Connect with us

Alaska

Robert Seitz: Yes, I actually am qualified to discuss climate and energy issues

Published

on

Robert Seitz: Yes, I actually am qualified to discuss climate and energy issues


Sitka’s Green Lake Hydroelectric Project. Photo credit: Dept. of Energy

By ROBERT SEITZ

I read through the 25 comments from my recent commentary “Time to fight the assault on energy,”  and the 24 comments on my previous column, “More on climate, politics and energy in Alaska.” 

Some commenters question my motive for my columns, thinking that I am being financed by dark money or have a hidden political agenda. Some think I am not qualified to look at the data and come up with conclusions contrary to thousands of climate scientists they vaguely cite. Then there are some who show that they understand what I present and are supportive of my comments and recommendations. I thank them.

My motivation for writing articles about electrical systems, use of renewable energy in Alaska, and issues of climate concerns is to ensure people of Alaska are provided truth facts to guide them to a right and proper understanding and application of energy resources and to what urgency energy progress must be done. When I work on an electrical design I make sure I know what problem is to be solved or what objective is to be met and then make sure that this is kept in mind during the entire design, building and installation processes.  

Advertisement

I have been investigating renewable and alternate energy resources since 1980 with consideration for their application for remote communities. Diesel fuel was expensive and at high risk of spill. Gathering wood is very time consuming. I have lived remotely in Alaska where the temperature got to -73oF.  I am qualified by training, education and experience to discuss the range of topics I cover.  

And, yes I will go against the reports of thousands of climatologist if what they advocate is wrong, is in error. In graduate school I studied physical oceanography, which included wind waves, ocean currents, tides and tidal currents.  I also studied meteorology, in which I learned of measurements of air temperature, winds, radiation, rainfall and other features. In my studies of Arctic Engineering, I learned about permafrost, soil temperatures, snow, ice (including sea ice), and other aspects of the Arctic.  

Then, with more than 50 years’ experience as an engineer in Alaska, I have successfully engineered systems and overseen their installation, to work with the environments we have in Alaska.  

I support wind, solar or other renewable energy sources to be connected to the Railbelt Electrical system when done to solve a particular problem to benefit the system as long as done with a free market approach, with a goal to  provide cheap electricity reliably and is not done through any legislated mandates.

There are practical reasons to have renewable energy resources incorporated into the Railbelt system. One application would be microgrids scattered through the system to provide power to isolated sections of the Railbelt system to provide local power when there are system wide outages. Battery energy storage systems have been proven over the last 20 years to provide stabilization for the electrical systems.

Advertisement

At least one commenter thinks that I might not have sufficient ability, capability or access to proper data to make an assessment of temperature data in Alaska. Others wonder if I had access to HAD-CRUT (Hadley Centre/Climatic Research Unit Temperature) raw data. Much of the analysis on the HAD-CRUT and other data have been analyzed by comparing average annual temperatures which provide a very steep increase(to show global warming) for the years with less cold temperatures, but do not disclose that the high temperatures are still within normal range and show no great warming trend.  This was the point of my earlier article in which I questioned whether or not Alaska is warming 2 to 4 times faster than the rest of the planet.   

My positions have been:

  • Inclusion of renewable energy sources to the Railbelt Electrical system requires long term energy storage such as pumped hydro to provide the greatest benefit;
  • Any addition or modification of the electrical system must be done according to best and proper engineering practice and must be incorporated to solve a particular problem or provide improvement to the system;
  • Legislation to impose RPS (Renewable Portfolio Standard) and other forms of mandated increase of renewable (wind and solar) are not needed, but demonstrated need and free market forces should be trusted;
  • Cook Inlet gas production needs to be stepped up immediately and expanded sufficiently to ensure the Railbelt utilities can provide electricity and heat year round to ensure safety and economy for the Railbelt for the foreseeable future. In the meantime our future fuel supply can be determined and secured;
  • Alaska is not warming 2 to 4 or even 2 to 3 times faster than the rest of the planet. Temperature data has been in a form that is misleading.  The temperatures are not warming, we have just had less cold in recent winters.

I will continue to present additional information and comments on these and related topics and they will all be topics well within my capability and qualification to discuss.  We will present truth and evaluate the energy requirements and the condition and needs of Alaska and its people fully and accurately.   For those who doubt, keep reading.  I hope to final convince you of the actual reality we live in.

Robert Seitz is a professional electrical engineer and lifelong Alaskan.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Alaska police and US Coast Guard searching for missing plane with 3 people onboard

Published

on

Alaska police and US Coast Guard searching for missing plane with 3 people onboard





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska delegates react to Biden ending 2024 reelection bid, endorsing VP Harris

Published

on

Alaska delegates react to Biden ending 2024 reelection bid, endorsing VP Harris


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – After Sunday’s announcement from President Joe Biden that he will not seek reelection in 2024 and instead endorses Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic party’s presidential nominee, Alaskans on both sides of the aisle shared their impressions and concerns.

Among them was Mike Wenstrup, chair of the Alaska Democratic Party.

“My biggest reaction was just seeing yet another example of how selfless and how much of a patriot President Biden is,” Wenstrup said. “He’s putting this country ahead of his own interest in what he wants. He’s been one of the most consequential presidents of my lifetime. And I think this is just another example of him, putting America first.

Wenstrup also explained how the nomination for president would go forward since many delegates have already pledged votes to Biden.

Advertisement

“Because of President Biden ending his campaign, all his pledged delegates are free to vote for any candidate of their choosing. I do believe there’s going to be a groundswell and movement towards everyone endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris moving forward. I’ve spoken to several of our delegates currently — I’ve spoken also to our leadership — and many of us are at this point that, those that I’ve spoken to, are all strongly supporting Vice President Harris.”

While members of the party decide who will lead their ticket in November, Wenstrup said he supports Harris as the next Democratic presidential nominee.

“I think there’s a ton of great Democratic leaders across the country who would make a great president. Nobody has vice President Harris’s record and her ability to not only unite the party but unite the country and become the first woman president,” he said.

The Alaska Republican Party’s chairman Carmela J. Warfield said in a statement posted to social media that the state’s party stands behind former president Donald Trump.

“The Alaska Republican Party stands united behind President Donald J. Trump and we will win in November,” Warfield wrote.

Advertisement

Other members of the party expressed support for Biden’s decision to withdraw from the upcoming election. Sen. Lisa Murkowski said in a social media post that she respects his decision not to seek reelection.

“I respect President Biden’s decision to act in the best interest of the country by stepping aside in the 2024 presidential election,” Murkowski said.

Rep. Jamie Allard, R-Eagle River, was a delegate at the 2024 Republican National Convention last week that endorsed former president Donald Trump. She doesn’t think the change on the ticket will have much affect on her constituents.

“I don’t think it impacted the constituents in my district — and I say that because we’re going full speed ahead with President Trump and getting him elected with our vice president J.D. Vance,” Allard said. “I wasn’t shocked. I mean, it was coming. We all knew it. There was no surprise. I was like, it’s about time.”

Allard remains steadfast in her support of Trump.

Advertisement

“I believe President Trump will be uniting our country, and we need to move forward. And we all need to come together, reach across the lines to be a unified country. But that doesn’t mean we compromise our values, or compromise our direction in which the country should go in order to be the greatest country in the world.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska’s education department wants a $750,000 external evaluator to study reading law

Published

on

Alaska’s education department wants a 0,000 external evaluator to study reading law


JUNEAU — The Alaska Department of Education and Early Development wants to hire an external evaluator on a $750,000 contract to study how a landmark measure is being implemented to improve reading outcomes for students between kindergarten and third grade.

The external evaluator would help write an annual report on reading improvement programs, and study their cost effectiveness — among other responsibilities. The education department’s contract was put out for bid Thursday.

The contract is set to run through June 30, 2026, with the option for two-year renewals through 2034.

Advertisement

In 2022, the Legislature narrowly approved the Alaska Reads Act on the final day of the legislative session. The wide-ranging measure included targeted reading intervention programs and regular testing.

But some legislators representing rural House districts were critical of the measure, saying it didn’t do enough to account for the challenges of rural education.

Legislators appropriated $5.2 million in May to fund reading support after school administrators complained that the law was underfunded. Gov. Mike Dunleavy vetoed that funding in June.

Alaska’s reading results have long languished at the bottom of national testing results. The bipartisan reading bill was intended to ensure all students could read proficiently by age 9.

After its first year in effect, Dunleavy touted data in June that he said showed students were “experiencing significant advances” in reading as a result of the measure he signed into law.

Advertisement

Some educators countered that implementing the law had been bumpy, and that it was too early to say it had been successful. Others expressed concerns about the rigidity of new testing requirements.

Palmer Republican Sen. Shelley Hughes, who strongly supported the Alaska Reads Act, said Friday that hiring an external evaluator made sense because the state had effectively transitioned from one statewide test to another.

“I think it is important to have a baseline,” she said. “Good data is important in order to measure the progress we’re making.”

Sen. Löki Tobin, D-Anchorage, who was a key legislative staff member behind the Alaska Reads Act, said in June that the law’s implementation had been “a bit of a mixed bag.”

Tobin said by text message Friday that she hadn’t reviewed the education department’s proposal for an evaluator, but the bill’s drafters had wanted a third party to analyze its effectiveness. She said that could help “give policymakers unbiased tools in determining next steps on how we support educators.”

Advertisement

Officials at the state education department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on why an external evaluator was needed, or how that position would improve the law.

In testimony to legislators, school administrators broadly said that Dunleavy’s signature reading measure was underfunded.

Legislators failed by one vote in March to override Dunleavy’s veto of a bill that would have permanently increased school funding at historic levels, and provided school districts with $10 million in dedicated reading support.

As a compromise, legislators approved $175 million in extra one-time school funding in the budget in May. Additionally, $5.2 million was appropriated to support reading. School districts would get $180 for each K-3 student. An extra $100 per student would be allocated to Title 1 schools.

Dunleavy then vetoed the $5.2 million for reading support in June.

Advertisement

Like most vetoes, the cut was explained in an online statement as being needed to “preserve general funds for savings and fiscal stability.” The Dunleavy administration added that school districts received “additional funding support” from the $175 million approved by lawmakers.

Tobin said she anticipated additional budget requests next year to fund intensive reading programs, to support the law’s virtual education consortium, and for professional development support.

• • •





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending