Connect with us

Alaska

‘He does not ponder like ordinary people’: The story of Alaska’s first aerial hijacker

Published

on

‘He does not ponder like ordinary people’: The story of Alaska’s first aerial hijacker


Part of a continuing weekly series on Alaska history by local historian David Reamer. Have a question about Anchorage or Alaska history or an idea for a future article? Go to the form at the bottom of this story. He’s presenting a series of free history talks at Bear Tooth Theatrepub this fall. The first, Sept. 14 at 11 a.m., is on Alaskan representation in a century of movies.

Del Lavon Thomas was an unemployed cannery worker when he entered the Beachcombers Bar in Kodiak early in the morning of Dec. 19, 1965. He carried a .22-caliber pistol. The original Beachcomber was a log cabin swept away by tsunamis after the 1964 Good Friday earthquake. Thomas walked into the second, more infamous Beachcomber, a retired steamship nudged against Mission Road by Potato Patch Lake.

The 23-year-old Thomas, perhaps lubricated into aggression, had a pre-existing grievance with Kenneth Cherry, another cannery worker. Cherry had allegedly arranged a “date” with a woman for Thomas in exchange for $45. This woman took his money but refused to provide services unless he paid more. A woman, perhaps the same woman from the “date,” reportedly beat him up in front of Cherry earlier that night. At his trial, Thomas claimed he intended to shoot Cherry in the arm or leg. His aim was a touch high then, as he put a bullet between his eyes, killing him.

Advertisement

Dr. William J. Rader, an Anchorage psychiatrist, examined Thomas before the trial. Rader described Thomas as a man of average intelligence but lacking a mature ability to conceptualize the consequences of his actions. The psychiatrist succinctly testified that Thomas “does not ponder like ordinary people.”

Prosecutors pursued a first-degree murder charge, but the jury returned with a manslaughter verdict. He was sentenced to 20 years in prison. While reading the sentence, Judge Ralph Moody referred to the psychiatric evaluation that described Thomas as a “menace to society.” This is all prologue.

Thomas’ prison journey took him from Lompoc in California to McNeil Island in Washington and back to Alaska. In 1969, he managed a brief breakout in Palmer. Despite that escape, he was paroled on Aug. 23, 1971. Upon release, he promptly found work at a Texaco service station in the Palmer area.

A free man for the first time in years, he feared a return to prison more than he reveled in his liberty. He was slight of build, withdrawn, sensitive, and tense, not exactly made for the hard life of a federal penitentiary. He later said, “I have been to Leavenworth and I don’t want to go back there. There are 2,500 maniacs there.”

Within weeks, he was implicated in a small robbery at work not yet officially reported. On Oct. 17, he chatted with Palmer acting police chief Bob Boyd about how a charge like that would affect his parole. Boyd told the Anchorage Daily Times, “Del was very uptight. Well, he was afraid he might have to go back to jail, even if he hadn’t done it, and I could tell that this was one of his greatest fears. Prison really can get to a man that way, but he was willing to come and talk about it.”

Advertisement

Around 4:30 in the morning on Oct. 18, 1971, he approached the Alaska Airlines counter in the Anchorage International Airport. The agent, Elsie Lewis, grew concerned when he asked for a ticket to either Fairbanks or Seattle. As Lewis told the Daily Times, “At the time he asked, I had a Seattle flight on the ground, but he asked for either Fairbanks or Seattle and in my mind they’re as opposite as left to right, so I assumed he really had no destination in mind.” She alerted airport police, who examined his backpack at the counter before allowing him to leave. The police did not search his person, missing the pistol in his coat. If he had been allowed to buy a ticket, he would have been caught by the airline’s metal detector before boarding an airplane.

Rebuffed by Alaska Airlines, he instead bought a ticket for a Wien Consolidated Airlines 5:30 flight to Bethel. Unlike Alaska Airlines, Wien did not have a metal detector. In the United States, there was no requirement to screen all passengers and their luggage until 1973. Thomas boarded the Boeing 737 jetliner and sat in the front row. When the seatbelt sign turned off, he was up and walking for the nearest flight attendant.

Twenty-two-year-old Nancy Davis had been employed by Wien for just two weeks. The flight to Bethel was her first run as a full-fledged flight attendant. She told the Anchorage Daily News, “I was up front in the galley when he came out. He walked up and stuck a gun in my face and said ‘we’re not going to Bethel’ and that he was hijacking the plane. I told him not to say such things, but then he demanded that I take him into the cockpit.” There, he ordered the pilot to turn south, to take him to Cuba via Mexico. The first airplane hijacking in Alaska history had begun.

A fear of prison, especially of a notorious federal penitentiary like Leavenworth, is an understandable and doubtlessly honest sentiment. However, there are surer paths to avoiding prison than hijacking an airplane. In the aftermath, a veritable crowd of Alaskans swore, “He was such a nice guy,” that “It just doesn’t fit his attitude.” But in truth, he was the sort of person who ended a bar fight with a gun, the sort of person who considered skyjacking the solution to all his problems just two months into parole. His pondering capabilities once again failed him.

At this time, aerial hijackings were an inescapable part of American culture, continually present in the news, television, movies, and countless jokes. From 1968 to 1972, there were 137 hijacking attempts in the United States. Of those, 90 wanted a trip to Cuba. Thomas quite possibly wanted to hijack a plan because he saw it on TV.

Advertisement

Five people were pressed into the 737 cockpit. With Thomas and Davis, the party included Captain Don Peterson, First Officer Ray Miller, and engineer Keith Forsgren. “(Thomas) was really getting upset,” said Davis. “He was waving the gun around and threatened to shoot out through the window.” They discussed logistics, the airplane’s range, and Thomas’s preferred destinations. Together, they sketched out a rough flight plan: back to Anchorage for refueling and then on to Vancouver. Peterson said, “I told him we could make Mexico City from Vancouver and that seemed to satisfy him for a while, and that we would go on from Cuba to Mexico.”

Davis maintained a running conversation with Thomas. While admittedly “very frightened,” she said, “I just fed him coffee and tried to keep him talking as much as I could.” “We talked about his different philosophies. He was very down on life, depressed. At one point, he asked what I was thinking about. I told him I was praying for him. He said no one had ever done that for him before.”

As they approached Anchorage, she convinced him to release the 30 passengers and the other flight attendant, Margie Hertz. Most of the passengers were unaware that the plane had been commandeered. Peterson informed them over the intercom that they were returning to Anchorage but did not offer a reason. The fortunate passengers were greeted by law enforcement, reporters, and a slowly dawning realization.

A few passengers complained about the inconvenience of the day, in interviews conducted while the flight crew were still being held at gunpoint. Farris McAlister, a White Alice facility engineer, slept through the short flight. His wife woke him for their return to Anchorage. She told the Daily News, “My husband lost all of his bags. In fact, he had to go buy an extra razor.” Dr. Thomas Boyce, an orthopedic surgeon, declared, “It really messed up some people’s day.” Wien did arrange another flight to Bethel for the displaced passengers later that day.

Other reactions varied, mixtures of confusion, fear, and anger. Louis Bunyon Jr. woke as they landed. Expecting Bethel, he peered through the window and remarked, “It looks kind of funny.” Janet Napoleon said, “I don’t think I’ll ever want to fly again. I can stay in Hooper Bay.” Lawton Lyons had a ticket but missed the flight. He said, “I don’t believe in capital punishment, but they ought to shoot a guy who does that.” Different people had different reactions to the hijacking. Morgan Richardson, Wien’s assistant vice president for sales, told the Daily Times, “The hijacking took a fourth of our jet fleet away from us!”

Advertisement

The flight landed back at Anchorage at 6:49 a.m. The jet taxied to an area of the north-south runway reserved for small planes. It was refueled, and a bus carried the passengers to the terminal. At 7:40 a.m., they departed for Vancouver. Two F-4 Phantoms from Elmendorf Air Force Base tailed them until they reached the Canadian border.

Thomas grew increasingly unsettled as they approached their next destination. Said Peterson, “As we got nearer Vancouver he seemed totally undecided as to what to do next.” Davis noted, “(Thomas) was scared too. He had very nervous habits, and I was afraid if he got upset about anything he might start shooting.” He asked for liquor. “I told him there wasn’t any because it was a morning flight,” said Davis. “Actually, I lied. So I gave him coffee, and we talked. He said he was frightened about going back to jail.”

Around 11 a.m. Anchorage time, they landed in Vancouver. Some 25 Royal Canadian Mounted Police, or RCMP, officers surrounded the airplane but did not approach as it was refueled. Under orders from the RCMP, Jim MacDonald drove a fuel truck to the jet and ensured that a typically 15-minute refuel lasted 45 minutes. MacDonald noted, “At first they wanted to refuel the plane over the wing, which is a very irregular procedure and only done in emergency situations. It also takes a lot longer. I told them ‘no way’ because if the hijacker decided to get trigger happy, I’d have been a sitting duck on top of the wing.” Instead, he used as little pressure as possible to slow the process.

At 11:43, the Wien 737 left again for Mexico City. About 45 minutes out from Vancouver, a nervous Thomas ordered them to return. Now he wanted an airplane with greater range for his trip south. Upon arrival, Thomas allowed RCMP Inspector Bruce Northorp to board the plane. Shortly after that, the four remaining flight crew members, including Davis, were allowed to disembark. Northorp talked to Thomas in the cockpit for over an hour and a half. Per Northorp, they discussed the “facts of life” and realities of the situation. After that, Thomas surrendered.

An extremely exhausted Wien Airlines crew arrived back in Anchorage at 2:15 a.m. on Oct. 19. Wien officials praised Davis for de-escalating the situation. “She handled it extremely well,” said Wien vice president A. E. “Bud” Hagberg, “and we’re proud of her.” Later that same day, Thomas was extradited to Seattle before a return to Anchorage where he was held on federal charges of air piracy.

Advertisement

As the hijacker sat in the Anchorage jail, awaiting his turn in court, Anchorage resident L. D. Harman wrote a letter to the Daily Times. He sharply criticized the criminal justice system that had allowed an “emotionally unstable” criminal go free. “A convicted felon sentenced to 20 years has already demonstrated his inability to live within the laws of our society.”

Nearly two weeks later, Thomas sent in his own letter. “Mr. Harman, I’m sorry I didn’t spend every day of my 20-year sentence locked up. Perhaps I’d been a much better citizen and a more productive member to society if I had, though I doubt it. Six years didn’t help much. Do you think all 20 years would have?” He continued, “You say I’m an unstable person. Perhaps you’re right on that point, too. I defy you to spend six years of your life in an abnormal situation and see how normal you are in the end. I guarantee you’ll be a different person.” He ended, “Mr. Harman, in closing, I’d like to say I feel sorry for you.”

The air piracy charge carried a maximum possible sentence of death. Speaking on his behalf before final sentencing, Thomas said, “All the time I was in (prison), I thought about how good it would be once I got out. But it was not so easy. There are too many people against you.” Instead of the death penalty, he received only 20 years, the statutory minimum punishment. The lack of personal injuries and private property damage played a role in the decision.

He was sent to the McNeil Island penitentiary southwest of Tacoma, Washington. After roughly seven and a half years there, he was moved to an Anchorage halfway house meant to rehabilitate prisoners. After release, he found work as a mechanic. He died on Oct. 8, 2017, at an assisted living facility in Homer. His ashes were spread on the Kenai River.

In the 1972 disaster film “Skyjacked” starring Charlton Heston, an airliner bound for Minneapolis is diverted by bomb threat to Anchorage, then Moscow. The airliner dramatically lands in Anchorage after battling severe storms, zero visibility, empty fuel tanks, and a near miss with a small craft while descending. The film is based on the 1970 David Harper novel “Hijacked” and not Thomas’ adventure. Former NFL Pro Bowler Roosevelt “Rosey” Grier plays a passenger. He would have a more notable role in another 1970s movie set in Alaska, “Timber Tramps,” an eagerly awaited future article subject.

Advertisement

• • •

• • •

Key sources:

“The Beachcombers Hotel and Bar: A Legacy of the Tsunami.” Waterlines, Kodiak Maritime Museum, Spring 2014, 4.

Bauman, Margie. “First Alaska Skyjacking Drama Ends in Vancouver.” Anchorage Daily News, October 19, 1971, 1, 2.

Advertisement

Cowals, Dennis. “Jet Crew Returns Home Following Harrowing Flight.” Anchorage Daily Times, October 19, 1971, 1, 2.

Edscorn, Paul. “Hijacker Gets 20 Years.” Anchorage Daily Times, May 13, 1972, 1, 4.

Edscorn, Paul. “Record Shows Hijack Lacks Pondering Ability.” Anchorage Daily Times, October 27, 1971, 45.

Harman, L. D. Letter to editor. “Who is Guilty?” Anchorage Daily Times, October 23, 1971, 5.

“Kodiak Man Sentenced for Manslaughter.” Anchorage Daily News, June 1, 1966, 2.

Advertisement

Loll, Scott. “Accused Hijacker Termed ‘Nice,’ ‘Model Prisoner.’” Anchorage Daily Times, October 20, 1971, 33.

“Longest Job Ever.” [Victoria, BC] Daily Colonist, October 19, 1971, 1.

May, Lisa. “‘Eagle Eye’ Refuses Ticket to Thomas.” Anchorage Daily Times, October 19, 1971, 1, 2.

“Obituaries—Del Lavon Thomas.” Homer News, October 19, 2017.

Peck, Henry, and Neal Menschel. “Flight Delayed—Due to Hijacking.” Anchorage Daily News, October 19, 1971, 16.

Advertisement

“Stewardess: ‘Hijacker Was Scared, Too.’” Anchorage Daily News, October 19, 1971, 1, 2.

Thomas, Del Lavon. Letter to editor. “Reply to Harman.” Anchorage Daily Times, November 4, 1971, 5.

“Wien Plane Hijacked.” Anchorage Daily Times, October 18, 1971, 1, 2.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

After school funding dispute, 4 Alaska districts move on without federally promised money

Published

on

After school funding dispute, 4 Alaska districts move on without federally promised money


Until last month, the U.S. Department of Education said Alaska underfunded four of its largest school districts by $17.5 million. As a result of a recent agreement, the schools in Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau and Kenai Peninsula Borough won’t directly receive any of that money.

However, two of the districts said they weren’t counting on receiving the money as they planned their current budgets, while the other districts either didn’t respond or declined to comment.

The $17.5 million is part of COVID-era pandemic funding, and until last month, how Alaska distributed that funding was at the heart of a years-long dispute between federal and state officials, and whether it was spent fairly.

The state repeatedly defended their school spending plan, while the federal government asserted the state failed to comply with guidelines and reduced spending on these districts with high-need or high-poverty areas, and withheld the sum they said was owed.

Advertisement

Federal officials said the state reduced spending to the Kenai Peninsula and Anchorage school districts by up to $11.89 million in the 2021 to 2022 school year, and all four districts by $5.56 million the following year.

Kenai Superintendent Clayton Holland said the district never budgeted for this particular federal COVID funding, as they were aware of the dispute.

“Had it gone through, we would have welcomed it, as we are facing a potential deficit of $17 million for next year” and have nearly exhausted the balance of funding the district can spend without restrictions, Holland said.

Anchorage School District officials did not respond to requests for comment.

The dispute came to an end on Dec. 20,  when the federal department told the state it was releasing the funding, citing a review of the state’s one-time funding boosts in the last two budgets, and considered the matter closed.

Advertisement

Alaska Education Commissioner Deena Bishop led the state’s defense effort, including appealing the penalty, and applauded the move by the federal Department of Education. She said the state always followed the state law governing school funding.

“The department said, ‘We don’t agree with your formula, you should have given these guys more.’ And we said, ‘No, no, no. Only our Legislature can make the law about our formula. That’s why we stood behind it,” she said in an interview Tuesday.

The dispute centered around what was known as a “maintenance of equity” provision of a federal COVID aid law, which banned states from dropping per-pupil spending during the pandemic. Bishop said that decreases in funding in the four districts were due to drops in enrollment, according to the state’s spending formula.

Bishop defended the formula as equitable, noting that it factors in geographic area, local tax bases, and other issues. “I just felt strongly that there’s no way that they can say that we’re inequitable, because there are third-party assessments and research that has been done that Alaska actually has one of the most equitable formulas,” she said.

“Our funding formula is a state entity. Our districts are funded according to that,” Bishop said. “And so basically, they [U.S. Department of Education] argued that the distribution of funds from the state funding formula, the state’s own money, right, nothing to do with the Feds, was inequitable.

Advertisement

“So they picked these districts to say, ‘You need to give them more.’ And we’re saying, ‘No, you don’t have a right to say that. We spent your money, how you said, but only the state Legislature can say’” how to spend state money, she said.

She said the state felt confident about their spending plan for American Rescue Plan Act funding.

In addition to temporarily withholding the funding, the federal government further penalized Alaska by designating it a “high risk” grantee.

Federal and state officials went back and forth on compliance, with the state doubling down, defending their school spending. By May, the state had racked up another $1 million in frozen federal funds.

Bishop said despite the holds from the feds, they continued to award the funds to districts.

Advertisement

“We felt as though we would prevail. So we never wanted to harm school districts who were appropriated those funds the way that they were supposed to,” she said. School districts followed the dispute closely.

Juneau School District’ Superintendent Frank Hauser said the district did not expect or budget for the funds.

“JSD was slated only to receive approximately $90,000 of the “maintenance of equity” funds, much less than Kenai, Fairbanks, or Anchorage,” he said in an email. “JSD will not receive that money now; however, we had not anticipated receiving it and had not included it in our budget projection.”

The Fairbanks North Star Borough School District declined to comment on the issue. A spokesperson said the district administration is awaiting clarification from the state education department.

On Monday, the administration announced a recommended consolidation plan for five elementary schools to be closed, citing a $16 million deficit for next year. A final vote on whether to close the schools is set for early February.

Advertisement

Now the state is in the process of applying for reimbursements from the federal Department of Education, and expects to receive that full $17.5 million award, Bishop said. If districts have outstanding pandemic-related expenses, she said those can be submitted to the state, and will be reimbursed according to the state’s COVID-19 funding guidelines. “We’ll process that, and then we’ll go to the Feds and get that money back,” she said.

In December, Gov. Mike Dunleavy applauded the federal announcement, calling the dispute “a tremendous waste of time,” in a prepared statement. He repeated his support for President-elect Donald Trump’s calls to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education.

“On the bright side, this saga is a wonderful case study of the U.S. Department of Education’s abuse of power and serves as further evidence for why I support the concept of eliminating it,” he said.

Dunleavy linked to a social media post he made on X, which read, in part, that eliminating the department “would restore local control of education back to the states, reduce bureaucratic inefficiency and reduce cost. Long overdue.”

Sen. Löki Tobin, D-Anchorage and chair of the Senate Education Committee, pointed to the timing for the outgoing Biden administration and federal leaders’ desire to release funding to Alaska schools.

Advertisement

“It’s very clear that if the presidential election had ended in a different result, we would not be having this conversation,” she said. “Instead, they would be continuing to work with the department to find a more elegant, a more clean solution.”

She said the federal letter announcing the end to the long dispute doesn’t mean the issue of equity was resolved.

“I think their letter to the Department of Education and Early Development here in Alaska was very clear that Alaska never did fully comply with the guidelines, but instead, due to a want and a fervent hope that the resources would get into the schools and into the communities that so desperately needed them, that they would choose to not pursue further compliance measures,” she said.

Last year, the Legislature passed a budget with $11.89 million included for the state to comply with the federal requirements, but that funding was vetoed by Dunleavy, who defended the state’s position, saying the “need for funds is indeterminate.”

The budget did include a one-time funding boost to all districts, but Tobin said the annual school aid debate left districts in limbo for future budget planning.

Advertisement

“We can see how this has cost school districts, how it has created instability, how it has resulted in a system that is unpredictable for funding streams for our schools,” Tobin said.

Kenai Superintendent Holland expressed hope that school funding would be prioritized by elected officials this year.

“The bigger issue for us, and for all Alaskan school districts, is what our legislators and governor will decide regarding education funding in the upcoming legislative session,” Holland said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska's population increases from 2023 to 2024

Published

on

Alaska's population increases from 2023 to 2024


The state of Alaska saw an increase in population of 0.31% from 2023 to 2024, despite more people leaving the state than entering it.
The increase is attributed to births outpacing both deaths and outward migration, according to new data from the Department of Labor and Workforce Development. Based on Census Data from 2020 and state data, the population is estimated to have increased to 741,147 people



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

How Alaska highlighted a record-breaking Pan Am cyclist’s journey through the Americas

Published

on

How Alaska highlighted a record-breaking Pan Am cyclist’s journey through the Americas


While Bond Almand can’t pinpoint exactly when he found out about the Pan Am cycling challenge and the record time it’s been completed in, it was something he’s dreamed about for the past decade.

“It’s always been the pinnacle of sport for me,” he said. “A lot of people think the Tour de France is the pinnacle of cycling, but I’ve always been attracted to the longer riding and this was one of the longest routes in the world you could do, so that’s what really attracted me to it.”

The Dartmouth College junior, who grew up near Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Tennessee, set out on Aug. 31, 2024, and completed the challenge Nov. 15. Almand set a record time with more than nine days to spare. The Pan Am route goes from the most northern point in North America to the most southern point in South America and can be traversed either way.

Advertisement

His desire to attempt to make history brought him all the way to the shores of Prudhoe Bay in Alaska to embark on his long-awaited journey.

“It starts in Alaska, which is somewhere I’ve always wanted to go,” Almand said. “I’d never been to Alaska before and Latin America was an allure to me too because I know a little bit of Spanish, but not that much, so that exploration aspect was an allure as well.”

His stay in the 49th state wound up being longer than he had originally planned, by an additional three days.

“When TSA searched my bike box when I was flying up, they took everything out and failed to put everything back in, so I was missing a piece to my bike when I got to Prudhoe Bay and was stuck there for a couple of days waiting for the new part to come in,” Almand said.

With plenty of time on his hands, Almand walked around town, which mostly consisted of a gravel road, and hitchhiked back and forth to meet people.

Advertisement

“There’s only like, one place to eat in town, at the Aurora Hotel, so I spent a lot of time there eating at the buffet but I spent a lot of time staring at the tundra,” Almand said.

When his bike part finally arrived and he set out on his adventure, the first leg was his most memorable.

“Alaska was incredible, probably one of my favorite sections for sure,” Almand said. “It was pretty good weather. I went through Brooks Range first, which was just so beautiful. It was fall, so it was turning colors and the aspen were all bright yellow.”

He rode through a little bit of snow in the Brooks Range, enjoyed seeing wildlife and was stunned riding through the Alaska Range and gazing upon Denali.

It only took him around 4 1/2 days to bike through the state, and even though he’s seen mountains of similar and even greater magnitude, having been to the Himalayas in his previous travels, he particularly appreciated his experience in Alaska.

Advertisement

“Being able to bike through the mountains instead of just flying to Nepal and seeing mountains made it really special,” Almand said. “The further south I got in Alaska got super remote, especially closer to Tok, and that was pretty incredible.”

He said that the most fun part of his journey was Alaska because that was when he was his freshest and he got to take in beautiful scenery and was fortunate enough to get good weather.

“But also Colombia was super exciting,” Almand said. “Like Alaska, there’s some really incredible mountains in Colombia and also beautiful culture and incredible food.”

The best meal he had during his travels was the tamales he ate while biking through pineapple fields in Mexico.

“It was in the middle of nowhere and there was a lady selling pineapple chicken tamales,” Almand said. “She was picking them right out of the field and cooking it right in front of me. Those tamales were so good.”

Advertisement

Almand’s 75-day ride was significantly faster than the previous record of 84 days, which was held by Michael Strasser. While Almand’s mark appears to be accepted in the bikepacking world, he didn’t have it certified with Guinness. He said that was partly due to cost and partly due to their standard for certification.

“They have a lot of stipulations around the record,” he said. “They have their own measurement, one of which is you have to have witnessing signatures every single day and you have to have live tracking and all these other rules.”

As far as the most challenging portion of his journey, it came while he was traveling through Canada. He had to brave cold rain and strong headwinds, which continued when he got to the Lower 48 and through South America.

“When you’re cycling, headwind is one of the worst things you can have because it slows you down a lot,” Almand said. “From Peru until the finish, I had headwinds pretty much every single day.”

Setting smaller goals for himself along the way helped him push through, including testing both his mind and body. But the biggest motivator was the ultimate goal of achieving his dream, which was more within reach the more he persevered.

Advertisement

“I’ve been dreaming the entire trip for so long that quitting was never an option,” Almand said. “Quitting would’ve been the hardest thing for me to do because I wouldn’t have been able to go home and live with myself having just walked away from it.”





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending