Connect with us

Arizona

The CHIPS Act transforms an Arizona neighborhood

Published

on

The CHIPS Act transforms an Arizona neighborhood


About 7 miles south of a massive construction site where Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., the world’s biggest chipmaker, is building three factories, one neighborhood is undergoing dramatic change.

The Golden Triangle — as at least one real estate developer calls it — occupies about a half-mile square in Phoenix, Arizona. It has about 100 houses, connected by mostly dirt roads. In addition to the human residents, many of whom moved there in search of a rural lifestyle, it’s home to horses, goats, cows, donkeys, chickens, bees and a 16-year-old tortoise named Crush. 

A dirt road with cacti and small homes in the distance
One of many dirt roads in the Golden Triangle, a rapidly developing area in north Phoenix. (Maria Hollenhorst/Marketplace)

But the economy of the Golden Triangle is getting an overhaul. Three new apartment complexes, with a combined 852 units, have been approved for construction inside its borders. Developers and city officials say the housing is needed, in part, to meet demand driven by the semiconductor industry.

As part of our ongoing series “Breaking Ground,” about how federal government investment is changing the economy in complicated, invisible and contradictory ways, Marketplace looked at the impact of the CHIPS and Science Act on Phoenix. The landmark legislation is part of the government’s plan to rebuild the semiconductor industry in the United States

Advertisement

Residents, business owners and city officials each have their own interests in this development cycle. To explore how the changes are fanning the flames of competition among them, “Marketplace” host Kai Ryssdal spoke with these stakeholders in the Golden Triangle. 

Click the audio player above to hear the story. 

The small-business owners

Blaz smiles from behind the counter of her store. Behind her is a display of Lego models.
Kat Blaz owns a Bricks & Minifigs franchise in north Phoenix. (Maria Hollenhorst/Marketplace)

Toward one corner of the Golden Triangle, there is a freshly built strip mall with a Mexican restaurant, a nail salon, a day care center and a couple of other small businesses. Its construction was part of a wave of commercial development in the area.

Kat Blaz, the owner of a Bricks & Minifigs franchise, which sells new and used Lego products, opened her store about 2½ years ago. “I was so excited when I found out what was going in behind us,” she said, referring to the planned apartment complexes. “It’s hard nowadays for brick-and-mortar [businesses] to survive with all the online shopping, and so the fact that we can get more foot traffic is awesome,” she said. 

Stumpf stands beside a rocket-shaped seat in a children's hair salon.
Yvette Stumpf is the owner of a Pigtails & Crewcuts franchise, a business that specializes in haircuts for kids. (Maria Hollenhorst/Marketplace)

One door down, Yvette Stumpf, the owner of a salon franchise specializing in haircuts for kids, hopes the neighborhood’s new residents will bring more traffic to her business as well. But she has mixed feelings about how development is changing the neighborhood. “I see that as a boon to my business because it’s more people,” she said. “However, I also do not like the big-city feel, and we still feel like country.”

Those competing feelings — hopes for the benefits of development and the desire to retain the neighborhood’s character — reflect an ongoing battle over the future of the Golden Triangle as federal investment accelerates the changes. 

The real estate developer

Real estate developer Charles Eckert is in the second category of stakeholder — he built the strip mall Blaz and Stumpf’s stores are in. “We’ve taken raw desert, basically, and turned it into this,” he said, gesturing toward the busy intersection.

Advertisement

“There were no curbs, no gutters, no sidewalks. The road was two lanes wide. That was a dirt road right there, and there was nothing here,” he said. “I’ve been developing in this area for 20 years.” 

Eckert, in a cowboy hat, stands on an empty stretch of land.
Developer Charles Eckert bet on this area 20 years ago. It paid off. (Maria Hollenhorst/Marketplace)

As more businesses invested in north Phoenix — some lured by state tax incentives — Eckert saw potential in that triangle. “That’s why I invested my entire net worth into this area,” he said.

Now, those bets seem to have paid off. He attracted a convenience store, an AutoZone, a Brakes Plus, a storage facility, a day care center and all the small businesses in that strip mall.

Last year, he sold some of his remaining land in the Golden Triangle to an apartment development company for $2.8 million. When making the case to the Phoenix City Council for a five-story apartment complex on that parcel, a representative for the developer cited its proximity to TSMC, the giant semiconductor producer.

“You’ve just got to look around and look at the commercial development that was coming here and say, ‘There will be housing demand here,’” Eckert said.

The neighbors

Laurel Brodie, who lives about 800 yards from Eckert’s strip mall, remembers what this neighborhood looked like before developers like him arrived.  

Advertisement

“We’re in what used to be the middle of the desert,” she said. Brodie’s husband and father-in-law bought property here in the 1970s. They were among the first residents in the neighborhood. 

Brodie points out her house in a framed photograph. Ryssdal stands beside her, holding a microphone.
Longtime north Phoenix resident Laurel Brodie shows Kai Ryssdal a photograph of her house from the 1990s, when it was surrounded by open desert. (Maria Hollenhorst/Marketplace)

Brodie showed Ryssdal an aerial photograph of her house from 1990, when the surrounding area was almost entirely undeveloped. “There’s nothing in this,” Ryssdal observed. “You can see all the way to the mountains.” 

Although Brodie acknowledges that development in the area was inevitable, she and a group of her neighbors tried, and failed, to fight Phoenix City Hall about the planned apartments inside the bounds of their unincorporated island on county land. 

They argued that high-density housing — especially a five-story apartment building — is inappropriate for the area. “Even the ones on the freeway don’t go up that high, and yet they find it appropriate to put five stories right here,” Brodie said. 

“It’s rather threatening to my way of life,” said Alison McKee, who lives down a dirt road from Brodie and joined her in the resistance effort. 

Alison McKee at her home in North Phoenix
Alison McKee at her home in north Phoenix. (Maria Hollenhorst/Marketplace)

McKee and her husband bought their property about 12 years ago because they wanted land where they could have a horse. Now, in addition to the horse, the McKees have five donkeys, 26 chickens, 18 goats (nine kids and nine adults), a dog, a barn cat and a rotating cast of foster donkeys from a local rescue. 

In the years since the McKees moved in, a megachurch was built across the street and shopping centers and apartments sprang up down the road. It’s clear that more will be coming with the investment in semiconductor plants.

Advertisement

“We do feel like we will be bowled over,” McKee said. “So am I the weird old lady that stands her ground and holds out? … Only time will tell.”

The city

Because both Alison McKee and Laurel Brodie’s properties sit on unincorporated county land, they do not pay Phoenix city taxes and cannot vote for Phoenix City Council candidates. But the city is getting closer and closer to them. 

Councilwoman Ann O’Brien, who represents the district that includes TSMC and the Golden Triangle area, is responsible for balancing the competing interests. She supported the proposed apartment developments. 

“You might know, we have a little bit of a housing shortage here, not just in Phoenix but the entire state of Arizona,” she told Ryssdal. “And one of my commitments when I ran for office in 2020 was to ensure that we brought a diversity of housing.”

Phoenix City Councilmember Ann Obrien speaks with Ryssdal in her office at City Hall.
Phoenix Councilwoman Ann O’Brien speaks with Ryssdal in her office at City Hall. (Maria Hollenhorst/Marketplace)

The Phoenix metropolitan area, already among the fastest-growing in the nation, received a wave of new residents during the pandemic, exacerbating a housing shortage. An Arizona State University research report found that Arizona was short about 270,000 units in 2022.

TSMC, which is investing $65 billion in Arizona with a $6.6 billion boost from the CHIPS Act, plans to hire 6,000 workers. Additionally, the company expects those factories to create tens of thousands of construction and indirect supplier jobs. Those workers will need places to live. 

Advertisement

“Phoenix is growing, and what used to be far out there isn’t so far out there anymore,” O’Brien said. 

As trillions of government dollars flow into the national economy, more communities will have to grapple with the tradeoffs of development, as the Golden Triangle has. What is happening there will happen elsewhere. 

“Change is coming?” Ryssdal asked.

“It’s not just coming,” O’Brien said. “It’s here.”

There’s a lot happening in the world.  Through it all, Marketplace is here for you. 

Advertisement

You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible. 

Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.  



Source link

Arizona

Data centers are good for Arizona. Here’s why | Opinion

Published

on

Data centers are good for Arizona. Here’s why | Opinion



Data centers have gotten a bad rap lately, but here’s why we think they are actually good for Arizona. It starts with jobs.

Advertisement
play

Arizona data centers have generated a lot of political heat in recent weeks.

At her State of the State address, Gov. Katie Hobbs questioned the social benefit of data centers and signaled an interest in reinstating a sales tax on data center equipment purchases. Neal Carter, a Republican state legislator, agrees with Hobbs. So too might Republican state legislator Leo Biasiucci.

A month ago, the Chandler City Council unanimously rejected a proposed data center despite the lobbying efforts of former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema. Hundreds of Chandler residents filled the auditorium for the vote, and 256 residents submitted online comments opposing the data center.

In Tucson, the city council unanimously rejected connecting a large data center (Project Blue) to the city’s water system. Attorney General Kris Mayes is now looking deeper into Project Blue, Tucson Electric Power and the Arizona Corporation Commission.

Advertisement

Here at The Arizona Republic, the opinion section published an editorial on Jan. 20 (Arizona data centers bring hidden water risks), and the news section printed an article on Jan. 18 (Gas power plant for data center project stirs concerns in Surprise), both of which cast data centers in a less-than-flattering light.

And earlier this week, handfuls of speakers at the Corporation Commission blamed data centers for proposed APS rate hikes.

Each situation has its own complexities and justifications (and I’ll get into some of them in future weeks). Some opposition is more factually substantiated than others. But they’re all rooted in a suspicion that these large warehouses of computer servers that power the modern world are no longer great things for Arizona.

Arizona data center benefits starts with jobs

If we may be so bold, and to set the stage for future articles here at the Republic, here are a few reasons why Arizona should celebrate our position as a top 10 state for data centers:

Advertisement
  • Jobs. It’s not just the people employed by data centers (many of which are high-paying jobs), but the ancillary jobs needed by data centers: contracted electricians, carpenters, pipefitters, HVAC technicians, etc. PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”) found that data centers accounted for 81,000 jobs in Arizona as of 2023.
  • Taxes.  It’s the start of the state legislative season and, sadly, this is going to be one of those years in which we hear lots about the things we can’t afford.  But data centers help that equation.  According to the same PwC report, data centers generated $2.3 billion in state and local tax revenue from 2017 to 2021.  That means money for schools and roads.  Or lower state income taxes (as happened).
  • Tech center. It’s a truism that tech begets other tech. We’ve said this as we’ve celebrated the massive expansions of TSMC and Intel. It’s also true of data centers. And if proprietors of data centers – companies like Amazon and Microsoft – are happy with Arizona as a data center home, they’ll likely consider Arizona a home for other tech investments.
  • Buying unwanted power. Normal businesses use power during the day (8 am-5 pm). Homes use power during the evening (5-11 pm). But few users demand power overnight (11 pm-8 am). This means we often have to dump unsold power. But data centers need power around the clock, and they can buy that overnight power, generating revenue for Arizona utility companies that then doesn’t have to be generated from Arizona households.

Those are the benefits.

Detractors focus on power, water and land. They’re all important, but solvable.

On power, public utilities can, and should, ensure data centers pay for all the power they use–not the public. The Salt River Project (SRP) website states this explicitly on its website. APS announced a proposed 45% increase on data center electricity costs to “make sure that (data centers) will continue to pay their fair share.” The recent agreement between Tucson Electric Power and Project Blue intends to do the same. And some data centers are even looking at generating their own power.

Data centers aren’t our biggest water worry

Regarding water, data centers have gotten so efficient at water use that, in some cases, they would use less water than vacant warehouses (of which there are, sadly, many). The Project Blue data center before Tucson City Council promised to be water-positive for the city, and other cities, such as Chandler have proposed caps on water usage by data centers. These caps are the same that apply to other businesses; data centers don’t get a special water deal. And, really, if you’re looking to pin water woes on any industry, it’s not chip-manufacturing, and it’s not data centers. It’s farming (over 70% of Arizona’s water supply goes to agriculture).

Lastly, regarding land, of course people don’t want to have neighborhoods disrupted by massive warehouses. And nobody should feel like they got into a bidding war with a data center for a home in a cute, quiet neighborhood. That’s why we have noise ordinances and zoning laws. Arizona still has plenty of space. The smart people in city planning can figure it out. And unlike big box stores, data centers don’t have 18-wheelers constantly delivering supplies.

Arizona is a state known for growth. We’ve grown massively in residents. We’ve grown massively in housing (and need to do more). We’ve grown massively in tourism. We’ve grown massively in healthcare. We’ve grown massively in education. And we’ve recently grown massively in semiconductors.

Advertisement

There’s no reason we can’t keep growing in data centers.

Stephen Richer is the CEO of Republic Affairs, a fellow at the Cato Institute, and a former Maricopa County Recorder. Josh Heywood is operations manager at Republic Affairs.



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona men’s basketball at BYU fan discussion

Published

on

Arizona men’s basketball at BYU fan discussion


The top-ranked Arizona Wildcats hit the road for a Big Monday matchup against No. 13 BYU. The Wildcats won in Provo last season.

Here’s all the info you need to watch, listen to or follow the game online. Come chat with us!

Arizona-BYU game time, details:

How can I watch Arizona-BYU?

Advertisement

Arizona-BYU will be shown on ESPN. Jon Sciambi (play-by-play) and Fran Fraschilla (analyst) will be calling the game.

How can I stream Arizona-BYU online?

The stream of Arizona-BYU can be viewed on ESPN.com.

How can I listen to Arizona-BYU on the radio?

How can I follow Arizona-BYU?

Advertisement

Arizona-BYU pregame coverage:



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona towns fight for federal disaster funding after deadly flooding

Published

on

Arizona towns fight for federal disaster funding after deadly flooding


MIAMI, AZ — Late last week, officials with Arizona’s Department of Emergency and Military Affairs (DEMA) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) were back in Gila County, meeting with state and local leaders to reassess damage created by deadly flooding in September and October last year.

Late last year, Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs ‘ office announced that FEMA had denied their request for a Major Disaster Declaration, which would have provided critical funding for the towns of Miami, Globe, and the rest of Gila County.

Globe Mayor Al Gameros told ABC15 they’ve estimated their damage to be around $96 million, with Miami leaders telling ABC15 the damage is about $56 million.

If FEMA approves funding for towns, the percentage of the overall cost that is owed by each town is reduced substantially, critical for towns with smaller populations.

Advertisement

Nick covered the initial round of flooding in late September 2025 and returned to Globe in late October to get an update on the recovery there.

Late last week, ABC15 returned to Gila County – this time to Miami – to see how leaders there were rebounding, nearly four months after the flooding that killed three people.

“We had some floods here, but it wasn’t anything like that,” explains Miami Mayor Gil Madrid, who was also born and raised in the small Gila County mining town.

“It was unbelievable. Unbelievable. And sad to see what was going on.”

It’s damage the Mayor says totals about $56 million, but as of right now, FEMA isn’t helping cover any of it.

Advertisement

In December 2025, FEMA officials sent the state a letter, denying their request for a major disaster declaration, saying in part, “this event was not of such severity and magnitude as to be beyond the capabilities of the state and affected local governments.”

“How could they not stand with us in that disaster?” questioned Mayor Madrid.

So the Town of Miami sent its own appeal to FEMA, citing not just the flooding events in September and October last year, but also another major natural disaster – The Telegraph Fire in 2021, which burned more than 180,000 acres, creating larges areas of erosion on the Pinal Mountains, that helped send flood water, tree limbs, and other debris down the mountains, and into areas like downtown Globe and Miami.

ABC15 surveyed the area of Mackey Camp Road and saw several areas covered in dirt and sand that had accumulated in the nearly five years since the fire.

For Miami Town Manager Alexis Rivera, who reached out directly to ABC15 after seeing his follow-up series in Globe, not having that funding from FEMA means money from other critical departments and resources will have to wait for key projects to begin, things like new work trucks, new police vehicles, and infrastructure improvements.

Advertisement

“We are going to keep fighting,” says Rivera.

ABC15 reached back out to FEMA late last week and received this statement:

FEMA has received the State of Arizona’s appeal related to the September 25–27, 2025 severe storms and flooding. The appeal is currently under review in accordance with the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. FEMA has sent staff to Arizona to join state and local representatives to validate new information contained in the State’s appeal.  There is no timeline for appeal determinations, as each request is evaluated based on the specific circumstances.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending