dogs pulled hard enough to strangle her to death?

Jack Earley: No, no — I didn’t. That was not the main theory that the dogs actually strangled her to death.

Instead, Earley focused on another injury identified in Susann Sills’ autopsy: that fractured C3 vertebra. He says that injury is consistent with a fall, and that it would have left Susann incapacitated.

Jack Earley: Let’s assume that someone trips and falls and fractures their C3 … their breathing is compromised. If they’re then choked, it doesn’t take much to kill ’em.

Advertisement
Susann Sills playing with dogs
Home video of Susann Sills playing tug-of-war with family dogs Buddy, left, and Annabelle.

Orange County Superior Court


The defense had the scarf tested for dog DNA and it came back positive. And there was testimony that the dogs were known to play tug-of-war. as seen in this video. And when Susann and Scott Sills’ now-19-year-old daughter Mary-Katherine took the stand for the prosecution, her testimony supported the defense’s theory. Investigator Dave Holloway was at the trial.

Det. Dave Holloway: Mary-Katherine testified that she … saw the dogs pulling at the scarf around her neck. And none of that came up during—the—the day we interviewed her the first time.

Tracy Smith: How did that strike you?

Advertisement

Det Dave Holloway: Well, (sighs), um, I know that she was still close with her father …

Tracy Smith: Do you think she’s trying to protect her dad?

Det. Dave Holloway: I would say so.

Earley denies that. He says the reason Mary-Katherine didn’t tell investigators is simple.

Jack Earley: It wasn’t asked. … Why would she think the dogs were important? She doesn’t even know that … there’s any question of being choked.

Advertisement

He says Scott Sills did tell first-responders. And he argued that Susann Sills’ toxicology tests point to an accidental fall. She had a muscle relaxant and pain medication in her system. And Earley told the jury that Susann suffered from a fainting disorder and that vertigo would accompany her migraines. But the prosecution said the defense’s theory just doesn’t make sense.

JENNIFER WALKER (in court): Strangulation is a silent killer. You know what’s not a silent killer? Falling down multiple stairs … You have to believe she bounced her head, neck, back, shoulders, inside of her arms, legs and feet, multiple ways against approximately six stairs. Like being in a soundproof pinball machine. … Then was strangled by her dogs. Not reasonable.

And why would Susann Sills have a scarf around her neck that early in the morning to begin with? Prosecutors suggested that Scott Sills used it to strangle her and then left it around her neck to cover the marks. But Earley told the jury it wasn’t unusual for Susann to wear a scarf, especially when she wasn’t feeling well.

Jack Earley: Because if she got sick, that was something that she would wear — a scarf to wipe … your mouth with it.

But the prosecution also pointed out that Susann and Scott Sills’ son Eric told investigators he saw his         mother put the dogs away in their crate in the hours before she died.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith: Eric said that his mom put the dogs in the crate.

Jack Earley: Yes. … Sometimes, dogs, when they’re crate-trained, when they go to bed, will go lay in the crate, even with the door open. 

Sills staircase
A lone shoe on the staircase of the Sills family’s San Clemente, California, home.

Orange County Superior Court


There was also no blood on the stairs or damage to them.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith: There are all these injuries that you say come from the fall down the stairs, all over her body, but she leaves no marks on the stairs.

Jack Earley: But there’s no marks anywhere in the house …

But there was that blood in Mary-Katherine’s bedroom, and the prosecution argued it was evidence that a fight occurred. A forensic scientist testified that the stains on the nightstand and drapes were consistent with Scott Sills’ DNA. Earley did acknowledge that his client’s blood was in the room, but he told the jury about Scott’s claim that he hurt himself there on an earlier date.

Tracy Smith: From Scott replacing a screen?

Jack Earley: Yeah. From getting cut on a nail that was in the back of … the nightstand that was there.

Advertisement

That forensic scientist though testified that one of the stains on the wall was a mixture of DNA—and Scott and Susann Sills were likely contributors. Earley says that doesn’t mean it was Susann’s blood and that it could have been her touch DNA that was picked up.

Jack Earley: Susann had touched that area before at some point in time. And she lived there.

But the prosecution pointed out that there were also clumps of Susann Sills’ hair found in Mary-Katherine’s room, and there were blood stains on Susann’s clothing that were found to be consistent with Scott Sills’ DNA, too. Earley had a rebuttal to it all, starting with the hair.

Jack Earley: She has hair extensions. And you know what hair extensions cause? Loss of hair. …

And the blood on the clothes?

Advertisement

Jack Earley: You don’t know how old it is.

The jury was also shown pictures of those injuries that were observed on Scott Sills. Remember how he told investigators that he hurt himself while working on his car with his son? And how, according to investigators, Eric Sills said that his father didn’t get injured? Well, when Eric Sills took the stand, his testimony allowed for the possibility.

Jack Earley: What he testified is, well, I didn’t stay there the whole time he fixed the car. …

Tracy Smith: Does that seem like a discrepancy to you?

Jack Earley: Well … it’s not a discrepancy. … nobody’s asking him that full story at — at the age 12.

Advertisement

Tracy Smith: So he didn’t necessarily say at age 12, dad didn’t get the injury from the car?

Jack Earley: No … he basically said I wasn’t there when he got the injury. …

While Eric Sills did testify that a loud discussion between his parents had woken him up shortly before his mother’s death, the defense told the jury that there was nothing to it. And those texts between Scott and Susann Sills in the months before Susann’s death?

Jack Earley: If you have 40,000 texts and there’s five of them with hard language in it, that’s a perfect marriage.

The jury didn’t hear about the life insurance policy, that e-mail Scott Sills sent to another woman or his social media photos in the wake of his wife’s death, but they were told about the Patrick.net posts. And the prosecution argued that topless photo that Susann Sills posted on the site enraged Scott Sills.

Advertisement

Jack Earley: It wasn’t a big deal.

Tracy Smith: It’s not striking to you that he had this photo in two places on his phone and then on the printer?

Jack Earley: No, first of all, I don’t know really who printed this stuff up.

Earley maintains there is no motive for murder.

Jack Earley: There was never any physical violence. … Their working and marriage relationship … everybody looked at it as loving.

Advertisement

Scott Sills chose not to take the stand. The trial spanned three weeks, and then the case went to the jury.

Erin Ellis: My heart was just pounding.

A JURY DECIDES .. BUT QUESTIONS REMAIN

Jurors Erin Ellis, Jack Van Camp, and Susan Blaho say that when deliberations began, they felt the pressure.

Jack Van Camp: It’s just so intimidating that you got someone’s life on the line …

Tracy Smith: It weighs on you.

Advertisement

Erin Ellis: Oh, yeah. And the ripple effect …

Jack Van Camp: The kids, and uh —

Erin Ellis: Yeah.

Tracy Smith: Did you think about that? That these kids didn’t only lose their mom? That if you convict him, now they’re losing their dad.

Erin Ellis: Of course.

Advertisement

Jack Van Camp: Yeah.

They say they also felt a clear motive was lacking.

Erin Ellis: I mean, it’s hard to imagine … why something like this would happen.

Jack Van Camp: Somebody would do that.

Erin Ellis: Yeah.

Advertisement

After about three hours, they came to a decision. The clerk read the verdict:

COURT CLERK: We the jury in the above-entitled action find the defendant, Eric Scott Sills, not guilty of the crime of first-degree murder …We the jury in the above-entitled action find the defendant, Eric Scott Sills, guilty of the crime of second-degree murder. 

Scott Sills trial
Eric Scott Sills was found guilty of second-degree murder.

Getty Images


Guilty of second-degree murder. Scott Sills, who gave the gift of life to so many through his IVF practice—now convicted of taking the life of his wife, the mother of his kids.

Advertisement

Erin Ellis: I just felt sad. I mean, I was tearing up on the way out … This whole family had been through so much, you know— now this is the next phase of it.

Susan Blaho: It was finality.

Jack Van Camp: But he did that.

The jurors we spoke to say that no one on the jury bought the defense’s theory about the dogs.

Jack Van Camp: The dogs would have to choke her on the stairs. And my dog was as big as hers and my dog cannot get a grip on wooden stairs with their nails to do anything. They just slide.

Advertisement

Erin Ellis: The scarf had no puncture wounds either. … I would’ve expected holes.

Jack Van Camp: And the fall down the stairs wouldn’t create that scenario on her body.

Instead, what they spent the most time grappling with was whether Scott Sills was guilty of first-degree or second-degree murder. First-degree murder requires premeditation and deliberation.

Jack Van Camp: I just didn’t think he planned it.

Erin Ellis: I don’t.

Advertisement

Jack Van Camp: If he had planned it or done any kind of forethought, it wouldn’t be a hot mess crime scene that it was.

Susan Blaho: It was kind of like a snap.

But investigator Dave Holloway says while Scott Sills may not have planned his crime, he certainly had the time to think about what he was doing.

Det. Dave Holloway: He had plenty of time from when he applied pressure to Susann’s neck, till she died to stop what he was doing. … And he still did it. … I was a little disappointed that it was a second degree.

On March 15, 2024, about three months after the verdict, court reconvened for sentencing. Susann Sills’ mother, Theresa Neubauer, addressed the court, and kept the focus on her daughter.

Advertisement

Theresa Neubauer: She was a dynamic person. She had hopes and dreams …

Hopes and dreams, Neubauer said, that one day Susann would see her daughter, Mary-Katherine, walk down the stairs of the family’s San Clemente home on her wedding day.

Theresa Neubauer: It was a very painful, uh, thing for me to learn of the role the staircase eventually played in real life. 

Mary-Katherine Sills in court
Mary-Katherine Sills addresses the court at her father’s sentencing

CBS News

Advertisement


Mary-Katherine also addressed the court and spoke of all the loss she had endured at such a young age. She and her brother were taken in by a family friend after their father’s arrest and that family friend died suddenly of a health condition around the end of the trial. She asked the judge to show her father mercy.

MARY-KATHERINE SILLS (in court): I want my father to walk me down the aisle at my wedding someday. When I have a family and children, I want my father to be there to hold my baby. I have been left orphaned and I feel so lost without my parents.

Judge Patrick Donahue sentenced Scott Sills to the mandatory sentence under California law: 15 years to life in prison. His fate was decided, but for so many, questions remain. Exactly what led up to Susann Sills’ death?

Tracy Smith: Do you think we’ll ever know exactly how it happened?

Det. Dave Holloway: I don’t think so.

Advertisement

Det. Eric Hatch: No.

Scott Sills declined “48 Hours”‘ requests for an interview. But in the end, no explanation will suffice — or ease the profound sense of loss that lingers. Patients now without their doctor —

Dr. Julio Novoa: Thousands of women felt him to be a saint. … From the saint all the way down to the devil, that’s how it ended up being.

— and children without their father or their mother.

Susann Sills
Susann Sills

Advertisement

Legacy.com


Chris Solimine: Her kids were so important to her and everything she did revolved around her children. … She was an incredible human being. … You know, I—I miss her (emotional).

Scott Sills will be eligible for parole in 2033, though it could be sooner with good behavior.

He is appealing his conviction.


Produced by Gayane Keshishyan Mendez and Stephanie Slifer. Alicia Tejada is the coordinating producer. Chelsea Narvaez is the associate producer. Michelle Fanucci, Cindy Cesare and Michelle Sigona are the development producers. Danielle Austen is the development associate producer. Gary Winter, Atticus Brady, Michelle Harris, Jason Schmidt and Michael Baluzy are the editors. Lourdes Aguiar is the senior producer

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement

California

AP Decision Notes: What to expect in California’s state primary

Published

on

AP Decision Notes: What to expect in California’s state primary


WASHINGTON — Two candidates for California governor will emerge from a massive field of 61 hopefuls in a state primary on Tuesday, when voters will also select U.S. House nominees using a new map they approved in a 2025 ballot measure.

Also on the ballot is a long list of state and local contests, including a Los Angeles mayoral race where the Democratic incumbent mayor faces more than a dozen challengers. Among them is a former reality TV personality whose candidacy has caught the eye of another former reality TV personality, President Donald Trump.

California’s top-two primary format, where all candidates run on the same ballot regardless of party, has complicated the campaign calculus in several high-profile races, including the one to replace term-limited Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. While Democratic candidates often welcome the opportunity to run head-to-head against a Republican in the dark blue state, the number of well-known Democrats in the race threatens to split the vote and inadvertently clear the path for two Republicans to advance to the general election, which would guarantee a Republican governor.

The Democratic field includes former U.S. health secretary Xavier Becerra, former U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, billionaire 2020 presidential candidate Tom Steyer and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. Republicans vying for the seat include Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and conservative commentator Steve Hilton, who has Trump’s endorsement.

Advertisement

Democrats Eric Swalwell and former state Controller Betty Yee will also appear on the ballot, although both have withdrawn from the race. Swalwell was a top contender in the campaign but withdrew on April 12 following sexual assault allegations he has denied. He resigned from Congress two days later.

In the race for control of the narrowly divided U.S. House, a new congressional map favorable to Democrats has complicated the reelection bids of several Republican House incumbents. Voters approved the new district boundaries in a Nov. 2025 referendum, which was a response to Trump’s initiative in Texas and other states to maximize the number of GOP seats heading into the fall midterm election.

In the 6th Congressional District, U.S. Rep. Kevin Kiley considered his limited options and left the Republican Party in March to run for reelection as an independent.

Republican U.S. Reps. Ken Calvert and Young Kim are competing against each other in the 40th Congressional District. Democrat Esther Kim Varet is one of several challengers hoping to snag one of two spots in the general election.

Also on the ballot is a special election in the 1st Congressional District to complete the term of the late Republican U.S. Rep. Doug LaMalfa, who died in January. The five-person field pits the Democratic state Senate President against the Republican state Assembly Minority Leader. If no candidate receives a vote majority, the top two finishers will compete one-on-one on Aug. 4. The winner will serve under the current district boundaries, not the new map going into effect in the next Congress.

Advertisement

A special election to fill Swalwell’s vacant 14th Congressional District seat will be held June 16, also under the current boundaries.

In the race for Los Angeles mayor, Democrat Karen Bass seeks a second term in the nonpartisan office against tech entrepreneur Adam Miller, former MTV reality show cast member Spencer Pratt, City Councilmember Nithya Raman and others. Trump recently said of Pratt, “I’d like to see him do well.”

Democrats have a significant advantage over Republicans in statewide races based on their overwhelming support in the populous areas surrounding Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento and San Diego. Republicans tend to perform best in the more sparsely populated areas of northern California and the Central Valley, while running competitively in Southern California suburbs outside of Los Angeles and San Diego. A Republican has not won statewide office in California since 2006.

Here are some of the key facts about the election and data points the AP Decision Team will monitor as the votes are tallied:

When do polls close?

Polls close at 8 p.m. PT, which is 11 p.m. ET.

Advertisement

What’s on the ballot?

The AP will provide vote results and declare winners in contested races for U.S. House, governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, controller, treasurer, attorney general, insurance commissioner, state school superintendent, Board of Equalization, state Senate, State House, mayor of Long Beach, mayor of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County sheriff.

Who gets to vote?

Any registered voter in California may participate in the state primary.

How many voters are there?

As of April 3, there were about 23.1 million registered voters in California, including about 10.4 million Democrats, about 5.8 million Republicans and about 5.3 million not registered with any party.

How many people actually vote?

About 7.3 million votes were cast in the U.S. Senate primary in 2024, roughly a third of registered voters.

How much of the vote is cast early or by absentee ballot?

About 89% of vote in the 2024 U.S. Senate primary was cast before primary day.

Advertisement

As of Thursday, about 2.6 million ballots had already been cast in Tuesday’s election.

When are early and absentee votes released?

About four out of every five California counties release some or most of their results from mail voting in the first vote report of the night, usually before any in-person Election Day results are released. Almost half the counties release most or all of their in-person early voting results in the first vote report.

Since mail voting tends to favor Democrats and in-person Election Day voting tends to favor Republicans, the release of mail voting results at the start of the night could result in an early lead for Democratic candidates, while Republican candidates may narrow the gap as more Election Day results are counted.

How long does vote-counting usually take?

In the 2024 primaries, the AP first reported results at 11:08 p.m. ET, or eight minutes after polls closed. The last vote update of the night was at 6:01 a.m. ET with about 52% of total votes counted. The count reached 99% of total votes about two weeks later on March 20 at 7:47 p.m. ET.

When will the AP declare a winner?

The Associated Press does not make projections and will declare a winner only when it’s determined there is no scenario that would allow a trailing candidate to close the gap. If a race has not been called, the AP will continue to cover any newsworthy developments, such as candidate concessions or declarations of victory. In doing so, the AP will make clear that it has not yet declared a winner and explain why.

Advertisement

How do recounts work?

There are no automatic recounts in California. Any registered voter may request and pay for a recount. The AP may declare a winner in a race that is subject to a recount if it can determine the lead is too large for a recount or legal challenge to change the outcome.

Are we there yet?

As of Tuesday, there will be 14 days until the June 16 special primary in Congressional District 14, 63 days until the Aug. 4 special general election in Congressional District 1, 77 days until the Aug. 18 special general election in Congressional District 14 and 154 days until the Nov. 3 general election.

Copyright © 2026 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

‘Sneaker wave’ sucks California fisherman out to sea

Published

on

‘Sneaker wave’ sucks California fisherman out to sea


A fisherman was pulled from the ocean and rushed to a hospital in critical condition after a powerful “sneaker wave” swept him off the shoreline at Baker Beach in San Francisco.

The dramatic May 29 rescue unfolded around 1 p.m. in the Presidio, where emergency crews responded to reports of a person sucked out to sea.

According to the San Francisco Fire Department, witnesses said the fisherman was standing along the shoreline when a sneaker wave suddenly surged ashore, knocking him to the ground and into the ocean, leaving him incapacitated.

Bystanders quickly called 911, helping launch a large-scale rescue effort that included San Francisco firefighters, an SFPD police boat, drone units and a helicopter.

Advertisement

Within minutes of being dispatched, three rescue swimmers from SFFD entered the water and reached the victim, officials said in a post on X. The crew conducted an open-water rescue and brought the fisherman safely back to shore.

Paramedic rescue swimmers and additional emergency medical personnel immediately began advanced life support measures and rushed the victim to a nearby hospital in critical condition, fire officials said.

Officials said the harrowing ordeal serves as a reminder of the dangers posed by sneaker waves, which can strike with little or no warning.

Unlike typical waves, sneaker waves can surge much farther up the beach than expected, even on days when ocean conditions appear calm. The powerful waves can easily knock people off their feet and drag them into the water before they have time to react.

Fire officials urged beachgoers to stay off wet sand and rocks, keep a constant watch on the ocean and never turn their backs to the water. Anyone who sees a person swept into the surf is asked not to enter the water, but instead to call 911 immediately and throw the victim a flotation device if one is available.

Advertisement

“Early calls to 911 save lives,” fire officials said.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California reports one of largest drops in homelessness in past year, Hud reports

Published

on

California reports one of largest drops in homelessness in past year, Hud reports


California reported one of the largest decreases in homelessness over the past year, according to a new report from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (Hud).

The Golden state recorded a total unhoused population of 181,934 in 2025 – an almost 3% decrease since the year prior, placing it among the five states with the largest decreases from 2024. However, more significant drops were recorded in Illinois (44%), Hawaii (41%), Florida (11%) and New York (8%).

The new data signals at least some success on the part of Gavin Newsom, the California governor who has intensified his crackdown on homelessness over the past year. In May 2025 he announced a new model ordinance for cities and counties to address “persistent” homeless encampments, as well as $3.3bn in voter-approved funding to increase housing and drug treatment programs.

California, along with New York, had the largest population of unsheltered people recorded in 2025. Homelessness has been a key issue in this year’s gubernatorial race, as well as in the Los Angeles mayoral race.

Advertisement

The data also showed that the national homeless population decreased for the first time since 2016, coming down 3% from 2024. The Trump administration attempted to downplay the small one-year decrease, instead highlighting the fact that homelessness has increased 27% since 2013.

“The data is clear that the status quo of ‘housing first’ has failed to meaningfully reduce homelessness, resulting in crisis levels of people living on the streets,” Scott Turner, the Hud secretary, said in a press release. “HUD is restoring its programs to advance recovery and self-sufficiency and to ensure that taxpayer-funded benefits serve American families.”

As the administration attempted to downplay the drop in homelessness, it also sought to connect the success to its immigration policies, stating that the 2025 decrease was “attributable to decreases in Sanctuary Cities”.

The data comes from the federally mandated homeless point-in-time count, which tallies people sleeping in shelters and outside on a given day. On a single night in January 2025, there were 745,652 homeless persons in the United States.

While anti-homelessness advocates cited the decrease in homelessness as a “relief”, they also pointed out that the Trump administration’s policies may erode the progress that has been made.

Advertisement

“So much of the progress reflected in the 2025 PIT Count is due to targeted housing and service resources that were available in 2024 to rehouse people, including the highly successful Emergency Housing Voucher program, and new funds to address rural and unsheltered homelessness,” Ann Oliva, the CEO of the National Alliance to End Homelessness, said in a statement.

“Unfortunately, the Trump Administration has largely deprioritized these tools and worked to dismantle the very systems that drove these reductions.” Oliva pointed to the administration’s proposed cuts to permanent housing programs, which the organization found would “force at least 170,000 formerly homeless people back on the streets”.

The government has also mandated treatment for recipients of federal housing vouchers, and penalized jurisdictions that employed harm-reduction strategies such as safe consumption sites. In April 2026, Hud introduced a proposed rule that would require federally funded shelters to house prospective tenants based on their birth sex alone.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending