It became clear that the fractured dysfunction that courses through professional tennis was getting worse on a bright November morning in Turin, Italy.

Andrea Gaudenzi, the chairman of the ATP Tour who views himself as the sport’s ultimate mover and shaker, was holding court in the sparkling hospitality dining area at the 2024 men’s Tour Finals before the room filled for lunch with corporate guests. White tablecloths, crystal stemware and silver flatware covered the tables.

About 100 yards away in the Inalpi Arena, a couple of exercise bikes and some rubber mats jammed into the dark corner of a basement corridor comprised the warmup and cooldown area for the players who are the lifeblood of men’s tennis. Just two months before, the men’s game’s most important young star, Carlos Alcaraz, had added his voice to the chorus of complaints about the inability of the people in charge of the sport to fix the 11-month, globe-crossing schedule.

“Probably, they are going to kill us in some way,” he said in a news conference at the Laver Cup in Berlin.

Players on both the ATP and WTA Tours spent most of the year in that chorus, largely lamenting the expansion of most 1,000-level tournaments — the rung below the four Grand Slams — from nine days to 12. The essentially two-week events reduce unbroken time off; the tours say that having a day of rest between matches in-tournament makes up for it. In 2025, just two of nine ATP Masters 1000 tournaments will finish in one week and players must play eight of them. On the WTA Tour, three of 10 are shorter; all 10 are mandatory.

In Turin, Gaudenzi had his chance to chime in. There is flexibility and space for change, he said. There was a but.

“We also have to consider that, if you do that, you’re destroying the product.”

Gaudenzi, who played in the 1990s, also lamented that five-set tennis matches are now reserved for Grand Slams.

“We started taking off, taking off, taking off from the product,” he said.

“Taking away from that product, in my opinion, is the wrong strategy. We have to take away somewhere else. Our commitment at the Masters is eight tournaments. Eight tournaments per year is not a lot.”

So says the man in the suit in the hospitality suite.

Players do not agree — even Stefanos Tsitsipas, who not so long ago sat down with Gaudenzi for a video promoting the changes to Masters 1000 tournaments. “The two-week Masters 1000s have turned into a drag,” the Greek wrote on X in November.

Alexander Zverev, a member of the ATP Player Council who was also in Turin, said he was already focused on 2025 and described his results as secondary to his preparations for the next season. He was spending a good hour practicing after his matches because the off-season offers so little time for rest and preparation.

Gaudenzi had thoughts on this, too.

“You need as a player a couple of weeks of holiday, a couple of weeks of rebuilding your body,” he said, “and then another couple of weeks where you start hitting the ball before you go to competition and head out towards, you know, Middle East and Australia.”

A reality check. Baseball players finish at the latest by the first week in November. They report to spring training in mid-February. NFL Players are done by early February. They have a handful of off-season workout weeks, but training camp begins in July. NBA players are done in mid-June. The vast majority finish by mid-May. Training camp begins at the end of September. The best golfers are largely done at the end of September and don’t start up again until January.

Gaudenzi was pitching a two-week holiday at the end of a nearly 11-month season, plus, potentially, the inclusion of a new 1000-level tournament to open the season in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, one week before the Australian Open and eight time zones away from Melbourne. It was this concept that sent the sport into turmoil in 2023, exposing the fissures that make it fractured and the inertia that keeps it so.

GO DEEPER

How to fix tennis

When Gaudenzi spoke among the silverware, more than a year had passed since tennis’ latest reckoning with its endless schedule, its nonsensical governing structure, and the competitive infrastructure that even devout fans sometimes struggle to understand. This exercise occurs roughly every 10 to 15 years.

Through an endless string of meetings, phone calls, negotiations, and sidebar dealings among allies and enemies in the alphabet soup of nine organizations that rule the sport, tensions and disagreements appeared to be giving way to a consensus around a more streamlined tour and schedule then billed as the ‘Premier Tour‘. It would take in the four Grand Slams and 10 further events that would always have the best ATP and WTA players in the same city at the same time, all with the same prestige as the current 1000-level tournaments. The fractured professional ranks of tennis would head in the direction of Formula One, offering fewer events and more money, but locking out much of the globe from the sport.

That was meant to be proposed in November 2023. It was pushed to March 2024, when meetings and a fractious presentation in Indian Wells, California, revealed that the commercial underpinnings of the plan did not yet exist. By April 2024, in London and Madrid, the finances were there, with the leaders of the Australian, French and U.S. Opens and Wimbledon pledging to commit a portion of their lucrative media and sponsorship rights to the premium tour plan. The ATP and WTA were not enthusiastic, with their 250- and 500-level events essentially relegated to the minor leagues under the proposal.

For the rest of the season, there were many discussions but little more than detente. The players played more two-week 1000s; the Cincinnati and Canadian Opens prepared to expand to join their ranks from 2025. The ATP and WTA counter-proposals to the Grand Slams’ plan, hinging on an event for and sizeable investment from Saudi Arabia along with a commercial merger between the two tennis organizations, stalled too.

And then by the end of the year, as Gaudenzi and Alcaraz looked at the same sky, one said it was blue and the other said it was gray. Nearly a year and a half had passed since the turmoil began and everyone was back where they started. By some measures, a few steps behind that.

GO DEEPER

More prize money, less tennis, equal pay: Grand Slams launch premium tour offensive

As tennis traveled across the globe while its own inertia sapped the momentum at the top of the sport, the ATP and WTA Tours and their players spent much of 2024 engaged in a perennial shadowbox.

It was as early as April that Zverev, the highest-ranked player with some sway inside ATP meetings, said in an interview at the Madrid Open: “Four weeks is not enough for a body and for an athlete to recover, but also to get ready.”

“Days between matches are not recovery days, they’re not days that you’re resting.”

Iga Swiatek, then the world No. 1, had raised similar concerns, calling the switch to the 12-day events a big problem. The tours dug in on their increased prize money and commercial value to tennis, contending that guaranteeing top-ranked players makes selling tickets and securing money from broadcast and sponsorship easier. When criticized for the disparity in prize money between Sinner and Sabalenka in 2024, the Cincinnati Open attributed the difference to broadcast and sponsorship.

With those financial promises came stringent and, at times, arcane rules, which in the autumn helped Aryna Sabalenka take over the world No. 1 ranking because Swiatek lost points for missing the quota of six mandatory 500-level tournaments, as well as much of the Asian hard-court swing.

It was later revealed that Swiatek was sidelined for the latter because she was appealing a provisional suspension after a positive doping test, but it was the points deductions, imposed without explanation overnight into Monday, October 21, that first robbed the sport of the spectacle of Sabalenka and Swiatek battling for its top ranking.

“These rules have been changed without us even knowing about them,” Swiatek said during a news conference at the U.S. Open. “These decisions about mandatory tournaments were shown to us after. We spoke to WTA about it: that we want to at least be in the loop. I don’t think our sport is going in the right direction because of that.”

Iga Swiatek is one of the players to criticize changes to the WTA Tour rules. (Valerio Pennicino / Getty Images)

The WTA said it discussed the changes with members of the Players Council before enacting them. The organization’s new chief executive Portia Archer, who replaced Steve Simon, is still in her first months on the job and it is too soon to assess the impact of any changes she has made or has planned.

In a broader context, women’s tennis continues to struggle with something of a self-inflicted identity crisis. There is plenty of work for the WTA to do, from promotion to media management. The French Open largely refuses to schedule a women’s match for the prestigious Court Philippe Chatrier night session. The ITF held this year’s Billie Jean King Cup Finals in a pop-up bubble in the parking lot of the arena for the Davis Cup.

More broadly, vast swaths of empty seats at women’s tournaments during so many weeks of the season make the sport look less than important when television viewers happen upon it. A potential merger with the ATP that might provide some more juice on the commercial side in sponsorship and media sales remains a long-talked-about work in progress, as does the looming but far-from-confirmed 1,000-level combined event for Saudi Arabia.

Though top men’s and women’s players descended on Riyadh this season — the former for the Six Kings Slam exhibition and the latter for the first of three WTA Tour Finals there — the biggest asset of Saudi Arabia’s three-headed push into tennis remains just an idea, with uncertainty on both sides over the tournament’s size, timing and financing. It is still not expected before 2027 at the earliest, as was the case in October this year.

With the ‘Premier Tour’ in suspension, three of the four Grand Slams have continued their evolution into three-week events, building high-profile exhibitions and boosting up qualifying matches on-site during the week before the main draw. Wimbledon has made progress in joining their ranks by securing planning permission to add 39 courts — but they won’t be built for several years and the approval is under challenge from community groups. Everything in this sport takes time.

More challenges are in the works. Lawyers working with the Professional Tennis Players Association, co-founded by Novak Djokovic, have spent 2024 scouring the sport’s rules and structure, preparing for a possible anti-trust litigation with the potential to remake the sport. It has exchanged stern letters with the International Tennis Integrity Agency, which controls anti-doping regulations, in the wake of cases involving men’s world No. 1 Jannik Sinner and Swiatek, with allegations including officials acting outside the norms of due process. The ITIA has denied those allegations.

One of those antitrust lawyers, James Quinn, who has worked on suits against the NBA and the NFL, described the structure of tennis as “classic monopolization.”

It’s not hard to understand why tennis is in this position. Each of the organizations that influence the structure and oversight of the sport has its own interests to protect.

The Grand Slams want to maintain and expand their primacy. The 1000-level tournament owners have lobbied Gaudenzi, Archer and Simon not to devalue their events by giving in to player pressure on their length. Those tournaments fought to get those extra days as they agreed to raise prize money, with the events in Rome, Cincinnati and Canada pledging to equalize the women and the men by 2027. Those extra days mean selling extra tickets for extra fans who spend extra money on those tickets and at the events, as well as extra content to sell to networks and streamers.

The Cincinnati Open in Ohio will expand to two weeks for the 2025 season. (Al Bello / Getty Images)

Owners of the 250- and 500-level tournaments want to make sure Gaudenzi, Archer and Simon don’t agree to a premium tour and devalue their events. The International Tennis Federation, which controls the national team tournaments, the Billie Jean King Cup and the Davis Cup, is fighting to keep its spots on the calendar. It’s already not pleased about being right at the end.

Then, for the players who create the product, there’s the fact that they are given a smaller percentage of revenues than their counterparts in other sports.  Those outside the top 50 or so are often a few bad months from having to think about cutting back on coaches and support staff. They get paid to play. There isn’t a lot of short-term incentive to rest. For 2025, ATP players in the top 30 will have to play five 500-level events to qualify for the bonus pool attached to those tournaments, instead of four. That bonus pool is growing to almost $3million (£2.4m) from just over $1m.

Add it all up and there is no shortage of intransigence and little room for optimism.

The result, at least for the time being, is something of a circular stand-off, with every side pointing at everyone else and the sound of revolution feeling more and more inevitable. For now, there is silence.

(Top photos: Getty Images; design: Eamonn Dalton)

Ahead of the Philadelphia Eagles’ season finale against the New York Giants, Saquon Barkley might be trolling his old team with his new advertisement.

Barkley, who played six seasons with the G-Men before joining the Eagles this past offseason, starred in an ad for Unisom, a sleep aid.

But the ad posted a cryptic message that may or may not be directed at Giants owner John Mara, who infamously said he would “have a hard time sleeping if Saquon goes to Philadelphia.”

“I heard some of you were having trouble sleeping, so I wrote you a lullaby,” Barkley said in the ad. “Rockabye baby, awake in your bed, as the thought of 2,000 swirls in your head. It sure is tough to lose sleep over football – not for me, though. Good night to you all.”

Well, that’s exactly what happened, and Barkley is putting up historic numbers with the Birds.

The Giants were featured in HBO’s “Hard Knocks” offseason edition, and Mara made the now-notorious statement in a discussion with general manager Joe Schoen, who never seemed all too interested in retaining Barkley, who was drafted second overall by his predecessor Dave Gettleman in 2018.

Philadelphia Eagles running back Saquon Barkley (26) runs the ball against the Dallas Cowboys during the second half of an NFL football game, Sunday, Dec. 29, 2024, in Philadelphia.  (AP Photo/Matt Slocum)

LAWMAKERS IN INDIANA, HOME OF NCAA HQ, LOOK TO EXPAND TRANSGENDER SPORTS BAN TO INCLUDE COLLEGE PROGRAMS

Barkley will rest for the playoffs in Week 18, which will leave him 101 yards short of becoming the NFL’s single-season rushing yards king and save the Giants from even more embarrassment. But, he surpassed the 2,000-yard mark after running for 167 yards on Sunday, becoming the ninth player to do so.

Barkley admitted there is a part of him that wants to break the record, but he says there is a bigger goal in mind.

“He asked me if I wanted to play, if I wanted to go for it. On Sunday, I probably didn’t care too much for it,” Barkley said this week. “When I slept on it, was like, it’s an opportunity to implant my name in football history. [I] may never get another opportunity like that again. 

Philadelphia Eagles running back Saquon Barkley (26) runs with the ball against the Carolina Panthers during the first quarter at Lincoln Financial Field. (Bill Streicher-Imagn Images)

“So I’m down. But in the end of the day, I don’t care for putting the team at risk.”

Instead, he will finish with 2,005 yards.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

The big picture demanded that the Lakers be smart; the small picture demanded the Lakers play a little tougher Thursday night.

Anthony Davis, who missed most of the Lakers’ game on Christmas, needed the night off because of lingering soreness in his sprained left ankle. Gabe Vincent needed more time to recover from an oblique strain.

Removing key pieces, especially one as critical as Davis, highlighted something JJ Redick’s one-time coach Doc Rivers used to say: winning any game in the NBA is hard.

The Lakers were going to need a big night from someone they rely on and a career night from someone they’re truly starting to.

LeBron James and Max Christie combined to score 66 points, Christie finishing with a career-best 28, in the Lakers’ 114-106 win over the Trail Blazers.

“Tonight was a career night for me,” Christie said, “so this is something that I want to hang on to and try to replicate as much as possible.”

James made a season-high seven three-pointers, needing only 10 attempts, on his way to 38 points as the Lakers (19-14) fought through a rocky fourth quarter. And Christie, cementing his place as the team’s shooting guard, hit five threes and aggressively cut off the ball with the Portland defense focused on James and Austin Reaves.

“He’s putting in the work and it’s paying off for him and [we] got coaches who believe in him,” James said of Christie. “We believe in him, and he was spectacular tonight on both ends of the floor.”

James turned 40 this week. Christie won’t turn 22 until February. On a night like Thursday with Davis resting, the Lakers needed James to have a big game.

“AD’s our No.1, No. 2 option,” James said. “And so when he’s out, we all have to step up our game, including myself.”

James’ 38-point game tied him with Michael Jordan for most 30-point games in NBA history. It was also the third-most points ever scored by a player after turning 40 (behind two Jordan games). James was also the second-oldest player ever to make seven threes in a game (Vince Carter did that when he was 42).

“We want him aggressive, shot-ready for three just as much as we want him aggressive to get downhill and put pressure on the rim,” Redick said of James. “He’s just fantastic. … A couple of possessions that seemed like they were dead possessions and he just bailed us out. Just another 38-point game for LeBron.”

Lakers star LeBron James and coach JJ Redick react to a goaltending call against the Lakers late in the fourth quarter Thursday.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

The Lakers were less ho-hum about Christie’s career night. Redick said Christie’s defensive demeanor was off early on, and a couple of missed mid-range jumpers had him ready to “wring his neck.”

But, in what has been common since the Lakers put him in the starting lineup Dec. 8, Christie overcame the adversity and learned from it. He made five threes, a career high, but it was a shift on defense that really helped him find a rhythm, Redick said.

“You have to learn how to be a pro. And by that I mean you have to learn how to do the same things every night to the point where you’re reliable and the coach can’t take you off the court,” Redick said. “And that’s where the growth I’ve seen from Max over the last six to eight weeks [has been].”

For much of the night, if it wasn’t James or Christie scoring, no one was.

Lakers guard Austin Reaves, center, loses control of the ball in front of Portland Trail Blazers guard Scoot Henderson (00) and forward Kris Murray (24) on Thursday.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

The pair shot the Lakers into a 15-point lead against one of the West’s worst teams, the Lakers’ defense finding its footing in the second and third quarters.

But the Trail Blazers’ younger, more athletic legs and their longer, stronger arms put the Lakers in tough spots.

Reaves, for the first time since the Lakers fully gave him the keys, got pressured into shooting just five for 15 from the field. He still managed to finish with 11 assists, eight rebounds and 15 points.

Anfernee Simons led Portland (11-22) with 23 points.

The Lakers host Atlanta on Friday night before playing key road games against Houston and Dallas, two teams currently ahead of them in the Western Conference.