Arizona

US bombs Iran nuclear sites: Arizona veterans, lawmakers react

Published

7 months ago

June 22, 2025

US bombs Iran nuclear sites: Arizona veterans, lawmakers react

article

PHOENIX – Arizona is home to many veterans, some of whom have fought directly against Iranian forces in recent years.

What they’re saying:

Conflict in the Middle East may seem far from us, but there are veterans right here in the Valley who know firsthand the weight of every military action.

“We can’t, the United States can’t allow them to have a nuclear weapon,” an Arizona Army veteran said, sharing his thoughts on the news of June 21’s airstrikes against three Iranian nuclear sites, including his hopes that Iranian civilians stay safe. “We have a heck of a lot of good Iranian people here and the whole country over there is almost all good Iranian folks, they just have the wrong leadership.”

That leadership is also tied to the Tower 22 drone strike that killed three U.S. soldiers in Jordan in January 2024. One of the wounded, Sergeant and Arizona State graduate Aneska Holness, spoke with FOX 10 after the deadly strike.

“I was in one of the rooms, buildings that were hit. It’s honestly just waking up to chaos,” Sgt. Holness said. “It was very unexpected. I don’t think anybody really thought that that would happen while we were there.”

Other Arizona National Guardsmen and women wounded in the attack received a homecoming last August in Phoenix. “They just have so much to be proud of, and they are the heroes they think they are,” a speaker at the event said.

The next steps are not yet clear, with peace and the possibility of further action both on the table. “I appreciate the Iranian people and I do have friends who are Iranian and I don’t want any of them to get hurt,” one veteran stated.

President Trump said, “This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days.”

The U.S. did launch retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed militias in Iraq and Syria after the Tower 22 attack.

Arizona lawmakers respond

Arizona lawmakers are weighing in on the attacks in Iran. Rep. Andy Biggs (5th District) says he’s grateful US troops made it out of the Middle East safely.

On social media, Sen. Mark Kelly praised members of the military and intelligence community for their service, but also expressed concern about the attacks, saying this may put the US on the edge of war with Iran – and that the US must keep Iran from a full retaliation.

Rep. Yassamin Ansari (3rd district) called the military action against Iran illegal and “without congressional authorization.”

She expressed concerns about US involvement in another war.

The congresswoman is also calling for an emergency session of Congress to vote on the War Powers Resolution.

Rep. Juan Ciscomani (6th District) says the president made the right decision, and we owe our military a tremendous debt of gratitude.

Rep. Greg Stanton (4th District) says “President Trump must immediately reassure the American people of how he will protect the safety of our troops and allies in the region, and move us toward de-escalation and ultimately peace.”

Sen. Ruben Gallego stated, “We have yet to see any evidence to prove that tonight’s strikes were necessary to protect U.S. national security. “

Rep. Abe Hamadeh tweeted, “The days of Iran’s nuclear blackmail are over.”

MilitaryPhoenixNewsDonald J. TrumpYassamin AnsariAndy BiggsMark KellyGreg StantonRuben GallegoJuan CiscomaniAbe Hamadeh

Source link

Click to comment

Arizona

Jordan Burks’ clutch plays enable UCF to edge Arizona State

Published

12 hours ago

January 27, 2026

Press Room

Jordan Burks’ clutch plays enable UCF to edge Arizona State

January 28 – Jordan Burks hit a go-ahead 3-pointer and forced a turnover in the final 34 seconds as UCF rallied from a 12-point second-half deficit to pull off a 79-76 Big 12 win over Arizona State on Tuesday night in Orlando, Fla.

Riley Kugel paced the Knights (16-4, 4-3 Big 12) with 17 points, nine rebounds and five assists. Burks added 15 points and three steals while Jamichael Stillwell posted 14 points.

Maurice Odum produced 18 points and six assists for the Sun Devils (11-10, 2-6), who never trailed in the second half until 1:11 to go. Anthony Johnson added 12 points and Bryce Ford had 11.

UCF took its first lead of the second half on Carmelo Pacheco’s 3-pointer with 1:11 to go. Odum answered with a pair of free throws to regain a 1-point edge.

Burks then took a diagonal feed from Kugel and canned the wide-open 3-pointer for a 78-76 lead. After Burks swiped an Odum pass, Themus Fulks tacked on a free throw. Ford’s deep ball at the buzzer was errant to give the Knights the comeback victory.

UCF shot 45% from the floor and held a 40-28 advantage in rebounding. The Sun Devils hit 47% from the field and made 10 of 23 (43%) from deep.

UCF sprinted to a 9-2 lead behind Bol’s layup and dunk, but the Sun Devils battled back and grabbed a 12-11 lead on Johnson’s 27-footer three minutes later.

Nearing the 10-minute mark, Kugel faked a defender, drove to his right and threw down a vicious dunk for a 16-14 lead to bring the UCF crowd to life as part of a 7-0 run.

Allen Mukeba’s tomahawk dunk on a 3-point play put the Sun Devils up 24-22 at the 6:13 mark. Odom’s deep ball at 5:34 gave the visitors their largest lead at 27-22 on the way to a 39-35 lead at the break.

The second half was played tightly over the first eight minutes, with the Sun Devils holding a slim lead that extended to five, 52-47, on Andrija Grbovic’s trey at 11:22.

Grbovic stroked another 3-pointer and Noah Meeusen converted three free throws. Odum’s 3-pointer with 8:26 capped a 9-0 run that pushed the lead to 61-51.

With 6:09 remaining, the lead grew to 70-58 on Massamba Diop’s two freebies — Arizona State’s largest advantage — but the Knights mounted a charge and tied it with 2:39 left on Fulks’ pair of free throws that wrapped an 11-0 run.

–Field Level Media

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Source link

Arizona

Data centers are good for Arizona. Here’s why | Opinion

Published

24 hours ago

January 27, 2026

Press Room

Data centers are good for Arizona. Here’s why | Opinion

Data centers have gotten a bad rap lately, but here’s why we think they are actually good for Arizona. It starts with jobs.

Stephen Richer and Josh Heywood
| For The Republic

Arizona data centers have generated a lot of political heat in recent weeks.

At her State of the State address, Gov. Katie Hobbs questioned the social benefit of data centers and signaled an interest in reinstating a sales tax on data center equipment purchases. Neal Carter, a Republican state legislator, agrees with Hobbs. So too might Republican state legislator Leo Biasiucci.

A month ago, the Chandler City Council unanimously rejected a proposed data center despite the lobbying efforts of former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema. Hundreds of Chandler residents filled the auditorium for the vote, and 256 residents submitted online comments opposing the data center.

In Tucson, the city council unanimously rejected connecting a large data center (Project Blue) to the city’s water system. Attorney General Kris Mayes is now looking deeper into Project Blue, Tucson Electric Power and the Arizona Corporation Commission.

Here at The Arizona Republic, the opinion section published an editorial on Jan. 20 (Arizona data centers bring hidden water risks), and the news section printed an article on Jan. 18 (Gas power plant for data center project stirs concerns in Surprise), both of which cast data centers in a less-than-flattering light.

And earlier this week, handfuls of speakers at the Corporation Commission blamed data centers for proposed APS rate hikes.

Each situation has its own complexities and justifications (and I’ll get into some of them in future weeks). Some opposition is more factually substantiated than others. But they’re all rooted in a suspicion that these large warehouses of computer servers that power the modern world are no longer great things for Arizona.

Arizona data center benefits starts with jobs

If we may be so bold, and to set the stage for future articles here at the Republic, here are a few reasons why Arizona should celebrate our position as a top 10 state for data centers:

Jobs. It’s not just the people employed by data centers (many of which are high-paying jobs), but the ancillary jobs needed by data centers: contracted electricians, carpenters, pipefitters, HVAC technicians, etc. PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”) found that data centers accounted for 81,000 jobs in Arizona as of 2023.
Taxes. It’s the start of the state legislative season and, sadly, this is going to be one of those years in which we hear lots about the things we can’t afford. But data centers help that equation. According to the same PwC report, data centers generated $2.3 billion in state and local tax revenue from 2017 to 2021. That means money for schools and roads. Or lower state income taxes (as happened).
Tech center. It’s a truism that tech begets other tech. We’ve said this as we’ve celebrated the massive expansions of TSMC and Intel. It’s also true of data centers. And if proprietors of data centers – companies like Amazon and Microsoft – are happy with Arizona as a data center home, they’ll likely consider Arizona a home for other tech investments.
Buying unwanted power. Normal businesses use power during the day (8 am-5 pm). Homes use power during the evening (5-11 pm). But few users demand power overnight (11 pm-8 am). This means we often have to dump unsold power. But data centers need power around the clock, and they can buy that overnight power, generating revenue for Arizona utility companies that then doesn’t have to be generated from Arizona households.

Those are the benefits.

Detractors focus on power, water and land. They’re all important, but solvable.

On power, public utilities can, and should, ensure data centers pay for all the power they use–not the public. The Salt River Project (SRP) website states this explicitly on its website. APS announced a proposed 45% increase on data center electricity costs to “make sure that (data centers) will continue to pay their fair share.” The recent agreement between Tucson Electric Power and Project Blue intends to do the same. And some data centers are even looking at generating their own power.

Data centers aren’t our biggest water worry

Regarding water, data centers have gotten so efficient at water use that, in some cases, they would use less water than vacant warehouses (of which there are, sadly, many). The Project Blue data center before Tucson City Council promised to be water-positive for the city, and other cities, such as Chandler have proposed caps on water usage by data centers. These caps are the same that apply to other businesses; data centers don’t get a special water deal. And, really, if you’re looking to pin water woes on any industry, it’s not chip-manufacturing, and it’s not data centers. It’s farming (over 70% of Arizona’s water supply goes to agriculture).

Lastly, regarding land, of course people don’t want to have neighborhoods disrupted by massive warehouses. And nobody should feel like they got into a bidding war with a data center for a home in a cute, quiet neighborhood. That’s why we have noise ordinances and zoning laws. Arizona still has plenty of space. The smart people in city planning can figure it out. And unlike big box stores, data centers don’t have 18-wheelers constantly delivering supplies.

Arizona is a state known for growth. We’ve grown massively in residents. We’ve grown massively in housing (and need to do more). We’ve grown massively in tourism. We’ve grown massively in healthcare. We’ve grown massively in education. And we’ve recently grown massively in semiconductors.

There’s no reason we can’t keep growing in data centers.

Stephen Richer is the CEO of Republic Affairs, a fellow at the Cato Institute, and a former Maricopa County Recorder. Josh Heywood is operations manager at Republic Affairs.

Source link