Connect with us

Alaska

As Texas school shooting reignites national debate on gun control, many Alaska politicians are leery of limits

Published

on

As Texas school shooting reignites national debate on gun control, many Alaska politicians are leery of limits


Within the aftermath of one other college capturing that left 19 elementary college college students and two lecturers useless in Texas, a nationwide dialog on gun management has reignited. In Alaska, the place many politicians tout their private firearm possession as a marketing campaign promoting level, some politicians are saying a psychological well being disaster — not weapons — is the issue.

Alaska’s GOP U.S. senators referred to as the Uvalde, Texas, capturing a “horror,” a “mindless act of violence,” and “evil.” However like different Senate Republicans, they didn’t instantly come out in help of gun management measures favored by most of their Democratic colleagues in Congress.

Sen. Dan Sullivan is one among a number of Republicans pinning latest mass shootings on a psychological well being disaster quite than a scarcity of gun management measures.

Advertisement

“The frequent theme of most of these mass shootings is the social alienation of sick younger males, usually fueled by social media,” Sullivan stated in a Twitter publish. “In that regard, I imagine our nation is within the preliminary phases of a extreme psychological well being disaster manifesting within the worst methods conceivable, particularly amongst our youth. The causes are multifaceted, and I’m deeply dedicated to understanding and addressing this disaster.”

[Q&A with Alaska U.S. House candidates: What should the federal government do to address mass shootings?]

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who’s extensively seen as a average keen to buck the occasion line on some points, didn’t instantly say whether or not she would help any present legislative efforts to broaden and strengthen background checks.

Murkowski “will vet any gun associated measures that come earlier than the Senate,” spokesperson Hannah Ray stated in an electronic mail.

“There is no such thing as a query that we should enhance public security, finish gun violence, and hold weapons out of the arms of these disqualified to own them,” Murkowski stated in an emailed assertion. “We are able to take extra steps to handle the psychological well being epidemic, expedite the sharing of knowledge for background checks when buying a firearm, and sort out violent crime. As a part of that, we’ll want concrete legislative proposals to judge which might be designed to handle the issue and never simply ship a partisan message.”

Advertisement

[Q&A with Alaska U.S. House candidates: Do you support gun control legislation?]

Murkowski has an A score from the Nationwide Rifle Affiliation and has obtained $146,000 in marketing campaign donations from them over the course of profession, whereas Sullivan has an A+ score and obtained $25,000 over the course of his profession, in response to reporting by the New York Instances.

Each Murkowski and Sullivan declined interview requests on Friday.

Murkowski is working for reelection final yr, and faces a Trump-backed Republican opponent in Kelly Tshibaka, who additionally pointed to psychological well being as the reason for mass shootings.

“We should tackle the basis of the difficulty, quite than blaming inanimate objects. I don’t help laws that restricts the constitutional rights of law-abiding residents. In Alaska, the lawful possession of weapons is key to who we’re, and I’ll all the time stand by the Second Modification,” Tshibaka stated in an emailed assertion.

Advertisement

“We’re studying extra concerning the delayed police response, and it’s heartbreaking and fully unacceptable. Leftists are taking the unsuitable lesson from the police response, nonetheless. If regulation enforcement is unable or unwilling to assist in a life-or-death state of affairs, the reply is to not disarm the law-abiding public.”

[Democrats seek swift action on limited gun-control proposals]

Pat Chesbro, a Democrat working within the Senate race, whose daughter was shot to loss of life with a handgun, referred to as for elevated gun management measures and stated arming lecturers — an answer proposed by some Republicans — wouldn’t resolve the issue.

“I do know all of the issues about rights, however together with rights come duties, and we have to take duty for these sorts of issues which might be taking place in our nation,” Chesbro stated in a cellphone interview Friday morning, sounding shaken after studying a couple of little one who was coated in her good friend’s blood throughout the capturing.

Chesbro stated she helps closing loopholes in present background examine legal guidelines and limiting assault weapon purchases.

Advertisement

“I don’t know what the reply is, however I do imagine that we have to attempt one thing and we have to gauge whether or not that’s efficient or not,” she stated.

[Inside Mitch McConnell’s decades-long effort to block gun control]

In Alaska, politicians stated, weapons — usually used for looking and self protection towards wildlife — are a part of a lifestyle, and plenty of throughout the political spectrum face stress to point out their unwavering help for the firearm possession.

“My husband was an enormous gun proprietor. We had a number of weapons,” stated Chesbro, including that she gave most away to their youngsters when her husband died, however nonetheless saved some.

“We want rifles. Folks goal shoot, individuals want to guard themselves from bears,” she stated. “However that’s not the identical as proudly owning these items that simply shoot many, many bullets at individuals indiscriminately.”

Advertisement

Gun management within the U.S. Home race

Within the particular race for Alaska’s lone U.S. Home seat, candidates have proven a reticence to help any gun management measures, with solely two saying they might help a ban on assault fashion rifles which might be utilized in many mass capturing incidents, together with the one in Texas.

Democrat Chris Fixed and nonpartisan progressive Santa Claus each stated they help banning the sale of assault fashion rifles, common background checks, pink flag legal guidelines, and journal capability reductions — all measures promoted by gun security teams.

Nevertheless, even for progressives in Alaska, favoring gun restrictions isn’t with out qualifiers. Fixed, an Anchorage Meeting member who says he has confronted loss of life threats over his work on the meeting throughout the coronavirus pandemic, says he carries a firearm for self protection, together with in some Meeting conferences.

“I actually really feel like I’m in a crucible on this challenge. My private expertise, my values — on this second, it’s all in battle,” stated Fixed, insisting a number of instances within the span of a 15-minute interview that he does, the truth is, help the Second Modification.

Different Democrats and average candidates the U.S. Home race who responded to a survey carried out by the Anchorage Day by day Information took a middle-of-the-road strategy on gun management laws, saying they might help some tightening of background examine legal guidelines. Nonetheless others, together with Republicans Nick Begich and Sarah Palin, stated they might not help any gun management measures, as an alternative pinning the issue on a psychological well being disaster.

Advertisement

“As policymakers, you can not make coverage within the wake of tragedies like this. Emotion can’t lead that dialogue,” Begich stated at a latest Republican candidate discussion board hosted by the Anchorage Republican Girls.

Adam Wool, a Democratic state Home member from Fairbanks who can also be working for the U.S. Home, referred to as {that a} stalling tactic.

“Republicans who oppose any type of gun measures I believe dig in deeper when stuff like this occurs, and so they say, ‘Let’s wait,’” stated Wool, who sponsored the one gun security invoice in Alaska’s most up-to-date legislative session. “After all, as you wait, the urgency slips away.”

Wool stated that when he first ran for workplace, an adviser instructed him that “it’s a must to take an image with a gun.” Wool, who isn’t a gun proprietor, declined. However for different Alaska candidates, starting from conservative Palin to unbiased Al Gross, footage with weapons has change into a marketing campaign staple.

Gun management measures within the Legislature

Current efforts inside the Alaska state Legislature to place limits on gun entry have failed to realize traction, and the lawmakers behind them say that’s as a result of legislators worry backlash in the event that they anger the gun foyer.

Advertisement

In 2018, Home Democrats tried within the wake of a Florida college capturing to cross a invoice that may restrict gun entry for individuals deemed harmful by law enforcement officials or judges. But it surely didn’t advance amid pushback from the Nationwide Rifle Affiliation, in response to Anchorage Democrat Rep. Matt Claman, who labored on the laws on the time and stated in an interview on Friday that he thought the gun foyer had satisfied Republicans to not vote for invoice.

“Despite the fact that nobody stated that to me, it was actually obvious to me from watching the place the NRA lobbyist was going across the Capitol,” Claman stated.

[Governors diverge on gun control, school security efforts]

Wool’s latest invoice would have required gun homeowners to maintain their firearms locked when not in use. The measure, which obtained one committee listening to however by no means superior to a vote, was initially cosponsored by Fairbanks Republican Rep. Stephen Thompson, however Thompson later withdrew his help for the measure.

That transfer, Wool stated, is indicative of the stress Republicans face to keep away from the looks of questioning Second Modification rights.

Advertisement

“He has a younger child, about my child’s age, and he has the identical considerations about discovering a gun laying round,” Wool stated. “After which the NRA lobbyist got here to city lately. And — what are you aware — he pulled his sponsorship. Is it a coincidence? I’m unsure.”

Gov. Mike Dunleavy has opposed requires gun limits.

“Stricter gun legal guidelines will not be an answer to this drawback – we should focus our consideration on the standing of psychological well being in our communities,” Dunleavy’s workplace stated in electronic mail to the Related Press.

Thompson stated in an interview that he withdrew his help for the invoice as a result of “it obtained took over by the fully anti-gun individuals.”

Advertisement

Thompson, who owns 12 weapons and is a lifetime member of the Nationwide Rifle Affiliation, stated he had conversations with an NRA lobbyist concerning the invoice however declined to share particulars concerning the conversations.

But he acknowledged that the NRA and gun foyer will probably make it tough to come back to a broad settlement on gun management laws.

“They aren’t going to sit down down and talk about and provide you with one thing that’s viable for everyone, and that’s unlucky,” he stated.

Passing gun associated laws in Alaska “takes braveness and other people standing by their rules,” Wool stated, however even he’s not proof against the stress. He insisted on saying his invoice was about “gun security” quite than “gun management.”

“The phrase ‘management’ scares individuals,” he stated.

Advertisement

• • •





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center

Published

on

Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Strong winds in the Portage area on Monday destroyed a shelter building at the Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center that was used to house Sitka deer. The conservation center says 80 mph winds swept through Portage Valley.

The conservation center says no animals were injured, but they are quickly raising money to rebuild. Their goal is $30,000, and as of Thursday morning, they have already fundraised over $26,000.

Sales & Marketing Director Nicole Geils said, “The shelter was in their habitat. It was essential for providing them a safe Haven during harsh weather. It’s a really useful area for when we’re feeding and doing enrichment with the deer and it’s also a safe space for recovery after medical procedures when needed.”

Executive Director Sarah Howard described how she learned about the damage.

Advertisement

“We had a staff member that radioed, ‘The shelter’s gone!’ And a couple of us were at least able to make a little light of the situation. Like, did it go to Oz? And thankfully, it didn’t go too far, and the deer were okay,” Howard said.

The conservation center is still accepting donations through their website.

Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center(Courtesy Nicole Geils)
Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center
Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center(Courtesy Nicole Geils)

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

After school funding dispute, 4 Alaska districts move on without federally promised money

Published

on

After school funding dispute, 4 Alaska districts move on without federally promised money


Until last month, the U.S. Department of Education said Alaska underfunded four of its largest school districts by $17.5 million. As a result of a recent agreement, the schools in Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau and Kenai Peninsula Borough won’t directly receive any of that money.

However, two of the districts said they weren’t counting on receiving the money as they planned their current budgets, while the other districts either didn’t respond or declined to comment.

The $17.5 million is part of COVID-era pandemic funding, and until last month, how Alaska distributed that funding was at the heart of a years-long dispute between federal and state officials, and whether it was spent fairly.

The state repeatedly defended their school spending plan, while the federal government asserted the state failed to comply with guidelines and reduced spending on these districts with high-need or high-poverty areas, and withheld the sum they said was owed.

Advertisement

Federal officials said the state reduced spending to the Kenai Peninsula and Anchorage school districts by up to $11.89 million in the 2021 to 2022 school year, and all four districts by $5.56 million the following year.

Kenai Superintendent Clayton Holland said the district never budgeted for this particular federal COVID funding, as they were aware of the dispute.

“Had it gone through, we would have welcomed it, as we are facing a potential deficit of $17 million for next year” and have nearly exhausted the balance of funding the district can spend without restrictions, Holland said.

Anchorage School District officials did not respond to requests for comment.

The dispute came to an end on Dec. 20,  when the federal department told the state it was releasing the funding, citing a review of the state’s one-time funding boosts in the last two budgets, and considered the matter closed.

Advertisement

Alaska Education Commissioner Deena Bishop led the state’s defense effort, including appealing the penalty, and applauded the move by the federal Department of Education. She said the state always followed the state law governing school funding.

“The department said, ‘We don’t agree with your formula, you should have given these guys more.’ And we said, ‘No, no, no. Only our Legislature can make the law about our formula. That’s why we stood behind it,” she said in an interview Tuesday.

The dispute centered around what was known as a “maintenance of equity” provision of a federal COVID aid law, which banned states from dropping per-pupil spending during the pandemic. Bishop said that decreases in funding in the four districts were due to drops in enrollment, according to the state’s spending formula.

Bishop defended the formula as equitable, noting that it factors in geographic area, local tax bases, and other issues. “I just felt strongly that there’s no way that they can say that we’re inequitable, because there are third-party assessments and research that has been done that Alaska actually has one of the most equitable formulas,” she said.

“Our funding formula is a state entity. Our districts are funded according to that,” Bishop said. “And so basically, they [U.S. Department of Education] argued that the distribution of funds from the state funding formula, the state’s own money, right, nothing to do with the Feds, was inequitable.

Advertisement

“So they picked these districts to say, ‘You need to give them more.’ And we’re saying, ‘No, you don’t have a right to say that. We spent your money, how you said, but only the state Legislature can say’” how to spend state money, she said.

She said the state felt confident about their spending plan for American Rescue Plan Act funding.

In addition to temporarily withholding the funding, the federal government further penalized Alaska by designating it a “high risk” grantee.

Federal and state officials went back and forth on compliance, with the state doubling down, defending their school spending. By May, the state had racked up another $1 million in frozen federal funds.

Bishop said despite the holds from the feds, they continued to award the funds to districts.

Advertisement

“We felt as though we would prevail. So we never wanted to harm school districts who were appropriated those funds the way that they were supposed to,” she said. School districts followed the dispute closely.

Juneau School District’ Superintendent Frank Hauser said the district did not expect or budget for the funds.

“JSD was slated only to receive approximately $90,000 of the “maintenance of equity” funds, much less than Kenai, Fairbanks, or Anchorage,” he said in an email. “JSD will not receive that money now; however, we had not anticipated receiving it and had not included it in our budget projection.”

The Fairbanks North Star Borough School District declined to comment on the issue. A spokesperson said the district administration is awaiting clarification from the state education department.

On Monday, the administration announced a recommended consolidation plan for five elementary schools to be closed, citing a $16 million deficit for next year. A final vote on whether to close the schools is set for early February.

Advertisement

Now the state is in the process of applying for reimbursements from the federal Department of Education, and expects to receive that full $17.5 million award, Bishop said. If districts have outstanding pandemic-related expenses, she said those can be submitted to the state, and will be reimbursed according to the state’s COVID-19 funding guidelines. “We’ll process that, and then we’ll go to the Feds and get that money back,” she said.

In December, Gov. Mike Dunleavy applauded the federal announcement, calling the dispute “a tremendous waste of time,” in a prepared statement. He repeated his support for President-elect Donald Trump’s calls to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education.

“On the bright side, this saga is a wonderful case study of the U.S. Department of Education’s abuse of power and serves as further evidence for why I support the concept of eliminating it,” he said.

Dunleavy linked to a social media post he made on X, which read, in part, that eliminating the department “would restore local control of education back to the states, reduce bureaucratic inefficiency and reduce cost. Long overdue.”

Sen. Löki Tobin, D-Anchorage and chair of the Senate Education Committee, pointed to the timing for the outgoing Biden administration and federal leaders’ desire to release funding to Alaska schools.

Advertisement

“It’s very clear that if the presidential election had ended in a different result, we would not be having this conversation,” she said. “Instead, they would be continuing to work with the department to find a more elegant, a more clean solution.”

She said the federal letter announcing the end to the long dispute doesn’t mean the issue of equity was resolved.

“I think their letter to the Department of Education and Early Development here in Alaska was very clear that Alaska never did fully comply with the guidelines, but instead, due to a want and a fervent hope that the resources would get into the schools and into the communities that so desperately needed them, that they would choose to not pursue further compliance measures,” she said.

Last year, the Legislature passed a budget with $11.89 million included for the state to comply with the federal requirements, but that funding was vetoed by Dunleavy, who defended the state’s position, saying the “need for funds is indeterminate.”

The budget did include a one-time funding boost to all districts, but Tobin said the annual school aid debate left districts in limbo for future budget planning.

Advertisement

“We can see how this has cost school districts, how it has created instability, how it has resulted in a system that is unpredictable for funding streams for our schools,” Tobin said.

Kenai Superintendent Holland expressed hope that school funding would be prioritized by elected officials this year.

“The bigger issue for us, and for all Alaskan school districts, is what our legislators and governor will decide regarding education funding in the upcoming legislative session,” Holland said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska's population increases from 2023 to 2024

Published

on

Alaska's population increases from 2023 to 2024


The state of Alaska saw an increase in population of 0.31% from 2023 to 2024, despite more people leaving the state than entering it.
The increase is attributed to births outpacing both deaths and outward migration, according to new data from the Department of Labor and Workforce Development. Based on Census Data from 2020 and state data, the population is estimated to have increased to 741,147 people



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending