Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska Utility to Scrap Coal Power Plant for Wind Farm

Published

on

Alaska Utility to Scrap Coal Power Plant for Wind Farm


(TNS) — An Inside Alaska electrical cooperative is planning to retire one in all its two coal crops and search proposals to construct a large-scale wind farm, whereas additionally upgrading its battery storage system and arising with an settlement to buy extra pure gas-fueled energy from Southcentral Alaska.

On Monday, the board of the Golden Valley Electrical Affiliation — the primary Inside electrical cooperative that serves 100,000 residents in communities from Healy to Fairbanks and Delta Junction — voted to develop a plan to shut one in all its two coal crops positioned in Healy by the tip of 2024.

The board confronted a choice over whether or not to shutter an older coal plant, Healy Unit 1, or add roughly $26 million in air pollution management gear by the tip of 2024, as outlined in a 2012 consent decree with the U.S. Environmental Safety Company.


The board determined so as to add these air pollution controls, however additionally they made a transfer to shut a separate coal plant, the adjoining Healy Unit 2, after a marketing consultant employed by the cooperative stated that might be an economically possible possibility.

Advertisement

In the end, the board authorised a plan to:

  • Set up air pollution controls on the cooperative’s older, smaller coal plant, Healy Unit 1.
  • Develop a plan for the retirement of the newer, bigger coal plant, Healy Unit 2, by Dec. 31, 2024.
  • Solicit proposals for a large-scale wind venture buy settlement in 60 to 90 days.
  • Buy and set up a brand new 46-megawatt battery storage system.
  • Safe a purchase order settlement with a number of Southcentral utilities, gasoline producers or suppliers for 30 to 50 megawatts of extra power.

“It is actually a imaginative and prescient for the place Golden Valley goes sooner or later,” stated Tom DeLong, the board’s chair.

Monday’s resolution was an enormous change in course for the cooperative, he stated. Whereas it could have appeared stunning to shut the newer of the 2 coal crops, Healy Unit 2 wasn’t practical, whereas DeLong described Unit 1 because the “little plant that would.”

“The choice concerning Unit 2 was unanimous and everybody knew we needed to do it as a result of the economics simply converse for themselves,” DeLong stated.

Healy Unit 2, a $300 million experimental plant constructed by the Alaska Industrial Growth and Export Authority within the ’90s with the U.S. Division of Vitality, “has been plagued with authorized points and operational points,” DeLong stated.

“Unit 2 was a troublesome plant to begin with,” DeLong stated. “It was a tough delivery and a tough childhood and a disgraceful older age.”

Advertisement

At 62 megawatts, Healy Unit 2 is the biggest coal plant within the state, however it would not function at that charge, Golden Valley Electrical spokesperson Meadow Bailey stated. Final 12 months, the plant “averaged a lot decrease manufacturing than it was constructed for,” she stated.

And whereas the cooperative has labored for years to extend its reliability, Healy Unit 2 has needed to come offline for repairs prompting the necessity to substitute its energy with electrical energy from costlier sources like oil, Bailey stated.

Going ahead, many of the electrical energy beforehand generated by the coal plant can be changed with energy from pure gasoline produced in Southcentral Alaska, Bailey stated. And with the long run wind and battery sources, the cooperative is not going to should depend on costly diesel era, Bailey stated.

Previous to the Monday night time assembly, the cooperative’s board, workers and consultants spent 18 months taking a look at their era sources.

In a presentation to the board, marketing consultant Mike Hubbard with the Monetary Engineering Firm offered situations for retiring one, each or neither plant, and what to exchange them with. He stated it was extra financial to retire Healy Unit 2 with much less threat than retiring each. And Hubbard stated including wind energy was useful each environmentally and economically.

Advertisement

A number of folks testified through the assembly, together with representatives from two close by gold mines who stated their power costs have been excessive and that additionally they help decreasing emissions. Some testified in opposition to retiring a plant, together with those that cited concern for the neighborhood of Healy and employment there.

“Simply hold into consideration that not solely is it going to have an effect on the workers on the energy plant, it is also going to in all probability have an effect on the workers on the coal mine, as effectively, as a result of that is fairly a little bit of coal that they might not should be giving to us. That is going to have an effect on all of the contractors, that is gonna have an effect on simply greater than the city of Healy, and I simply need you contemplate that,” stated Christi Killian, who recognized as a management room operator certified to run each Healy Unit 1 and a couple of.

Others additionally spoke in regards to the significance of decreasing carbon emissions and concern over local weather change. A number of folks underscored the significance of jobs and coaching alternatives for these in Healy impacted by the potential closure.

“It is a actually tough resolution to make,” stated Bailey, with Golden Valley Electrical. “We’ve got workers and we’ve a neighborhood that operates round Healy Unit 1 and a couple of. So something that we do this impacts these crops, we acknowledge additionally impacts our workers there and that neighborhood.”

The board additionally instructed Golden Valley Electrical to give attention to alternatives for workers, together with jobs inside the cooperative, extra coaching, ability constructing or different transitional providers, Bailey stated.

Advertisement

Jessica Gerard, government director of the Fairbanks Local weather Motion Coalition, characterised the choice as a “actually massive win for us” as a result of it was not solely a step towards closing a coal plant, but in addition an funding in renewable power manufacturing and storage.

“The people who made this occur, so far as FCAC is anxious, (are) the member homeowners which were engaged with GVEA for years testifying and inspiring their shift to renewable power,” Gerard stated.

It is a consequential resolution for Inside Alaska, stated Philip Wight, an power and environmental historian and assistant professor of historical past and Arctic Research on the College of Alaska Fairbanks. He additionally works with the Alaska Public Curiosity Analysis Group, however stated he did not do any paid formal advocacy on the Healy subject.

Wight stated that always when renewables are introduced on-line, folks suppose they’re going to find yourself paying extra. However the Monday resolution was each a low-cost and low-carbon state of affairs, he stated.

“There was not a tradeoff right here between spending more cash and saving carbon, it was a win-win for each economics and the surroundings,” Wight stated.

Advertisement

And, he stated, it wasn’t only a resolution about one piece of energy era. As a substitute, the cooperative unveiled a number of situations that might diversify energy era away from coal, together with a big new battery and extra wind power, in addition to a purpose to buy energy from Southcentral, which is a step towards integrating energy alongside the Railbelt.

“That is arguably one of the crucial consequential choices GVEA has ever made as an electrical utility,” Wight stated.

©2022 the Alaska Dispatch Information, Distributed by Tribune Content material Company, LLC.





Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Early voting is surging, but not in rural Alaska

Published

on

Early voting is surging, but not in rural Alaska


Denise Shelton was one of hundreds of Anchorage-area voters who waited in the snow Thursday to cast their ballots.

Shelton, an East Anchorage resident, waited in line for 25 minutes as the snow came down outside the Division of Elections office on Gambell Street.

Shelton said she preferred voting early to sending in an absentee ballot by mail. She wanted to vote before Election Day to avoid the Tuesday post-work rush at the polling place.

Advertisement

The weather Thursday wasn’t great, but who knows — it could be worse on Tuesday, she said.

Shelton is one of 45,847 Alaskans who had cast their ballots as of Wednesday at one of a dozen early voting locations across the state — two each in Anchorage and Juneau, and one each in Eagle River, Fairbanks, Wasilla, Palmer, Nome, Soldotna, Kenai and Homer.

Early voting is on track to break state records that were set in 2020, said Division of Elections Regional Director Jeff Congdon, who oversees the Anchorage office. Typically, he said, early voting begins with a rush of excited voters but then tapers off as Election Day nears.

“This year, it hasn’t really tapered off,” said Congdon. “We’ve had many many days in a row where the lines are over an hour.”

Early and absentee voting increased in popularity across the country and in Alaska in 2020, when elections were held amid the COVID-19 pandemic-era restrictions. Now, the Alaska Republican Party — which has in the past discouraged voting methods other than same-day in-person ballots — is embracing early voting, with early ballots coming disproportionately from registered Republicans.

Advertisement

But early voting is not distributed equally across the state. Only voters in 10 communities — or those who happen to visit those communities ahead of Election Day — can vote early. In other communities, voters can cast absentee-in-person ballots that are counted similarly to ballots received by mail.

That means that in House Districts covering Homer, Kenai, Soldotna, Eagle River, Palmer and Juneau — early voting is soaring, with turnout already exceeding 10% in some House districts. But in communities that don’t have road access to an early voting location, like Ketchikan, Kodiak, Bethel, Utqiagvik and Kotzebue — the number of early voters is counted in single digits or dozens.

As of Wednesday, only five early votes came from Alaskans who reside in Bethel and the surrounding House district; and eight votes came from the House district covering the North Slope and Northwest Arctic. The only early voting location serving the area was in Nome — a place that is hundreds of miles and multiple plane rides away from voters in those communities.

Meanwhile, in three House districts covering most of the Kenai Peninsula, where there are early voting places in Homer, Kenai and Soldotna, 6,836 people had voted early.

‘Where else is something like that acceptable?’

Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher declined an interview request. She said that absentee-in-person locations make up for the lack of early voting locations in rural parts of the state.

Advertisement

According to the Division of Elections’ tally from Tuesday — a week before Election Day — 71,897 Alaskans had received or submitted absentee ballots. Of those, fewer than 2,600 had been submitted and tallied at in-person locations. A total of 27,330 absentee ballots had been received by the division through all methods, including mail.

“Early voting is limited to a few locations due to the requirements for access directly to the Voter Registration System. We are required to have them at the regional offices, and we have a few more in other locations. All other locations can have absentee in-person voting two weeks ahead, if they agree to hosting it in their locations,” Beecher said in an email.

Regional Division of Elections offices are located in Juneau, Anchorage, Fairbanks, Nome, Wasilla and Kenai. Beecher did not explain why some communities without such offices — including Homer, Palmer, Eagle River and Soldotna — had been given access to early voting, while other hub communities without access to the road system had not.

The discrepancy in early voting access could have far-reaching consequences for Alaska’s statewide election. In Alaska’s highly competitive congressional race, Democratic incumbent Rep. Mary Peltola is heavily favored by rural voters, while her Republican challenger Nick Begich is favored in conservative-leaning communities such as Wasilla, Palmer and Soldotna.

In-person absentee voting locations are meant to provide an alternative to early voting, but early data indicates they are underutilized in some rural communities. In House District 40, where a pivotal state House race could determine control of the chamber, only one Kotzebue resident’s absentee-in-person ballot had been received as of Tuesday. In House District 37, which covers Bristol Bay and the Aleutian Chain, only one voter — from King Salmon — had cast an absentee ballot in person. In House District 38, no in-person absentee ballots had been counted as of Tuesday.

Advertisement

According to the Division of Elections, absentee in-person voting locations are available in some rural villages — but not all. In House District 40, there are absentee-in-person locations in Utqiagvik, Kotzebue, Kivalina, Noorvik, Wainwright, Deering and Prudhoe Bay. That leaves Alaska residents in some villages with two options — cast a ballot by mail, despite a history of spotty service and delays, or wait for Election Day, which has its own history of unreliable staffing in some locations, including in the August primary, when some polling locations didn’t open on time.

Michelle Sparck, director of Get Out the Native Vote, a statewide nonprofit voter education organization, said Wednesday that her goal is to eventually have an in-person early voting opportunity in every rural district, including through early absentee voting. But the state offers poll workers only $100 in compensation for volunteering two weeks at the polling location, making it difficult for villages to find willing election workers, Sparck said.

Jeremiah Angusuc, the Nome-based Division of Elections regional director, said in a brief phone interview Wednesday that there are “no concerns for me at this time in my region” with regard to staffing polling places on Election Day.

Robyn Burke, an Utqiagvik Democrat running to represent House District 40, said Wednesday that she had cast an absentee-in-person ballot on Tuesday in Utqiagvik. According to records she saw at the polling place, only 14 other people had done so.

She said that on the first day of early in-person voting, which began Oct. 21, her sister had attempted to cast an absentee ballot in Utqiagvik, only to find that the borough building, where early voting was meant to take place, was closed.

Advertisement

“Where else is something like that acceptable outside of rural Alaska?” said Burke. “Even in the most rural communities anywhere else in the country, there would be an uproar.”

Burke is running against Republican-turned-independent incumbent Rep. Thomas Baker of Utqiagvik, and Democrat Saima Chase of Kotzebue. The outcome of the race could prove pivotal for control of the Alaska House next year. Burke said that if some polling places on the North Slope don’t open on Election Day — the result of the race could change.

Sparck said Wednesday that her organization had trained 13 election workers that will be ready to deploy on Election Day if needed in rural communities, in case poll workers don’t show up.

“We can’t apologize for trying to be strategic and trying to be prepared, even if it steps on some protocol,” said Sparck.

But a last-minute staffing shortage could be hard to fill, said Burke. There is only one regularly scheduled flight from Anchorage to Utqiagvik, and it arrives after the regularly scheduled flights from Utqiagvik to outlying villages depart.

Advertisement

• • •





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

A hunter in Alaska is found dead after being mauled by a bear

Published

on

A hunter in Alaska is found dead after being mauled by a bear


Toby, an orphaned four-year-old Alaskan coastal brown bear, stands and looks out over the compound at the Fortress of the Bear Center in Sitka, Alaska, on Aug. 1, 2013.

Charles Rex Arbogast/AP


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Charles Rex Arbogast/AP

A man from Sitka, Alaska, was found dead Wednesday after he was apparently attacked by a brown bear during a deer hunting trip, according to officials.

Advertisement

Tad Fujioka, a 50-year-old resident of Sitka, had been reported overdue from the deer hunting trip on Tuesday, the Alaska Department of Public Safety said in a statement. Fujioka’s remains were found at 11:30 a.m. local time Wednesday by search teams and an investigation shows “he was the likely victim of a fatal bear mauling,” the agency said.

Tim DeSpain, an information officer with the department, said Fujioka had killed a deer before being attacked by the brown bear.

“The area is remote and there are a lot of bears,” DeSpain told NPR.

Troopers and members of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game searched for bears “until daylight constraints affected the search, and did not locate the bears,” DeSpain said. “The bears consumed the deer and left the immediate area which is remote and difficult to access.”

Members of Fujioka’s family have been notified, the public safety department said.

Advertisement

Sitka is located in southeastern Alaska and is a community on Baranof Island. The community is nearly 100 miles south of Juneau, the state’s capital.

There are 30,000 brown bears estimated to be in Alaska, according to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. They normally live along Alaska’s southern coast and can weigh up to 1,500 pounds.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Halloween brings stormy weather to Alaska

Published

on

Halloween brings stormy weather to Alaska


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – A sunny break on Wednesday over Southcentral Alaska gave residents a chance to take a breather after nearly a foot of snow Monday to Tuesday.

But don’t get too relaxed, because Halloween in Southcentral is calling for snow and rain.

As for overnight, there is a chance of snow and temperatures in the 20s. That will mean slick roads, and with snow expected to fall Thursday morning, it could cover up those slippery areas of roads and highways. Take it slow in the snow!

The storm set to hit Southcentral is already pushing snow, freezing rain and gusty winds over Southwest Alaska. The storm is centered over the Bering Sea.

Advertisement

No advisories or warnings going into Wednesday night, but this next storm is likely to move in very challenging weather conditions all over again. Starting early Thursday, snow is likely to be falling over the Kenai Peninsula.

The snow will move north to Anchorage, with 2 to 3 inches possible, and then mix with rain by afternoon, and in another possibility, if temperatures remain too warm, rain could be substantial, about 7/10 of an inch.

Southeast Alaska will get a break Thursday and Friday too. Halloween should remain mostly dry, with just a few showers. Another storm front reaches the region by the weekend.

The hot spot for Alaska on Wednesday was Sitka at 55 degrees and the cold spot was Anaktuvuk Pass with a temperature of 15 degrees below zero.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending