Connect with us

Alaska

‘Red’ Scare: A day on the Kenai

Published

on

‘Red’ Scare: A day on the Kenai


There’s nothing extra balls-out Alaskan than a seven-year-old driving a $30,000 side-by-side. As I’m hauling a bloody, sandy load of fish up the Kenai seaside, toes sloshing in my waders from an unidentified pinhole leak, the child in query comes screeching previous me, ITP Mud-Lite tires throwing up sand, with a motley assortment of his underage associates driving shotgun. The child’s on a mission, and as he slows the Can-Am Defender to a cease to let me cross, his equally pint-sized buddy shrieks, “What’s the DEALIO? Why we STOPPING?”

Each winter, gray whales migrate 12,000 miles south to the nice and cozy waters of Baja California to breed and provides beginning. They then make the journey again up north in the summertime to feed on Alaska’s northern abundance of fish and plankton, rising sturdy within the chilly waters of the North Pacific. And yearly, Alaskans make the identical journey – boarding funds airways and smearing on low cost sunscreen within the lifeless of winter to cavort, carouse, and conceive kids on the seashores of Maui, Cabo, and Palm Seashore. However the summer time – that’s fishing season.

The south seaside the place the Kenai River meets the Cook dinner Inlet resembles nothing a lot as a Mad Max film set between takes. Nearly each type of four-wheel-drive car is represented right here: dented Suburbans, lifted Tacomas, F-150s hauling trailers, Kias, Hondas, Datsuns, Suzukis, all of them start to mix collectively in a cacophonous blur of revving engines, spinning wheels, and flying sand.

Commercial. For details about buying advertisements, please click on right here.

Advertisement

To achieve entry to the south seaside, you must pay the gate payment (a quantity which appears to extend yearly, however at the moment it’s $22) drive off the filth highway, after which rigorously (however speedily) observe the tracks which were left for you by another driver down the seaside for maybe half a mile. Too quick, and also you’ll lose management – too sluggish, and also you’ll lose momentum, necessitating a tow from some diesel driver hiding a smirk.

However he’ll haul you out if the state of affairs calls for it, and the man standing subsequent to you’ll assist give your fish-laden freight sled a push in case your four-wheeler can’t get it going from a lifeless cease, and the nurse taking PTO to restrict out on reds will give you a bloody baseball bat to dispatch your catch because it flops round on the sand, and the Nationwide Guard dudes to the left and proper of you smoking Marlboros and ingesting King Road IPAs will soar in your salmon if it jumps freed from your web and appears to be headed again to the river. I do know, as a result of I noticed it completed 100 instances over the course of two days – a thousand little acts of tough kindness.

The seaside is the “degree taking part in discipline” politicians all the time appear to reference – everybody right here is in pursuit of 1 factor. Each ethnic group is represented, and 100 totally different tongues float by means of the air in a wealthy tapestry of noise. For each white anarchocommunist with dreads studying Utne, ingesting vegan matcha and paying lip service to a “completely free agrarian society,” there’s fifty folks sweating it out in concord with one another on the Kenai seaside, ready to dash in the direction of the sand and attempt to haul a crimson, flipping and splashing, into their battered Yeti cooler.

In idea, dipnetting is straightforward. Yearly, within the late summer time, thousands and thousands of crimson salmon make their means again up the Kenai to spawn. It’s your job to intercept them, by standing within the water with a big, long-handled web, ready for a fish swimming upstream to run into it. It’s a mode of fishing so easy a toddler might determine it out (and lots of do, beneath risk of parental punishment) and so efficient that it’s restricted to residents solely, for private subsistence. Every little thing you catch right here goes into your freezer, smoker, or soup pot.

As you wait within the water, shivering, dodging boat wake from the bowpickers coming and going, you catch little snippets of dialog.

“A buddy of mine … he was on a flat backside river boat, most beat up fuckin’ factor I ever noticed, possibly 15 toes lengthy, like that one on the market… he was on the boat with a buddy and so they had been going throughout the inlet possibly ten years in the past… and swiftly, a beluga jumps out of the water proper in entrance of them – SCREAMING – and proper behind it? Killer whale… from the place I’m standing to the truck…” 

Advertisement

The four-wheeler isn’t a requirement, but it surely definitely helps when, after six hours of gill-popping and net-hauling, you’re canine drained however there’s 150 kilos of fish to be hauled uphill to the automobile. Throughout, Yamaha Grizzlies, Honda Ranchers, Can-Am Outlanders, and Kawasaki Brute Forces zip round, pulling sleds and trailers and typically, entire households from automobile to seaside and again once more. My very own rig, a mid-90s Suzuki King Quad that I’ve dubbed the “Cockroach” for its beat-up plastic fenders and perceived “unkillable” standing, sits ready to drag my fish to the automobile, or me to the outhouse, because the case could also be.

Commercial. For details about buying advertisements, please click on right here.

Oxford

“I take a sip of beer – fish is gonna hit. I mild a cig – fish is gonna hit. After which I’m gonna need to haul it out and I’ll spill my beer or drop my cig, but when I don’t have both, there’s no fish. So I can’t have fuckin’ SHIT, is what I’m getting from this.”

As I’m staring up and down the seaside, taking within the scene and observing, Bateman-like, all of the totally different manufacturers of ATVs, my web shakes, and I shove my Montucky Chilly Snack again into my wader entrance pocket. (The man ingesting a Coors to the left of me voiced his need for a wader with a cupholder, and I’d need to say I agree with him.) I slosh out of the water, throw the online up onto the financial institution, and extricate my catch. He’s good and caught, gilled within the nylon dipnet fibers, and as I untwist the online and pop his gills, sending a spurt of blood and slime down my arm, I can’t assist however really feel a bit unhappy, as I assume many do.

Like me, all this chromey little fucker needed was to get laid – in actual fact, he was spending the final of his power to stand up the Kenai to shoot a load on some eggs, after which die, in a fugue of post-coital bliss. As a substitute, nevertheless, he’s flopping his final inside a bloodstained Igloo cooler. There, however for the grace of God… one thing, one thing.

“Pay attention man, you don’t wish to take off straight up the hill, as a result of that freight sled, all it needs to do is dig into the sand. Begin the wheeler off sideways, let her choose up some pace, after which flip up the hill. She’ll haul a fuckin’ grizzly bear in the event you begin it proper…”

Advertisement

The tide modifications, the present quickens, and it turns into tougher and tougher to carry my web straight out in entrance. The man subsequent to me, taking part in Alabama Shakes on a water-proof speaker hooked up to his wader strap, wanting vaguely Unabomber-esque in a hoodie and sun shades, is equally struggling. At this level within the course of, issues will typically shift from a static netting line, to a mass stroll upstream and drift downstream, working with the present in a loop of a number of hundred yards. So I and thirty or forty different beleaguered, soaked fishermen haul out, trudge up the seaside, into the water, and again downstream, pulling out to repeat the method once we hit the road of stationary holdouts, stubbornly combating the present, or once we get a fish. It seems to be easy, however after the 20 th or thirtieth loop, dodging web handles, fingers bleeding from popping sharp salmon gills, toes soaked and blistering inside ill-fitting wader boots, it appears like nothing wanting a sub-Arctic Bataan Demise March.

So why do it? Why undergo this type of early-morning fishing low-grade torture – it’s loud, not notably glamorous, and crowded. For the value of gasoline and parking, you possibly can float the river and not less than get a pleasant view out of the entire deal.

We do that for a similar purpose folks go to Costco – sacrifice luxurious and aesthetic for a bulk acquisition of extremely fascinating, natural, wild-caught protein. Possibly that metaphor’s a bit crude, but it surely’s the reality. The Kenai, for all of the criticisms that may be levied at it by fishing snobs, is extremely efficient at producing crimson salmon in bulk for the private subsistence fisherman.

However I believe there’s a bit extra to it than that, some type of deeper intuition that drives folks all the way down to the river en masse in July. They go, the folks which were doing this for years, even many years, for a similar purpose elephants migrate and that geese fly south for the winter. Go the place the meals is. The lizard-brained freelance columnist, driving a beat-up Chevy Suburban, can determine that one out as simple as any would-be Izaak Walton, kitted out with a bamboo flyrod and a raised eyebrow.

A raveled wanting mother runs previous me as I’m assembling my web. “Have you ever seen a bit boy run previous right here?” she asks, frantically, and I haven’t, I’m sorry. However not 30 seconds later, an enormous man in an Alaskan Amber sweatshirt, gingerly holding the hand of a small boy, walks by and calls out to ask if “anybody’s lacking a child?” I level him within the mother’s course, and shortly, there’s a reunion on the seaside. The dipnetters look out for their very own.

Advertisement

Jacob Hersh was born and raised in Anchorage, Alaska. He just lately graduated from Washington State College with a level in political science. He’s again in Alaska taking a yr off earlier than he attends legislation college. He’s been described as neurotic, emotionally distant, and unhealthily obsessive about nationwide politics – all by the identical individual.

Commercial. For details about buying advertisements, please click on right here.

Advertise with Landmine



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Legislative task force offers possible actions to rescue troubled Alaska seafood industry • Alaska Beacon

Published

on

Legislative task force offers possible actions to rescue troubled Alaska seafood industry • Alaska Beacon


Alaska lawmakers from fishing-dependent communities say they have ideas for ways to rescue the state’s beleaguered seafood industry, with a series of bills likely to follow.

Members of a legislative task force created last spring now have draft recommendations that range from the international level, where they say marketing of Alaska fish can be much more robust, to the hyper-local level, where projects like shared community cold-storage facilities can cut costs.

The draft was reviewed at a two-day hearing in Anchorage Thursday and Friday of the Joint Legislative Task Force Evaluating Alaska’s Seafood Industry. It will be refined in the coming days, members said.

The bill that created the task force, Senate Concurrent Resolution 10, sets a deadline for a report to the full Legislature of Jan. 21, which is the scheduled first day of the session. However, a final task force report may take a little longer and be submitted as late as Feb. 1, said Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak, the group’s chair.

Advertisement

The draft is a good start to what is expected to be a session-long process, said Rep. Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak, a task force member.

“We can hit the ground running because we’re got some good solid ideas,” Stutes said in closing comments on Friday. The session can last until May 20 without the Legislature voting to extend it.

Another task force member, Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, urged his colleagues to focus on the big picture and the main goals.

“We need to take a look at how we can increase market share for Alaska seafood and how we can increase value. Those two things aren’t easy, but those are the only two things that are going to matter long term. Everything else is just throwing deck chairs off the Titanic,” he said Friday.

Many of the recommended actions on subjects like insurance and allocations, if carried out, are important but incremental, Bjorkman said. “If the ship’s going down, that stuff isn’t going to matter,” he said.

Advertisement

Alaska’s seafood industry is beset by crises in nearly all fishing regions of the state and affecting nearly all species.

Economic forces, heavily influenced by international turmoil and a glut of competing Russian fish dumped on world markets, have depressed prices. Meanwhile, operating costs have risen sharply. Climate change and other environmental factors have triggered crashes in stocks that usually support economically important fisheries; Bering Sea king and snow crab fisheries, for example, were closed for consecutive years because stocks were wiped out after a sustained and severe marine heatwave.

Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak, and Rep. Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak, listen to testimony on Thursday from Nicole Kimball of the Pacific Seafood Processors Association. Kimball was among the industry representatives who presented information at the two-day hearing, held on Thursday and Friday, of the Joint Legislative Task Force Evaluating Alaska’s Seafood Industry. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

In all, the Alaska seafood industry lost $1.8 billion from 2022 to 2023, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Those problems inspired the creation of the task force last spring. The group has been meeting regularly since the summer.

Advertisement

The draft recommendations that have emerged from the task force’s work address marketing, product development, workforce shortages, financing, operating costs, insurance and other aspects of seafood harvesting, processing and sales.

One set of recommendations focuses on fisheries research. These call for more state and federal funding and an easy system for fisheries and environmental scientists from the state, federal government and other entities to share data quickly.

The draft recommends several steps to encourage development of new products and markets for them, including non-traditional products like protein powder, nutritional supplements and fish oil. Mariculture should be expanded, with permitting and financing made easier, according to the draft.

The draft recommendations also propose some changes in the structure of seafood taxes levied on harvesters and processors, along with new tax incentives for companies to invest in modernization, product diversification and sustainability.

Other recommendations are for direct aid to fishery workers and fishing-dependent communities in the form of housing subsidies or even development of housing projects. Shortages of affordable housing have proved to be a major challenge for communities and companies, the draft notes. More investment in worker training — using public-private partnerships — and the creation of tax credits or grants to encourage Alaska-resident hire, are also called for in the draft recommendations.

Advertisement

Expanded duties for ASMI?

The Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, the state agency that promotes Alaska seafood domestically and internationally, figures large in the draft recommendations.

The draft calls for more emphasis on the quality and sustainability of Alaska fish and, in general, more responsibilities for ASMI. An example is the recommended expansion of ASMI’s duties to include promotion of Alaska mariculture. That would require legislation, such as an early version of bill that was sponsored by outgoing Rep. Dan Ortiz, I-Ketchikan. It would also require mariculture operators’ willingness to pay into the program.

But ASMI, as it is currently configured, is not equipped to tackle such expanded operations, lawmakers said. Even obtaining modest increases in funding for ASMI has proved to be a challenge. A $10 million increase approved by the Legislature last year was vetoed by Gov. Mike Dunleavy, who cited a failure by ASMI to develop a required plan for the money. 

The governor’s proposed budget released in December includes an increase in state money for ASMI, but his suggestion that $10 million in new funding be spread over three years falls far short of what the organization needs, Stevens said at the time.

Incoming House Speaker and task force member Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham, said there will probably be a need to reorganize or restructure ASMI to make it more autonomous. That might mean partnering with a third party and the creation of more managerial and financial independence from whoever happens to be in political office at the time, as he explained it.

Advertisement

Dillingham, and Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, listen to information presented on Jan. 9, 2025, at a hearing held by the Joint Legislative Take Force Evaluating Alaska's Seafood Industry. Edgmon and Bjorkman are two of the eight task force members. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
House Speaker Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham, and Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, listen to information presented on Thursday at a hearing held by the Joint Legislative Task Force Evaluating Alaska’s Seafood Industry. Edgmon and Bjorkman are two of the eight task force members. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

“The umbilical cord needs to be perhaps cut to some degree,” Edgmon said on Friday, during the hearing’s public comment period. The solution could be to make ASMI more of a private entity, he said.

“Because the world is changing. It’s a global marketplace. We need to have ASMI to have as large a presence as possible,” he said. 

But for now, ASMI and plans for its operations have been constricted by political concerns. “People are afraid of how it’s going to go back to the governor’s office,” Edgmon said.

Federal assistance

U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, spoke to the task force on Thursday about ways the federal government could help the Alaska seafood industry.

One recent success, she said, is passage of the bipartisan Fishery Improvement to Streamline Untimely Regulatory Hurdles post Emergency Situation Act, known as the FISHES Act, which was signed into law a few days earlier.

Advertisement

The act establishes a system to speed fisheries disaster aid. It can take two to three years after a fisheries disaster is declared for relief funds to reach affected individuals, businesses and communities, and that is “unacceptable,” Murkowski said.  The bill addresses that situation, though not perfectly. “It’s still not the best that it could be,” she said.

Another helpful piece of federal legislation that is pending, she said, is the Working Waterfronts Bill she introduced in February. The bill contains provisions to improve coastal infrastructure, coastal energy systems and workforce development.

More broadly, Murkowski said she and others continue to push for legislation or policies to put seafood and fisheries on the same footing as agriculture. That includes the possibility of fishery disaster insurance similar to the crop insurance that is available to farmers, she said.

But getting federal action on seafood, or even attention to it, can be difficult, she said.

“It is a reality that we have faced, certainly since my time in the senate, that seafood has been viewed as kind of an afterthought by many when it comes to a food resource, a source of protein,” she said.

Advertisement

Inclusion of seafood in even simple programs can be difficult to achieve, she said. She cited the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s decision, announced in April, to include canned salmon as a food eligible for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, also known as WIC. She and others had been working for several years to win that approval, she said.

Tariffs a looming threat

Seafood can also be an afterthought in federal trade policy, Murkowski said.

Jeremy Woodrow, at right, fields questions from lawmakers on Jan. 9, 2025, at an Anchorage hearing of the Joint Legislative Task Force Evaluating Alaska's Seafood Industry. Woodrow is executive director of the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute. Next to him is Tim Lamkin, a legislative aide for Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Alaska, the task force chair. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
Jeremy Woodrow, at right, fields questions from lawmakers on Thursday at an Anchorage hearing of the Joint Legislative Task Force Evaluating Alaska’s Seafood Industry. Woodrow is executive director of the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute. Next to him is Tim Lamkin, a legislative aide for Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak, the task force chair. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

Tariffs that President-elect Donald Trump has said he intends to impose on U.S. trade partners pose a serious concern to Alaska’s seafood industry, she said.

“The president-elect has made very, very, very, very clear that this is going to be a new administration and we’re going to use tariffs to our advantage. I don’t know what exactly to expect from that,” she said.

In the past, tariffs imposed by the U.S. government have been answered with retaliatory tariffs that cause problems for seafood and other export-dependent industries.

Advertisement

Jeremy Woodrow, ASMI’s executive director, has similar warnings about tariffs, noting that about 70% of the Alaska seafood, as measured by value, is sold to markets outside of the U.S.

“We tend to be, as an industry, collateral damage in a lot of trade relationships. We’re not the main issue. And that usually is a bad outcome for seafood,” he told the committee on Thursday.

To avoid or mitigate problems, Alaska leaders and the Alaska industry will have to respond quickly and try to educate trade officials about tariff impacts on seafood exports, Woodrow said.

Task force members expressed concerns about impacts to the export-dependent Alaska industry.

“If we raise tariffs on another country, won’t they simply turn around and raise tariffs on us?” asked Stevens.

Advertisement

Tariffs on Chinese products, which Trump has suggested repeatedly, could cause particular problems for Alaska seafood, Stutes said. She pointed to the companies that send fish, after initial processing, to China for further processing in preparation for sale to final markets, some of which are back in the U.S.

“If there is a huge tariff put on products going and coming from China, that would seem to me to have another huge gut shot to those processors that are sending their fish out for processing,” Stutes said.

Bjorkman, a former high school government teacher, said history shows the dangers of aggressive tariff policies.

The isolationist “America-first” approach, as carried out at turns over the past 150 years, “hasn’t worked out very well. It’s been real bad,” Bjorkman said.” As an alternative, he suggested broader seafood promotions, backed by federal or multistate support, to better compete in the international marketplace.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Rural Alaska schools face funding shortfall after U.S. House fails to pass bipartisan bill • Alaska Beacon

Published

on

Rural Alaska schools face funding shortfall after U.S. House fails to pass bipartisan bill • Alaska Beacon


Rural schools, mostly in Southeast Alaska, are facing a major funding shortfall this year after the U.S. House of Representatives failed to reauthorize a bill aimed at funding communities alongside national forests and lands. 

The bipartisan Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act was first passed in 2000, and enacted to assist communities impacted by the declining timber industry. It provided funds for schools, as well as for roads, emergency services and wildfire prevention. The award varies each year depending on federal land use and revenues. The legislation is intended to help communities located near federal forests and lands pay for essential services. In 2023, the law awarded over $250 million nationwide, and over $12.6 million to Alaska.

But this year, the bill passed the Senate, but stalled in the House of Representatives amid partisan negotiations around the stopgap spending bill to keep the government open until March. House Republicans decided not to vote on the bill amid a dispute around health care funding, a spokesperson for the bill’s sponsor, Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, told the Oregon Capital Chronicle, which first reported the story. 

Eleven boroughs, as well as unincorporated areas, in the Tongass and Chugach national forests have typically received this funding, awarded through local municipalities. According to 2023 U.S. Forest Service data, some of the districts who received the largest awards, and now face that shortfall, include Ketchikan, Wrangell, Petersburg, Sitka and Yakutat, as well as the unincorporated areas. 

Advertisement

“We’re already at our bottom,” said Superintendent Carol Pate of the Yakutat School District, which received over $700,000 in funding, one of the largest budget sources for its 81 students. 

“We are already down to one administrator with six certified teachers,” Pate said in a phone interview Thursday. “We have a small CTE (career and technical education) program. We don’t have any art, we don’t have any music. We have limited travel. Anything that we lose means we lose instruction, and our goal is for the success of our students.”

Yakatat is facing a $126,000 deficit this year, a large sum for their $2.3 million budget, Pate said. “So that’s a pretty significant deficit for us. We do our best to be very conservative during the school year to make up that deficit. So wherever we can save money, we do.” 

The school has strong support from the borough, Pate said. However, last year they were forced to cut funding for one teacher and a significant blow for the school, she said. 

Advertisement

“We’re trying very hard to break the cycle, but it’s a continuing cycle,” she said. “Every time we lose something, we lose kids because of it, and the more kids we lose, the more programs we lose.”

In the southern Tongass National Forest community of Wrangell, the school district received over $1 million in funds last year, and Superintendent Bill Burr said the federal funding loss is dramatic. 

“It’s pretty devastating from a community standpoint,” Burr said in a phone interview. “Because that is very connected to the amount of local contribution that we get from our local borough, it has a dramatic effect on the school district, so I’m disappointed.”

“As these cuts continue to happen, there’s less and less that we’re able to do,” he said. “School districts are cut pretty much as thin as they can. So when these things happen, with no real explanation, the impact for districts that do receive secure schools funding is even more dramatic.”

Whether and how the funding loss will impact the district has yet to be determined, as budgets for next year are still in development, Burr said, but it could mean cuts to matching state grants, facilities projects, or staff salaries. He said most non-state money for the district comes from the federal program.

Advertisement

“Part of our funding does come from sales tax, but a majority of it comes from the secure rural schools (grant),” he said. “So without increases in other areas, the amount of money that can come to the schools is going to be injured.”

“We do have contracts, and a majority of our money is paid in personnel. So we would have those contracts to fill, regardless of the funding, until the end of the year. A major reduction really will affect our ability to provide school services and personnel, so it could have a massive impact on next year’s, the fiscal ‘26 year, budget,” he said. 

The district is facing an over $500,000 budget deficit this year, Burr said, and so the loss puts further pressure on the district.

“So we’re continuing to find areas that we can cut back but still provide the same service. But that’s getting harder and harder,” he said. 

The schools in unincorporated areas known as regional educational attendance areas, received over $6 million in funding through the program.  

Advertisement

Alaska Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan supported the bill through the Senate.

Murkowski was disappointed that the bill was not reauthorized, a spokesperson for the senator said. 

“As a longtime advocate for this program, she recognizes its critical role in funding schools and essential services in rural communities,” said Joe Plesha, in a text Friday. “She is actively working to ensure its renewal so that states like Alaska are not disadvantaged.”

Former Alaska Rep. Mary Peltola also supported the funding. 

Alaska’s school funding formula is complex, and takes into account the local tax base, municipalities’ ability to fund schools, and other factors. With the loss of funding for the local borough’s portion, whether the Legislature will increase funding on the state’s side is to be determined. 

Advertisement

The Department of Education and Early Development did not respond to requests for comment on Friday. 

Superintendents Burr and Pate described hope for the upcoming legislative session, and an increase in per-pupil spending. “The loss of secure rural schools funding makes it even more difficult to continue with the static funding that education in the state has received,” Burr said. 

“I really have high hopes for this legislative season. I think that the people that we’ve elected recognize the need to put funding towards education,” Pate said. 

The funding could be restored, if the legislation is reintroduced and passed by Congress. Both Oregon Democratic Sen. Wyden and Idaho Republican Sen. Mike Crapo have said they support passing the funding this year.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Raised In Alaska Spotting Moose And Grizzly On Trail Cameras

Published

on

Raised In Alaska Spotting Moose And Grizzly On Trail Cameras


We’re sharing some of the Last Frontier adventures of the popular YouTube account Raised In Alaska. This week: Moose and grizzly trail camera shots.

YouTube screenshot/Raised In Alaska

Subscribe to Raised In Alaska on YouTube. Follow on X, formerly known as Twitter (@akkingon).

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending