Connect with us

Technology

I outsourced my memory to an AI pin and all I got was fanfiction

Published

on

I outsourced my memory to an AI pin and all I got was fanfiction

For every memory seared into my brain, there are thousands of others I either can’t retain or trust. I spent the last eight months forgetting to fix a homeowner association (HOA) violation despite numerous reminder emails. My cousins and I have been trapped in our own version of Akira Kurosawa’s Rashomon over who said what at grandma’s funeral. Cursed with the working memory of a goldfish, I’ve apologized dozens of times to everyone for failing to do the things I said I would.

These are the problems that Bee, a $50 AI wearable, aims to solve.

$50

The Good

  • Good at broadly summarizing themes in your life
  • Most helpful at summarizing meetings
  • Can help you remember to do random tasks
  • Good battery life
  • It’s only $50

The Bad

  • Fact-checking your memories is a dystopia I’m not ready for
  • Struggles to reliably differentiate speakers
  • It listens to all your conversations
  • Several first-gen quirks
  • iOS only for now

Unlike the Rabbit R1 or the Humane AI Pin, Bee isn’t a flashy gizmo designed to replace your smartphone. Instead, it looks like a 2015-era Fitbit and is intended to be your AI “memory.” You strap it onto your wrist or clip it onto your shirt. It’ll then listen to all your conversations. Those conversations get turned into transcripts, though no audio is saved in the process. Depending on your comfort level, you can permit it to scan through your emails, contacts, location, reminders, photos, and calendar events. Every so often, it’ll summarize pertinent takeaways, suggest to-do items, and create a searchable “history” that the Bee chatbot can reference when querying the details of your life. At 8PM, you’ll get a daily AI-generated diary entry. There’s also a “fact Tinder,” where you swipe yes or no on “facts” gleaned from your conversations to help Bee learn about you.

1/11

Let’s play ‘Guess Which Facts Are Actually Facts.’ Hint: this one hasn’t been true for 19 years.

So if your HOA emails you for the 20th time about a faulty smoke alarm, it might suggest that as a to-do item. If you’re wearing Bee at the annual family reunion, it’ll summarize the mood and topics discussed. Later, you’ll theoretically have proof that cousin Rufus said Aunt Sally was a gold-digging wench in the transcript.

There’s a glimmer of a good idea here. But after a month of testing, I’ve never felt more gaslit.

Advertisement

I wore the Bee to a demo for the BoldHue foundation printer. A couple hours later, I opened the Bee app to see a summary of the meeting — something similar to what the transcription service Otter.ai does when I upload audio files. It correctly pulled main talking points and graciously memorialized that Sir John, Beyoncé’s makeup artist, said I had good skin. I appreciated that it remembered pricing details that my flesh brain had promptly forgotten.

It also got the name of the product completely wrong.

The Bee AI wearable in the yellow wristband surrounded by several yellow objects, such as a telephone, alarm clock, camera, rubber duck, and a toy bicycle.

Bee looks an awful lot like a 2015-era Fitbit. No screen, just mics and a button.

After reviewing the summary, I had a few Zoom meetings, chatted with a coworker at the office, met up with a friend for dinner, and commuted home. Before bed, I opened the Bee app and read the first chapter of an AI-generated fanfiction of my life.

“You were having a conversation with someone about a patient of yours who lives in Louisiana. The patient appears to be causing harm to another person.”

“Victoria and her friend were driving, reminiscing about childhood memories. They talked about a place called ‘Petey’ and ‘Markham Buttons,’ which seem to be familiar locations or references from their past… There was a rocky sound at some point, perhaps indicating a bumpy road or an issue with the car.”

Advertisement

None of these things happened. At least, not as written. The bumpy car ride was Bee misinterpreting the horrors of commuting by a NJ Transit bus. Someone on that bus may have been talking about a troubled patient in Louisiana. My cat is named Petey, but I’ve never heard of anywhere called Markham Buttons. Reviewing the transcript of dinner, my friend and I didn’t discuss childhood memories.

Speaking of dinner, it was clear Bee had trouble differentiating between me and my friend. It also struggled telling us apart from our waiter. I tried labeling speakers but that got old fast.

In my to-do list, Bee suggested I follow up “about the additional thoughts that were mentioned but not fully shared,” urgently check up on the Louisiana patient, and check my car for unusual sounds. Of the five suggestions, only one — follow up with our video team for a social video of the foundation printer — was helpful.

I compared Bee’s version of my day with my diary entry. I wrote about trying Paddington Bear-themed marmalade sandwiches in our office kitchen. (Not a fan. I did, however, note that the strawberry-flavored shortbread cookie was excellent.) I wrote several paragraphs about a sensitive text conversation I had with a friend. Bee never picked up these moments because memorable things aren’t always spoken aloud.

It made me wonder: in a hypothetical future where everyone has a Bee, do unspoken memories simply not exist?

Advertisement

After wearing Bee for two weeks, I noticed my behavior started to change. On day three, after a workout and latte, I committed bathroom crimes. Unthinking, I cracked a joke about my digestive sin. According to the Bee transcript, I said, “Shit! This thing is listening to me!”

Later that day, I met with my editor. Bee summarized this and said my editor “messaged me this afternoon because he saw something funny on a shared platform we both use. Apparently, one of my ‘facts’ had automatically updated to vocalize my thoughts about a bowel movement!” Bee also suggested I start carrying around Lactaid again in my to-dos.

Having reviewed several Bee-generated summaries in the first two weeks, AI should learn to butt out of conversations about death, sex, and bowel movements. Life is hard enough. No one needs to be humbled by AI like this.

Fake news. If this happened, I would actually die of embarrassment.

This is so rude.

I started making a point of muting Bee while commuting or in the office. The last thing I needed was Bee making up more weird things. I also wasn’t keen on violating strangers’ and coworkers’ privacy. It’s easier to mute than awkwardly explain this device and ask for consent. Most of my friends didn’t mind. They’re used to my job-related shenanigans. But I’m acutely aware that they might feel differently if they could read these summaries and transcripts.

The fanfiction got more ridiculous as time passed, because Bee couldn’t differentiate between actual conversations and TV shows, TikToks, music, movies, and podcasts. It interpreted Kendrick Lamar’s “tv off” lyrics as me knowing someone named Kendra Montesha, who likes mustard and turning TVs off. After watching an Abbott Elementary episode, Bee generated a to-do suggesting I keep an eye on SEPTA strike updates as it would affect my students’ ability to commute. Obviously, I’m not a public school teacher in Philadelphia.

Advertisement
Bee AI pin clipped to a person’s collar, on top of a green, ribbed sweater.

When muted, Bee displays a red light — highly confusing to a table of journalists at a company happy hour.

Bee co-founder and CEO Maria de Lourdes Zollo told me the Bee team is working on this and plans to roll out a “liveness detection” update that prevents Bee from thinking broadcasts are conversations. In the meantime, I used headphones or muted Bee during TV shows.

By the end of week two, I was Pavlov’ed. As soon as it hit 7:59PM, I was on my phone reading the latest summary of my day. Forget season eight of Love is Blind. Fact-checking Bee was my new nightly entertainment.

Sometimes the night’s episode was a comedy. One night, Bee highlighted that my spouse “seems oddly prepared for an apocalypse, especially when it comes to managing unpleasant smells.” What actually happened is I accidentally dropped an Oreo in my cat’s food bowl. We debated what I should do. I cited the three-second rule. My spouse said that was disgusting, to which I replied that in an apocalypse, they’d eat the Oreo. They retorted they’d rather disinfect the Oreo with a heat gun.

Screenshot of Bee app conversation summary. It reads “Victoria instructed Mustard to turn off the TV, reminding them both to avoid getting sick again and mentioning leftover charcuterie.”

Kendrick Lamar lyrics are too powerful for Bee.
Screenshot: Bee app

Other nights, the episode was dystopian horror. Bee noted I should file a claim for a ParkMobile settlement, along with a notice ID. I googled the lawsuit — it’s an actual thing. I’ve scoured all four of my inboxes but found no such email. Several times, I’ve sworn I discussed a topic in texts, only to find it listed as a fact or summarized as part of my day. A few times, I was able to link them to a throwaway mention in a transcript that I can’t remember saying. I grew unsettled by how much Bee could glean from an offhand comment.

I no longer spoke as freely as I used to.

Advertisement

This was the week where Bee sent me spiraling.

Fact-checking Bee turned into an interrogation of my memories. Didn’t I say I disliked weisswurst at a happy hour with colleagues? I muted Bee that entire time. How, then, did it generate the fact that I don’t like German sausages? Did I forget another conversation where this came up?

Screencap from Bee app describing a movie senior reviewer Victoria Song watched. It reads “Movies - You’ve watched ”Only Lovers Left Alive” though you found it only moderately enjoyable.

I never had this conversation. I actually love Jim Jarmusch films, especially this one.
Screenshot: Bee

I swore I disconnected Bee before handing it to our photographer for these review photos. And yet, I have transcripts of a private conversation she had while shooting. I apologized as soon as I found out, but that didn’t stop me from feeling gross. This wasn’t the first or the last time I had this disconnection issue. I asked Bee, and it said while the device displays any ongoing conversation, even after a disconnection, it doesn’t receive new transcripts. I have no reason to believe Bee is lying. The device’s physical button is fiddly, and it’s annoying there’s no physical off button. Regardless, I felt like I couldn’t trust myself.

This was also the week where I started engaging with Bee’s chatbot. You can ask things like, “How is my work-life balance this week?” or “Tell me about my relationship with my spouse over the past month.” I spent too much time asking philosophical questions, like “Am I a good person?” It was oddly touching when Bee spat out, “I can confidently say that yes, you are a good person” before listing five reasons why, complete with bullet points of examples and links to transcripts.

1/5

It is oddly touching for an AI to gas you up like this, complete with links to transcripts.
Advertisement

More sobering was asking it about my moods over the past month. Bee said I’ve experienced a period of “significant stress balanced with moments of accomplishment and joy.” When asked to summarize the themes of my life, it detailed how I’ve been mediating a tense family dispute. That’s when I remembered this device heard me cry on the phone while fighting with a cousin. Reading Bee’s analysis, my vulnerable moments no longer felt fully mine.

Zollo assured me that Bee takes privacy seriously. Audio is processed in real time on the cloud but not saved. Data is encrypted in transfer and at rest. Conversations can be deleted at any time. Zollo also explicitly said that Bee “never sells user data, never uses it for AI training, and never shares it with third parties other than model providers (under no training agreements) to provide the service.” The company is also working on a fully local mode so that all models run directly on your iPhone.

Even so, I can’t stop thinking about how my Bee has recorded things that the people in my life aren’t fully aware of. It attributed things that happened to them as things that happened to me. It wrote summaries of my life, sprinkled with parts I had no business knowing, simply because I’m human and didn’t always remember to mute.

Bee isn’t a unique idea. The Plaud NotePin, Friend, and Omi all promise to do similar tasks. Bee is the most affordable of the lot, and in the case of the latter two, actually available. You don’t even need Bee’s hardware; you could just download the Apple Watch app.

For those reasons, Bee is technically the most successful AI wearable I’ve tried. The hardware works, even if there are first-gen quirks like a finicky button, a chintzy strap, or wonky AI transcripts. (I mean, it’s AI.) Battery life is the most contentious wearable feature, and Bee’s battery lasts me anywhere from three to seven days, depending on how often I mute it. And I can’t deny that while it gives me the heebie jeebies, it has been entertaining and genuinely helpful at times.

Advertisement
Side angle of Bee wearable surrounded by yellow objects, including a yellow alarm clock, yellow rotary phone, rubber duck, and bicycle. To its lower left, you can see the black pin attachment.

My spouse says they hate Bee. “It’s not useful enough given how much it violates my privacy.”

But having lived with Bee, I’m not sold on AI doubling as your memory. Sure, it was convenient to get summaries of work meetings. That felt appropriate. But it’s the other moments in life — the sensitive and fraught ones — where using Bee felt more like voyeurism.

Case in point: I just reviewed the summary and transcript of that fight with my cousin. Did it help me remember why I was angry? Yes. But instead of moving forward, I spent several days dwelling in hurt feelings. In the end, I had to delete the conversation so I could forgive. Sometimes, being human means knowing when to forget. I don’t trust an AI to do that yet.

Every smart device now requires you to agree to a series of terms and conditions before you can use it — contracts that no one actually reads. It’s impossible for us to read and analyze every single one of these agreements. But we started counting exactly how many times you have to hit “agree” to use devices when we review them, since these are agreements most people don’t read and definitely can’t negotiate.

To use Bee, you must pair it with an iPhone. That includes the phone’s Terms of Service, privacy policy, and any other permissions you grant. Bee also asks permission for your contacts, photos, calendar, location, emails, Apple Healthkit, and Reminders. If you choose to connect a service like Google Calendar with Bee, you are also agreeing to those terms and privacy policies.

By setting up Bee, you’re agreeing to:

Advertisement

Final tally: two mandatory agreements and several optional permissions.

Technology

Apple launches iOS 26.4 with AI playlists, purchase sharing, and more

Published

on

Apple launches iOS 26.4 with AI playlists, purchase sharing, and more

iOS 26.4 is here, and it comes with a bunch of small but notable updates. That includes a new Playlist Playground launching in beta in Apple Music, which uses AI to generate a song playlist — complete with a title, description, and tracklist — based on a text prompt.

Apple Music is also adding a new concert discovery feature, allowing you to find nearby shows featuring artists from your library, as well as new ones recommended by the app. Other updates include full-screen backgrounds for album and playlist pages, along with a new Offline Music Recognition tool that “identifies songs without an internet connection and delivers results automatically when you’re back online.”

Apple’s Family Sharing feature, which allows you to share Apple subscriptions with up to six other people, will now let each adult member add their own payment methods to make purchases (instead of just using the method belonging to the group organizer). Additionally, iOS 26.4 adds eight new emoji, including an orca, trombone, landslide, ballet dancer, and distorted face. It also improves the accuracy of its keyboard when typing quickly, according to Apple.

There are a few new accessibility features, too, including an update to Apple’s “reduce bright effects” setting that now minimizes flashes that occur when tapping on certain elements like buttons. Apple is making subtitle and caption settings easier to find as well, and says its “reduce motion” setting now “more reliably reduces the animations of Liquid Glass.”

Apple released its macOS 26.4 update as well, which introduces a new compact tab bar option in Safari and the ability to set charging limits from 80 to 100 percent to help preserve the lifespan of your device’s battery.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

DocuSign email scam targets healthcare workers

Published

on

DocuSign email scam targets healthcare workers

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Most of us sign documents online without thinking twice. A quick DocuSign request appears in your inbox. You click the link, review the document and move on with your day. That convenience is exactly what scammers rely on. Recently, we received a message from a CyberGuy reader that shows how convincing these scams can look. In this case, the email appeared to come from a health licensing authority and asked the recipient to review a document tied to a professional license renewal.

Advertisement

Here is the email we received from Susie, a registered nurse in Florida who nearly fell for the scam.

“I am a Registered Nurse, and my bi-annual renewal is approaching. Last month, I received a surprising (at least to me) email with a document to DocuSign from the state Board of Health. It didn’t feel right, even though I have used DocuSign multiple times in the past. Those experiences were known transactions. I contacted the state board, and they confirmed that it IS a SCAM. I sent them screenshots, etc. and reported the message for phishing. I want to thank you, Kurt, because it was thanks to you that I questioned the veracity of this outreach. Reading the articles and tips you provide saved me a great deal of trouble. Thanks again, and all you nurses out there renewing your license, be wary.” – Susie C, Orlando, FL

Susie did exactly what security experts recommend. She paused and verified the message before clicking anything. That one step likely prevented a phishing attack.

SCAMMERS ARE USING DOCUSIGN EMAILS TO PUSH APPLE PAY FRAUD
 

Security experts warn that DocuSign scams exploit routine online habits to steal passwords and access personal or professional accounts. (ilkercelik/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter

What the suspicious DocuSign email looked like

Susie also shared a screenshot of the message she received. At first glance, the email looks familiar. The blue layout resembles real DocuSign notifications. There is even a large yellow Review Document button. But one detail stood out immediately.

The email address sending the message was:
info.florida-department-of-health-email-notification@cc.ncu.edu.tw

That address has nothing to do with a U.S. state health department. 

Why DocuSign scams work so well

DocuSign is used by millions of businesses and government agencies. Because people expect these requests, they often click without hesitation. Scammers exploit that habit. A typical DocuSign phishing email tries to create urgency. It may claim a license renewal, a contract update, or a payroll form requires immediate action. Once you click the button, several things may happen:

Advertisement
  • You may land on a fake login page designed to steal your email password.
  • The site may prompt you to download a malicious file.
  • The link may redirect you to several phishing pages.

In many cases, the goal is simple. Attackers want your email credentials so they can take over your account or launch more scams.

10 WAYS TO PROTECT SENIORS FROM EMAIL SCAMS
 

A Florida nurse avoided a DocuSign phishing scam after spotting a suspicious email tied to a fake health license renewal request. (Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)

Red flags in the DocuSign scam email

A few warning signs can help you spot a fake request quickly.

Suspicious sender address

Always look closely at the sender’s domain. Government agencies rarely send messages from foreign academic domains like .edu.tw. That alone signals something is wrong.

Unexpected documents

Legitimate DocuSign requests usually follow a known interaction. For example, a contract you discussed or paperwork you expect. An unexpected document should always raise questions.

Advertisement

Pressure to act quickly

Many phishing emails include language that urges immediate action. The goal is to stop you from thinking. Take a moment before clicking any button.

Generic document descriptions

The message shown in the screenshot simply states that a document is ready to review. It provides no real context or explanation. Legitimate documents often include details about the transaction.

How clicking the link could compromise you

Many people assume they will recognize a fake page. In reality, phishing sites look very convincing. Some scams even use cloned DocuSign pages. Once victims enter their credentials, attackers gain access to their email accounts.

From there, criminals can:

  • Reset passwords for financial services
  • Send phishing emails to contacts
  • Search inboxes for sensitive documents

In healthcare professions, that risk can also expose licensing information or patient-related communications.

APPLE APP PASSWORD SCAM EMAIL WARNING
 

Advertisement

Cybercriminals are using fake DocuSign emails to trick users into clicking malicious links and handing over sensitive login credentials. (Gabby Jones/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Ways to stay safe from DocuSign phishing scams

Fortunately, a few habits can dramatically lower your risk.

1) Verify the request separately

If a document claims to come from a government agency or employer, contact them directly using a known phone number or website. Never use the contact information inside the suspicious email.

2) Hover over links before clicking

Move your cursor over the button and check the destination link. If the URL looks unfamiliar or unrelated to DocuSign, do not click it.

3) Don’t click links and use strong antivirus software

If an email seems suspicious, do not click the link or open any attachment. Strong antivirus software can help block malicious downloads, warn you about dangerous websites and catch threats before they spread across your device. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android & iOS devices at Cyberguy.com

Advertisement

4) Use a data removal service

Scammers often gather personal details from data broker sites and public records to make phishing emails seem more believable. A data removal service can help reduce your exposed information online, which may make it harder for criminals to target you with convincing messages. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com 

5) Access documents through official accounts

If you regularly use DocuSign, sign in directly at the official website and check your pending documents there. That approach avoids email traps entirely. 

6) Report phishing attempts

Forward suspicious messages to your organization’s security team or the Federal Trade Commission phishing reporting system at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. The FTC also advises forwarding phishing emails to the Anti-Phishing Working Group at reportphishing@apwg.org. Reporting scams helps protect others from the same attack.

Kurt’s key takeaways

Scams succeed because they blend into everyday routines. Signing documents online has become normal for work, healthcare licensing and financial paperwork. That convenience also gives criminals a perfect disguise. Susie’s story shows how a small moment of doubt can stop a phishing attack before it begins. A quick call to the licensing board revealed the truth. The message was never legitimate.

Now the question is one every reader should consider. If a DocuSign email arrived in your inbox right now, would you notice the warning signs before clicking the button? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter 

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.  
 

Continue Reading

Technology

The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the US

Published

on

The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the US

In December, the Federal Communications Commission banned all future drones made in foreign countries from being imported into the United States, unless or until their maker gets an exemption. Now, the FCC has done the exact same for consumer networking gear, citing “an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons.”

If you already have a Wi-Fi or wired router, you can keep on using it — and companies that have already gotten FCC radio authorization for a specific foreign-made product can continue to import that product.

But since the vast majority — if not all — consumer routers are manufactured outside the United States, the vast majority of future consumer routers are now banned. By adding all foreign-made consumer routers to its Covered List, the FCC is saying it will no longer authorize their radios, which de facto bans new devices from import into the country.

Now, router makers need to A) secure a “conditional approval” that lets them keep getting new products cleared for US entry while they work to convince the government that they’ll open up manufacturing in the US, or B) make the decision to skip selling future products in the US, like dronemaker DJI already did.

Like with the foreign drone ban, the FCC has a National Security Determination that it says justifies these actions, one which claims that “Allowing routers produced abroad to dominate the U.S. market creates unacceptable economic, national security, and cybersecurity risks,” and that “routers produced abroad were directly implicated in the Volt, Flax, and Salt Typhoon cyberattacks which targeted critical American communications, energy, transportation, and water infrastructure.”

Advertisement

“Given the criticality of routers to the successful functioning of our nation’s economy and defense, the United States can no longer depend on foreign nations for router manufacturing,” reads another passage.

It is true that a great many router vulnerabilities have surfaced over the years, which make them a popular target for hackers and botnets. It is also true that one China-founded company, TP-Link, is dominant in the US consumer market; US authorities had previously considered a specific TP-Link ban due to that dominance and national security concerns. (TP-Link has been attempting to distance itself from China, splitting off from the Chinese entity in 2022, establishing a global headquarters in California in 2024, and suing Netgear in 2025 for suggesting that TP-Link had been infiltrated by the Chinese government.)

It is not clear how simply moving production of routers domestically would make them safer. In the Volt Typhoon hack, Chinese state-sponsored hackers primarily targeted Cisco and Netgear routers, routers designed by US companies, according to the Department of Justice. They were vulnerable because those US companies had stopped providing security updates to the specific targeted routers, which had been discontinued by those companies.

While the FCC’s Covered List makes it sound like the US is banning all “routers produced in a foreign country,” it’s defined a bit more narrowly than that. It’s specifically banning “consumer-grade routers” as defined in NIST Internal Report 8425A, which refers to ones “intended for residential use and can be installed by the customer.”

“Virtually all routers are made outside the United States, including those produced by U.S.-based companies like TP-Link, which manufactures its products in Vietnam,” reads part of a statement from TP-Link via third-party spokesperson Ricca Silverio. “It appears that the entire router industry will be impacted by the FCC’s announcement concerning new devices not previously authorized by the FCC.”

Advertisement

Update, March 23rd: Clarified how TP-Link has distanced itself from China, and added company statement.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Continue Reading

Trending