Connect with us

Alaska

NASA images reveal stark changes in Alaska’s lakes

Published

on

NASA images reveal stark changes in Alaska’s lakes


In the southeastern reaches of Alaska, landscapes are being dramatically reshaped as ice gives way to water.

Recent images released by the NASA Earth Observatory reveal striking changes to the region’s proglacial lakes, formed as glaciers retreat and meltwater pools at their fronts.

Over the past four decades, three lakes—Harlequin, Alsek and Grand Plateau—have grown at an astonishing pace, transforming the region into a burgeoning “lake district.”

The trio of glaciers feeding these lakes—Yakutat, Alsek and Grand Plateau—descend from Alaska’s inland mountains to the coastal plain southeast of Yakutat borough.

Advertisement

Drag slider

compare photos

Before
After

Glaciers are massive, slow-moving rivers of ice formed from compacted layers of snow that accumulate over centuries, flowing under their own weight and reshaping the landscapes they traverse.

An analysis by glaciologist Mauri Pelto of Nichols College highlights the dramatic retreat of these glaciers between 1984 and 2024.

During this time, Yakutat Glacier’s main arm retreated 4.3 miles, and Alsek Glacier’s northern and southern arms retreated 3.3 miles and 3.4 miles, respectively.

Grand Plateau Glacier’s northern arm saw the most significant change, retreating 4.8 miles.

Advertisement

These changes were captured in a pair of satellite images from the Landsat 5 and Landsat 8 satellites in the summers of 1984 and 2024, revealing how water now fills the void left by ice. Together, the three lakes almost doubled in size over the 40-year period.

In 1984, the lakes spanned about 50 square miles. By 2024, they covered 90 square miles—an area larger than New York’s Seneca Lake, one of the Finger Lakes also carved by ancient glaciers.

“The lakes that are forming in this region are immense, starting at the mountains and spreading toward the coast, making this a new lake district that is unique in our nation,” Pelto said in a statement.

Pelto suggested this lake system could represent the fastest-growing collection of lakes in the U.S. in this century, reflecting the accelerated retreat of Alaska’s glaciers due to climate change.

The lakes are not only expanding but also undergoing noticeable transformations.

Advertisement

Alsek Lake, for instance, appears much bluer in the 2024 image compared to 1984. This shift suggests that the lake is receiving less “glacial flour”—fine-grained sediment carried by meltwater streams, according to a NASA Earth Observatory article.

As sediment levels drop, the lake’s water will continue to darken, allowing more light to penetrate and potentially fostering aquatic life and fishery development.

The pattern is one that is repeating across Alaska and the Arctic more broadly.

According to the National Park Service, glaciers within Alaska national parks shrank by 8 percent between the 1950s and the early 2000s. This pace ticked upward, with 13 percent lost from 1985 to 2020.

Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about glaciers? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Alaska

Biologists forecast a reduced Alaska commercial salmon harvest

Published

on

Biologists forecast a reduced Alaska commercial salmon harvest


Two spawning pink salmon head upstream in shallow water in Cove Creek in Whittier on Aug. 5, 2024. (Photo by Yereth Rosen / Alaska Beacon)

Alaska’s statewide commercial salmon harvest this year is expected to total 125.5 million fish, less than two-thirds of the total landed by commercial harvesters in 2025, according to the annual forecast released last week by state biologists.

The anticipated 2026 total, detailed in the Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s 2026 forecast and 2025 review, is lower than annual statewide harvests in all but four years since 2000, according to department records.

The lowered expectations for the statewide salmon harvest are driven mostly by anticipated declines in runs of pink salmon, also known as humpback salmon, according to the forecast.

Pink salmon are the most plentiful, smallest and cheapest of Alaska’s five salmon species. They have two-year life cycles, the shortest of all of Alaska’s salmon species. Although there are regional variations, the general pattern for the recent past is alternating big-run and smaller-run years, with 2025 as one of the big-run years.

Advertisement

The year-to-year difference has been significant, said Forrest Bowers, who heads the department’s commercial fishing division.

“We have been seeing a pronounced even-odd year difference in pink salmon returns, with much larger returns in odd-numbered years,” Bowers said by email.

In all, about 197.4 million salmon were harvested commercially last year, 120 million of which were pink salmon, the forecast said. This year, about 60 million pink salmon are expected to be harvested commercially, according to the forecast.

For Alaska’s other four salmon species, the forecast calls for lower total catches as well, with a combined reduction of 11% below the 2025 non-pink salmon total harvest, Bowers said.

That is not considered a precise prediction. There are estimate ranges for different species and locations, which put the anticipated 2026 harvest in the general ballpark of last year’s harvest, except for pink salmon.

Advertisement

“When we consider forecast uncertainty and the distribution of harvests across the state, the forecast for non-pink salmon is fairly similar to the 2025 actual harvest,” Bowers said.

Alaska commercial salmon harvest totals from 1975 to 2024 are shown on a graph. In recent years, totals have fluctuated widely from year to year, reflecting the pattern in pink salmon returns. The 2025 total, not shown on the graph, was over 197 million fish, putting it among the top years in the past five decades for salmon numbers. (Graph provided by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game)

Sockeye salmon, also known as red salmon, is the second-most plentiful of Alaska’s five species, and the statewide harvest is dominated by Southwest Alaska’s Bristol Bay, site of the world’s largest sockeye salmon runs.

That status will continue this year, according to the forest. Bristol Bay’s estimated 2026 harvest for this year is 33.5 million fish, a little over the average over the last 20 years — but smaller than in some recent years, when harvests in that region hit or approached records. Last year’s Bristol Bay sockeye harvest was about 41.2 million fish, a little more than three-quarters of the statewide sockeye harvest.

This year, the statewide sockeye salmon harvest is forecast to total 49.7 million fish, of which about two-thirds are expected to come from Bristol Bay.

The forecast chum salmon commercial harvest this year is 17.2 million fish, compared to 21.7 million last year. This year’s forecast harvest of coho salmon, also known as silver salmon, is 2.4 million fish, compared to 2.7 million harvested last year. This year’s forecast harvest of chinook salmon, also known as king salmon, is 197,000 fish, compared to last year’s total harvest of 201,000 fish.

The department’s forecast details regional differences along with species differences.

Advertisement

In the Yukon and Kuskokwim river systems, salmon runs are expected to continue to be weak, as they have been for the past several years, according to the forecast. There is no commercial fishing anticipated on either of those river systems. The only commercial fishing in the Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim region is expected to be in Norton Sound and in the Kotzebue area, as was the case last year and in other recent years.

The newly released forecast is for commercial harvesting alone. It does not include subsistence or sport harvests. Reports detailing last year’s subsistence harvests are expected to be released in the future, the forecast said.

Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.

Pink salmon are seen in an undated photo. Male pink salmon develop humps on their backs, and the fish are also known as humpback salmon or “humpies.” (Photo provided by National Oceanic and Atrmospheric Administration Fisheries)





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Miss Manners: When a host cares more about their dogs than their guests

Published

on

Miss Manners: When a host cares more about their dogs than their guests


DEAR MISS MANNERS: My husband is the president of a local college alumni chapter, and I am the secretary. The chapter recently held an alumni meeting at the residence of the headmaster of a local private high school. Though the setting was a private home, the event was a formal gathering attended by the university president and various dignitaries.

Upon our arrival, five dogs began jumping on us and the other guests. We did not know that the headmaster and his wife had dogs. As I am severely allergic, I quietly asked the hostess if the dogs could be kept upstairs during the meeting.

She took great offense, loudly declaring that the dogs were her “children” and refusing to move them. I spent the evening wheezing and sneezing through my presentation to the university president.

Was I wrong to make this request? Should I have suffered in silence to avoid offending the hosts?

Advertisement

GENTLE READER: As unpleasant as this situation was for you, Miss Manners can’t help being relieved that it wasn’t even more dangerous.

You and your husband are not employees of the college, but its beneficiaries. Therefore any estrangement would have been a loss to the school, and not to your own status.

And evidently, the headmaster and his wife do not have human children, if they believe youngsters of any kind should be jumping on their guests — especially ones suffering physical distress. (One wonders at the standard of behavior in the headmaster’s school, if this is what prevails at home.)

Of course you should not have stayed and suffered. You could have apologized to the guests that you had to leave because of your allergy, or you could have stuck the university president with that task. He would have had a strong interest in not alienating the leaders of the alumni group.

• • •

Advertisement

DEAR MISS MANNERS: We’ve hosted an annual Kentucky Derby party in our home for years. We invite most of the same people every year, with a few new folks now and then.

We send out the invitations and let them know that we are providing all the food, and also tell them what drinks we will be serving. We ask that they RSVP so we will know how many to prepare for.

We have had as few as 25 people show up, and as many as 60 — the majority of whom had not responded to our invitation. I feel compelled to let the non-responders know how rude it is to ignore an invitation and how hard it makes it for us to prepare, but I fear that would be rude as well.

How do I handle non-responders? My first inclination is to ask them if they understand what “RSVP” means, or just to drop them from the list next year. Help.

GENTLE READER: The non-rude way to let them know how rude they are is to ask whether they plan to attend, and then to drop them from next year’s list.

Advertisement

But Miss Manners wonders why your invitations don’t plainly state “please respond” instead of using a silly French form that some people really might not understand.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

A fight against the invisible: How the Alaska State Virology Laboratory is hunting down measles

Published

on

A fight against the invisible: How the Alaska State Virology Laboratory is hunting down measles


Each morning a vehicle containing hundreds of samples approaches an unassuming building located in UAF’s upper campus. As the packages are carefully handled and test tubes are collected, a meticulously coordinated system of scientists starts its daily routine: extracting viral genetic material, testing its contents, and reporting the results. Each step carefully studied, each movement repeated, over and over again.

Behind these numbered cuvettes, each containing a small amount of fluid, there is a human waiting for answers. What caused their disease, how could they cure it, and what are the dangers others might encounter?



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending