Connect with us

Technology

Amazfit Helio Smart Ring review: bargain bin bust

Published

on

Amazfit Helio Smart Ring review: bargain bin bust

Smart rings are in the middle of a renaissance. That’s great because we finally have way more options than just an Oura Ring. The downside is most of Oura’s would-be rivals are launching their first, maybe second-gen smart rings. Meaning, if you want an Oura Ring alternative, there’s a good chance you’ll have to put up with quirks and a distinct lack of polish. The $199.99 Amazfit Helio smart ring is no exception.

Amazfit isn’t a household name but is well-known among wearable bargain hunters. It’s a compelling brand because its gadgets get you a lot of bang for your buck. That’s the case with the Helio ring, the brand’s first foray into smart rings. It’s primarily a sleep tracker, but it comes with an AI chatbot called Zepp Flow, an AI coaching feature, and it has an electrodermal activity (EDA) sensor for monitoring stress, a blood oxygen sensor, a temperature sensor, and period tracking. It also syncs with popular third-party fitness apps like Adidas Running, Strava, and Komoot, as well as Apple Health and Google Fit. Like the Samsung Galaxy Ring, it works with Amazfit’s other smartwatches so you can double up on data sources — or switch between the two depending on the activity or remaining battery life.

$170

The Good

  • No subscription
  • Works with Amazfit smartwatches
  • Decent sleep and recovery tracking
  • Comfortable

The Bad

  • Charging case would be better than a dock
  • Limited sizes available
  • Inconvenient sizing method
  • Battery life is unimpressive

That’s a lot packed into a smart ring, and since launching, Zepp permanently cut the price by $100 and offered free lifetime subscriptions to its Aura and Fitness services. On paper, this has the makings of a stellar deal. In reality, there’s always a catch.

In the Helio ring’s case, it’s battery life and limited sizing.

Right now, the best smart rings get you around 4-7 days on a single charge, depending on the size. (Bigger rings, bigger batteries.) The Helio ring is rated for roughly four days on a single charge, but I never managed that. At best, I got around three. That’s not great, Bob. Especially when this is meant to primarily track sleep. I wore it concurrently with the Oura Ring 4 and had to charge it two to three times as often. I also didn’t notice any discernable battery benefits when worn with two separate Amazfit watches. At least with the Galaxy Ring, using it with the Galaxy Watch meant much better battery life because Samsung optimizes which sensors are being used across both devices.

Adding to my battery woes, I don’t love that the ring relies on a dock. My cats delight in knocking these puck-like chargers around when they get the night-time zoomies. I much prefer charging cases, like the ones used by the Galaxy Ring, RingConn, and the Evie Ring.

Advertisement
Person wearing Amazfit Helio ring with colorful wooden toy in background

The ring only comes in one color and three sizes. This is the size 8.

The other thing about wearables is they have to be, well, wearable. While Oura and Samsung have expanded their size ranges and offer multiple finishes, Amazfit only offers the Helio smart ring in one color and three sizes: 8, 10, and 12. That’s swell if that’s your size — it’s quite lightweight and comfortable, and it hasn’t gotten scratched up like some of my other smart rings. The slim size selection of leaves out many people with smaller hands, particularly women. I happen to fit the size 8, but for some of my friends, this isn’t something they can wear.

Another annoyance: there’s no sizing kit. Getting the right size matters with smart rings, both for accuracy and comfort. Fingers swell and shrink with temperature changes, and while sizing kits can be tedious, they’re useful in the sense you can thoroughly vet which size will work best for 24/7 wear. With the Helio ring, you have to use either a string or a piece of tape to measure the circumference of your finger and then choose based on that measurement. Just, no.

But if you can get past all that, the sleep and health tracking is alright, though it’s best for a big-picture look at your overall trends. For instance, one night during my Christmas holidays, I slept for a glorious 9 hours, 47 minutes per my Oura Ring 4 and 10 hours, 34 minutes per my Eight Sleep bed. The Helio ring logged that as 11 hours and 23 minutes. It’s true I spent around 12 hours that evening doing my best impression of an inert log, but I also spent two hours doomscrolling, consumed by the Blake Lively / Justin Baldoni drama on TikTok. I wouldn’t call that one night accurate, but it correctly logged that I was irregular with my sleep schedule and well-rested that entire week. Other metrics, like blood oxygen, HRV, and stress, were broadly on par with my Oura Ring and Eight Sleep bed.

It’s not a great fitness tracker, though. The activities you can choose from are limited, you’ll need your phone on your for GPS, and it doesn’t automatically track activities either. And, if like me, you occasionally forget to end an exercise, there’s no way to edit the data after the fact. I hope this is something that gets added over time.

Amazfit Helio Ring with the sensor near colorful wooden toys

Two to three days of battery life simply isn’t good enough given the competition.

The Zepp app is also a mixed bag. The app’s been redesigned since I tested the excellent GTR 4, and I like the cleaner look and straightforward interface. My main beef is it’s difficult to view long-term historical data, which was highly annoying when reviewing metrics for this review. Still, Zepp Flow is one of the better implementations for an AI chatbot I’ve seen in a fitness tracking app. You’ll see weekly insights pop up, and a handful of prompts where you can dig in further with the chatbot. The AI insights are, how shall we say, Captain Obvious levels of basic common sense, but at least it’s speedy, straightforward to use, and easily ignored if that’s not your thing. It’s neat you can get sleep sounds and guided breathing for free via the Zepp Aura tab, but I didn’t use it much. I’ve found I fall asleep best to true crime podcasts. Chances are, you’ve also got a decent idea of what works for you and the Aura stuff isn’t going to trump that unless you’re looking for something new.

Advertisement

I don’t dislike the Helio smart ring. But aside from the price, it’s not a particularly compelling option unless you already have an Amazfit watch. At least then, all your data syncs to the same app. And even then, your Amazfit watch will probably outlast the ring and then what are we really doing here? Maybe a second-gen version or future software will address issues like battery life and bring more sizes. But until then, it’s hard to call this a true bargain.

Agree to Continue: Amazfit Helio Smart Ring

Every smart device now requires you to agree to a series of terms and conditions before you can use it — contracts that no one actually reads. It’s impossible for us to read and analyze every single one of these agreements. But we started counting exactly how many times you have to hit “agree” to use devices when we review them, since these are agreements most people don’t read and definitely can’t negotiate.

To use the Amazfit Helio Smart Ring, you must pair it with an iPhone or Android smartphone. That includes the phone’s Terms of Service, privacy policy, and any other permissions you grant. If you choose to enable Zepp’s Aura or Fitness services, you’re also agreeing to those privacy policies and services. The same goes if you enable third-party integrations.

By setting up the Helio Smart Ring, you’re agreeing to:

Advertisement

Final Tally: Three mandatory agreements, and several optional permissions and agreements.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Technology

The FBI is buying Americans’ location data

Published

on

The FBI is buying Americans’ location data
Senate Intelligence Committee Hears Testimony From Top Officials On Worldwide Threats

WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 18: Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel testifies during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on worldwide threats in the Hart Senate Office Building on March 18, 2026 in Washington, DC. A closed session immediately followed the hearing. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Getty Images

Continue Reading

Technology

Genealogy boom exposes personal data scammers can exploit

Published

on

Genealogy boom exposes personal data scammers can exploit

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Millions of Americans are digging into their roots. Genealogy has quietly become one of the fastest-growing hobbies in North America, with the industry now valued at more than $5 billion. From DNA kits to digital family tree builders, people are discovering relatives, tracing migration stories and reconnecting with their past.

There is something deeply meaningful about learning where you come from. However, there is another side to this trend that many people never consider.

The same information that helps you find your great-grandparents can also help scammers find you. Once personal details appear online, they rarely stay in one place. And that can create unexpected security risks.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

Advertisement

DNA KITS MAY SHARE PERSONAL DATA AFTER DEATH
 

A woman looks at the contents of a 23andMe DNA testing kit in Oakland, California, on June 8, 2018. Millions of Americans using family tree platforms may be unknowingly sharing sensitive details like maiden names and birthplaces online. (Cayce Clifford/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

What family tree sites encourage you to upload

Genealogy platforms feel harmless. In fact, they are designed to feel warm, nostalgic and personal.

To build a detailed family tree, users often upload information such as:

  • Full legal names, including maiden names
  • Birth dates
  • Places of birth
  • Marriage records
  • Address history
  • Names of children, siblings and relatives
  • Old family photos
  • Obituaries and memorial information

Each detail may seem harmless on its own. But together, they create something extremely valuable: a fully mapped identity profile. Not just of you, but of your entire family network. And that kind of information is exactly what scammers look for.

Once information is uploaded, it rarely stays private

Many genealogy platforms allow public trees by default. Even when accounts are private, information can still spread in several ways.

Advertisement

For example, data can appear through:

  • Shared family trees
  • Public obituaries
  • Search features
  • Data scraping tools
  • Third-party integrations

Over time, this information becomes searchable. It may be indexed by search engines. Bots can scrape it. Data brokers can absorb it into their databases. Once that happens, your family details no longer live only on a genealogy website. They can appear on people search websites, background check platforms and marketing databases. And you may never know it happened.

The 23andMe wake-up call

The recent bankruptcy of the DNA testing company 23andMe served as a reminder for millions of users. When companies change ownership or shut down, your data does not simply disappear. Genetic data raises serious privacy concerns on its own.

However, the broader genealogy ecosystem carries a similar risk. When you upload deeply personal, multi-generational information, you lose control over how long it is stored, who can access it and where it may end up in the future. Even if you trust a company today, you cannot control what happens tomorrow.

23ANDME PROBE LAUNCHED TO PREVENT CUSTOMER DNA DATA FROM BEING SOLD TO CHINA OR OTHER BAD ACTORS
 

A woman collects a DNA sample in Oakland, California, on June 8, 2018. Personal data uploaded to genealogy sites can spread across data broker networks, making it difficult to control where information appears. (Cayce Clifford/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Why scammers love family tree data

Cybercriminals no longer focus only on credit card numbers. Instead, they want context. They want personal details that help them impersonate you or bypass security checks. Family tree websites provide exactly that. Here are three ways criminals can exploit genealogy data.

1) Answering security questions

Many financial institutions still rely on knowledge-based authentication questions, such as:

Unfortunately, those answers often appear directly in public family trees. With enough background information, scammers may bypass account protections without ever knowing your password. 

2) Crafting believable impersonation scams

Now imagine receiving a message like this: “Hi, Aunt Linda, it’s Jake. I’m stuck overseas and need help.”

If a scammer already knows:

Advertisement
  • Your relatives’ names
  • Who is related to whom
  • Where family members live

They can create highly believable emergency scams. These are no longer random “grandparent scams.” They are customized attacks, and genealogy data makes that customization easy.

3) Targeting entire families

When one person’s information becomes exposed, it rarely stops there. A scammer can quickly map your entire family network. They may identify:

  • Adult children
  • Elderly parents
  • Siblings
  • Multiple addresses

Then they can launch phishing attempts across several family members at once. In other words, one data leak can turn into a family-wide vulnerability.

How genealogy data strengthens data broker profiles

Here is where the situation becomes even more concerning. Data brokers do not just collect phone numbers and addresses. They build detailed relational profiles.

These profiles often include:

  • Household connections
  • Extended relatives
  • Age ranges
  • Property ownership
  • Income indicators

When genealogy data gets scraped or resold, it strengthens those profiles. Your listing may suddenly include:

  • An accurate maiden name
  • Verified birth year
  • Confirmed past addresses
  • Detailed family connections

The richer the profile becomes, the more valuable it is-not only to marketers but also to criminals. “But I set my tree to private.” Privacy settings certainly help. However, they do not solve the entire problem.

Even if your family tree is private:

  • Relatives may publish overlapping information
  • Obituaries remain public records
  • Historical records continue to be digitized
  • Other users may repost or copy data

Once information spreads across multiple websites, tracking it becomes extremely difficult. In addition, data brokers constantly refresh their databases. Even if you remove your data once, it may quietly reappear months later.

COULD HACKERS STEAL YOUR DNA AND SELL IT?
 

Advertisement

A technician works on a device that conducts direct-to-consumer genetic testing at the University of Tokyo’s Institute of Medical Science in Tokyo, Japan, on July 9, 2014. Genealogy websites may help you trace your roots, but experts warn they can also expose personal data that scammers use to target entire families. (Kiyoshi Ota/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

How to enjoy genealogy without exposing yourself

You do not have to give up genealogy. You simply need to approach it the same way you approach social media.

Consider these precautions:

  • Limit public visibility on family trees
  • Avoid posting full birthdates
  • Be cautious with maiden names
  • Remove exact address histories
  • Think carefully before sharing details about living relatives

Most importantly, remember that the real risk is not the genealogy site itself. The risk is where that data travels next.

Stop your family history from becoming a scammer’s playbook

Once personal information enters the data broker ecosystem, it can spread far beyond the original platform. That is why proactive privacy protection matters.

Data brokers collect and resell personal information gathered from public records, websites and scraped databases. If genealogy details such as maiden names, birthplaces and family relationships get pulled into those systems, they can quietly appear across people-search sites and background check databases.

Advertisement

Over time, this information can make it easier for scammers to build detailed identity profiles. Those profiles can be used for impersonation scams, phishing attacks or attempts to bypass security questions.

You can take steps by searching your name and relatives online to see what information is publicly visible, submitting removal requests to people-search sites and limiting what you share publicly on genealogy platforms. Taking these precautions can help prevent your family history from becoming a roadmap for scammers.

However, manually tracking down and removing your information across hundreds of sites can be time-consuming and difficult to keep up with.

One of the most effective steps you can take is to use a data removal service to help remove your information from data broker and people-search websites. While no service can guarantee the complete removal of your data from the internet, a data removal service is really a smart choice.

These services do the work for you by actively monitoring and systematically erasing your personal information from hundreds of websites. They also continue scanning for new exposures, which helps prevent your data from quietly reappearing later.

Advertisement

It’s what gives me peace of mind and has proven to be one of the most effective ways to erase personal data from the internet. By limiting the information available, you reduce the risk of scammers cross-referencing breach data with details they might find online, making it much harder for them to target you.

Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com.

Get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web: Cyberguy.com.

Kurt’s key takeaways

Genealogy can be an incredibly rewarding hobby. Discovering where your family came from often creates a deeper sense of connection and identity. But the digital tools that make this research easier can also expose more information than many people realize. A family tree filled with birthplaces, maiden names and relatives may look harmless, yet it can quietly create a roadmap for scammers. The good news is you do not have to stop exploring your ancestry. You simply need to share carefully, protect your data and understand how information travels online.

Have you ever searched for your own name or family members online and been surprised by how much personal information was publicly available? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Technology

Trump’s AI chief’s big Iran warning gets big time ignored

Published

on

Trump’s AI chief’s big Iran warning gets big time ignored

Hello and welcome to Regulator, a newsletter for Verge subscribers about the politics of technology and the technology of politics — now landing in your inbox on Wednesdays! If someone has forwarded this email to you, and you’re not a Verge subscriber yet, you should sign up right here, and not just because it would be really, really cool if you do that. We can apparently see how many non-subscribers have opened this email, and why should Palantir get all the “spying on people” fun?

Do you have cool events to highlight, tips to toss over, and secrets to spill? Send everything to tina.nguyen+tips@theverge.com. Or, if you’re truly tech-pilled, send me a message on LinkedIn.

Surprisingly, artificial intelligence does not take the highest political priority during a war — much less an ill-conceived war with Iran that’s paralyzed the energy markets, destabilized America’s relationships with the Middle East and Europe, and alienated members of President Donald Trump’s diehard MAGA coalition. (Just yesterday, Joe Kent, election denier and onetime Trump-endorsed congressional candidate, announced that he was stepping down as the director of the National Counterterrorism Center in protest of the Iran war.) But the effect it’ll have on the tech and AI industry — and industry in general — is so dire that David Sacks, billionaire and the AI and crypto czar shaping the Trump administration’s tech policies, did something politically risky: He publicly suggested that Donald Trump find some way to get out of the Iran war.

Last Friday on his podcast All In, Sacks and his crew laid out several alarmingly realistic scenarios based on recent developments: Iran indicated it was willing to attack oil and gas depots in neighboring countries, destroy desalination plants crucial for supplying water to over 100 million people (which Sacks described as a “humanitarian crisis” that would render the Middle East uninhabitable), and bombard Israel until it either relented or decided to use a nuclear weapon. The Democrats would probably win the midterms. But also, and arguably worse, World War III was possible. “This would be a really good time to take stock of where we are and try, I think, to seek an off-ramp,” he told his co-hosts. “And look, if escalation doesn’t lead anywhere good, then you have to think about, well, how do you de-escalate? And de-escalation, I think, involves reaching some sort of ceasefire agreement or some sort of negotiated settlement with Iran.”

Whatever advice Sacks may have tried to offer has fallen on deaf ears. On top of the US military’s continued assault on Iranian oil infrastructure, over the past few days, Trump said he was open to putting US troops on the ground in Iran, said that NATO countries hesitant to support him were making a “foolish” decision, and just because, added that he was thinking of invading Cuba next. Trump also told reporters this week that Sacks had not spoken to him about the war, either. Whether that’s true or not, Trump often defaults to this explanation when trying to diminish a critic. And the sources I speak to around the White House — especially the ones familiar with Trump’s MO — are pessimistic that Sacks will have any shot at getting the president to listen to him.

Advertisement

A David Sacks hater may note that the billionaire has hit the boundaries of his perceived influence on Trump. At the same time, every single one of Trump’s former allies — especially the ones who don’t work for him — have hit that limit, too. The MAGA anti-war isolationists have been completely betrayed. The titans of industry who care about the markets are at the mercy of Trump’s whims. Heck, Trump has turned around and embraced the neoconservatives who used to despise him, but are now the only people on the right clamoring for regime change in Iran. (If you want to get a sense of how his administration underlings are enabling Trump, I was literally at the Pentagon last week for a vibe check.)

Out of the Trump oligarch classes, the technologists may suffer the longest term effects. Unlike the MAGA base, who’d supported Trump for intangible ideological reasons, Big Tech’s got a deeply financial incentive to stay allied with the president. So much of their current advantages rely on their direct relationships and ability to assuage his ego, which has certainly paid dividends for them over the past year: antitrust investigations dropped, trade loopholes opened, executive orders signed, and so on. (What do you think the ballroom donations were for?) And it’s possible that they believed that the Iran situation would be similar to Venezuela, wherein they’d reap the benefits of seizing Iran’s oil supply, and decided not to intervene.

But there’s a critical characteristic they overlooked, one that dates back to Trump’s relationship with Roy Cohn in the ’70s: Trump does not like to be humiliated by his foes, and Trump is always inclined to strike back twice as hard in order to crush their spirits, with little care for consequences or long-term damage. It mostly manifests via legal challenges and lawsuits in America, but has occasionally gone in a violent direction (see: January 6th and the ICE protests in Minnesota). In this case, he is trying to one-up a violent religious theocracy, which declared a military jihad against the United States in the wake of Khamenei’s death, and also possesses missiles. The rich nerds who make the beep-boops have very little chance of changing Trump’s mind — especially so long as there’s a political contingent on the right egging him on — and even if Sacks believed he was talking to a friendly audience in an online safe space, there’s no guarantee that Trump will be happy that he voiced dissent at all.

Oh, right, crypto is still happening, too.

Unfortunately, I couldn’t catch a lot of the Blockchain Conference this year (see: Iran) but it seems like some major developments came out of it, including the CFTC and the SEC dropping a major guidance that most digital assets are not securities, clarifying the way that certain cryptocurrency is regulated and whose rules apply. But though it’s the most comprehensive document released around this crucial issue, they also warned that it still needs Congress to pass laws that would make those changes permanent, and the CFTC is pretty busy as is. In other words: The Clarity Act still needs to be passed, guys. And that seems to be going great. Right?

Advertisement

.. another blockchain-based bar! This time, Polymarket announced the surprise opening of The Situation Room, “the world’s first bar dedicated to monitoring the situation.” According to renderings posted on X, the bar, described as a “sports bar just for situation monitoring,” will have everything one needs to monitor the situation: live feeds on X, sports games, and Bloomberg terminals. (Polymarket did not immediately comment on where said bar would be located.)

screenshot via @polymarket/X.

I’ve been doing some spring cleaning at home and recently found a quart-sized Ziploc bag that’s got a handful of spare change that I’ve been meaning to drop off at a Coinstar for over a year. But I’m lazy, and if there’s anything I’ve learned from TMZ, it’s that paying money for stories works (sometimes). So I will give this bag of loose change to anyone who can send authentic, verified, non-AI generated footage of this reported fight between Sam Altman and playwright Jeremy O. Harris at the exclusive, off-the-record Vanity Fair Oscar Party, allegedly over OpenAI’s contract with the Pentagon. (I presume the audience of Regulator is composed of Hollywood A-listers.)

And, no, I’m not going to send you the cash equivalent of the bag’s value. The condition for the payout is that you have to take this bag off of my hands, including all of the Costa Rican currency. AND I’m keeping all the quarters. And in the extraordinarily unlikely event that someone follows through on this offer, I have to get permission from Nilay Patel to break the ethics policy this one time, because this is technically a quid pro quo, albeit an extremely awful quid pro quo for whomever sends it.

This bag of untold riches (sans quarters) could be yours!

This bag of untold riches (sans quarters) could be yours!
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending