Connect with us

Alaska

Power outage plagues Western Alaska town for days

Published

on

Power outage plagues Western Alaska town for days


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – For weeks, many residents in Manokotak have been living in the dark and cold as a generator failure left them without power in the middle of winter.

In the days since, there has been uncertainty surrounding when the lights will come back on in the small Western Alaska community.

“We need [a] new generator big enough to run community with the school. Logistics is a challenge with bringing one in,” Manokotak Mayor Melvin Andrew said. ” [The] airport’s not suitable for aircraft big enough to haul it. Another option is bringing just a motor to run the current ‘big’ generator.”

Since Dec. 13, when a generator failure left the community without reliable electricity, the city has had to alternate power to homes by switching lines on a grid, but that has resulted in frequent blackouts, sometimes lasting all day or all night, according to Andrew.

Advertisement

During the first week of power issues, Andrew said many in the city had to use personal generators, while others had to seek shelter in the school, which has been turned into an emergency shelter and remains that way to date.

On Dec. 21, Manokotak passed an emergency ordinance declaring a disaster and requesting state assistance after the Alaska Energy Authority declared an emergency for Manokotak Power Company, owned and operated by Manokotak Natives, Ltd.,

State Rep. Bryce Edgmon, who represents most of Bristol Bay and the Alaska Peninsula, said will help the community to approach outside entities for help.

“You’re looking at generators that are fairly aged as well, been around a long time. You’re looking at a community having to sort of suddenly pivot and sort of go into emergency shelter mode. That’s not easy to do,” Edgmon said.

As reported by the mayor, while the city waited for aid, they have had to endure frozen pipes, lack of heat, and an inability to cook or heat homes, especially in the newer housing units with electric ranges.

Advertisement

Andrew said city officials contacted the Bristol Bay Native Corporation and Bristol Bay Native Association for assistance on Dec. 22, agreeing to provide cots, blankets, food, milk, juice, and small propane bottles.

The city also started using local emergency management to check on the elderly and disabled and those known to have only electricity to heat and cook. Andrew said the community also faced challenges in getting reliable cell service on the same day.

Andrew reported that by Dec. 23, two loads of supplies donated by BBNC, BBNA Food Bank, and SAFE had arrived in the city.

Andrew also reported that the lights were still unstable, as the city tried to alternate power to homes with power in phases. A Facebook message stated that the school had counted 23 people taking shelter at the time and that community members had been donating food, coffee, and other items.

The mayor also reported that the city was preparing for a winter storm and would have to wait for the weather to lift for the initial supplies donated by BBNC, BBNA, and SAFE.

Advertisement

The city was dealing with plummeting temperatures and unstable power and had only one small generator for the community, alternating a three-phase grid, Andrew said. The school was running on its own generator, but on Dec. 27, the mayor reported that its lights had also gone out.

Manokotak residents received some good news when city officials received the initial supplies they had been waiting for, as reported by the mayor. On Dec. 28, a second set of supplies from BBNC, carrying food from Anchorage, was expected to be in the city over the New Year’s weekend.

“Red Cross sent 60 cots with blankets. NAC donated transport to Dillingham [Thursday]. Expect them in Manokotak on [Dec. 30],” Andrew wrote on Thursday.

With electricity remaining stable for 30 hours in the community, things were beginning to look up by the New Year’s weekend until Andrew received a message from Alyssa Apalayak, utility manager with the Manokotak Power Company.

“[We] have not-so-great news … one of the parts was the wrong size, but Moses is going to talk with Kyler from AEA. I asked him to call him to explain what is going on and maybe discuss what we need now,” Andrew wrote.

Advertisement

The mayor said city officials had to work with used parts with the uncertainty of how long they would last, another setback to what had already been a challenging ordeal.

Andrew reported Friday that the power had been on continuously for 48 hours.

While the mayor and Rep. Edgmon praised the community, city administrator Nancy George, and the regional local government specialist Cindy Roque for initiating the emergency ordinance request to the governor and banding together, the mayor says they are not out of the woods yet.

”My recommendation to them from here in Dillingham was that they look at this through the lens of sort of an immediate-term fix — which they of course are — but also a long-term fix that might involve barging up an entirely new generator or something like that, when the conditions allow for it later on this year,” Edgmon said. “And as a member of the Alaska legislature, that’s something that myself and Sen. Hoffman will be looking closely at providing that funding for.”

Advertisement



Source link

Alaska

Mat-Su Initial Attack Responding to Fire in Flat Lake

Published

on

Mat-Su Initial Attack Responding to Fire in Flat Lake


An engine and firefighters from the Division of Forestry & Fire Protection’s Mat-Su Area are responding to a fire near Flat Lake.

A caller reported a fire on an island in Flat Lake, with 2 foot flame lengths and structures near by.

The engine crew responding will be shuttled by boat to the fire. The fire is currently reported as .1 acre, creeping and smoldering.

Advertisement

Additional updates will be shared as they become available.

‹ Pioneer Peak Hotshots, Gannett Glacier Crew Join Fight Against 2 Fires Near Ruby

Categories: Active Wildland Fire

Tags: #FireYear2026 #2026AKFIRESEASON, 2026 Alaska Fire Season



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Opinion: Alaska’s $10,000 question: Leave or stay?

Published

on

Opinion: Alaska’s ,000 question: Leave or stay?


A new home under construction in Potter Valley in Anchorage. (Loren Holmes / ADN)

This June, two very different offers reach Alaska families, and both amount to the same thing: $10,000. The difference is everything.

Bill Walker, running for governor, would hand every eligible Alaskan a one-time $10,000 check and then end the Permanent Fund dividend for good. Ask one question: Where does his $10,000 come from?

It comes from the Permanent Fund, the people’s own money and the savings Alaskans built for their children. Walker would spend that endowment once to pay Alaskans to give up the yearly dividend forever.

Think about what that does. It cancels the annual check that gives a family a reason to keep an Alaska address and replaces it with a single payout. You hand people their own savings, call it a gift and cut the tie that held them here in the same motion. It is the oldest mistake in governing money: raid what you have saved to buy a moment’s applause and call the spending generosity.

Advertisement

A plan that spends the people’s savings to send the people away is not bold. It is foolish.

Now consider the other $10,000. Through Alaska Housing Finance Corp., the state offers families up to $10,000 to build a new, energy-efficient home. AHFC raids nothing. It earns its own way. Over the years, it has returned more than $2 billion to the state treasury, and it spends some of that income the way any good business does: to win a customer.

Here, the customer is an Alaskan who wants to own a home, put down roots and stay.

That is the oldest sound move in business: Invest a little of what you earn to bring in someone who stays. The homeowner remains, the community gains a family and the corporation keeps earning. The money spent comes back. A plan that puts earnings to work to bring people home is not charity. It is clever.

Same amount. Opposite source. Opposite wisdom. One spends savings; the other spends earnings. One pays Alaskans to leave; the other pays them to stay. One empties the state; the other fills it.

Advertisement

This Homeownership Month, the choice is the size of a single check, and the whole question is where the check comes from and what it asks of you. Ten thousand dollars of your own fund, to wave you goodbye. Or $10,000, earned and reinvested, to help you stay and build.

Evan Swensen is the publisher of Publication Consultants in Anchorage and the author of “What’s the Money For: A Permanent Fund Mortgage Proposal.”

• • •

The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan’s primary challenger who has the same name is eligible for ballot, judge rules

Published

on

Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan’s primary challenger who has the same name is eligible for ballot, judge rules


man with the same name and party affiliation as Alaska Republican U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan is eligible to challenge the senator in the August primary, a judge ruled Friday.

Superior Court Judge Thomas Matthews’ ruling overturns a June 15 decision by Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher to disqualify the challenger and keep him off the primary ballot. Matthews’ ruling can be appealed to the state Supreme Court.

Attorneys for the state have said Tuesday is the deadline for a final ruling so that ballots for the Aug. 18 primary can be printed.

The judge ruled that the division’s decision to exclude Dan J. Sullivan because his candidacy was not “in good faith” was not based on the Constitution, Alaska law or the division’s own regulations. The retired teacher from the small fishing community of Petersburg filed to challenge the incumbent.

Advertisement

Dan Sullivan, who has filed to run for U.S. Senate in Alaska, poses for a photo Friday, June 26, 2026, in Petersburg, Alaska.

Katie Holmlund/AP Photo


“Instead, the decision was based upon a new, previously unstated, ‘good faith’ criteria,” the judge wrote.

The division is appealing the decision, Sam Curtis, a spokesperson with the state Department of Law, said by email Saturday. Jeffrey Robinson, an attorney for Dan J. Sullivan, said in an email he expected the division to appeal and couldn’t comment until the Alaska Supreme Court rules on the case.

Advertisement

The controversy over the two Dan Sullivans has underscored the stakes involved in the incumbent’s reelection campaign. The Alaska race is one of about half a dozen U.S. Senate races expected to be highly competitive in the fall, and the seat is one Democrats are trying to flip in their efforts to try to regain the majority. But it’s expected to be an uphill battle in a state that President Trump won by 13 points in 2024.

The senator and allies, including the National Republican Senatorial Committee, have condemned the challenger’s efforts to join the race, arguing his presence could confuse voters. Republican Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom earlier this month opened an investigation into the non-Senator Sullivan’s candidacy.

Under Alaska’s election system, the top four candidates from the primary, regardless of party, move on to the ranked-choice November general election.

The senator has accused the challenger Sullivan of working with Democrats and the campaign of Democratic former U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola — who is considered the senator’s main opponent — to cause confusion and boost Peltola’s chances. The sitting senator brought the situation to reporters’ attention at the Capitol earlier this month, accusing Democrats of being “complicit in trying to trick Alaskans” to “rig an election in their favor.” 

Dan Sullivan

Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, speaks to reporters at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., June 30, 2025.

Advertisement

Mark Schiefelbein/AP Photo


Peltola’s campaign and state Democrats have denied the allegation, as has the challenger.

Sen. Sullivan and Peltola are the highest-profile candidates in the crowded race and the only ones to report raising any money.

Beecher has said she determined the challenger Sullivan is not eligible to run because his candidacy was not filed in good faith and instead was done with an intent to confuse voters. She said he had registered to vote as Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. and, in conjunction with his candidacy, changed his party affiliation to Republican. She also cited similarities between his campaign website and the senator’s, and his work with a consultant whose clients have included some Democrats. She did not mention finding any evidence of alleged coordination.

In arguing to keep the challenger disqualified, attorneys for the state pushed back on suggestions the ballot could be designed in a way to reduce voter confusion over two candidates with the same name and party running for the same office.

Advertisement

“The Constitution does not require States to place a sham candidate on the ballot and then attempt to mitigate the damage through design choices,” attorney Rachel Witty, with the Alaska Department of Law, and outside attorneys Christopher Murray and Michael Francisco wrote in court filings.

Attorneys for the challenger Sullivan argued that the Constitution lays out three exclusive qualifications for the Senate, addressing only age, citizenship and residency. They said Beecher lacked the legal authority to boot their client off the ballot.

The challenger Sullivan has said that sharing a name and party affiliation with the incumbent gave him “an instant megaphone.” But the 69-year-old retired teacher and former U.S. Forest Service employee said he had considered a run for some time and had grown frustrated with the senator.

He initially was certified on the state’s candidate list as Dan J. Sullivan, with the senator listed as Dan S. Sullivan and identified as the incumbent.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending