Connect with us

Arizona

Lawmakers, governor seek major changes for assisted living in Ariz. following Republic investigation

Published

on

Lawmakers, governor seek major changes for assisted living in Ariz. following Republic investigation


play

Two Republican lawmakers want to prevent Arizona senior living facilities from keeping resident and employee injuries secret.

Advertisement

A bill introduced at the state Capitol is one of several measures expected in the coming weeks that could make facilities safer. Arizona has some of the weakest protections for assisted living residents in the country, but if the proposed changes are enacted the state could emerge as a leader in stringent oversight.

The movement for reform responds to problems exposed by The Arizona Republic’s investigative series “The Bitter End,” which chronicled residents hurting each other and employees, poor care and sexual assaults in senior living.

Gov. Katie Hobbs also plans to push a package of bills to address the problems and her recent budget proposal includes funding for 15 more inspectors of licensed facilities — like nursing homes and assisted living centers — who can levy fines and citations.

Hobbs’ plan also would create three new long-term care ombudsman positions at the Department of Economic Security, “to make sure that families who need a place to report incidents to and have support have a place to go,” the governor told reporters Wednesday.

Advertisement

She said The Republic’s reporting was a “driving factor” for her proposals.

Catch up: Arizona senior living facilities are often understaffed, endangering workers and residents

The legislation introduced this week by Reps. Quang Nguyen and Selina Bliss, both Prescott Republicans, is separate from Hobbs’ proposal. 

The Republicans’ legislation would:

Advertisement
  • Require assisted living facilities to report to the Arizona Department of Health Services when residents hurt each other or hurt employees.
  • Require facilities to report serious injuries to families and notify them of any follow-up action they took to prevent future incidents.
  • Allow facilities to install cameras in common areas, like hallways.
  • Require facilities to allow residents and their families to install cameras in their rooms.
  • Require the director of the Arizona Department of Health Services to create rules around the use of cameras in assisted living facilities and nursing homes
  • Forbid facilities from keeping or hiring employees found by Adult Protect Services to have abused, neglected or exploited a vulnerable adult.

People harmed by the broken senior living system are hopeful for change.

“By the time I end up in one of those, it’ll be better,” said Susan Severe, a caregiver who had her eye nearly ripped from its socket by a resident at a Cottonwood facility in 2021.

Requirements for reporting let incidents fly under radar

Assisted living facilities do not have to tell the state health department about most nonfatal resident injuries even though the department is charged with licensing and investigating them. 

Facilities only have to report to police or Adult Protective Services about resident altercations that end in injury. Law enforcement officers generally do not investigate systemic abuse and neglect, and protective services keeps most of its work secret and rarely substantiates complaints.

When residents hurt each other, facility employees only have to conduct an internal investigation and keep it on file for a year. They don’t have to share it with anyone, unless they’re subpoenaed or the state health department asks for it. 

These conditions allowed what happened to Jennie Fischer to fly under the state’s radar and even leave her own family in the dark.

Advertisement

The 101-year-old woman was living in the memory care wing of Brookdale North Mesa in January 2020 when management paired her with a roommate.

Jennie’s family immediately started having problems. The roommate stole Jennie’s wheelchair. She pushed her. She slapped at Jennie’s daughter when she’d try to intervene. 

More: Tragedies at 2 Arizona dementia care units leave families shattered, outraged

Sometimes people with dementia lash out thinking they are protecting themselves. Especially when they have the disease for a long time, which her roommate had.

Advertisement

Jennie’s daughters felt their mom was unsafe and asked management to move her roommate. That request was declined and the facility manager said the new roommate was harmless, but soon after Jennie was found on the floor with a broken arm. She said her new roommate had pushed her. She died a month later, with the broken arm listed as a contributing factor.

Unbeknownst to Jennie’s family but not the manager, the new roommate had killed her previous roommate at another facility three weeks prior after a medication error.

Still, the health department wasn’t informed about Jennie’s death and never investigated it.

The Republicans’ bill would prevent such secrecy in the future. Joey Wilson, one of Jennie’s daughters, said her mother would be proud to be part of the change. 

“If they had to report injuries maybe they would have been more responsible for doing something, listening to the family … something,” Wilson said.  “Brookdale just didn’t have any accountability, at all.”

Advertisement

Brookdale has told The Republic that their residents’ “health, safety and well-being is our top priority” but has declined to comment on Jennie’s case.  

Cameras could provide evidence when residents can’t

In addition to reporting requirements, the Republicans’ bill would make it easier for families and facilities to monitor residents.

A Republic review of dozens of police reports found that law enforcement seldom substantiates sexual assault claims from seniors living in memory care units. The cases are rarely witnessed and easily dismissed as misunderstandings or hallucinations. 

But The Republic found some facilities and state agencies ignored warning signs that could have prevented sexual assaults.

Advertisement

Having cameras in residents’ rooms could help validate residents who are dismissed. Cameras also could prevent employees from taking advantage of them, said Dana Kennedy, AARP Arizona director, who worked with lawmakers on the legislation. 

The provision in Nguyen and Bliss’s bill allowing families to install cameras came from Kennedy’s frustration after reading The Republic’s investigation on sexual abuse, she said.  

The piece featured a facility that hindered a police investigation after one resident inappropriately touched another; a caregiver who was reported to police three times for sexual and physical abuse before he finally was caught and charged with rape; and a nurse who was groped by a resident convicted of sexually assaulting another caregiver just months before.

“I was so furious after that,” Kennedy said. “It was like well, how do you — how do you stop this?” 

Who’s to blame?: Arizona senior care centers face little accountability when residents, staff are sexually assaulted

Advertisement

The bill also would require the health department to adopt rules around the use of cameras in senior care facilities, and allow — but not require — those facilities to place cameras in common areas like hallways.

A former police detective whose wife was sexually assaulted by another resident at Scottsdale’s Lone Mountain Memory Care in 2022 said he would have liked the option to install a camera in his wife’s room and watch over her even when he wasn’t at the facility for one of his daily visits.

The Republic does not generally share the names of sexual assault victims, and is not sharing the man’s name to protect the identity of his wife.

The bill doesn’t go far enough, he said.

Advertisement

He’d like to see requirements for senior care centers to have surveillance in common areas — and consequences for facilities that fail to comply. 

Without those requirements, “They won’t do it. I guarantee you they will not do it,” he said. “They need to put more teeth in it.”

Responding to that critique, Bliss said the legislation was a start.

“It gets our foot in the door and then if we want to strengthen this, we have something to build on it for next session,” she said. “If we go for too much, we could risk losing the bill altogether. So, in our book, a little is better than nothing.”

Legislation would bar abusive employees from facilities 

Another key piece of the proposal would prevent facilities from hiring or keeping abusive employees.

Advertisement

Adult Protective Services’ website states that its registry — a list of people the program found to have abused, neglected or exploited a vulnerable adult — exists to protect vulnerable adults from being hurt by someone who has done it before. 

But senior care centers are currently free to hire people on that list. And Adult Protective Services rarely adds people to it.

The Republic found that over the course of two years, protective services opened investigations into more than 1,600 allegations of sexual abuse and assault. During the same time period, the program substantiated less than 1% of that number.

Those low substantiation rates are part of what allowed Manuel Corral, formerly a caregiver at Heritage Village assisted living center in Mesa, to work at facility after facility over several years even as he was repeatedly accused of abusing residents. He was finally arrested for rape after he attacked a resident in 2020.

While Corral was arrested on rape charges, he ultimately pled guilty to three counts of attempted sexual assault. His name was added to the Adult Protective Services registry nearly a year after his arrest, and he was sentenced to seven years in prison.

Advertisement

But Corral was reported to police three times for physically or sexually abusing residents at facilities where he worked before Heritage Village.

History: Arizona senior living center where resident killed roommate has had nearly 150 citations since

He was fired from at least one and suspended from another. He was reported to Adult Protective Services at least twice, but his name never showed up on the registry — and even if it had, senior care centers could have hired him.

While the proposed change in law would prevent people like Corral from working at facilities, it does not address ways to expedite getting people’s names on the list.

Advocates hopeful for significant year of reform

AARP Arizona has pushed to improve the senior living system for years with little traction. But this year is different — Kennedy said she’s never experienced more momentum. Everyone wants to improve the system, she said.

Advertisement

How the system enables violence: At an Arizona senior living center, a resident killed another

Even without a legislative mandate, the state health department is investigating and citing facilities more often in light of “media oversight,” the director of the board that licenses facility managers said during a recent legislative committee hearing. He said his team has, as a result, investigated more managers.

The Republic’s investigative reporting in 2021 also influenced changes on that board, including a law that forbids the board from licensing people to run nursing homes if they have felonies for fraud.

“We knew that there was abuse and neglect in these facilities for a long time and I always said after Hacienda, the evidence was a baby,” Kennedy said, referencing a 2018 case when an employee raped and impregnated a patient who was quadriplegic and couldn’t communicate. “The evidence here is the reporting.”

Arizona Republic reporter Stacey Barchenger contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Reach Caitlin McGlade at caitlin.mcglade@arizonarepublic.com. Follow her on X, formerly Twitter, @caitmcglade. Reach Sahana Jayaraman at Sahana.Jayaraman@gannett.com. Follow her on X, formerly Twitter, @SahanaJayaraman.



Source link

Arizona

Arizona’s ‘QAnon Shaman’ denounces ‘slush fund’ for Jan. 6 rioters

Published

on

Arizona’s ‘QAnon Shaman’ denounces ‘slush fund’ for Jan. 6 rioters


The Arizona man known as the “QAnon Shaman” said Wednesday that President Donald Trump’s new Anti-Weaponization Fund is an abuse of power by a would-be “king.”

Jacob Angeli-Chansley – the face of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot with his red, white and blue face paint and horned fur headdress – denounced the $1.776 billion program as a “slush fund” for Trump to reward his loyalists.

The Justice Department announced the fund on Monday as part of a settlement with Trump, who had sued the IRS for $10 billion over the leak of his tax returns. The settlement included an assurance that the IRS will drop all audits and claims for back taxes against Trump, his family and businesses.

“You think I’m gonna take a f—ing dime from Trump and the government after he’s using this thing to cover him and his family in perpetuity for all of their crimes?” he told Cronkite News by phone. “You think I’m gonna take a dime of that blood money?”

Advertisement

Trump pardoned more than 1,500 people who participated in the Jan. 6 riot the day he returned to the White House in January 2025. Many had been convicted of assaulting police officers.

Cronkite News reached out to 17 of those defendants with Arizona ties. None besides Angeli-Chansley responded.

Thirteen were convicted or pleaded guilty to crimes related to the attack. Four of the cases were dismissed after the pardon. The charges included assault on federal agents, physical violence at the Capitol and seditious conspiracy.

See our previous coverage of the Anti-Weaponization Fund and “QAnon Shaman” in the video player above.

Angeli-Chansley pleaded guilty to a charge of obstruction of an official proceeding. He served 27 months of a 41-month sentence. He was released from federal prison in March 2023.

Advertisement

During the riot, he carried an American flag fastened to a spear and used a bullhorn to call other rioters to the dais in the Senate chamber.

“He stated that ‘Mike Pence is a f—-ing traitor’ and wrote a note on available paper on the dais, stating, ‘It’s Only A Matter of Time. Justice Is Coming,’” according to prosecutors.

At a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing Tuesday, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the compensation fund, saying it will be open to anyone victimized by a politically motivated prosecution, not just Jan. 6 defendants.

“It’s not limited to Republicans. … It’s not limited to the Biden weaponization. It’s not limited to, in any way scope or form, January 6 or to (targets of special counsel) Jack Smith. There’s no limitation on the claims,” Blanche said. 

He rejected Democrats’ assertions that the fund is a massive, taxpayer-funded attempt by Trump to whitewash the assault on democracy.

Advertisement

“I think it’s telling that everybody on the left and … the liberal side of the media immediately says it’s a slush fund for President Trump’s friends,” Blanche said. “If anything else, that’s an outright admission that they know that the people that really had this Department of Justice weaponized against them were President Trump and his friends. But … that is not what the AG order that I signed yesterday says.”

Blanche, who served as Trump’s private attorney in several cases – prosecutions over election interference and classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago and allegations of hush money paid to an adult actress ahead of the 2016 election – faced strong criticism from Senate Democrats.

“You are acting today like the president’s personal attorney and that’s the whole problem,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, who also noted that a huge banner with Trump’s portrait was draped over the front of the Department of Justice building in February.

At a homeland security committee meeting Tuesday, Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego called for legislation barring establishment of a fund of the sort proposed by the Trump administration.

He called it outrageous to provide compensation to “traitors who attacked the Capitol.”

Advertisement

“No president, Republican or Democrat, should be able to use the federal treasury as a personal checkbook,” he said.

Angeli-Chansley now refers to himself as the “American Shaman.” He was heavily involved in the QAnon movement, which centered on a conspiracy theory that Trump was fighting a cabal of Satan worshippers who engage in child sex trafficking.

He was a strong MAGA supporter when the pro-Trump mob stormed the Capitol, interrupting congressional certification of Democrat Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election.

Angeli-Chansley has since become disenchanted with Trump. He has also repudiated the QAnon movement.

In a rambling phone conversation with Cronkite News, he repeatedly cited Trump’s connections to Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting federal trial for trafficking young women and girls for sex.

Advertisement

He reiterated his anger with Trump for resisting the release of the Epstein files.

And he criticized Trump for attacking Iran and supporting Israel, among other things.

Angeli-Chansley sued Trump for $40 trillion in September 2025, asserting he is the true leader of the free world and vowing to use the sum to wipe out the national debt. The lawsuit was dismissed. He later filed a lawsuit against the CIA, FBI, World Bank and others in Maricopa County.

He urged fellow Jan. 6ers to “reject that … money.”

If courts allow the fund to operate, Angeli-Chansley said, it would mean that Trump “can do whatever it is that he wants.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona school board member’s Nazi salute horrifies teacher union

Published

on

Arizona school board member’s Nazi salute horrifies teacher union


play

School teacher unions are calling for the resignation of a Deer Valley Unified School District board member after she made a “Nazi salute” and said “heil’ at the end of a public meeting on May 26.

Advertisement

Boardmember Kimberly Fisher stretched out her arm, making the salute motion and repeating the word “heil” twice after the board president called for a vote to adjourn the meeting.

Fisher defended her actions in a Facebook video after the meeting, stating she made the gesture because she felt that the board had been under a “dictatorship” led by Board President Paul Carver and the district’s superintendent.

“All I could think of tonight was Hitler, so that’s why I said heil or whatever,” Fisher said in an eight-minute-long video.

Prior to the motion, Fisher and the board members were speaking on scheduling future meetings to discuss changes to district boundaries. Superintendent Curtis Finch stated they could not discuss the topic because it was on the meeting’s agenda. Then Carver quickly called for a vote to end the meeting, which prompted Fisher to make the salute.

The board members did not immediately react or acknowledge Fisher’s salute at the May 26 meeting.

Advertisement

This was not the first time Fisher has recently come under scrutiny. In October, she was slammed with a violation of Open Meeting Law by the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, The Daily Independent reported.

Fisher could not be immediately reached for comment.

How the community is reacting to Fisher’s Nazi salute

The local chapter of the Anti-Defamation League, an organization focused on advocating against antisemitism and hate, denounced Fisher’s use of the salute.

Advertisement

“We unequivocally condemn this behavior that glorifies Nazis and Hitler. Regardless of intent, these actions instill fear in the community and are unbecoming of officials entrusted with educating children,” said Sarah Kader, the deputy regional director of ADL Desert, in a social media post.

The Arizona Education Association and the Deer Valley Education Association are calling for Fisher’s resignation.

“Kimberly Fisher should apologize to the DVUSD community and step down,” the state union group wrote on X.

The local teacher union wrote in a Facebook statement that they were “horrified and disgusted” to see Fisher’s actions.

“Any leader who uses a Nazi salute during a School Board meeting is unfit for public service. There is no justification for this behavior,” the union wrote.

Advertisement

Boardmember Stephanie Simacek, in a statement, said “this is what antisemitism looks like when people get comfortable” and called for an “immediate censure.”

“I am calling for accountability. And I am calling on every parent, educator, and elected official Republican or Democrat — to stand up and say clearly: THIS HAS NO PLACE HERE,” she wrote in the statement.

Simacek is also a house member in the Arizona State Legislature and is running for a state senate seat.

She wrote, “What happened in that room was not a joke.”

Advertisement

The school district “does not condone, support, or endorse gestures or language associated with hate, discrimination, intimidation, or violence in any form,” said Kayla Pologa, a spokesperson for Deer Valley, in a written statement.

“As an elected official, Mrs. Fisher speaks and acts independently,” Pologa wrote.

She said Fisher’s views don’t reflect nor should be attributed to other board members or members of the school district.

Who is Kimberly Fisher?

Fisher has been a Deer Valley School District parent for 24 years, according to her biography on the district’s website. She had two children graduate from the district and her third is being homeschooled in his final year, her biography states.

She had previously served on the board from 2015 to 2018.

Advertisement

In 2017, Fisher was the school board president and was criticized for a social media exchange with a teacher.

She was reelected in 2020. Fisher’s current term ends in 2028.





Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Mark Lamb allegations: Arizona congressional candidate faces misconduct claims

Published

on

Mark Lamb allegations: Arizona congressional candidate faces misconduct claims


Former Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb, the Republican candidate for Congressional District 5, is facing new criticism following a recent report published by The Arizona Republic. 

What we know:

Advertisement

The article cites unidentified sources who allege Lamb engaged in racist and homophobic text exchanges and sent inappropriate and threatening messages to women. 

There are a few things working in Lamb’s favor, which are his name recognition combined with an endorsement from President Donald Trump. 

Big picture view:

Advertisement

Analysts said it ultimately comes down to what voters decide at the ballot box.

“People have weathered worse,” Stan Barnes said.

Advertisement

Barnes is a political consultant and former Republican state senator. He points to other figures, like former President Bill Clinton and current President Trump, who both faced high-profile misconduct allegations.

“The American people said, all right, but we still want to vote for him, and Mark Lamb could be in the same situation,” Barnes said.

What they’re saying:

Advertisement

Lamb has largely kept quiet on the issue, a strategy Barnes said can work for candidates.

“He might decide, you know what? It’s salacious, it’s unprovable,” Barnes said. “A lot of people won’t believe it, people aren’t paying attention, and name ID and Trump endorsement’s going to carry me through.”

Advertisement

Inquiries were made to Lamb’s campaign. They responded with a statement, saying in part: “The Arizona Republic admitted that their article was based on a 10-year-old text from a person that couldn’t be located, or might not be a real person. Not exactly what one would call quality, independent journalism.”
However, the allegations could present challenges for his path to Congress.

The other side:

“The problem for Mr. Lamb and his candidacy is that his opponent will attempt to remind voters,” Barnes said.

Advertisement

Lamb’s Republican opponent, Daniel Keenan, spoke out against the former sheriff following the report.

“This story only adds to a pattern of disqualifying, disgraceful, and embarrassing behavior unbecoming of a congressman,” Keenan said in part.

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

Noble, a political data researcher, said the accusations could hurt Lamb with moderate voters.

“There’s really no strong candidates running in that primary because he’s cleared the field,” Mike Noble said. “It’s going to hurt him with women, it’s going to hurt him with independents, self-identified moderates, those that have a high school or less education.”

Advertisement

In a heavily Republican district, Noble said if the accusations gain traction, it could help the opposing party.

“It could potentially be fatal for him in the general election and actually give Democrats an opening in the general election, which normally they wouldn’t,” Noble said.

Advertisement

What’s next:

On the Democratic side, there are four people running in the primary for Congressional District 5. The primary election is scheduled for July 21.

The Source: This information was gathered from the article from The Arizona Republic, a political consultant and Lamb’s campaign. 

Advertisement

Pinal CountyArizona PoliticsNews



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending