Connect with us

West

3 Northern California officers charged with involuntary manslaughter of suspect pinned face-down on ground

Published

on

3 Northern California officers charged with involuntary manslaughter of suspect pinned face-down on ground

Three Northern California law enforcement officers have been charged with involuntary manslaughter in the death of a man who was pinned facedown during a 2021 incident that drew comparisons to the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

The charges against James Fisher, Cameron Leahy and Eric McKinley were announced Thursday by Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price.

The charges were filed just before the statute of limitations were to expire and marked a reversal of a decision by a previous district attorney who cleared the officers of wrongdoing.

HOMICIDE SUSPECT FATALLY SHOT BY POLICE OUTSIDE SAN FRANCISCO

Mario Gonzalez, 26, died in the city of Alameda on April 19, 2021. McKinley, Fisher and Leahy were all Alameda police officers at the time. McKinley and Leahy are still with that department but Fisher is now a Contra Costa County sheriff’s deputy.

Advertisement

The officers confronted Gonzalez after receiving 911 calls that said he appeared disoriented or drunk. According to police video, he resisted being handcuffed and they pinned him to the ground for several minutes before he became unconscious.

Three California police officers have been charged in the 2021 death of Mario Gonzalez. (Fox News)

The county coroner’s autopsy report listed the cause of death as “toxic effects of methamphetamine” with the contributing factors of “physiologic stress of altercation and restraint,” morbid obesity and alcoholism. Then-District Attorney Nancy O’Malley subsequently found that the officers’ actions were reasonable.

A second, independent autopsy done at the request of Gonzalez family lawyers found that he died of “restraint asphyxiation.” The district attorney’s office noted the second autopsy in announcing the involuntary manslaughter charges.

Defense attorneys denounced the charges as politically motivated, noting that an effort to oust Price has gathered enough signatures to force a recall election this year.

Advertisement

Fisher’s attorney, Michael Rains, said the charges are a “desperate effort to shore up her chances of remaining in office,” Bay Area News Group reported.

The district attorney waited “until the 11th hour” before the statute of limitations was set to expire and just days after it was confirmed she would face a recall, attorney Alison Berry Wilkinson, who represented the three officers in previous investigations and now represents Leahy, said in an email to The Associated Press.

“There is no new evidence,” Berry Wilkinson wrote. “This is a blatantly political prosecution.”

Berry Wilkinson said the officers’ actions were reasonable, necessary and lawful, and the death was due to drug toxicity.

“We are confident a jury will see through this charade and exonerate the officers, just as the two prior independent investigations did,” the attorney said.

Advertisement

An attorney for McKinley was not immediately available for comment Friday.

Price said she was “walled off” from the case review, which was conducted by her office’s Public Accountability Unit.

Last year, Alameda settled two lawsuits over Gonzalez’s death. The city agreed to pay $11 million to his young son and $350,000 to his mother.

“A wrong has been righted,” Adante Pointer, the attorney for Gonzalez’s mother, told the news group.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

Wind damage highlights insurance challenges for Montana homeowners

Published

on

Wind damage highlights insurance challenges for Montana homeowners


It’s the talk of the town this week — powerful winds ripped the roof off Lincoln Elementary School on Sunday, leaving students, teachers, and residents in shock.

The incident has sparked concern among homeowners who are now worried about how such weather damage could impact their own homes—and what their insurance would cover.

According to Tauna Locatelli, owner of Advantage Insurance, most insurance policies have a set deductible for things like fire or theft, but wind and hail damage deductibles are often much higher, or even based on a percentage of a property’s value.

Quentin Shores reports – watch the video here:

Advertisement

Wind damage highlights insurance challenges for Montana homeowners

“Right now our industry is going through a really challenging time, especially when it comes to wind and hail in Montana. Several carriers are going to a standard ‘all peril’ deductible for everything other than wind and hail. So, it could be $1,000 for all but wind and hail, $2,500 wind and hail,” Locatelli explained.

A deductible is the amount homeowners must pay before insurance covers the rest. For wind and hail, that deductible can be steep.

Advertisement

“Some companies are going 1 or 2% of a coverage value, so that’s the building value. If it’s insured for $500,000 and you have a 1% deductible, you’re looking at a $5,000 deductible for wind and hail, which is what we get in Montana,” Locatelli said.

It’s important for homeowners to know their deductible—if repairs cost less than the deductible, insurance won’t pay anything.

Filing small claims can also impact your rates; Locatelli said, “Because if you have a $3,000 patch job claim and you have a $5,000 deductible, you really don’t want to file that because you’re not going to get anything in. That claim is going to follow your insurance record for five years.”

Age of property factors in as well. If you have an older roof, insurance may not fully cover its replacement.

“You’ve now lived half the roof life. Well, insurance is about indemnity and putting you back in the same condition you were in before the loss. You can’t put a 16-year-old roof on a home, so at 16 years, they’ll now pay 50% of that roof instead of 100% because it’s already lived half of its life. And then it drops each year as it goes by,” Locatelli added.

Advertisement

The bottom line: Keep your property maintained, review your insurance policy, and think carefully before filing a claim—especially as Montana faces more intense weather.





Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

‘I am very sorry’: Health district board votes to ditch proposed septic regulations

Published

on

‘I am very sorry’: Health district board votes to ditch proposed septic regulations


Retirees Sandra and George Stewart began building their forever home in 1977, in a neighborhood off of Sahara Avenue and Jones Boulevard. They have lived there ever since.

George Stewart, a Vietnam War vet, said homeownership was a welcome prize for his service.

Now, there’s only one problem — the house’s septic system. When it was built, sewer lines did not exist in that part of Las Vegas, and the Stewarts say they now face pressure from local agencies to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to tap into the city sewer system so that the water they use can be recycled and sent back to Lake Mead.

“We’ve worked really hard and paid off our house,” Sandra Stewart said. “Then we retired, and now we’re on a fixed income. There is no way we can afford this. We’ll end up selling our dream home.”

Advertisement

The Stewarts were two of at least a hundred Las Vegas Valley residents who spoke to officials Wednesday during the public comment section of a special board meeting of the Southern Nevada Health District.

Board members, including several public officials from across the valley, unanimously voted to rescind proposed regulations for about 18,000 septic systems in the valley. More than 1,000 people showed up to a public outreach meeting last month to express their dissatisfaction with any change to current regulations.

Though not under consideration at Wednesday’s meeting or the last one, a previous version of the rules could have required homeowners to apply for a permit every five years for $226.

“All I want to say is I am very sorry,” said County Commissioner April Becker, following an hour of public comment that even included a caller from Sandy Valley. “I‘m thankful that you came out every single time. And as painful as these meetings are for me, I’m just happy I’m here right now to be able to vote the way you want me to.”

Water savings, but a supposed health issue, too

Southern Nevada agencies have long pushed for homeowners to consider tapping their homes into the larger wastewater recycling system in the face of what scientists call a “megadrought” that hasn’t let up in two decades.

Advertisement

Assembly Bill 220, signed into law in 2023, gave the Southern Nevada Water Authority the broad legal power to limit residential water use. The bill originally contained a provision that would have required septic-to-sewer conversions but was later amended to make the conversions voluntary.

The water authority has limited funds available to offset the cost of conversions should homeowners wish to apply. Available grants could cover the entire conversion, or at least a good portion of it.

Many homeowners who spoke, like Las Vegas resident Greg Austell, said they see the supposed water savings the region would gain from conversions as a thinly veiled attempt to facilitate the valley’s uncontrolled growth.

“It’s driven politically by the Southern Nevada Water Authority to get water credits,” Austell said. “Why? So we can increase expansion of the valley during a severe drought, which makes no sense. Water is essential to live. Why are we expanding?”

Southern Nevada’s water managers have said that growth is inevitable and necessary to stimulate the economy. Accommodating growth is built in to the region’s long-term water plans, which get updated yearly.

Advertisement

While Las Vegas City Councilwoman Shondra Summers-Armstrong voted with her colleagues on the board and said she admired the community’s persistence, she emphasized that the issue of septic-to-sewer conversions must be re-visited in the future.

“At some point, we’ve got to find a way to come to a happy medium, or a compromise,” she said. “Water is a real issue, and none of us will be able to remain living here without it.”

Contact Alan Halaly at ahalaly@reviewjournal.com. Follow @AlanHalaly on X.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Mexico

Route 66 stamps will make their debut later this year

Published

on

Route 66 stamps will make their debut later this year


ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – The U.S. Postal Service is commemorating the centennial anniversary of Route 66 with a set of eight stamps.

The stamps feature eight different photographs from each state that Route 66 runs through. For New Mexico, a photo shows a old Grants Cafe sign.

Greg Breeding, an art director for USPS, designed the stamps and stamp pane using existing photographs by David J. Schwartz.

The stamps will make their debut at the National Postal Forum, also known as the NPF, at the Phoenix Convention Center on May 5. The event will be free and open to the public.

Advertisement

Route 66 was established on Nov. 11, 1926. It originally stretched about 2,400 miles from Chicago to Los Angeles. Dubbed “The Mother Road” by author John Steinbeck, Route 66 became a national symbol of freedom and adventure.

News of the stamps is being shared online with the hashtag #Route66Stamps.

Lowrider stamps

In another nod to local car culture, the USPS will begin issuing its Lowrider Forever stamps in sheets of 15 beginning Friday.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending