Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska: The Sad Story of the Navy’s Failed Mini-Battleship Plan

Published

on

Alaska: The Sad Story of the Navy’s Failed Mini-Battleship Plan


The Alaska-class appeared like a good suggestion in principle. And, but, these mini-battleships, or what we all know in the present day and formally referred to as a battlecruiser, failed for a lot of causes. Right here is why: The idea of “battlecruiser” had been conceived within the early twentieth century as an evolution of the armored cruiser. The thought was to create a warship that had the velocity of a quick cruiser with a highly effective important battery that was close to on par with that of a battleship. Nevertheless, after the First World Warfare, the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 primarily restricted the variety of capital ships that the key powers might possess and that included the battlecruiser.

In consequence, the United States Navy, which had constructed a fleet of battleships, had been a latecomer to the battlecruiser idea. It wasn’t till the late Thirties {that a} want for such a warship was even seen.

Meet the Alaska-class

The origin of the Alaska­-class started within the Thirties when Nazi Germany developed a category of huge but quick cruisers that the British Royal Navy dubbed “pocket battleships.” The U.S. Navy sought to counter these warships with the Alaska-class. Nevertheless, the event of this new class of warship had really lingered on the drafting board till the U.S. Navy responded to the rumors that Japan was constructing its personal “tremendous cruisers.”

Advertisement

President Franklin D. Roosevelt has been credited with supporting this system, which was thus created as a lot from politics as from true wartime pondering.

Designed to prowl the oceans and seek out enemy commerce raiders, these “battlecruisers” possessed excessive velocity and appreciable firepower; but weren’t highly effective sufficient and lacked the armor safety to tackle precise battleships. In consequence, critics of the vessels have instructed they have been each state-of-the-art and out of date on the similar time.

All six of the subsequently deliberate vessels have been to be named after territories or insular areas of the US and the explanation was considerably becoming in that these weren’t battleships, that are sometimes named for states; nor have been the ships really cruisers, which had been named for cities and city. The Alaska-class was primarily a brand new, and even unchartered, territory in warship design.

In response to Jane’s Combating Ships of World Warfare II –initially revealed by the navy analyst agency as Jane’s Combating Ships 1940/41/42/43/44/45 – all have been “Ordered in September and formally described as ‘Bigger Cruisers.’ Actually, they’re the primary battlecruisers to be ordered by any Navy because the Washington Convention met in 1921. The 12-inch weapons are of a brand new and highly effective mannequin. Inclusive value is formally estimated at $74,066,000 per ship. Three extra ships of this kind, Philippines, Puerto Rico and Samoa, approved in 1940, have been cancelled on June 24, 1943. Hawaii, nonetheless incomplete has been laid up awaiting ultimate determination regarding armament, which can be modified to incorporate rocket projectors.”

USS Alaska (CB-1) entered service in June 1944, whereas her sister USS Guam (CB-2) joined the fleet a couple of months later. A 3rd ship within the class, USS Hawaii (CB-3), was laid down and nonetheless underneath building when the struggle ended, whereas the three moreover deliberate vessels have been subsequently canceled.

Advertisement

The Alaska-Class in Wartime

Displacing almost 34,253 lengthy tons underneath full load, the Alaska-class was barely on the massive finish for cruisers however was by no means a battleship. The ships primarily arrived in time to fulfill a menace that now not existed.

They have been fitted with 9 12-inch/50 caliber Mark 8 naval weapons, a barrel measurement not really utilized by the U.S. Navy in three a long time; nonetheless, it was really a brand new breed of naval cannon. It was in a position to fireplace particular “tremendous heavy” shells that supplied efficiency barely superior to that of the older battleships mounting 14-inch naval weapons. The Mark 8 was really thought-about probably the most highly effective naval gun of the struggle when it comes to measurement.

The Alaska-class was designed to withstand cruiser weapons although it lacked the armor of the bigger battle wagons. Moreover, the vessels have been designed with out a torpedo protection system, so that they couldn’t have simply prowled on enemy transport on their very own.

Nevertheless, what the ships lacked in armor and safety they made up for in velocity because the ships might obtain as much as 33 knots, which allowed them to maintain tempo with carriers – at the least in principle. Because of the size of the battlecruiser and its single rudder meant it had a big turning radius of 800 yards, which wouldn’t have been preferrred in fight.

Advertisement

Thankfully, the 2 vessels have been by no means really put to the check.

Neither USS Alaska nor USS Guam ever really confronted Japanese battlecruisers in fight, and as a substitute, each ships served largely in assist of U.S. landings and escort roles. Through the summer time of 1945, the 2 ships performed a number of shore bombardment missions, and when the struggle ended every supplied help within the switch of energy of Korea from Japanese to Allied forces. Each ships participated in Operation Magic Carpet, the repatriation of American forces.

The 2 battlecruisers have been decommissioned in February 1947 and remained within the reserve fleet in New Jersey till the Sixties, when every was damaged up for scrap. As famous by Jane’s, the third ship of the category, the unfinished USS Hawaii was briefly thought-about for conversion to a guided-missile cruiser to fireside the U.S. Navy’s model of the German V-2 Rocket, however the plan did not get previous lawmakers in Congress, and later to have her function as a command ship alongside the Baltimore-class cruiser USS Northampton, however by no means mission moved ahead. The unfinished ship was scrapped in 1959 and with it ended the U.S. Navy’s experiment with the battlecruiser.

Now a Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based author who has contributed to greater than 4 dozen magazines, newspapers and web sites. He repeatedly writes about navy {hardware}, and is the writer of a number of books on navy headgear together with A Gallery of Army Headdress, which is offered on Amazon.com. Peter can also be a Contributing Author for Forbes.



Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Moderate earthquake strikes south-central Alaska

Published

on

Moderate earthquake strikes south-central Alaska


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – A moderate earthquake occurred in south-central Alaska Sunday afternoon, striking at 2:42 p.m.

Its epicenter was located about 24 miles due east of Anchorage with a depth of 18 miles.

No damage or injuries were reported.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

OPINION: CDQ program and pollock fishery are essential to Western Alaska

Published

on

OPINION: CDQ program and pollock fishery are essential to Western Alaska


By Eric Deakin, Ragnar Alstrom and Michael Link

Updated: 1 hour ago Published: 1 hour ago

We work every day to support Alaska’s rural communities through the Community Development Quota (CDQ) program and have seen firsthand the lifeline the program provides to our state’s most isolated and economically vulnerable areas.

Advertisement

This program is one of the most successful social justice programs in the United States, giving rural, coastal communities a stake in the success of the Bering Sea fisheries, and transferring these benefits into community investments. Our fisheries participation provides $80 million to $100 million of programs, wages and benefits into Western Alaska annually, and the full economic reach of the CDQ program is substantially larger when accounting for jobs and support services statewide.

In some communities, CDQs are the largest and only private-sector employer; the only market for small-boat fishermen; the only nonfederal funding available for critical infrastructure projects; and an essential program provider for local subsistence and commercial fishing access. There is no replacement for the CDQ program, and harm to it would come at a severe cost. As one resident framed it, CDQ is to Western Alaska communities, what oil is to Alaska.

Consistent with their statutory mandate, CDQ groups have increased their fisheries investments, and their 65 member communities are now major players in the Bering Sea. The foundation of the program is the Bering Sea pollock fishery, 30% of which is owned by CDQ groups. We invest in pollock because it remains one of the most sustainably managed fisheries in the world, backed by rigorous science, with independent observers on every vessel, ensuring that bycatch is carefully monitored and minimized.

We also invest in pollock because the industry is committed to constantly improving and responding to new challenges. We understand the impact that salmon collapses are having on culture and food security in Western Alaska communities. Working with industry partners, we have reduced chinook bycatch to historically low levels and achieved more than an 80% reduction in chum bycatch over the past three years. This is a clear demonstration that CDQ groups and industry are taking the dire salmon situation seriously, despite science that shows bycatch reductions will have very minimal, if any, positive impact on subsistence access.

The effects of recent warm summers on the Bering Sea ecosystem have been well documented by science. This has caused some species to prosper, like sablefish and Bristol Bay sockeye salmon, while others have been negatively impacted, including several species of crab and salmon. Adding to these challenges is the unregulated and growing hatchery production of chum salmon in Russia and Asia, which is competing for limited resources in the Bering Sea, and increasing management challenges.

Advertisement

Attributing the current salmon crises to this fishery is misguided and could cause unnecessary harm to CDQ communities. Without the pollock fishery, we would see dramatic increases in the cost of food, fuel and other goods that are shipped to rural Alaska. We would also see the collapse of the CDQ program and all that it provides, including a wide array of projects and jobs that help keep families fed and children in school.

The challenges Alaska faces are significant, and to address them we need to collectively work together to mitigate the impacts of warming oceans on our fisheries, build resiliency in our communities and fishery management, and continue to improve practices to minimize fishing impacts. We must also recognize the vital need for the types of community investments and job opportunities that the CDQ program creates for Western Alaska and ensure these benefits are considered when talking about the Bering Sea pollock fishery.

Eric Deakin is chief executive officer of the Coastal Villages Region Fund.

Ragnar Alstrom is executive director of the Yukon Delta Fisheries Development Association.

Michael Link is president and CEO of Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp.

Advertisement

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

‘Drag racing for dogs:’ Anchorage canines gather for the ‘Great Alaska Barkout’

Published

on

‘Drag racing for dogs:’ Anchorage canines gather for the ‘Great Alaska Barkout’


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Alaska’s first “flyball” league held its annual “Great Alaska Barkout Flyball Tournament” on Saturday in midtown at Alyeska Canine Trainers.

Flyball is a fast-paced sport in which relay teams of four dogs and their handlers compete to cross the finish line first while carrying a tennis ball launched from a spring loaded box. Saturday’s tournament was one of several throughout the year held by “Dogs Gone Wild,” which started in 2004 as Alaska’s first flyball league.

“We have here in Alaska, we’ve got, I think it’s about 6 tournaments per year,” said competitor and handler Maija Doggett. “So you know every other month or so there will be a tournament hosted. Most of them are hosted right here at Alyeska Canine Trainers.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending