Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska child care study shows sizable state subsidy gap

Published

on

Alaska child care study shows sizable state subsidy gap


A first-of-its-kind study into child care in Alaska shows a sizable gap between state subsidies and the true cost of child care.

When determining child care subsidies, state officials have used a market-based survey, which simply summarizes what providers charge for child care. A true cost study is much more expansive, and includes all of the expenses actually required to provide child care.

The 112-page true cost study, written by the McKinley Research Group, was unveiled on Friday at a child care task force meeting. Gov. Mike Dunleavy established the task force last year through an administrative order to improve the affordability, availability and quality of child care in Alaska.

Advertisement

The study shows the average monthly cost of providing child care at licensed centers across Alaska ranges from $1,785 for infants to $1,250 for preschoolers. The average monthly cost of providing child care at home-based centers averages at $911 per child.

But those costs vary widely by region in Alaska, with higher figures reported in rural parts of the state that have higher utility and transportation costs. Some regions in Alaska have few, if any, licensed child care options, the report’s authors said.

Senate Bill 189, a landmark child care measure, passed into law last week. The new law expands the income threshold for families who can receive child care assistance. The Alaska Department of Health estimated that an additional 18,000 Alaska kids under 12 will meet the new criteria for assistance at a cost to the state of $5.6 million per year.

[Alaska child care advocates hope new law and $7.5 million in subsidies will help beleaguered sector]

Friday’s report describes a substantial cost for families above what they receive in state child care assistance. The average gap at child centers ranges from $766 per month for toddlers to $360 per month for preschoolers. The gap at home-based centers, though, is much lower.

Advertisement

In an interview Friday, Leah Van Kirk, health care policy adviser for the Department of Health commissioner’s office, said state health officials refer to child care costs in excess of state assistance as “the over-and-above.”

She said around 20% to 30% of child care spots in Alaska are filled by families who receive state child care assistance. Low-income families are underutilizing that assistance “because they can’t afford the over-and-above,” Van Kirk said.

Low wages, lack of availability and high tuition costs have left Alaska’s child care sector in crisis. Half of families report they cannot fully participate in the labor force due to the cost, availability, or quality of child care in Alaska, the McKinley Group’s report stated.

Child care advocates applauded SB 189 passing into law and said it was a good first step to stabilize the sector.

Stephanie Berglund, CEO of thread Alaska — a child care advocacy network — said the gap shown between state subsidies and the true cost of child care was unsurprising. She said Friday’s report would help inform strategies to strengthen the sector and improve affordability for families.

Advertisement

“The exciting part about this study is it’s going to give more accurate numbers to what that gap is and how we can better support child care businesses and the sector overall,” she said.

Earlier in the year, thread Alaska called on the Legislature to appropriate $30.5 million for the beleaguered child care sector. The Legislature approved $7.5 million for providers.

Berglund said Friday that advocates are “really excited” about the $7.5 million appropriation, but she anticipated a larger funding request next year than $30.5 million. Robert Barr, Juneau’s deputy city manager and a member of the governor’s child care task force, echoed Berglund.

“I think the subsidy rates will have to increase for the families who need it,” he said.

Task force members, though, expressed caution. They said providers often set their tuition costs based on child care subsidy rates. Boost state subsidies, and tuition costs could inadvertently increase too much for families who don’t receive state assistance.

Advertisement

Berglund said that finding, too, was unsurprising. There could be strategies to decouple subsidies from tuition costs or potentially a flat subsidy paid to providers, task force members said.

The governor’s child care task force issued its first set of recommendations in December to stabilize the sector. Those recommendations included state wage subsidies for child care workers.

The task force is now finalizing a second set of recommendations. Those include allowing state subsidies at unlicensed child care providers run by friends and neighbors; finding underused space in schools that could be used for child care, and subsidizing child care for the children of child care workers.

Anchorage Republican Rep. Julie Coulombe, the lead sponsor behind SB 189 and a member of the task force, said she was really “pleased that the task force is wrapping up with some good, detailed recommendations that, if implemented, can help working families access quality childcare.”

The second set of child care recommendations are set to be put out for public comment later in August, before they are then submitted to Dunleavy in September.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Search underway for 4 missing people in waters off Homer

Published

on

Search underway for 4 missing people in waters off Homer


By Anchorage Daily News

Updated: 26 seconds ago Published: 1 hour ago

Authorities say a search was underway Sunday for four people, two adults and two juveniles, in the waters off Homer after a vessel capsized Saturday.

The U.S. Coast Guard received a mayday call around 7 p.m. Saturday for a 28-foot aluminum vessel taking on water with eight people aboard, according to Petty Officer Shannon Kearney. Four people were rescued by a good Samaritan vessel, with no reports of injuries, Kearney said.

Advertisement

An active search continued Sunday morning for the four people still believed to be in the water, she said. Coast Guard assets involved in the search include the cutter Naushon, a C-130 and helicopter, and two 29-foot vessels.

The Coast Guard arrived on scene at about 8 p.m., officials said.

Alaska Wildlife Troopers and multiple good Samaritan vessels were also involved, a troopers spokesman said Sunday morning.

The search area is roughly 14 nautical miles west of the Homer Spit, according to the Coast Guard.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Anchorage School Board looks to punish the indirect ‘disturbing’ of ‘sexual orientation’

Published

on

Anchorage School Board looks to punish the indirect ‘disturbing’ of ‘sexual orientation’


Students, staff and volunteers throughout the Anchorage School District may soon face stiff punishments for indirectly “disturbing” someone’s claimed sexual orientation.

In a proposed revision, the board will be introducing changes to its Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying policy at its Aug. 6 meeting. The changes were recommended by a subcommittee and passed on to the board for a final vote.

The current policy seeks to foster a positive school environment by defining harassment, intimidation and bullying, while also imposing punishments on staff, students and volunteers who run afoul of the rules. Disciplinary actions include suspension or expulsion for students, suspension or termination for staff, and denial of opportunities for volunteers.

Advertisement

The current policy makes no mention of sexual orientation, nor does it address “indirect” harassment. Instead, it defines harassment, intimidation and bullying as action that “physically harms” a student, “has the effect of substantially interfering” with education, is “intimidating or threatening,” or substantially disrupts orderly school operations.

The new and vastly expanded proposal, however, defines harassment as “the intentional behavior by a student (or group of students) that is disturbing or threatening to another student. Intentional behaviors that characterize harassment include “unwelcome verbal or written comments,” which are either “direct or indirect” and related, but not limited to, race, religion, sexual orientation, cultural background, economic status, size or personal appearance.

Other districts across the nation that have instituted such sweeping policies have used them to target conservative and religious minded staff.

Advertisement

While the proposed Anchorage policy includes a disclaimer stating it “should not be interpreted to prohibit a reasoned and civil exchange of opinions or debate that is protected by law and School Board Policy,” the policy opens the door for district officials to clamp down on a wide range of unwanted free speech.

The nonprofit legal group, Alliance Defending Freedom, has represented numerous educators across the nation who have been targeted by similarly worded policies.

“Unfortunately, radical gender ideology and its accompanying pronoun demands aren’t giving people that freedom,” the group’s website warns. “Many corporations and government officials label it offensive, discriminatory, and harmful not to use a person’s ‘preferred pronouns.’ And, in the name of diversity and inclusion, this leads them to fire or ‘cancel’ those who don’t toe the line. Ultimately, activists’ goals are to change the way you think, to punish any dissent, and to render it difficult (if not impossible) to communicate the truth that God created each of us either male or female.”

Click here to support Alaska Watchman reporting.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Airfare wars start with no notice. But staying informed helps a savvy traveler find the best deals.

Published

on

Airfare wars start with no notice. But staying informed helps a savvy traveler find the best deals.


Last week I was staying up late and getting up early to review the latest versions of on-again, off-again fare skirmishes both in Europe and between Anchorage, Hawaii and the West Coast.

Just to be clear: Airlines don’t run ads or issue news releases announcing that fares are going down or popping right back up. But if you happen to be planning a trip in the midst of a fare war, you could score a really good deal. Last Tuesday and Wednesday, some travelers scored tickets to Hawaii on Delta for $128 each way. Anchorage-Portland tickets were available for $108 one-way, before popping back up on Thursday.

At the same time, a big discount wave washed over Europe. Delta and United were the major players, with basic economy fares as low as $456 round-trip between Anchorage or Fairbanks and Barcelona.

Those fares to Europe all have popped back up to the $600 range for round-trip tickets. That’s not a bad price for fall or winter travel to Europe, but I’m quite confident the rates will drop again.

Advertisement

All of the great rates I found were basic economy fares. Travelers buying the cheapest fares board last, which means there’s no overhead bin space. They receive less credit toward their frequent flyer plan and cannot choose their seats in advance. The budget travelers are also last in line for any upgrades, too.

So, the challenge for mileage hounds and upgrade-seekers is how much extra airlines will charge for those add-ons: advance seat assignments, full mileage credit and a decent shot at an upgrade.

[US proposal would bar airline fees for parents to sit beside kids on flights]

When the basic economy fares first were introduced, the upcharge was about $30 each way for most destinations. Between Anchorage and Seattle, Delta still charges $30 more for the main cabin fares, while Alaska Airlines charges $35 each way.

For Saver travelers, Alaska Air awards 30% of the actual miles flown toward a traveler’s Mileage Plan account. Delta doesn’t allow any SkyMiles credit for basic economy flyers.

Advertisement

South of Seattle, the spread between the basic and main cabin increases. Between Anchorage and Honolulu, Alaska Air charges $55 one-way for an upcharge to a main cabin fare on its nonstop flight. Delta charges $50.

Travelers headed to Chicago can fly nonstop from Anchorage on Alaska or United. American also flies each day — but their flights are more expensive. I don’t know why. Both Alaska and United charge $40 each way for an upcharge to the main cabin.

United’s basic economy is particularly onerous regarding carry-on luggage. Unless you pay the upcharge, you’re not allowed to bring aboard a standard-size rolling suitcase to stuff in the overhead bin. If you get to the gate and the agent busts you for trying to smuggle on your suitcase, there’s an extra $25 penalty in addition to the bag fee.

Between Anchorage and Washington, D.C., Alaska Airlines charges between $50 and $84 each way for the upcharge to main. United charges between $50 and $74 each way. Delta charges between $30 and $65 each way.

If you’re traveling within Alaska on Alaska Airlines, all the economy seats are main cabin seats. Further, travelers can check up to three bags at no additional cost.

Advertisement

Both Alaska Airlines and Delta Air passengers can check two bags at no additional charge when traveling to or from Alaska and the Lower 48 or Hawaii. Delta travelers who reside in Alaska must belong to the airline’s SkyMiles loyalty plan. Alaska Air travelers must belong to its Club 49 plan for residents.

Travelers to Europe face a different equation when it comes to the difference between basic economy and the main cabin. The upcharge to main cabin also includes a checked bag.

If you’re flying to Paris, the cheapest fare on Delta in mid-October is $591 round-trip. A checked bag will cost you an additional $150. If you choose to pay $210 more, you can pick your seat in advance and get your first checked bag at no additional cost.

United offers the same package, for a little less: $200. American also charges $200 more and includes a pre-assigned seat and one checked bag (up to 23 kilograms).

Travelers to Asia have a few more twists in the equation. Flying to Singapore, United Airlines has a great fare of $798 round-trip. There’s just one stop in San Francisco on the outbound date I checked (Aug. 29). Even a basic economy ticket includes one checked bag. An upcharge to the main cabin for $160 round-trip includes the fee for a second checked bag.

Advertisement

By the way, United’s return flight from Singapore goes through San Francisco and Denver. It makes for a 30-hour travel day.

Traveling from Anchorage to Tokyo on Delta, the cost for basic economy is $1,552 round-trip. That price includes a free checked bag. The upcharge to main is $260. Once you’ve got your credit card out, though, Delta is likely to tempt you with an upgrade to Comfort+ for an additional $360. That’s a total of $2,172, or $620 more than the basic economy rate. The biggest benefit with Comfort+ is a few inches of extra legroom.

Depending on the airline, travelers to Asia may be able to choose a seat in advance and pay for it even if they’re traveling on a basic economy ticket.

[With seat sizes and passenger priorities changing, the cheapest ticket isn’t always the best]

There are different terms and conditions for traveling to different continents, including South America and Africa. The take-home message is this: The advertised price probably is not what you’re going to pay when you check out. In addition to basic vs. main, there may be additional fees for preferred seating, for any food you pre-order or if you want to pay for priority boarding or to go to a lounge before your flight.

Advertisement

For travelers who compare airlines before making a decision, these additional fees and options make the job harder. A travel agent can advise you on the best options for a flight, including whether or not you’re likely to make a tight connection in … say … Seattle. But the agent will charge an additional fee. Even so, if booking travel is not your core competence, an agent’s counsel could save you a lot of money and aggravation.

It can be confusing to keep track of what airline offers this or that. But it’s worth it to be aware that the optional fees will boost the cost of your next trip.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending