Connect with us

Alaska

The history of the proposed Alaska bill that was to levy a $50 tax on single women

Published

on

The history of the proposed Alaska bill that was to levy a  tax on single women


Part of a continuing weekly series on Alaska history by local historian David Reamer. Have a question about Anchorage or Alaska history or an idea for a future article? Go to the form at the bottom of this story.

“The odds are good, but the goods are odd.” How many times have you heard that said, or more like grumbled, by Alaska women? Meanwhile, men in Alaska have complained about a supposed shortage of women, regardless of quality, for more than a century. Back in 1921, a group of desperate Anchorage bachelors formed the Bridegroom Club, which essentially subsidized the hunt for matrimony. “We’ll revolt and import some brides,” said one member. The group shared the costs of bride shipping, hotel suites, and wedding banquets. Or, they would have if they ever managed to convince a woman to move north for their sake.

In 1949, the future honorable Gov. William A. Egan (1914-1984), then the humble Territorial Rep. Bill Egan, introduced a bill into the Legislature. “Braving the snarls of spinsters,” as the anonymous Associated Press scribe wrote, Egan called for a tax of $50 on every single woman in Alaska. His stated intent was to “further the institution of matrimony, relieve the housing shortage and levy a special tax on the privilege of being single.”

More specifically, House Bill 108 was a head tax on every unmarried woman between 18 and 50 who was also gainfully employed. The tax was either a flat $50 or 10% of the woman’s federal income tax, whichever was higher. Thus introduced, the bill was referred to the Ways and Means Committee. Other bills introduced that day included the early steps toward creating a water pollution control board, Alaska Youth Commission, and some assorted trade regulations.

Advertisement

Egan had already made a stir that session by introducing a bill offering a $2 bounty on bald eagles killed in the territory. This bill, which passed into law, increased bald eagle bounties that had been on the books in Alaska since 1917. The proposal was supported by fishermen who claimed eagles were unfair competition for salmon. Thus, the sportsmen required the government’s assistance if they were to thrive. The bounty program lasted into 1952, when it was superseded by federal regulation. As governor in the early 1960s, Egan notably opposed bounties on hair seals and wolves.

Within a couple of days, news of the “spinster tax” spread nationwide, gleefully picked up by newspapers as far away as New York City. News from Alaska has long played well in the Lower 48, especially curiosities, tall tales, and attempts to tax single women out of existence. In less than a week, Egan received several letters of protest, including ones from Seattle, Detroit and Newburgh, New York. The Newburgh man thought the bill was “most preposterous.” “I certainly trust, sir, that you were joking,” he added.

Egan was himself married. Neva McKittrick (1914-2011) moved to Valdez in 1937 for a teaching position, when schoolteachers were required to be single. In Anchorage, the school district had a mandatory resignation for pregnancy in effect for teachers until 1972. Anyway, a young Egan took an immediate liking to McKittrick. His status as one of the few men in town with a car was one of his more desirable attributes, such was the state of Valdez. Still, she was at least partially immune to these charms and initially turned him down. Three years later, however, they were wed.

While there are still more men than women in Alaska, the divide has narrowed from a 67% male population per the 1900 Census to 52.6% per 2022 Census Bureau estimates. Per the 1950 Census, conducted one year after Egan’s bill was introduced, Alaska’s population was 62% male. For adults 20 years old and up, the population was 67% male. Of course, some towns had more significant disparities, yet for urban Alaska, where most lonely complainers lived, the population was a far closer to even 55% male.

Advertisement

Egan’s bill was best lampooned by Jane Hafling (1923-2017), the longtime cartoonist for the Anchorage Daily Times. A female cartoonist working a regular assignment for a midcentury newspaper would have been notable anywhere, let alone in distant Alaska, where there were fewer opportunities and female cartoonists. After an education at the Denver Art Institute, Hafling moved to Alaska in 1941, where she worked as a stenographer before winning a 1945 Daily Times drawing contest. She worked for the Daily Times through 1965 and, in 1959, published a book, “Haf Baked Alaska.” If you need a relatively obscure, affordable, and worthwhile bit of Alaskana for gift-giving season, consider tracking down a copy.

In her March 12, 1949 cartoon, a woman sits on a couch while an eager suitor kneels before her. “Darling, will you marry me?” he says. “I’m poor — but we can live on love and the fifty bucks I’ll be saving you!” Hafling remarkably drew her without an obvious reaction. While the woman in the cartoon might have been facing an economic hardship given the tax, she would have also had other options, other goods to peruse.

There was at least one exception within the bill. As written, single women could apply for a tax waiver because of physical disfigurement, granted at the discretion of the tax commissioner. This would have been a hint for anyone who read it. On March 14, 1949, Egan surrendered and assured everyone in range that he had merely been joking. Whether true or not, it was a convenient end to the brouhaha for him, if not the single men who thought their big chance had come.

Key sources:

“Alaska’s Bald Eagles Protected by New Law.” Anchorage Daily Times, May 16, 1952, 14.

Advertisement

“Bachelor Girls’ Tax Sponsor Puts Out ‘White Flag.’” Anchorage Daily Times, March 15, 1949, 1.

“Bachelors of Anchorage in Revolt Prepare to Import Many Brides.” Anchorage Daily Times, January 19, 1921, 1.

Berry, Barbara Snyder. “An Alaskan Cartoonist: The Work of Jane Hafling.” In Alaska Journal: A 1986 Collection, edited by Terrence Cole, 156-161.

“Bill Spurs Hunt of Single Women.” Anchorage Daily Times, March 9, 1949, 1.

Dunham, Mike. “Neva Egan, the First of Alaska’s First Ladies, Dies at Age 96.” Anchorage Daily News, January 20, 2011.

Advertisement

“‘Eagle Bounty’ Egan Out to Scalp Females.” Anchorage Daily News, March 9, 1949, 1.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

OPINION: CDQ program and pollock fishery are essential to Western Alaska

Published

on

OPINION: CDQ program and pollock fishery are essential to Western Alaska


By Eric Deakin, Ragnar Alstrom and Michael Link

Updated: 1 hour ago Published: 1 hour ago

We work every day to support Alaska’s rural communities through the Community Development Quota (CDQ) program and have seen firsthand the lifeline the program provides to our state’s most isolated and economically vulnerable areas.

Advertisement

This program is one of the most successful social justice programs in the United States, giving rural, coastal communities a stake in the success of the Bering Sea fisheries, and transferring these benefits into community investments. Our fisheries participation provides $80 million to $100 million of programs, wages and benefits into Western Alaska annually, and the full economic reach of the CDQ program is substantially larger when accounting for jobs and support services statewide.

In some communities, CDQs are the largest and only private-sector employer; the only market for small-boat fishermen; the only nonfederal funding available for critical infrastructure projects; and an essential program provider for local subsistence and commercial fishing access. There is no replacement for the CDQ program, and harm to it would come at a severe cost. As one resident framed it, CDQ is to Western Alaska communities, what oil is to Alaska.

Consistent with their statutory mandate, CDQ groups have increased their fisheries investments, and their 65 member communities are now major players in the Bering Sea. The foundation of the program is the Bering Sea pollock fishery, 30% of which is owned by CDQ groups. We invest in pollock because it remains one of the most sustainably managed fisheries in the world, backed by rigorous science, with independent observers on every vessel, ensuring that bycatch is carefully monitored and minimized.

We also invest in pollock because the industry is committed to constantly improving and responding to new challenges. We understand the impact that salmon collapses are having on culture and food security in Western Alaska communities. Working with industry partners, we have reduced chinook bycatch to historically low levels and achieved more than an 80% reduction in chum bycatch over the past three years. This is a clear demonstration that CDQ groups and industry are taking the dire salmon situation seriously, despite science that shows bycatch reductions will have very minimal, if any, positive impact on subsistence access.

The effects of recent warm summers on the Bering Sea ecosystem have been well documented by science. This has caused some species to prosper, like sablefish and Bristol Bay sockeye salmon, while others have been negatively impacted, including several species of crab and salmon. Adding to these challenges is the unregulated and growing hatchery production of chum salmon in Russia and Asia, which is competing for limited resources in the Bering Sea, and increasing management challenges.

Advertisement

Attributing the current salmon crises to this fishery is misguided and could cause unnecessary harm to CDQ communities. Without the pollock fishery, we would see dramatic increases in the cost of food, fuel and other goods that are shipped to rural Alaska. We would also see the collapse of the CDQ program and all that it provides, including a wide array of projects and jobs that help keep families fed and children in school.

The challenges Alaska faces are significant, and to address them we need to collectively work together to mitigate the impacts of warming oceans on our fisheries, build resiliency in our communities and fishery management, and continue to improve practices to minimize fishing impacts. We must also recognize the vital need for the types of community investments and job opportunities that the CDQ program creates for Western Alaska and ensure these benefits are considered when talking about the Bering Sea pollock fishery.

Eric Deakin is chief executive officer of the Coastal Villages Region Fund.

Ragnar Alstrom is executive director of the Yukon Delta Fisheries Development Association.

Michael Link is president and CEO of Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp.

Advertisement

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

‘Drag racing for dogs:’ Anchorage canines gather for the ‘Great Alaska Barkout’

Published

on

‘Drag racing for dogs:’ Anchorage canines gather for the ‘Great Alaska Barkout’


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Alaska’s first “flyball” league held its annual “Great Alaska Barkout Flyball Tournament” on Saturday in midtown at Alyeska Canine Trainers.

Flyball is a fast-paced sport in which relay teams of four dogs and their handlers compete to cross the finish line first while carrying a tennis ball launched from a spring loaded box. Saturday’s tournament was one of several throughout the year held by “Dogs Gone Wild,” which started in 2004 as Alaska’s first flyball league.

“We have here in Alaska, we’ve got, I think it’s about 6 tournaments per year,” said competitor and handler Maija Doggett. “So you know every other month or so there will be a tournament hosted. Most of them are hosted right here at Alyeska Canine Trainers.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

State of Alaska will defend its right to facilitate oil and gas development

Published

on

State of Alaska will defend its right to facilitate oil and gas development


Last week, Superior Court Judge Andrew Guidi indicated he will rule that Alaska does not have authority to permit access across its lands to facilitate oil and gas development on the North Slope.

The Alaska Dept. of Natural Resources plans to fight and appeal any final adverse ruling that undermines the state’s constitutional interests in resource development.

The Department of Natural Resources has issued a permit allowing Oil Search Alaska (OSA) to cross the Kuparuk River Unit, operated by Conoco Phillips Alaska, to develop the Pikka Unit. As described in the State’s brief to the court, “the denial of such access implicates the delay of development of millions of barrels of oil and billions of dollars of public revenues.”

Advertisement

“The State of Alaska has a constitutional obligation to maximize the development of our resources,” DNR Commissioner John Boyle said on Nov. 22. “We have to confirm with the Supreme Court that we have the authority to permit access for all developers to ensure we can meet this obligation.”

Once the Superior Court issues the final judgement, Alaska will be able to file its appeal. This is expected to occur in the coming weeks.

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending