Connect with us

Alaska

New Ketchikan company aims to kick-start Alaska kelp industry – KRBD

Published

on

New Ketchikan company aims to kick-start Alaska kelp industry – KRBD


Nick Stern holds up a strand of giant kelp, after harvesting it from a wild kelp bed near Ketchikan on Thursday, March 13, 2025. (Michael Fanelli/KRBD)

On a clear March afternoon, John Smet shut off the engine of his workboat as he approached his go-to wild kelp bed. It was high tide, so less kelp was pooling on the surface of the water, making it harder to see.

As the boat drifted ahead, his business partner Nick Stern noticed a kelp strand within reach. Using a gardening rake, he pulled it on board, cut off a few feet and threw the rest back. As Stern held up the shiny seaweed for a photo op, Smet explained the basic anatomy of Macrocystis pyrifera, the species known as giant kelp.

“So you have the blade, pneumatocyst, which is the little air pocket, and then stipe,” Smet said.

Giant kelp is probably what you picture when someone says “kelp,” those flowing golden-brown towers that fish dart through and sea otters like to sleep on top of. And this species is what brought the two entrepreneurs to Ketchikan. 

Advertisement

After working several years in New York finance, the college friends decided to quit their jobs and start a company that could be both profitable and good for the planet. Stern grew up working on a garlic farm, so Smet said they wanted to focus on agriculture.

“We looked at a lot of different businesses, things like spirulina, or on-land-aquaculture, mushrooms, greenhouses, vertical farming,” Smet said. “And we thought that kelp was by far the most environmentally beneficial. And we thought, ‘Oh, there could really be a business here.’”

They settled on giant kelp because it’s one of the world’s fastest growing organisms, at up to two feet per day. That means their new company Pacific Kelp Co., can grow more biomass in a given area, making for a more efficient business model. They just got permitted to start a giant kelp farm in the waters off of Duke Island, and they plan to begin planting this summer.

Kelp farming is still a young industry in Alaska, but one that’s created a lot of excitement. Farmers throughout the state’s coastal communities can grow high quality kelp, a type of seaweed, but they’ve been hampered by a lack of local processing and insufficient demand for their products.

The Pacific Kelp founders think they can help address both of those issues. 

Advertisement

They’ve been refining giant kelp into a liquid extract that they think can have big implications for the terrestrial farming world. They just received a grant to work with two universities, studying the benefits their extract has on growing wine grapes and grass. If it’s proven to work as they hope, it could drive up demand for kelp throughout Alaska.

John Smet points out the various parts of a giant kelp strand. (Michael Fanelli/KRBD)

And Pacific Kelp Co. will soon have something else to help their industry neighbors: a processing facility. Back on dry land, Stern stood inside a warehouse just south of downtown Ketchikan.

“With the equipment we have today, we can do about 1,000 kilograms or 2,200 pounds of raw kelp per day,” Stern said, pointing to their shredder and other machinery.

The company is sharing the space with local dive fisherman, but say they have plenty of room to process kelp from other regional farms and their own. Alaska currently has very few kelp processors, which makes it difficult and expensive to get the cumbersome raw product to markets in the Lower 48. Stern said that’s an industry gap they’re trying to fill.

“We’ve had talks with kelp farmers up in Kodiak and Juneau, over in Prince of Wales,” Stern said. “So once we’re up and running, [we can] buy their product, process it for them, and distribute and sell it into markets that we have been spending the better part of the last two years trying to cultivate and build.”

Part of that market cultivation process is proving that their liquified kelp extract can be an effective biostimulant, a specialized type of fertilizer. Kyle Wickings is one of two researchers they’ve partnered with to conduct field trials to demonstrate the value of their product. He’s a Cornell biologist who studies grass (officially called “turfgrass”) and he thinks Pacific Kelp’s fertilizer could help make grass, or any number of other plants, more resistant to stressors like drought and pests. And as bans on certain insecticides go into effect, Wickings said this extract could help farmers replace them.

Advertisement

“When you’ve got the potential for a product like a seaweed extract to sort of up regulate those defenses and stress tolerance of the plant, that’s, I think, what drives a lot of the interest across the whole range of different agricultural sectors,” Wickings said.

The $500,000 research grant comes from the Southeast Conference, a regional economic development organization. The goal of the project is to strengthen Alaska’s mariculture industry while contributing to broader agricultural sustainability efforts. Stern hopes the research will stir up demand for kelp products by showing that they can save farmers money on things like irrigation and synthetic fertilizer.

“If every school in the country is spraying kelp on their turf grass, they’re using a lot less water and fertilizer, but they’re also using a lot more Alaskan kelp,” Stern said.

Pacific Kelp plans to get their extract certified as a basic fertilizer and onto shelves in the next few months. The research project over the next two years will help the company complete the much more rigorous process to register as a specialized biostimulant.

Nick Stern pours Pacific Kelp’s nutrient dense liquified kelp extract on Feb. 13, 2025. (John Smet)



Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Alaska delegation mixed on Venezuela capture legality, day before presidential war powers vote

Published

on

Alaska delegation mixed on Venezuela capture legality, day before presidential war powers vote


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Alaska’s congressional delegation had mixed reactions Wednesday on the legality of the Trump administration’s actions in Venezuela over the weekend, just a day before they’re set to vote on a bill ending “hostilities” in Venezuela.

It comes days after former Venezuelan Nicolás Maduro was captured by American forces and brought to the United States in handcuffs to face federal drug trafficking charges.

All U.S. Senators were to be briefed by the administration members at 10 a.m. ET Wednesday, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, according to CBS News.

Spokespersons for Alaska Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, say they were at that meeting, but from their responses, the two shared different takeaways.

Advertisement

Sullivan, who previously commended the Trump administration for the operation in Venezuela, told KDLL after his briefing that the next steps in Venezuela would be done in three phases.

“One is just stabilization. They don’t want chaos,” he said.

“The second is to have an economic recovery phase … and then finally, the third phase is a transition to conduct free and fair elections and perhaps install the real winner of the 2024 election there, which was not Maduro.”

Murkowski spokesperson Joe Plesha said she had similar takeaways to Sullivan on the ousting of Maduro, but still held concerns on the legality.

“Nicolás Maduro is a dictator who led a brutally oppressive regime, and Venezuela and the world are better places without him in power,” Plesha said in a statement Wednesday. “While [Murkowski] continues to question the legal and policy framework that led to the military operation, the bigger question now is what happens next.”

Advertisement

Thursday, the Senate will decide what happens next when they vote on a war powers resolution which would require congressional approval to “be engaged in hostilities within or against Venezuela,” and directs the president to terminate the use of armed forces against Venezuela, “unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force.”

Several House leaders have also received a briefing from the administration according to CBS News. A spokesperson for Rep. Nick Begich, R-Alaska, said he received a House briefing and left believing the actions taken by the administration were legal.

“The information provided in today’s classified House briefing further confirmed that the actions taken by the Administration to obtain Maduro were necessary, time-dependent, and justified; and I applaud our military and the intelligence community for their exceptional work in executing this operation,” Begich said in a statement.

Looming vote

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-VA, authored the war powers resolution scheduled for debate Thursday at 11 a.m. ET — 7 a.m. AKST.

It’s a resolution which was one of the biggest topics of discussion on the chamber floors Wednesday.

Advertisement

Sen. Rand Paul, R-KY, said on the Senate floor Wednesdya that the actions taken by the administration were an “act of war,” and the president’s capture of Maduro violated the checks and balances established in the constitution, ending his remarks by encouraging his colleagues to vote in favor of the resolution.

“The constitution is clear,” Paul said. “Only Congress can declare a war.”

If all Democrats and independents vote for the Kaine resolution, and Paul keeps to his support, the bill will need three more votes to pass. If there is a tie, the vice president is the deciding vote.

“It’s as if a magical dust of soma has descended through the ventilation systems of congressional office buildings,” Paul continued Wednesday, referring to a particular type of muscle relaxant.

“Vague faces in permanent smiles and obedient applause indicate the degree that the majority party has lost its grip and have become eunuchs in the thrall of presidential domination.”

Advertisement

Legality of actions under scrutiny

U.S. forces arrested Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, from their Caracas home in an overnight operation early Saturday morning, Alaska time. Strikes accompanying the capture killed about 75 people, including military personnel and civilians, according to U.S. government officials granted anonymity by The Washington Post.

Maduro pleaded not guilty Monday in a New York courtroom to drug trafficking charges that include leading the “Cartel of the Suns,” a narco-trafficking organization comprised of high-ranking Venezuelan officials. The U.S. offered a $50 million reward for information leading to his capture.

Whether the U.S. was legally able to capture Maduro under both domestic and international law has been scrutinized in the halls of Congress. Members of the administration, like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have been open in defending what they say was a law enforcement operation carrying out an arrest warrant, The Hill reports. Lawmakers, like Paul or Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-NY, say the actions were an act of war and a violation of the constitution.

While the president controls the military as commander in chief, Congress constitutionally has the power to declare wars. Congressional Democrats have accused Trump of skirting the Constitution by not seeking congressional authorization before the operation.

Murkowski has not outright condemned or supported the actions taken by the administration, saying in a statement she was hopeful the world was safer without Maduro in power, but the way the operation was handled is “important.”

Advertisement

Sullivan, on the other hand, commended Trump and those involved in the operation for forcing Maduro to “face American justice,” in an online statement.

Begich spokesperson Silver Prout told Alaska’s News Source Monday the Congressman believed the operation was “a lawful execution of a valid U.S. arrest warrant on longstanding criminal charges against Nicolás Maduro.”

The legality of U.S. military actions against Venezuela has taken significant focus in Washington over the past several months, highlighted by a “double-tap” strike — a second attack on the same target after an initial strike — which the Washington Post reported killed people clinging to the wreckage of a vessel after the military already struck it. The White House has confirmed the follow-up attack.

Advertisement

Sullivan, who saw classified video of the strike, previously told Alaska’s News Source in December he believed actions taken by the U.S. did not violate international law.

“I support them doing it, but they have to get it right,” he said. “I think so far they’re getting it right.”

Murkowski, who has not seen the video, previously said at an Anchorage press event the takeaways on that strike’s legality seem to be divided along party lines.

“I spoke to a colleague who is on the Intelligence Committee, a Republican, and I spoke to a colleague, a Democrat, who is on the Senate Armed Services Committee … their recollection or their retelling of what they saw [was] vastly different.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

National Native helpline for domestic violence and sexual assault to open Alaska-specific service

Published

on

National Native helpline for domestic violence and sexual assault to open Alaska-specific service


A national support line for Native survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault has begun work to launch an Alaska-specific service. Strong Hearts Native Helpline is a Native-led nonprofit that offers 24-hour, seven-day-a-week support for anonymous and confidential calls from people who have experienced domestic violence or sexual assault. The line is staffed by Native […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Dozens of vehicle accidents reported, Anchorage after-school activities canceled, as snowfall buries Southcentral Alaska

Published

on

Dozens of vehicle accidents reported, Anchorage after-school activities canceled, as snowfall buries Southcentral Alaska


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Up to a foot of snow has fallen in areas across Southcentral as of Tuesday, with more expected into Wednesday morning.

All sports and after-school activities — except high school basketball and hockey activities — were canceled Tuesday for the Anchorage School District. The decision was made to allow crews to clear school parking lots and manage traffic for snow removal, district officials said.

“These efforts are critical to ensuring schools can safely remain open [Wednesday],” ASD said in a statement.

The Anchorage Police Department’s accident count for the past two days shows there have been 55 car accidents since Monday, as of 9:45 a.m. Tuesday. In addition, there have been 86 vehicles in distress reported by the department.

Advertisement
Snow measuring up to 17 inches deep in Anchorage, Alaska, on Jan. 6, 2026.(Alaska’s News Source)

The snowfall — which has brought up to 13 inches along areas of Turnagain Arm and 12 inches in Wasilla — is expected to continue Tuesday, according to latest forecast models. Numerous winter weather alerts are in effect, and inland areas of Southcentral could see winds up to 25 mph, with coastal areas potentially seeing winds over 45 mph.

Up to a foot or more of snow has fallen across Southcentral Alaska, with more snow expected...
Up to a foot or more of snow has fallen across Southcentral Alaska, with more snow expected through the day.(Alaska’s News Source)

Some areas of Southcentral could see more than 20 inches of snowfall by Wednesday, with the Anchorage and Eagle River Hillsides, as well as the foothills of the Talkeetna Mountain, among the areas seeing the most snowfall.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending