Arizona
Lawmakers, governor seek major changes for assisted living in Ariz. following Republic investigation
Woman dies after being attacked at Phoenix senior living facility
Cathy McDavid’s mother, Joann Thompson, was beaten to death by another resident at Bethesda Gardens, a north Phoenix assisted living facility.
Michael Chow, Arizona Republic
Two Republican lawmakers want to prevent Arizona senior living facilities from keeping resident and employee injuries secret.
A bill introduced at the state Capitol is one of several measures expected in the coming weeks that could make facilities safer. Arizona has some of the weakest protections for assisted living residents in the country, but if the proposed changes are enacted the state could emerge as a leader in stringent oversight.
The movement for reform responds to problems exposed by The Arizona Republic’s investigative series “The Bitter End,” which chronicled residents hurting each other and employees, poor care and sexual assaults in senior living.
Gov. Katie Hobbs also plans to push a package of bills to address the problems and her recent budget proposal includes funding for 15 more inspectors of licensed facilities — like nursing homes and assisted living centers — who can levy fines and citations.
Hobbs’ plan also would create three new long-term care ombudsman positions at the Department of Economic Security, “to make sure that families who need a place to report incidents to and have support have a place to go,” the governor told reporters Wednesday.
She said The Republic’s reporting was a “driving factor” for her proposals.
Catch up: Arizona senior living facilities are often understaffed, endangering workers and residents
The legislation introduced this week by Reps. Quang Nguyen and Selina Bliss, both Prescott Republicans, is separate from Hobbs’ proposal.
The Republicans’ legislation would:
- Require assisted living facilities to report to the Arizona Department of Health Services when residents hurt each other or hurt employees.
- Require facilities to report serious injuries to families and notify them of any follow-up action they took to prevent future incidents.
- Allow facilities to install cameras in common areas, like hallways.
- Require facilities to allow residents and their families to install cameras in their rooms.
- Require the director of the Arizona Department of Health Services to create rules around the use of cameras in assisted living facilities and nursing homes
- Forbid facilities from keeping or hiring employees found by Adult Protect Services to have abused, neglected or exploited a vulnerable adult.
People harmed by the broken senior living system are hopeful for change.
“By the time I end up in one of those, it’ll be better,” said Susan Severe, a caregiver who had her eye nearly ripped from its socket by a resident at a Cottonwood facility in 2021.
Requirements for reporting let incidents fly under radar
Assisted living facilities do not have to tell the state health department about most nonfatal resident injuries even though the department is charged with licensing and investigating them.
Facilities only have to report to police or Adult Protective Services about resident altercations that end in injury. Law enforcement officers generally do not investigate systemic abuse and neglect, and protective services keeps most of its work secret and rarely substantiates complaints.
When residents hurt each other, facility employees only have to conduct an internal investigation and keep it on file for a year. They don’t have to share it with anyone, unless they’re subpoenaed or the state health department asks for it.
These conditions allowed what happened to Jennie Fischer to fly under the state’s radar and even leave her own family in the dark.
The 101-year-old woman was living in the memory care wing of Brookdale North Mesa in January 2020 when management paired her with a roommate.
Jennie’s family immediately started having problems. The roommate stole Jennie’s wheelchair. She pushed her. She slapped at Jennie’s daughter when she’d try to intervene.
More: Tragedies at 2 Arizona dementia care units leave families shattered, outraged
Sometimes people with dementia lash out thinking they are protecting themselves. Especially when they have the disease for a long time, which her roommate had.
Jennie’s daughters felt their mom was unsafe and asked management to move her roommate. That request was declined and the facility manager said the new roommate was harmless, but soon after Jennie was found on the floor with a broken arm. She said her new roommate had pushed her. She died a month later, with the broken arm listed as a contributing factor.
Unbeknownst to Jennie’s family but not the manager, the new roommate had killed her previous roommate at another facility three weeks prior after a medication error.
Still, the health department wasn’t informed about Jennie’s death and never investigated it.
The Republicans’ bill would prevent such secrecy in the future. Joey Wilson, one of Jennie’s daughters, said her mother would be proud to be part of the change.
“If they had to report injuries maybe they would have been more responsible for doing something, listening to the family … something,” Wilson said. “Brookdale just didn’t have any accountability, at all.”
Brookdale has told The Republic that their residents’ “health, safety and well-being is our top priority” but has declined to comment on Jennie’s case.
Cameras could provide evidence when residents can’t
In addition to reporting requirements, the Republicans’ bill would make it easier for families and facilities to monitor residents.
A Republic review of dozens of police reports found that law enforcement seldom substantiates sexual assault claims from seniors living in memory care units. The cases are rarely witnessed and easily dismissed as misunderstandings or hallucinations.
But The Republic found some facilities and state agencies ignored warning signs that could have prevented sexual assaults.
Having cameras in residents’ rooms could help validate residents who are dismissed. Cameras also could prevent employees from taking advantage of them, said Dana Kennedy, AARP Arizona director, who worked with lawmakers on the legislation.
The provision in Nguyen and Bliss’s bill allowing families to install cameras came from Kennedy’s frustration after reading The Republic’s investigation on sexual abuse, she said.
The piece featured a facility that hindered a police investigation after one resident inappropriately touched another; a caregiver who was reported to police three times for sexual and physical abuse before he finally was caught and charged with rape; and a nurse who was groped by a resident convicted of sexually assaulting another caregiver just months before.
“I was so furious after that,” Kennedy said. “It was like well, how do you — how do you stop this?”
Who’s to blame?: Arizona senior care centers face little accountability when residents, staff are sexually assaulted
The bill also would require the health department to adopt rules around the use of cameras in senior care facilities, and allow — but not require — those facilities to place cameras in common areas like hallways.
A former police detective whose wife was sexually assaulted by another resident at Scottsdale’s Lone Mountain Memory Care in 2022 said he would have liked the option to install a camera in his wife’s room and watch over her even when he wasn’t at the facility for one of his daily visits.
The Republic does not generally share the names of sexual assault victims, and is not sharing the man’s name to protect the identity of his wife.
The bill doesn’t go far enough, he said.
He’d like to see requirements for senior care centers to have surveillance in common areas — and consequences for facilities that fail to comply.
Without those requirements, “They won’t do it. I guarantee you they will not do it,” he said. “They need to put more teeth in it.”
Responding to that critique, Bliss said the legislation was a start.
“It gets our foot in the door and then if we want to strengthen this, we have something to build on it for next session,” she said. “If we go for too much, we could risk losing the bill altogether. So, in our book, a little is better than nothing.”
Legislation would bar abusive employees from facilities
Another key piece of the proposal would prevent facilities from hiring or keeping abusive employees.
Adult Protective Services’ website states that its registry — a list of people the program found to have abused, neglected or exploited a vulnerable adult — exists to protect vulnerable adults from being hurt by someone who has done it before.
But senior care centers are currently free to hire people on that list. And Adult Protective Services rarely adds people to it.
The Republic found that over the course of two years, protective services opened investigations into more than 1,600 allegations of sexual abuse and assault. During the same time period, the program substantiated less than 1% of that number.
Those low substantiation rates are part of what allowed Manuel Corral, formerly a caregiver at Heritage Village assisted living center in Mesa, to work at facility after facility over several years even as he was repeatedly accused of abusing residents. He was finally arrested for rape after he attacked a resident in 2020.
While Corral was arrested on rape charges, he ultimately pled guilty to three counts of attempted sexual assault. His name was added to the Adult Protective Services registry nearly a year after his arrest, and he was sentenced to seven years in prison.
But Corral was reported to police three times for physically or sexually abusing residents at facilities where he worked before Heritage Village.
History: Arizona senior living center where resident killed roommate has had nearly 150 citations since
He was fired from at least one and suspended from another. He was reported to Adult Protective Services at least twice, but his name never showed up on the registry — and even if it had, senior care centers could have hired him.
While the proposed change in law would prevent people like Corral from working at facilities, it does not address ways to expedite getting people’s names on the list.
Advocates hopeful for significant year of reform
AARP Arizona has pushed to improve the senior living system for years with little traction. But this year is different — Kennedy said she’s never experienced more momentum. Everyone wants to improve the system, she said.
How the system enables violence: At an Arizona senior living center, a resident killed another
Even without a legislative mandate, the state health department is investigating and citing facilities more often in light of “media oversight,” the director of the board that licenses facility managers said during a recent legislative committee hearing. He said his team has, as a result, investigated more managers.
The Republic’s investigative reporting in 2021 also influenced changes on that board, including a law that forbids the board from licensing people to run nursing homes if they have felonies for fraud.
“We knew that there was abuse and neglect in these facilities for a long time and I always said after Hacienda, the evidence was a baby,” Kennedy said, referencing a 2018 case when an employee raped and impregnated a patient who was quadriplegic and couldn’t communicate. “The evidence here is the reporting.”
Arizona Republic reporter Stacey Barchenger contributed to this report.
Reach Caitlin McGlade at caitlin.mcglade@arizonarepublic.com. Follow her on X, formerly Twitter, @caitmcglade. Reach Sahana Jayaraman at Sahana.Jayaraman@gannett.com. Follow her on X, formerly Twitter, @SahanaJayaraman.
Arizona
Make-A-Wish Arizona creates sea turtle adventure for San Tan Valley boy
Boats, beaches, and buckets of fun! Just the way you’d expect a boy to spend his Florida vacation!
But there was something else 11-year-old Miles Boyd got to do last year when he and his family traveled to Florida. It was a sea turtle adventure that truly became the trip of a lifetime.
“I had never been to the ocean before,” explained Miles. “So see that just wowed me. It was amazing!”
Miles and his family also got to see baby sea turtles on the beach at night.
“The ocean is so mysterious,” says Miles. “It’s such a big place, and the fact that these turtles can move but are so tiny and when they go in the ocean, they get to hundreds of pounds.”
In so many ways, the trip to Palm Beach County, Florida, was a dream vacation for Miles and his family, but it only came after what was a living nightmare.
“I couldn’t imagine losing him,” says Miles’ mom, Natasha.
It was the harsh reality that Natasha had to face after learning her son Miles had a cancerous brain tumor.
“The world just stopped,” Natasha says about the moment she found out the devastating news. “I just sat on the floor and cried.”
Even Miles admits he was scared.
“I’m just a kid, you know what I mean?” he says. “It’s a lot to handle all at once.”
After three brain surgeries, countless hours of therapy and rehab, and having to take a chemo medication twice daily, Miles proved to the world he is a true survivor!
And his trip to Florida, through Make-A-Wish Arizona, proved to be the medication he never knew he needed.
Miles explains that the trip motivated him to keep going.
“It showed me that I made it to this car, and I can keep going,” he says. “I started at the lowest of lows, and now, I’m on a beach – it just gave me confidence and motivated me that I could keep going.”
Last year alone, Make-A-Wish Arizona granted 476 wishes; they’ve also fulfilled more than 8,500 since being founded in 1980.
Across the Globe, Make-A-Wish has granted more than 650,000 wishes since 1980
Miles and Nick Ciletti will co-host Make-A-Wish Arizona’s Wish Ball on Saturday! To learn more about Make-A-Wish Arizona, click here.
Arizona
11 illegal Indian national truck drivers arrested at Arizona border last month
Eleven illegal Indian national truck drivers were arrested at the Arizona border in the month of February.
The Yuma Sector Border Patrol arrested 11 total Indian national truck drivers in Yuma, Arizona in February 2026.
According to a Facebook post by the Yuma Sector Border Patrol, all 11 truck drivers held commercial drivers licenses from the states of Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and California. All were “found to be present in the United States illegally.”
“Border Patrol remains committed to upholding immigration laws and protecting our communities,” the post continued.
Arizona
Arizona Independent Party to appeal ruling erasing name
Ballot processing at Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center
Election workers process ballots at the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center on Nov. 6, 2024, in Phoenix.
The Arizona Independent Party will appeal a court ruling that invalidated its name, guaranteeing more legal limbo and possibly a new chapter of confusion in the effort to give unaffiliated voters a viable third-party option at the ballot box.
Party chair Paul Johnson confirmed he would appeal the ruling from Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Greg Como, which forces the party to revert to its prior name: the No Labels Party. The ruling ordered elections officials in Arizona to follow suit.
The decision was a high-profile loss for Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, who Como said had permitted a “bait and switch” on voters by allowing the name change.
“We were given due process, the judge did a fair job,” Johnson said. “I don’t agree with his final position, but I like the way our country works in terms of the rule of the law.”
“I don’t feel discouraged at all,” Johnson said, adding that an appeal could proceed in federal court and raise claims of First and Fourteenth Amendment violations.
It is unclear how the judge’s order, if it stands, could impact candidates who submitted signatures to qualify for the ballot under the Arizona Independent Party label.
“The commission’s position has been that this would cause confusion,” said Tom Collins, executive director of the Clean Elections Commission, which was part of the case. “This is an example of that confusion.”
The number of signatures required to make the ballot is a percentage of registered voters for each party, but unaffiliated candidates had to collect roughly six times as many as Republican or Democratic candidates. Running with the Arizona Independent Party meant only 1,771 signatures were needed.
Como’s order was signed March 19 but made public on March 25, after a March 23 deadline for candidates to file signatures to make the ballot.
“Unfortunately due to the court order, this question is left unaddressed,” said Calli Jones, a spokesperson for Fontes. “This question will be left to the challenge process or other court proceedings.”
Clarity could come through any lawsuits filed challenging Arizona Independent Party candidates’ signatures. No such challenges had been filed as of March 25, and the deadline is April 6.
What’s preventing ‘Arizona Nazi Party’ or the ‘Arizona Anarchists’?
Last October, Fontes agreed to change the name of the No Labels Party to the Arizona Independent Party, saying to do so was not explicitly prohibited in law. The change was done at the request of Johnson, a former Phoenix mayor and advocate for open primaries. To Johnson, the party is something of a can’t-beat-them-join-them way to put independent candidates on an even playing field with those from the two major parties.
The name change quickly led to a trio of lawsuits filed by the state’s voter education agency, the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission, and the Arizona Republican Party and Arizona Democratic Party. Those cases were merged into one, which ultimately led to the March ruling.
The commission and political parties argued the name change would create confusion for voters and election officials in terms of distinguishing when someone wanted to be part of the new party versus and independent voter in a colloquial sense, which means not registering with any party. Fontes did not dispute there could be confusion.
State law does not directly address when a political party wants to change its name, but Como said that request should follow the process for creating a new party. That includes gathering signatures from supportive voters. Como has been on the bench since 2015.
Como raised concerns of transparency, noting that voters who registered for the old party may not support the new party name. He said a party could gather support with an “innocuous sounding name,” then change it entirely. Como offered a grave example.
“Would the same 41,000 people who signed petitions to recognize the No Labels Party have signed to support the ‘Arizona Nazi Party’ or the ‘Arizona Anarchists’?” he wrote.
His ruling is guided by and affirms Arizona court precedent that statewide elected officials’ powers are only those that are given explicitly to them in statute or the constitution.
Legal challenges needed to bring clarity
Jones, Fontes’ spokesperson, said the office had no power to address whether signatures were valid, because the office presumes “anyone who met the requirements at the time of filing their signatures are valid candidates.” Fontes, a Democrat seeking reelection this year, said he would not appeal the ruling given the “fast approach of the election and the challenging job election administrators have before them.”
He also stood by his decision, but said the court ruled with voters. “Both approaches, being reasonable, the Court entered an order with a lean towards the voters, not the party leaders,” Fontes said.
Como did not find Fontes’ approach was reasonable, saying it was beyond Fontes’ authority.
“The judge noted that even Fontes admitted this issue would cause confusion for the voters, but Fontes disregarded that concern and the obvious truth, and proceeded to allow them to continue the charade,” Arizona Republic Party Chair Sergio Arellano said, responding to the ruling.
That Fontes will not appeal was welcome, because “he has already cost taxpayers too much money” and “further eroded trust in our election officials at a time when that trust is already at an all-time low,” Arellano said.
Eleven candidates are running for office with the Arizona Independent Party name, or whatever it turns out to be. That includes candidates for Congress, governor and state Legislature. Hugh Lytle, the party’s preferred candidate for governor, said in a statement the ruling proves “how far the political parties will go to protect their grip on power.”
Lytle is among the candidates who could face a challenge to his just over 6,000 signatures. Of those, just 132 were gathered via the state’s online system, which requires verification before signing. The remaining could be more vulnerable to objections.
Ultimately, Lytle said, the judge’s ruling wouldn’t change much.
“We are on the ballot,” he said.
Reach reporter Stacey Barchenger at stacey.barchenger@arizonarepublic.com or 480-416-5669.
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago‘Youth’ Twitter review: Ken Karunaas impresses audiences; Suraj Venjaramoodu adds charm; music wins praise | – The Times of India
-
Sports6 days agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
New Mexico5 days agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Business1 week agoDisney’s new CEO says his focus is on storytelling and creativity
-
Technology5 days agoYouTube job scam text: How to spot it fast
-
Tennessee4 days agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Texas1 week agoHow to buy Houston vs. Texas A&M 2026 March Madness tickets