Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska Airlines flight attendants to vote on second sellout contract deal

Published

on

Alaska Airlines flight attendants to vote on second sellout contract deal


Alaska flight attendants: Tell us how you’re voting on this tentative agreement and why by filling out the form below. All submissions will be kept anonymous.

Alaska Airlines aircraft sit in the airline’s hangar at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2024, in SeaTac, Washington. [AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson]

More than two years after contract negotiations began, the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) has announced a vote on the latest tentative agreement (TA) reached by the union leadership and Alaska Airlines.

Rank-and-file workers soundly rejected the previous TA in August by a vote of 68 percent, with a high turnout of 94 percent of the 6,900 flight attendants in the bargaining unit. Flight attendants cited “poverty-level wages,” building up unsustainable debt and scrambling to make rent as reasons to vote down the agreement that did not address their concerns.

The AFA bureaucracy hailed the August TA as a “record” deal, with AFA President and Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member Sara Nelson telling Forbes that the agreement was “leading the industry.” At the time, voting was opened on the TA before the contract language was even finalized, angering workers who called for a postponement of the vote until they could see the final details.

Advertisement

At the time, the company was offering a 15 percent wage increase with 2 percent raises each year over four years. Accounting for 20 percent inflation since 2019, however, the offer equated to only a 1 percent raise above pre-pandemic wages.

The latest TA is essentially unchanged, with base pay seeing only minimal increases for flight attendants with over 13 years of seniority. Flight attendants currently receive no boarding pay, meaning they work for free while performing critical safety and preparatory tasks during passenger boarding. The new TA provides a marginal amount of boarding pay which would slightly benefit only more junior flight attendants, who tend to work shorter routes and thus have more boardings.

Voting will begin on February 11 and close on February 18, giving workers a week to decide whether to ratify the contract. The AFA fully backs the new TA and expects the membership to vote to approve it, despite the agreement being nearly the same as before with only a new coat of paint.

Flight attendant workers should once again rally for the rejection of the tentative agreement at Alaska Airlines. The fact that the AFA is presenting an agreement that is for all purposes the same as the one workers voted down in August is a slap in the face and a betrayal to the rank and file who desperately need significant raises.

With this proposal, the AFA is siding with the company on the issue of maximizing profits and minimizing wages. To achieve their necessary demands, flight attendant workers will need to override their own union and insist on a contract with adequate pay and working conditions.

Advertisement

Flight attendants must carry their struggle forward in rebellion against the corporate flunkeys in the AFA apparatus. This means forming rank-and-file committees to enforce democratic decision-making, countermanding actions which violate their will and providing workers with a platform to discuss and plan actions they deem necessary.

The union bureaucrats anticipate the rebellious rank and file to fold from the pressure of this being the last chance to vote on a proposal before fresh bargaining begins in April, for a combined contract covering both Alaska Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines flight attendants following a merger between the two entities.

The Alaska contract, if approved, would provide a baseline for negotiating an agreement covering 6,900 Alaska Airlines and 2,200 Hawaiian Airlines flight attendants. The union bureaucracy sees the ratification of this TA as a way to grease the wheels to ram the next contract through without significant worker resistance in April.

Taylor Garland, spokesperson for the AFA, puffed up the new agreement when he said it “addresses issues identified by members, puts in place significant economic gains, and provides the foundation we need for a second bite of the apple in this merger.”

Christina Frees, a Seattle-based flight attendant who has worked for Alaska for 13 years said she expects the agreement to pass this time under the pressure even though it is “not an overall improvement at all.”

“They put us in between a rock and a hard place. I do believe it’s likely to be ratified because the cost of living is high and the pay is so bad,” Frees said. “We have to get the increase in pay, otherwise we sit for another two to three years waiting for a merger contract.”

Advertisement

Thresia Raynor, a flight attendant based in Anchorage, Alaska with over 17 years of experience said that rank-and-file union members “are all fully aware of the consequences of turning it down this time.” She repeated the coercive hope dangled in front of members by the union bureaucracy when she said, “It’s the only deal we are going to get, with the hope of more gains later in the joint collective bargaining agreement” with the Hawaiian flight attendants.

The AFA union is using this “ticking clock” pressure against their own membership in order to ram through the same sellout agreement as before with only token changes. The union bureaucracy is only interested in securing their own positions and cozy relationships with the company management and politicians who have a vested stake in securing a subpar agreement.

The Alaska Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines merger will also trigger a union election for new leadership. The president, vice president and secretary-treasurer will be selected using a highly undemocratic process. Eight voting members will be responsible for choosing the slate, six local presidents from Alaska bases and two from Hawaiian bases. Two out of eight of these individuals will be candidates seeking election, which is a huge conflict of interest. Rank-and-file union members will be allowed to vote for candidates who essentially chose themselves for the bureaucratic leadership roles.

The AFA stands by its undemocratic farce of an election process, claiming it provides equal representation for smaller bases such as San Diego. In practice, the system allows a small clique to maintain control over the union bureaucracy.

A proposal was made during the AFA board of directors convention in Atlanta last May to amend the bylaws to allow a democratic full membership vote for leadership positions, but the same small clique used their exclusive voting rights to swiftly kill the proposal.

Despite the costly impending merger with Hawaiian Airlines and a rough start to 2024, Alaska Airlines raked in record profits this last year. Passenger levels rose even higher than pre-pandemic counts in 2024 and Alaska rode the air traffic boom along with the rest of the major US airlines.

Advertisement

Alaska Air Group reported a net 2024 profit of $395 million compared to $235 million in 2023. Alaska ended the year with a positive cash flow of $949 million, despite spending $659 million on the merger with Hawaiian Airlines and $1.3 billion on aircraft and equipment. Alaska projects the Hawaiian merger will increase their pretax profits by $1 billion over the next three years. Delta Airlines similarly reported $3.5 billion in net profits and United Airlines $3.1 billion in 2024.

In a recent earnings call, Alaska Air Group CEO Ben Minicucci said he “couldn’t be happier that we reached an agreement in concept” with the AFA. Boasting about the airline’s “outstanding financial performance,” he said he looks forward to the April joint negotiations after the merger.

By way of contrast with the thriving corporate profits, in 2023, Alaska flight attendants set up a private Facebook page called “Alaska Airlines FAs experiencing hunger and homelessness.” In this group, workers share their stories of poverty and are able to receive financial help through Venmo and tips about where to find free food in the cities where the airline operates.

Rebecca Owens is one of the group’s founders along with fellow Anchorage-based flight attendant Thresia Raynor. “When you go to work, you see all these bright shining faces. We’re known for that, right?” Owens said. “You don’t see the difficulty that people are facing. Oftentimes it’s actually hidden because people feel so ashamed.”

“We needed somewhere that people can finally talk about it so that nobody is struggling alone anymore,” she said.

Advertisement

The “last chance” pressure tactics used by the union bureaucracy should be seen for what they are, a collusion with the company to ram through an insulting contract against the wishes of the membership. To prepare a struggle against both Alaska Airlines and the AFA bureaucracy, flight attendants should organize rank-and-file committees which will provide the means to link up with workers in other airline companies and separate industries to receive and provide support in the fight for workers’ common interests.



Source link

Alaska

First Alaska mule deer harvest follows years of fleeting appearances in the state

Published

on

First Alaska mule deer harvest follows years of fleeting appearances in the state


An adult male mule deer walks on Oct. 22, 2024, in the National Elk Refuge in Wyoming. (Gannon Castle / U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

When Westin Nelson of Skagway became the first Alaska hunter on record to harvest a mule deer, he may have been doing the state a favor.

Mule deer, better known as inhabitants of the Rocky Mountain and Great Plains regions, have been expanding their range northward, including into Alaska. As they do so, they are expanding the risks of parasites and some contagious diseases.

The most concerning issue is the winter tick, or Dermacentor albipictus. It has yet to be documented in Alaska, but it has wiped out much of the moose population in New England and started causing problems for moose populations as far north as Canada’s Yukon and Northwest Territories.

In recent years, nearly half of the mule deer examined in the Whitehorse area were found to be tick-infested, said Dr. Kimberlee Beckmen, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s wildlife biologist. That is ominous for Alaska, she said.

Advertisement

“All it takes is one mule deer with one female tick on it to come into Alaska, and that would completely devastate our moose population,” Beckmen said.

Mule deer have been well-established in the Yukon Territory since at least the 1980s, and in Alaska, people have been spotting them on sometimes fleeting occasions for a little over a decade.

Most sightings have been in the northern part of the Southeast Panhandle, but some were as far north as Interior Alaska. Three mule deer were reported in 2013 near Delta Junction, one was photographed near the Fort Knox mine outside of Fairbanks in 2016 and one was struck by a vehicle and killed in North Pole in 2017, according to the Department of Fish and Game.

Though they are related to the Sitka black-tailed deer that live in territory stretching from the British Columbia rainforest to the Kodiak Archipelago, mule deer are different from their Alaska cousins.

The contrast is striking, said Nelson, the Skagway hunter.

Advertisement

“These deer are big, maybe twice the size of Sitka black-tailed deer,” he said. “Mule deer have enormous ears. They have ears like a mule.”

A chart shows the difference in sizes betwen mule deer and whitetail deer, which are newcomers to Alaska, and Sitka blacktail deer, which have a long-established population. (Illustration provided by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game)

Adult Sitka black-tailed deer generally weigh 80 to 120 pounds, according to the Department of Fish and Game, while adult mule deer often weigh more than 200 pounds.

Nelson said he has seen mule deer occasionally in the Skagway area over the past few years. He had a light-hearted competition with a friend about who would be the first to hunt one. It was not until April when circumstances came together to result in a successful hunt — right in that friend’s yard.

“I just happened to kind of get lucky,” Nelson said.

The rules for hunting mule deer in Alaska, where the species is non-native and considered “deleterious,” are liberal. There are no seasonal restrictions and no bag limits. Even though it took until this year for Nelson to become the first hunter on record to harvest a mule deer in Alaska, state officials first authorized mule deer hunting in 2019.

The caveat for mule deer hunters is that the Department of Fish and Game wants them to submit tissue samples for testing. That is to screen for signs of tick infestations and for numerous problems like brain worm, also known as “moose sickness,” chronic wasting disease, different types of hemorrhagic diseases, bluetongue, worm infestation and other diseases or parasites.

Advertisement

Nelson provided abundant samples to the department: the hide, head and neck, liver, heart, lungs, spleen, lower colon and two lower legs with the hooves attached, according to officials with the Department of Fish and Game.

Importantly, Beckmen with the department said, there were no signs of hair loss or breakage in the hide, indicating that any tick infestation during the past winter was unlikely.

Nelson said he has been reading up on mule deer and the state’s concerns about ticks and other dangers. But he downplayed any contributions he might have made to state wildlife safety. “I wouldn’t say I’m super-noble or anything. I just wanted to get one,” he said.

Climate change, along with factors like road-building and agricultural development, have allowed mule deer to thrive in new territory even as some habitat is lost to development, according to the Department of Fish and Game.

Climate change is also helping spread the winter tick northward and westward.

Advertisement

The ticks do not travel on their own. Rather, they grow from eggs that are laid on the ground in the spring that grow into larvae that climb up plants in packs to latch onto passing hosts in the fall, a process known as “questing.” If they stay attached all winter, they develop into adults that repeat the cycle by dropping from their hosts in spring to lay eggs. Shorter winters and later snowfalls are increasing opportunities for successful questing by the ticks, scientists say.

In New England, moose have been found with tens of thousands of winter ticks embedded in their skin. The blood loss they cause can be fatal, especially to young moose. In Maine, for example, biologists in 2022 found that 86% of the moose calves they had collared died from tick infestations. In New Hampshire, the moose population now is only about half of what it was in the 1990s, according to state biologists there.

The image of a “ghost moose” with significant hair loss from winter tick infestation is captured on a remote camera in a New England forest on April 25, 2022. (Photo provided by the U.S. Geological Survey Massachusetts Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit)

While mule deer can become infested with winter ticks, they also are able to get rid of them fairly effectively through self-grooming.

Moose lack those grooming skills. That results in moose rubbing and scratching off so much of their hair that they are called “ghost moose” because their bald spots make them look white.

Mule deer are not the only species expanding their range to Alaska.

Another such species is the mountain lion, also known as cougar. The Alaska Board of Game early this year approved a first hunting and trapping season for mountain lions. It is set to start on Aug. 1 in parts of Southeast Alaska.

Advertisement

Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

University of Alaska names U.S. Army commander as new UAF chancellor

Published

on

University of Alaska names U.S. Army commander as new UAF chancellor


The University of Alaska Fairbanks campus, photographed in October 2019. (Loren Holmes / ADN archive)

Officials with the University of Alaska have tapped the commander of the U.S. Army 11th Airborne Division’s Arctic Aviation Command as the new permanent chancellor of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Col. Russell “Russ” Vander Lugt was selected from four finalists after an eight-month search process. He will be the top executive of Alaska’s leading research institution, which describes itself as “America’s Arctic university.” He will replace interim chancellor, and former U.S. Ambassador to the Arctic, Mike Sfraga, who succeeded former chancellor Dan White who announced his retirement in May of last year.

Vander Lugt is a senior U.S. Army officer, an Arctic scholar and UAF alumni, with over two decades of executive leadership experience, according to a university announcement on May 27. He has served as commander of the 11th Airborne Division’s Arctic Aviation Command at Fort Wainwright in Fairbanks since Aug. 2024.

“I’m humbled to be selected to lead the University of Alaska Fairbanks during this pivotal time,” Vander Lugt said in a statement with the announcement.

Advertisement

“I look forward to leading through trust, transparency, and teamwork as we see Alaska and the Arctic transformed through education, research, and public service. I’m committed to building on the strong foundation Chancellors Sfraga and White have established, and working closely with university leadership and governance to support and advance UAF’s mission,” he said.

Russell “Russ” Vander Lugt is seen in an undated photo. (Photo provided by the University of Alaska)

Vander Lugt will step into the permanent chancellor role on Sept. 8. Sfraga’s last day was Friday, and university officials have selected Larry Hinzman, director of the UA Arctic Leadership Initiative, to serve as interim chancellor through the summer.

Vander Lugt has had a long career with the U.S. Army in various roles in Alaska, where he is stationed in Fairbanks, and across the U.S. His resume lists deployments to Europe and the Middle East.

He served in executive leadership roles that include the Alaskan Command, a division of the U.S. Northern Command, the 601st Aviation Support Battalion, and the 1st Stryker Brigade Combat team. He also taught history and military leadership as an assistant professor at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and was a professor of military science and department chair at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, Arizona.

He holds a master’s degree and doctoral degree in Arctic and Northern Studies, which he completed in 2022 at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Vander Lugt’s hire is the latest in major leadership changes in the University of Alaska system — former UA President Pat Pitney retired last month and former university attorney Matt Cooper was named as her successor. Cooper will begin as university president in early August, and Michelle Rizk, vice president of university relations and chief strategy, planning and budget officer, is serving as interim president. Cheryl Siemers was appointed permanent chancellor of the University of Alaska Anchorage in March, after serving as interim chancellor since the retirement of former chancellor Sean Parnell last year.

Advertisement

Vander Lugt’s base salary will be $309,000, according to the university’s announcement.

The University of Alaska Fairbanks serves roughly 7,500 students. It employs more than 800 faculty and nearly 2,000 staff across urban and rural campuses in Fairbanks, Kotzebue, Nome, Bethel and Dillingham.

Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Dutch Harbor Remembrance Day 2026 – Mike Dunleavy

Published

on


WHEREAS, on June 3, 1942, six months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, World War II arrived in Alaska when Dutch Harbor on Amaknak Island was bombed by Japanese – the first aerial attack by an enemy on the continental United States; and

WHEREAS, the Japanese pilots expected little resistance; but because of an intercepted message three weeks earlier, the installation was on high alert, and Navy and Marine personnel were prepared with anti-aircraft defenses; and

WHEREAS, encountering unexpected resistance at Dutch Harbor, installation, Japanese forces shifted their focus to the Margaret Bay Naval Barracks, where the attack claimed the lives of 25 servicemen; and

WHEREAS, following the initial attack on Dutch Harbor, Japanese forces launched additional assaults on Dutch Harbor, Adak, Kiska, and Attu, resulting in the Aleut people being evacuated and held in internment camps in Southeast Alaska for three years, through which many did not survive; and

Advertisement

WHEREAS, the brave soldiers of the United States Armed Forces and allied Canadian Forces fought valiantly for more than a year to reclaim the remaining Aleutian Islands. The battle of Attu stands as one of the most costly American assaults in the Pacific, with hundreds of servicemen making the ultimate sacrifice to liberate Alaska; and

WHEREAS, on the 84th anniversary of the bombing of Dutch Harbor, we remember and honor all who were affected by the attack, paying tribute both to the military personnel who served and died to defend our Nation and to the Aleut people who died while imprisoned.

NOW THEREFORE, I, Mike Dunleavy, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, do hereby proclaim June 3, 2026, as:

Dutch Harbor Remembrance Day

in Alaska and encourage all Alaskans to join with the people of Dutch Harbor, Unalaska, and the Aleutian Islands to honor all who were lost in Alaska during World War II, and I order the Alaska State Flag to be flown at half-staff in remembrance of those who perished.

Advertisement

Dated: June 3, 2026



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending