Connect with us

Arizona

Family of slain UA professor file $9 million claim against the Arizona Board of Regents

Published

on

Family of slain UA professor file  million claim against the Arizona Board of Regents


This story is creating.

The household of slain College of Arizona professor Dr. Thomas Meixner has filed a discover of a $9 million declare in opposition to the Arizona Board of Regents. The household claims that UA’s “pass-the-buck response to repeated violent threats” led to Meixner’s homicide.

Meixner was killed on campus by alleged shooter Murad Dervish final October. Meixner, together with a pupil and different college, have been topic to over a yr’s value of alleged harassment and threats by Dervish. Experiences of those threats have been despatched to school departments just like the Workplace of Normal Counsel and the College of Arizona Police Division. However Meixners’ attorneys declare “the college’s utter failure to do even the naked minimal, to make sure security on its campus, resulted” within the division head’s demise.

The regulation companies of Zwillinger Wulkan and Kuykendall & Associates are representing Meixner’s widow, Kathleen, and his sons, Sean and Brendan.

Advertisement

Of their declare’s first sentence, they are saying “the College of Arizona sacrificed Professor Tom Meixner’s life, repeatedly ignoring the clear and current hazard of a hostile and harmful pupil who overtly marketed his intent to homicide.”

All through the doc, they element the timeline of occasions main as much as Meixner’s demise. Within the declare, they share the back-and-forth inside communications that affected college and college students obtained from UA departments for months previous to Oct. 5, 2022. Nonetheless, based on the declare, “the College ignored the outcry of scholars and school involved over Dervish’s actions and refused to make the mandatory lodging for the division primarily based on security issues.”

They proceed on to assert that, “the College didn’t, and nonetheless doesn’t, have a complete system to watch and consider such violence dangers, regardless of a recognition that their present inside communication channels are ineffective.”

In that assertion, they harken again to a February School Senate assembly the place UA President Robert Robbins known as for the necessity to work collectively to “mitigate” problems with belief and security. He went on to assert full duty, regardless of not being conscious of the threats previous to the capturing.

The declare compares UA’s violence danger response to “scorching potato.”

Advertisement

“In truth, a number of different claims in opposition to the College reveal inside indifference to those conditions and a sample of passing duty from one division to a different like a scorching potato, moderately than performing in a manner that protects the College neighborhood.”

The Arizona Board of Regents has 60 days to answer the household’s declare. In the event that they fail, the household will file a proper lawsuit.

The Arizona Board of Regents holds the license for AZPM.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arizona

Cardinals Expect All-Pro Kicker to Return

Published

on

Cardinals Expect All-Pro Kicker to Return


ARIZONA — The Arizona Cardinals are set to see kicker Matt Prater return to the practice field on Wednesday as the team prepares for their Week 16 matchup against the Carolina Panthers.

“He’ll be out there kicking today. You’ll see him out there booting it today,” head coach Jonathan Gannon told reporters ahead of practice.

Prater played in just four games this season after suffering a knee injury which saw him land on injured reserve back on Oct. 15.

While the full injury was not disclosed, ESPN’s Josh Weinfuss reported Prater has been recovering from surgery to repair his meniscus in the left knee.

Advertisement

Replacement Chad Ryland has mostly been clutch for the Cardinals in Prater’s absence, helping Arizona to a 7-7 record while going 22-26 on all field goal attempts, converting all 15 kicks under 40 yards.

With just three weeks left in the regular season, Prater could make a return at any point when the Cardinals officially open his 21 day window for return. Prater is allowed to practice with the team and can be elevated to the active roster at any point.

Arizona has matchups against the Carolina Panthers, Los Angeles Rams and San Francisco 49ers to close out the year.

It will be interesting to see how the Cardinals handle their kicking conundrum, as Ryland has mostly played well while Prater is one of the league’s best despite being at the age of 40.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Samford Bulldogs play the Arizona Wildcats, aim for 6th straight win

Published

on

Samford Bulldogs play the Arizona Wildcats, aim for 6th straight win


Associated Press

Samford Bulldogs (9-2) at Arizona Wildcats (4-5, 0-1 Big 12)

Tucson, Arizona; Wednesday, 9 p.m. EST

Advertisement

BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Wildcats -19.5; over/under is 168.5

BOTTOM LINE: Samford is looking to keep its five-game win streak intact when the Bulldogs take on Arizona.

The Wildcats are 3-1 in home games. Arizona averages 83.4 points and has outscored opponents by 12.4 points per game.

The Bulldogs are 2-2 on the road. Samford averages 19.1 assists per game to lead the SoCon, paced by Rylan Jones with 6.1.

Arizona’s average of 6.3 made 3-pointers per game is 1.2 fewer made shots on average than the 7.5 per game Samford allows. Samford averages 19.5 more points per game (90.5) than Arizona gives up to opponents (71.0).

Advertisement

TOP PERFORMERS: Caleb Love is shooting 36.6% and averaging 13.3 points for the Wildcats.

Jones is averaging 10.5 points, 6.1 assists and 1.6 steals for the Bulldogs.

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona regulators reaffirm monthly fee for APS solar customers

Published

on

Arizona regulators reaffirm monthly fee for APS solar customers


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Arizona Public Service (APS) electric customers with solar panels will still need to pay a relatively new monthly fee after the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) voted in favor of the grid access charge.

Commissioners reaffirmed the fee in a 3-1 decision on Tuesday. The APS grid access charge (GAC) was approved in February and came under fire after opponents said it discriminated against residential solar customers by increasing rates.

“In general, all costs related to such services should be equitably distributed to each class of service. As demonstrated… residential solar customers are paying less than 70% of the costs to serve them,” Judge Belinda Martin said.

Proponents of the upgraded charges say there is a cost shift in place now and that the restructured charges will balance costs between the two types of customers.

Advertisement

“$61 million were imposed on APS’ residential customers that do not have solar. That means about one million customers have been paying the bill for those that have solar on their homes,” said Jim O’Connor, an ACC chairman.

APS says the fee is a fixed charge that helps recover the costs of maintaining services and equipment. Regulators say that solar customers rely on APS’ power grid to provide electricity when their systems aren’t working, which is why the increase is justified.

Still, groups like the Arizona Solar Energy Industries Association (AriSEIA) disagreed, saying that utility provider miscalculated the cost of service to solar customers.

“APS testified that if the ACC eliminated the solar fees, the difference would be $.25 to residential customers. Despite the evidence, the ACC will penalize solar customers several dollars per month and approved an amendment to increase it in APS’ next rate case, which is anticipated to be filed in 2025,” the association said in a news release after the ruling.

“The evidentiary record makes it clear that solar customers are subsidizing non-solar customers and yet APS and the ACC continue to penalize solar customers with unfounded and discriminatory fees,” said Autumn Johnson, the executive director of AriSEIA.

Advertisement

In a news release, the ACC said critics of the opinion have “mischaracterized the GAC as a ‘solar tax’ on about 184,000 Arizonans with rooftop solar.”

“I understand no one wants to pay more on their bills, but this is about parity and fairness for all ratepayers,” said Commissioner Kevin Thompson. “I hope there’s a day when homeowners can live completely free from the grid, but we are not there now. I believe all costs related to providing service should be equally and fairly distributed among all classes of customers, and we have a duty to address cost shifts and subsidies when they exist.”

AriSEIA said an appeal is likely early next year.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending