Connect with us

Arizona

What Arizona coach Brent Brennan said ahead of trip to Kansas State

Published

on

What Arizona coach Brent Brennan said ahead of trip to Kansas State


After playing the first two games in the friendly confines of Arizona Stadium, the UA hits the road for the first time when it visits 14th-ranked Kansas State. It’s a Friday night game, which means the time to prepare for a top-15 opponent on the road has been condensed.

“We kind of essentially lost Monday, so this is a Tuesday practice,” UA coach Brent Brennan said. “There’s not a huge difference that way. I think just the biggest difference will that we’re going on the road playing an excellent team.”

To prepare for the environment at Bill Snyder Family Stadium, which holds 50,000 but drew 51,240 for K-State’s first home game, Arizona is piping in crowd noise at practice.

“That’s the only thing can do,” Brennan said. “The good news is that this team and these players do have experience playing in some tough venues over the last few years. Playing at Oregon or Washington or Utah, those places are all places that are really, really rowdy. I think that you gotta lean on some of that and try and be smart with what you do, in terms of how you huddle, how you communicate. Working through that in practice because that’s how it’s going to be on game day.”

Advertisement

Here’s what else Brennan said at his Monday presser:

On Kansas State: “I think we’re playing an excellent football team. They’re really good in all three phases. They had a nice win on the road last weekend against Tulane. Good players, they’re extremely well coached, they play with real physicality. Obviously it’s gonna be a great game day atmosphere in kind of that venue. Coach Kleiman is a fantastic football coach. I think those guys have done a really nice job everwhere they’ve been. Obviously the results speak to themselves, and when you turn on the tape I think it’s really impressive about how they play in all three phases.”

On how the players feel about this game: “I think they’re fired up. We just had a great practice, and I’m really excited about that. I think that’s a good indication of kind of where they’re at in their mindset in terms of attacking the practice environment. We’re off to a good start today. Obviously, we’ve got a lot of work to do because of the short week. It’s heavy gameplan conversations and some long days. But that’s the nature of this time of year, especially on a short week so. But the players are fired up. I think everyone’s excited. I’m sure Kansas State is, too.”

On the offensive line: “Like I mentioned the other night, there was some good stuff, too, done by that group. And did have some guys, some new guys, playing in there. Grayson (Stovall) had never played before. He had to snap every ball, and that’s a eye-opening experience, and so I give him a lot of credit. I thought he handled it really well. There’s a couple simple mistakes here that we can clean up easily, which we’ve already worked on starting yesterday. I think hopefully, as time goes, we’ll be more and more healthy, and some of the people that are not available right now will come back to us and get in the mix. But after watching the film, I think we were encouraged, because there was some better stuff that we were able to get done that we realized in game.”

On missing veteran center Josh Baker: “I don’t think anyone on our football team undervalues Josh Baker. He’s an excellent player and an excellent leader. He’s team captain, he’s awesome. Everybody knows exactly how special he is and how important he is to our football team.”

Advertisement

On when decisions are made about if injured players will be available for a game: “Those are always decisions made by our medical staff, not by me. And so if they tell me that so and so can go, then so and so can go. Coaches will never make those decisions. That’s all medical people, doctors and training.”

On Jacory Croskey-Merritt’s status, and what the issue is: “It’s where it was when I talked to you guys on Saturday. We’re still trying to find out exactly what went on. We’re working through it.”

On switching punters and if that’s permanent: “That’s going to be something that’s going continue to play out over time as we watch it. I don’t know if that decision’s been made yet.”

On failing to convert a 3rd down: “I think it’s a couple things. I think it was a couple of missed throws, missed opportunities, that part of it is really, really frustrating. And sometimes when you’re in those situations, you kind of try and press, and we just gotta relax and let the game come to us and execute the details of our assignment, and we’ll have higher level execution.”

On penalties: “I spoke on Saturday night (and a) week ago, my concern was what I considered the self-imposed, negatives. The after the whistle nonsense that can really, really hurt you. Some of the other penalties that happen when you’re playing football, you know, we’re not coaching holding or whatever. To me, I tend to focus more on the controlables. That conversation has been ongoing. It was ongoing really, really aggressively last week with just the stuff that happened kind of after the whistle. It’s all the stuff that’s either after the whistle or before the whistle that really, really gets me fired up. Offside, false start, and then any nonsense after the whistle, whatever that is.”

Advertisement

On the defense vs. NAU: “I thought the defense was outstanding. I thought we did a great job of getting population football. There’s just some really, really good effort. I thought the D-line did an outstanding job, and obviously that helped the linebackers put up some big numbers in terms of their tackles. It’s exciting to see them respond, because I know they were frustrated from the week before.”

On if Tetairoa McMillan had bad body language, as ESPN+ reported during the broadcast: “No, I actually thought T-Mac handled it pretty well. I think everybody was frustrated for stretches in that game, and I think it’s important for every player on our team, but more importantly for the leaders, to understand that their body language has influence. Guys feed off of that, whether it’s positive or negative. Again, that’s something that’s in our control, and something that we coach really hard.”

On whether to return kickoffs out of the end zone or take the touchback: “It depends week to week. There’s games where we’re going to be really aggressive that way and there’s games where we’ll make a determination whether or not we’ll bring those out. So it just depends on lots of factors: who were playing, where we’re playing, what kind of kickoff guy they got, what kind of kickoff team they have. There’s a bunch of components that go into this, those decisions are made game by game.”

On Noah Fifita’s freedom to change the play: “Sometimes there’s stuff that we double call, but then also sometimes there’s stuff that would probably be more (about) protection. He does it every game.”

On Kansas State QB Avery Johnson compared to New Mexico’s Devon Dampier: “I think the difference is, is that I think Avery’s more of a complete player. He’s got arm talent, and then he’s faster. Like he’s ridiculously explosive.”

Advertisement

On being excited in locker room after an uneven win: “I’m not going to let anything on the outside take away from the joy of winning. Those moments are special, and they need to be celebrated and enjoyed by everybody. We can fix the stuff we need to fix later, but in that moment, with the team in a locker room, there’s nothing like it. There’s nothing like a locker room after a win. It’s a really, really special place, and so we’re going to enjoy the hell out of those when they happen.”

On Jeremiah Patterson: “I’m really encouraged by him. I think he’s going to be a really good player for us, and I think he’s just going to get better the more he plays. The way he approaches practice and workouts, he’s definitely dead serious about his process and improving every day. He was raised by good people at College of San Mateo, those guys did a great job. I’ve been watching Jeremiah since he was in high school, because he was right down the street from us (at San Jose). It’s awesome to see him doing the things he’s doing.”

On the debut of the red helmets with ‘Cats’ in script: “I think anything that the players get excited about is good. I love it. I think that’s fun. I think that’s part of college football. Some people may or may not agree with it, but for me, it’s all it’s about the players.”

On his history with Kansas State: “The only time I’ve been out there was when I was an assistant with Coach Tomey at San Jose, I believe we went out there in 2007 and we’re still trying to tackle Jordy Nelson.”



Source link

Advertisement

Arizona

Make-A-Wish Arizona creates sea turtle adventure for San Tan Valley boy

Published

on

Make-A-Wish Arizona creates sea turtle adventure for San Tan Valley boy


Boats, beaches, and buckets of fun! Just the way you’d expect a boy to spend his Florida vacation!

But there was something else 11-year-old Miles Boyd got to do last year when he and his family traveled to Florida. It was a sea turtle adventure that truly became the trip of a lifetime.

“I had never been to the ocean before,” explained Miles. “So see that just wowed me. It was amazing!”

Miles and his family also got to see baby sea turtles on the beach at night.

Advertisement

“The ocean is so mysterious,” says Miles. “It’s such a big place, and the fact that these turtles can move but are so tiny and when they go in the ocean, they get to hundreds of pounds.”

In so many ways, the trip to Palm Beach County, Florida, was a dream vacation for Miles and his family, but it only came after what was a living nightmare.

“I couldn’t imagine losing him,” says Miles’ mom, Natasha.

It was the harsh reality that Natasha had to face after learning her son Miles had a cancerous brain tumor.

“The world just stopped,” Natasha says about the moment she found out the devastating news. “I just sat on the floor and cried.”

Advertisement

Even Miles admits he was scared.

“I’m just a kid, you know what I mean?” he says. “It’s a lot to handle all at once.”

After three brain surgeries, countless hours of therapy and rehab, and having to take a chemo medication twice daily, Miles proved to the world he is a true survivor!

And his trip to Florida, through Make-A-Wish Arizona, proved to be the medication he never knew he needed.

Miles explains that the trip motivated him to keep going.

Advertisement

“It showed me that I made it to this car, and I can keep going,” he says. “I started at the lowest of lows, and now, I’m on a beach – it just gave me confidence and motivated me that I could keep going.”

Last year alone, Make-A-Wish Arizona granted 476 wishes; they’ve also fulfilled more than 8,500 since being founded in 1980.

Across the Globe, Make-A-Wish has granted more than 650,000 wishes since 1980

Miles and Nick Ciletti will co-host Make-A-Wish Arizona’s Wish Ball on Saturday! To learn more about Make-A-Wish Arizona, click here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

11 illegal Indian national truck drivers arrested at Arizona border last month

Published

on

11 illegal Indian national truck drivers arrested at Arizona border last month


Eleven illegal Indian national truck drivers were arrested at the Arizona border in the month of February. 

The Yuma Sector Border Patrol arrested 11 total Indian national truck drivers in Yuma, Arizona in February 2026. 

According to a Facebook post by the Yuma Sector Border Patrol, all 11 truck drivers held commercial drivers licenses from the states of Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and California. All were “found to be present in the United States illegally.”

“Border Patrol remains committed to upholding immigration laws and protecting our communities,” the post continued.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona Independent Party to appeal ruling erasing name

Published

on

Arizona Independent Party to appeal ruling erasing name


play

The Arizona Independent Party will appeal a court ruling that invalidated its name, guaranteeing more legal limbo and possibly a new chapter of confusion in the effort to give unaffiliated voters a viable third-party option at the ballot box.

Party chair Paul Johnson confirmed he would appeal the ruling from Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Greg Como, which forces the party to revert to its prior name: the No Labels Party. The ruling ordered elections officials in Arizona to follow suit.

Advertisement

The decision was a high-profile loss for Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, who Como said had permitted a “bait and switch” on voters by allowing the name change.

“We were given due process, the judge did a fair job,” Johnson said. “I don’t agree with his final position, but I like the way our country works in terms of the rule of the law.”

“I don’t feel discouraged at all,” Johnson said, adding that an appeal could proceed in federal court and raise claims of First and Fourteenth Amendment violations.

It is unclear how the judge’s order, if it stands, could impact candidates who submitted signatures to qualify for the ballot under the Arizona Independent Party label.

Advertisement

“The commission’s position has been that this would cause confusion,” said Tom Collins, executive director of the Clean Elections Commission, which was part of the case. “This is an example of that confusion.”

The number of signatures required to make the ballot is a percentage of registered voters for each party, but unaffiliated candidates had to collect roughly six times as many as Republican or Democratic candidates. Running with the Arizona Independent Party meant only 1,771 signatures were needed.

Como’s order was signed March 19 but made public on March 25, after a March 23 deadline for candidates to file signatures to make the ballot.

“Unfortunately due to the court order, this question is left unaddressed,” said Calli Jones, a spokesperson for Fontes. “This question will be left to the challenge process or other court proceedings.”

Advertisement

Clarity could come through any lawsuits filed challenging Arizona Independent Party candidates’ signatures. No such challenges had been filed as of March 25, and the deadline is April 6.

What’s preventing ‘Arizona Nazi Party’ or the ‘Arizona Anarchists’?

Last October, Fontes agreed to change the name of the No Labels Party to the Arizona Independent Party, saying to do so was not explicitly prohibited in law. The change was done at the request of Johnson, a former Phoenix mayor and advocate for open primaries. To Johnson, the party is something of a can’t-beat-them-join-them way to put independent candidates on an even playing field with those from the two major parties.

The name change quickly led to a trio of lawsuits filed by the state’s voter education agency, the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission, and the Arizona Republican Party and Arizona Democratic Party. Those cases were merged into one, which ultimately led to the March ruling.

The commission and political parties argued the name change would create confusion for voters and election officials in terms of distinguishing when someone wanted to be part of the new party versus and independent voter in a colloquial sense, which means not registering with any party. Fontes did not dispute there could be confusion.

Advertisement

State law does not directly address when a political party wants to change its name, but Como said that request should follow the process for creating a new party. That includes gathering signatures from supportive voters. Como has been on the bench since 2015.

Como raised concerns of transparency, noting that voters who registered for the old party may not support the new party name. He said a party could gather support with an “innocuous sounding name,” then change it entirely. Como offered a grave example.

“Would the same 41,000 people who signed petitions to recognize the No Labels Party have signed to support the ‘Arizona Nazi Party’ or the ‘Arizona Anarchists’?” he wrote.

His ruling is guided by and affirms Arizona court precedent that statewide elected officials’ powers are only those that are given explicitly to them in statute or the constitution.

Legal challenges needed to bring clarity

Jones, Fontes’ spokesperson, said the office had no power to address whether signatures were valid, because the office presumes “anyone who met the requirements at the time of filing their signatures are valid candidates.” Fontes, a Democrat seeking reelection this year, said he would not appeal the ruling given the “fast approach of the election and the challenging job election administrators have before them.”

Advertisement

He also stood by his decision, but said the court ruled with voters. “Both approaches, being reasonable, the Court entered an order with a lean towards the voters, not the party leaders,” Fontes said.

Como did not find Fontes’ approach was reasonable, saying it was beyond Fontes’ authority.

“The judge noted that even Fontes admitted this issue would cause confusion for the voters, but Fontes disregarded that concern and the obvious truth, and proceeded to allow them to continue the charade,” Arizona Republic Party Chair Sergio Arellano said, responding to the ruling.

That Fontes will not appeal was welcome, because “he has already cost taxpayers too much money” and “further eroded trust in our election officials at a time when that trust is already at an all-time low,” Arellano said.

Eleven candidates are running for office with the Arizona Independent Party name, or whatever it turns out to be. That includes candidates for Congress, governor and state Legislature. Hugh Lytle, the party’s preferred candidate for governor, said in a statement the ruling proves “how far the political parties will go to protect their grip on power.”

Advertisement

Lytle is among the candidates who could face a challenge to his just over 6,000 signatures. Of those, just 132 were gathered via the state’s online system, which requires verification before signing. The remaining could be more vulnerable to objections.

Ultimately, Lytle said, the judge’s ruling wouldn’t change much.

“We are on the ballot,” he said.

Reach reporter Stacey Barchenger at stacey.barchenger@arizonarepublic.com or 480-416-5669.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending